↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SWC217-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 21:57:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.77s 0.95s
% Output   : Refutation 0.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   14 (  10 unt;   1 nHn;  14 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   21 (   7 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause8,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause8) ).

cnf(clause98,axiom,
    ( cons(X,Y) != nil
    | ~ ssItem(X)
    | ~ ssList(Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause98) ).

cnf(clause100,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X)
    | ~ ssList(Y)
    | neq(Y,X)
    | Y = X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause100) ).

cnf(co1_1,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).

cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sk2,nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).

cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ neq(sk1,nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).

cnf(co1_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssItem(sk5)
    | ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_10) ).

cnf(194,plain,
    ssItem(sk5),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_10,co1_7,co1_5,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(co1_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(sk5,nil) = sk3
    | ~ neq(sk4,nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_11) ).

cnf(196,plain,
    cons(sk5,nil) = sk1,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[co1_11,co1_7,co1_5,co1_6,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2157,plain,
    nil != sk1,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause98,194,clause8]),196,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3226,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[clause100,clause8,co1_1,co1_8]),2157]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.14  % Problem  : SWC217-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 21:50:54 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.50  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.22/0.51   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.22/0.51   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.22/0.51   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.22/0.51   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.22/0.51   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  "."
% 0.22/0.51  * 
% 0.22/0.51  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-12T21:50:54
% 0.22/0.51  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n005.cluster.edu at 2022-06-12T21:50:54
% 0.77/0.95  
% 0.77/0.95  
% 0.77/0.95  #||
% 0.77/0.95  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.77/0.95  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.77/0.95  ||#
% 0.77/0.95  
% 0.77/0.95  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.77/0.95  ;      6077 formulas have been input or derived (from 108 formulas).
% 0.77/0.95  ;      3226 (53%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.77/0.95  ;           11 ( 0%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.77/0.95  ;         3215 (100%) are still being kept.
% 0.77/0.95  ; 
% 0.77/0.95  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.77/0.95  ;     0.038   9%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.77/0.95  ;     0.006   1%   Assert                       (197 calls)
% 0.77/0.95  ;     0.135  31%   Process new row              (5,169 calls)
% 0.77/0.95  ;     0.106  24%   Resolution                   (214 calls)
% 0.77/0.95  ;     0.000   0%   Paramodulation               (107 calls)
% 0.77/0.95  ;     0.004   1%   Condensing                   (273 calls)
% 0.77/0.95  ;     0.002   0%   Forward subsumption          (273 calls)
% 0.77/0.95  ;     0.003   1%   Backward subsumption         (271 calls)
% 0.77/0.95  ;     0.001   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (115 calls)
% 0.77/0.95  ;     0.058  13%   Forward simplification       (5,169 calls)
% 0.77/0.95  ;     0.045  10%   Backward simplification      (3,222 calls)
% 0.77/0.95  ;     0.001   0%   Ordering                     (199 calls)
% 0.77/0.95  ;     0.001   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.77/0.95  ;     0.001   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.77/0.95  ;     0.034   8%   Other
% 0.77/0.95  ;     0.435        Total
% 0.77/0.95  ;     0.436        Real time
% 0.77/0.95  ; 
% 0.77/0.95  ; Term-hash-array has 5,039 terms in all.
% 0.77/0.95  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 266 entries (271 at peak, 271 added, 5 deleted).
% 0.77/0.95  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 727 nodes (758 at peak, 758 added, 31 deleted).
% 0.77/0.95  ;  Retrieved 230 possibly forward subsuming rows in 273 calls.
% 0.77/0.95  ;  Retrieved 194 possibly backward subsumed rows in 271 calls.
% 0.77/0.95  ; Path-index has 5,045 entries (5,045 at peak, 5,055 added, 10 deleted).
% 0.77/0.95  ; Path-index has 3,377 nodes (3,377 at peak, 3,387 added, 10 deleted).
% 0.77/0.95  ; Trie-index has 5,045 entries (5,045 at peak, 5,055 added, 10 deleted).
% 0.77/0.95  ; Trie-index has 11,916 nodes (11,916 at peak, 11,926 added, 10 deleted).
% 0.77/0.95  ; Retrieved 2,084 generalization terms in 8,562 calls.
% 0.77/0.95  ; Retrieved 2,950 instance terms in 2,950 calls.
% 0.77/0.95  ; Retrieved 227,255 unifiable terms in 5,139 calls.
% 0.77/0.95  ; 
% 0.77/0.95  ; The agenda of rows to process has 900 entries:
% 0.77/0.95  ;     9 with value 9             477 with value 15              36 with value 19
% 0.77/0.95  ;   126 with value 13            252 with value 17
% 0.77/0.95  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 86 entries:
% 0.77/0.95  ;    11 with value 14              9 with value 21               1 with value 29
% 0.77/0.95  ;     3 with value 15              5 with value 22               1 with value 32
% 0.77/0.95  ;     3 with value 16              2 with value 23               1 with value 33
% 0.77/0.95  ;     4 with value 17              3 with value 24               1 with value 35
% 0.77/0.95  ;     7 with value 18              8 with value 25               2 with value 40
% 0.77/0.95  ;     2 with value 19              3 with value 26               3 with value 44
% 0.77/0.95  ;    11 with value 20              6 with value 27
% 0.77/0.95  ; The agenda of rows to give has 3022 entries:
% 0.77/0.95  ;     7 with value (4 4)         318 with value (4 9)           30 with value (4 13)
% 0.77/0.95  ;    32 with value (4 5)         960 with value (4 10)         132 with value (4 14)
% 0.77/0.95  ;     4 with value (4 6)         782 with value (4 11)          54 with value (4 16)
% 0.77/0.95  ;   105 with value (4 7)         441 with value (4 12)          12 with value (4 19)
% 0.77/0.95  ;   145 with value (4 8)
% 0.77/0.95  Evaluation took:
% 0.77/0.95    0.437 seconds of real time
% 0.77/0.95    0.400856 seconds of user run time
% 0.77/0.95    0.035971 seconds of system run time
% 0.77/0.95    [Run times include 0.042 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.77/0.95    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.77/0.95    0 page faults and
% 0.77/0.95    29,638,704 bytes consed.
% 0.77/0.95  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.77/0.95  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-12T21:50:54
% 0.77/0.95  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.77/0.95  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------