%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWC213-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:43:29 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 18 unt; 3 nHn; 25 RR)
% Number of literals : 38 ( 15 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_14,negated_conjecture,
~ neq(sk1,nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_14) ).
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk2,nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
cnf(co1_15,negated_conjecture,
( nil != sk3
| nil = sk4 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_15) ).
cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(clause100,axiom,
( ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| X2 = X1
| neq(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause100) ).
cnf(co1_3,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_3) ).
cnf(clause8,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause8) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ neq(sk1,nil),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk2,nil),
co1_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
co1_5 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( nil != sk3
| nil = sk4 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ neq(sk1,nil),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
co1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| X2 = X1
| neq(X2,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause100]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk4,nil),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( nil != sk3
| nil = sk4 ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ neq(sk3,nil),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| X2 = X1
| neq(X2,X1) ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk3),
co1_3 ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
ssList(nil),
clause8 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( sk3 != nil
| neq(nil,nil) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
sk3 = nil,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
neq(nil,nil),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWC213-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:04:36 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.48 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.48 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.48 % new_bool_3 with pid 324615 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.48 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.48 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.48 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.48 % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.48 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.48 % SubtermCWHack with pid 324624 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.48 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.48 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.48 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.48 % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.48 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.48 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.48
% 0.15/0.48 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.48 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.48 % Parsed axioms : 200
% 0.15/0.48 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 161
% 0.15/0.48 % Initial clauses : 39
% 0.15/0.48 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Initial clauses in saturation : 39
% 0.15/0.48 % Processed clauses : 25
% 0.15/0.48 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % ...remaining for further processing : 24
% 0.15/0.48 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Backward-rewritten : 8
% 0.15/0.48 % Generated clauses : 7
% 0.15/0.48 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
% 0.15/0.48 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Paramodulations : 7
% 0.15/0.48 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Total rewrite steps : 22
% 0.15/0.48 % ...of those cached : 13
% 0.15/0.48 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.48 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.48 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.48 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.48 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.48 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.48 % Current number of processed clauses : 16
% 0.15/0.48 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.15/0.48 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.48 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 21
% 0.15/0.48 % ...number of literals in the above : 85
% 0.15/0.48 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 0.15/0.48 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.15/0.48 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.15/0.48 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.15/0.48 % BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.15/0.48 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.48 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2959
% 0.15/0.48 % Search garbage collected termcells : 931
% 0.15/0.48
% 0.15/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.48 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.48 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.48 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.15/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 4068 pages
% 0.15/0.48
% 0.15/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.48 % User time : 0.011 s
% 0.15/0.48 % System time : 0.014 s
% 0.15/0.48 % Total time : 0.025 s
% 0.15/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.15/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------