↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWC218-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:43:30 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   18
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   59 (  31 unt;   3 nHn;  59 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  114 (  43 equ;  58 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ neq(sk1,nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_12) ).

cnf(clause100,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | X2 = X1
    | neq(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause100) ).

cnf(co1_11,negated_conjecture,
    app(app(sk5,cons(sk7,nil)),sk6) = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_11) ).

cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

cnf(co1_1,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).

cnf(clause8,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause8) ).

cnf(clause119,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != nil
    | nil = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause119) ).

cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk6),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).

cnf(clause85,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ssList(app(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause85) ).

cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk5),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).

cnf(clause86,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ssList(cons(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause86) ).

cnf(co1_10,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(sk7),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_10) ).

cnf(clause73,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(X1,nil) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause73) ).

cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
    app(sk5,sk6) = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).

cnf(clause118,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != nil
    | nil = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause118) ).

cnf(co1_4,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_4) ).

cnf(clause98,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,X2) != nil ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause98) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ neq(sk1,nil),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | X2 = X1
    | neq(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause100]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    app(app(sk5,cons(sk7,nil)),sk6) = sk3,
    co1_11 ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    co1_6 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ neq(sk1,nil),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | X2 = X1
    | neq(X2,X1) ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk1),
    co1_1 ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    clause8 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != nil
    | nil = X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause119]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    app(app(sk5,cons(sk7,nil)),sk6) = sk1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != nil
    | nil = X2 ),
    c_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    app(app(sk5,cons(sk7,nil)),sk6) = nil,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk6),
    co1_8 ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ssList(app(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause85]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(app(sk5,cons(sk7,nil)))
    | sk6 = nil ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ssList(app(X2,X1)) ),
    c_0_31 ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk5),
    co1_7 ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ssList(cons(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause86]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(cons(sk7,nil))
    | sk6 = nil ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ssList(cons(X1,X2)) ),
    c_0_35 ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(sk7),
    co1_10 ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(X1,nil) = X1 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause73]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    app(sk5,sk6) = sk4,
    co1_9 ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    sk6 = nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_38]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(X1,nil) = X1 ),
    c_0_39 ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    app(sk5,nil) = sk4,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != nil
    | nil = X1 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause118]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    sk5 = sk4,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]),c_0_34])]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != nil
    | nil = X1 ),
    c_0_44 ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    app(app(sk4,cons(sk7,nil)),nil) = nil,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_41]),c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(app(sk4,cons(sk7,nil)))
    | app(sk4,cons(sk7,nil)) = nil ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk4),
    co1_4 ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(cons(sk7,nil))
    | app(sk4,cons(sk7,nil)) = nil ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_33]),c_0_49])]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(cons(sk7,nil))
    | sk4 = nil ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_50]),c_0_49])]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    sk4 = nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_37]),c_0_38]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(cons(sk7,nil))
    | app(nil,cons(sk7,nil)) = nil ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,X2) != nil ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause98]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(cons(sk7,nil))
    | cons(sk7,nil) = nil ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_53]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,X2) != nil ),
    c_0_54 ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    cons(sk7,nil) = nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_37]),c_0_38]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57]),c_0_38]),c_0_24])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWC218-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:06:18 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.45  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.51  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.16/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.51  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.51  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.51  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.51  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.51  % new_bool_3 with pid 2447774 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.51  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.16/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.51  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.51  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.51  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.16/0.51  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.51  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.51  % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.51  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.51  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.51  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2447777 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.51  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.16/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.51  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.51  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.51  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.16/0.51  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.51  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.51  % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.51  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.51  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.51  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.51  
% 0.16/0.51  % Proof found!
% 0.16/0.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.51  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.51  % Parsed axioms                        : 197
% 0.16/0.51  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 164
% 0.16/0.51  % Initial clauses                      : 33
% 0.16/0.51  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.16/0.51  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 33
% 0.16/0.51  % Processed clauses                    : 63
% 0.16/0.51  % ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.16/0.51  % ...subsumed                          : 4
% 0.16/0.51  % ...remaining for further processing  : 58
% 0.16/0.51  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 6
% 0.16/0.51  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.16/0.51  % Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 0.16/0.51  % Backward-rewritten                   : 23
% 0.16/0.51  % Generated clauses                    : 84
% 0.16/0.51  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 62
% 0.16/0.51  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.16/0.51  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.16/0.51  % Paramodulations                      : 78
% 0.16/0.51  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.16/0.51  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.16/0.51  % Equation resolutions                 : 7
% 0.16/0.51  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.16/0.51  % Total rewrite steps                  : 127
% 0.16/0.51  % ...of those cached                   : 111
% 0.16/0.51  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.16/0.51  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.16/0.51  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.51  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.16/0.51  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.51  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.16/0.51  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.16/0.51  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.16/0.51  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.16/0.51  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.16/0.51  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.16/0.51  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.16/0.51  % Current number of processed clauses  : 28
% 0.16/0.51  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 12
% 0.16/0.51  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.51  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.16/0.51  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 15
% 0.16/0.51  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 26
% 0.16/0.51  % ...number of literals in the above   : 99
% 0.16/0.51  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.16/0.51  % Current number of archived clauses   : 27
% 0.16/0.51  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 55
% 0.16/0.51  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 40
% 0.16/0.51  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 0.16/0.51  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.16/0.51  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.16/0.51  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 9
% 0.16/0.51  % BW rewrite match successes           : 9
% 0.16/0.51  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.16/0.51  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.16/0.51  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 3827
% 0.16/0.51  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 918
% 0.16/0.51  
% 0.16/0.51  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.51  % User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.16/0.51  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.16/0.51  % Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.16/0.51  % Maximum resident set size: 3808 pages
% 0.16/0.51  
% 0.16/0.51  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.51  % User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.16/0.51  % System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.16/0.51  % Total time               : 0.029 s
% 0.16/0.51  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.16/0.51  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------