↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SWC207-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:57:09 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 23.05s 3.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 23.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  21 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   83 (  29 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   80 (  40   ~;  40   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (   0 sgn   6   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1_11,axiom,
    ( nil = sk4
    | cons(sk5,nil) = sk3 ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1_11) ).

cnf(c_61,plain,
    ( nil = sk4
    | cons(sk5,nil) = sk3 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[co1_11]) ).

cnf(c_62,plain,
    ( sk4 = nil
    | cons(sk5,nil) = sk3 ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_61]) ).

fof(co1_9,axiom,
    ( nil = sk4
    | ssItem(sk5) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).

cnf(c_65,plain,
    ( nil = sk4
    | ssItem(sk5) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[co1_9]) ).

cnf(c_66,plain,
    ( sk4 = nil
    | ssItem(sk5) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_65]) ).

fof(co1_8,axiom,
    ~ neq(sk1,nil),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).

cnf(c_67,plain,
    ~ neq(sk1,nil),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[co1_8]) ).

fof(co1_7,axiom,
    neq(sk2,nil),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).

cnf(c_68,plain,
    neq(sk2,nil),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[co1_7]) ).

fof(co1_6,axiom,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

cnf(c_69,plain,
    sk1 = sk3,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[co1_6]) ).

fof(co1_5,axiom,
    sk2 = sk4,
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

cnf(c_70,plain,
    sk2 = sk4,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[co1_5]) ).

fof(co1_4,axiom,
    ssList(sk4),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1_4) ).

cnf(c_71,plain,
    ssList(sk4),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[co1_4]) ).

fof(co1_3,axiom,
    ssList(sk3),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1_3) ).

cnf(c_72,plain,
    ssList(sk3),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[co1_3]) ).

fof(clause115,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( ~ ssList(VAR_0)
      | ~ ssList(VAR_1)
      | ~ neq(VAR_0,VAR_1)
      | VAR_0 != VAR_1 ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',clause115) ).

cnf(c_135,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(A)
    | ~ ssList(B)
    | ~ neq(A,B)
    | A != B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[clause115]) ).

fof(clause100,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( VAR_1 = VAR_0
      | neq(VAR_1,VAR_0)
      | ~ ssList(VAR_1)
      | ~ ssList(VAR_0) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',clause100) ).

cnf(c_150,plain,
    ( B = A
    | neq(B,A)
    | ~ ssList(B)
    | ~ ssList(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[clause100]) ).

fof(clause99,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( ~ ssList(VAR_1)
      | ~ ssItem(VAR_0)
      | cons(VAR_0,VAR_1) != VAR_1 ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',clause99) ).

cnf(c_151,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(B)
    | ~ ssItem(A)
    | cons(A,B) != B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[clause99]) ).

fof(clause8,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('theBenchmark.p',clause8) ).

cnf(c_227,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[clause8]) ).

cnf(c_331,plain,
    ~ neq(sk3,nil),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_67]) ).

cnf(c_332,plain,
    neq(sk4,nil),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_68]) ).

cnf(c_15882,plain,
    ( ssItem(sk5)
    | ~ ssList(sk4)
    | ~ ssList(nil)
    | ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_135,c_66]) ).

cnf(c_15883,plain,
    ( ssItem(sk5)
    | ~ ssList(sk4)
    | ~ ssList(nil) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_332,c_15882]) ).

cnf(c_15884,plain,
    ( ssItem(sk5)
    | ~ ssList(sk4) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_227,c_15883]) ).

cnf(c_1374,plain,
    ssItem(sk5),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_71,c_15884]) ).

cnf(c_15885,plain,
    ( cons(sk5,nil) = sk3
    | ~ ssList(sk4)
    | ~ ssList(nil)
    | ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_135,c_62]) ).

cnf(c_15886,plain,
    ( cons(sk5,nil) = sk3
    | ~ ssList(sk4)
    | ~ ssList(nil) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_332,c_15885]) ).

cnf(c_15887,plain,
    ( cons(sk5,nil) = sk3
    | ~ ssList(sk4) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_227,c_15886]) ).

cnf(c_1375,plain,
    cons(sk5,nil) = sk3,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_71,c_15887]) ).

cnf(c_1429,plain,
    ( sk3 = A
    | neq(sk3,A)
    | ~ ssList(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_150,c_72]) ).

cnf(c_15888,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(nil)
    | ~ ssItem(sk5)
    | sk3 != nil ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1375,c_151]) ).

cnf(c_15889,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(nil)
    | sk3 != nil ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1374,c_15888]) ).

cnf(c_13026,plain,
    sk3 != nil,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_227,c_15889]) ).

cnf(c_15890,plain,
    ( sk3 = nil
    | neq(sk3,nil) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1429,c_227]) ).

cnf(c_15891,plain,
    sk3 = nil,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_331,c_15890]) ).

cnf(c_15881,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_13026,c_15891]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWC207-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 12:31:01 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.11/0.37  % Process 2139188 was started by sandbox on n005,
% 0.11/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 12:31:01 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.11/0.38  
% 0.11/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 23.05/3.71  
% 23.05/3.71  % given #500 (I,wt=37): 566 app(app(A,cons(B,C)),cons(B,D)) != D | -ssList(D) | -ssList(C) | -ssList(A) | -ssItem(B) | lt(B,B) | -lt(skaf59(D),skaf60(D)).  [factor(304,e,f),merge(g)].
% 23.05/3.71  
% 23.05/3.71  % given #1000 (A,wt=24): 950 app(app(A,B),C) != sk4 | -ssList(C) | -ssList(A) | -ssList(B) | segmentP(sk4,B).  [resolve(82,e,71,a)].
% 23.05/3.71  
% 23.05/3.71  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 23.05/3.71  
% 23.05/3.71  % Proof 1 at 2.42 (+ 0.76) seconds.
% 23.05/3.71  % Length of proof is 21.
% 23.05/3.71  % Level of proof is 4.
% 23.05/3.71  % Maximum clause weight is 13.000.
% 23.05/3.71  % Given clauses 1394.
% 23.05/3.71  
% 23.05/3.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------