%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWC244+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 20:27:34 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 3.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 33 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 192 ( 45 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 39 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 262 ( 103 ~; 103 |; 37 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 18 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 29 ( 7 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 11 ( 9 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 69 ( 0 sgn 30 !; 10 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ~ frontsegP(X4,X3)
| ~ equalelemsP(X3)
| nil = X1
| ? [X5] :
( ssList(X5)
& neq(X3,X5)
& frontsegP(X4,X5)
& segmentP(X5,X3)
& equalelemsP(X5) )
| ? [X6] :
( ssItem(X6)
& ? [X7] :
( ssList(X7)
& ? [X8] :
( ssList(X8)
& app(app(X7,cons(X6,nil)),X8) = X1
& ! [X9] :
( ssItem(X9)
=> ( ~ memberP(X7,X9)
| ~ memberP(X8,X9)
| ~ lt(X6,X9)
| leq(X6,X9) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
fof(ax93,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssItem(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssItem(X2)
=> ( lt(X1,X2)
<=> ( X1 != X2
& leq(X1,X2) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax93) ).
fof(ax28,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> app(nil,X1) = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax28) ).
fof(ax17,axiom,
ssList(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax17) ).
fof(ax81,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssItem(X2)
=> cons(X2,X1) = app(cons(X2,nil),X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax81) ).
fof(ax16,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssItem(X2)
=> ssList(cons(X2,X1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax16) ).
fof(ax20,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ( nil = X1
| ? [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
& ? [X3] :
( ssItem(X3)
& cons(X3,X2) = X1 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax20) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( X2 != X4
| X1 != X3
| ~ frontsegP(X4,X3)
| ~ equalelemsP(X3)
| nil = X1
| ? [X5] :
( ssList(X5)
& neq(X3,X5)
& frontsegP(X4,X5)
& segmentP(X5,X3)
& equalelemsP(X5) )
| ? [X6] :
( ssItem(X6)
& ? [X7] :
( ssList(X7)
& ? [X8] :
( ssList(X8)
& app(app(X7,cons(X6,nil)),X8) = X1
& ! [X9] :
( ssItem(X9)
=> ( ~ memberP(X7,X9)
| ~ memberP(X8,X9)
| ~ lt(X6,X9)
| leq(X6,X9) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( X3 != X4
| ~ lt(X3,X4)
| ~ ssItem(X4)
| ~ ssItem(X3) )
& ( leq(X3,X4)
| ~ lt(X3,X4)
| ~ ssItem(X4)
| ~ ssItem(X3) )
& ( X3 = X4
| ~ leq(X3,X4)
| lt(X3,X4)
| ~ ssItem(X4)
| ~ ssItem(X3) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax93])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
! [X14,X15,X16,X17] :
( ssList(esk48_0)
& ssList(esk49_0)
& ssList(esk50_0)
& ssList(esk51_0)
& esk49_0 = esk51_0
& esk48_0 = esk50_0
& frontsegP(esk51_0,esk50_0)
& equalelemsP(esk50_0)
& nil != esk48_0
& ( ~ ssList(X14)
| ~ neq(esk50_0,X14)
| ~ frontsegP(esk51_0,X14)
| ~ segmentP(X14,esk50_0)
| ~ equalelemsP(X14) )
& ( ssItem(esk52_3(X15,X16,X17))
| ~ ssList(X17)
| app(app(X16,cons(X15,nil)),X17) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(X16)
| ~ ssItem(X15) )
& ( memberP(X16,esk52_3(X15,X16,X17))
| ~ ssList(X17)
| app(app(X16,cons(X15,nil)),X17) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(X16)
| ~ ssItem(X15) )
& ( memberP(X17,esk52_3(X15,X16,X17))
| ~ ssList(X17)
| app(app(X16,cons(X15,nil)),X17) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(X16)
| ~ ssItem(X15) )
& ( lt(X15,esk52_3(X15,X16,X17))
| ~ ssList(X17)
| app(app(X16,cons(X15,nil)),X17) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(X16)
| ~ ssItem(X15) )
& ( ~ leq(X15,esk52_3(X15,X16,X17))
| ~ ssList(X17)
| app(app(X16,cons(X15,nil)),X17) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(X16)
| ~ ssItem(X15) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( leq(X1,X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X2)
| ~ lt(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( lt(X1,esk52_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| app(app(X2,cons(X1,nil)),X3) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(esk52_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| app(app(X2,cons(X1,nil)),X3) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2)
| app(app(X2,cons(X1,nil)),X3) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ leq(X1,esk52_3(X1,X2,X3)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ ssList(X2)
| app(nil,X2) = X2 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax28])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( app(app(X1,cons(X2,nil)),X3) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssList(X1)
| ~ ssItem(X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( app(nil,X1) = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
ssList(nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssItem(X4)
| cons(X4,X3) = app(cons(X4,nil),X3) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax81])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( app(cons(X1,nil),X2) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(cons(X1,nil))
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( cons(X1,X2) = app(cons(X1,nil),X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ ssList(X3)
| ~ ssItem(X4)
| ssList(cons(X4,X3)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax16])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( cons(X1,X2) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(cons(X1,nil))
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ssList(cons(X1,X2))
| ~ ssItem(X1)
| ~ ssList(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
! [X4] :
( ( ssList(esk44_1(X4))
| nil = X4
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& ( ssItem(esk45_1(X4))
| nil = X4
| ~ ssList(X4) )
& ( cons(esk45_1(X4),esk44_1(X4)) = X4
| nil = X4
| ~ ssList(X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax20])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( cons(X1,X2) != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(X2)
| ~ ssItem(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( nil = X1
| cons(esk45_1(X1),esk44_1(X1)) = X1
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( nil = X1
| ssItem(esk45_1(X1))
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( nil = X1
| ssList(esk44_1(X1))
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( nil = X1
| X1 != esk48_0
| ~ ssList(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
ssList(esk48_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
nil != esk48_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : SWC244+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 18:46:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/3.44 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/3.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.026 s
% 0.25/3.44
% 0.25/3.44 # Proof found!
% 0.25/3.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/3.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/3.44 # Proof object total steps : 33
% 0.25/3.44 # Proof object clause steps : 19
% 0.25/3.44 # Proof object formula steps : 14
% 0.25/3.44 # Proof object conjectures : 14
% 0.25/3.44 # Proof object clause conjectures : 11
% 0.25/3.44 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.25/3.44 # Proof object initial clauses used : 13
% 0.25/3.44 # Proof object initial formulas used : 7
% 0.25/3.44 # Proof object generating inferences : 6
% 0.25/3.44 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 9
% 0.25/3.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/3.44 # Parsed axioms : 96
% 0.25/3.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.25/3.44 # Initial clauses : 205
% 0.25/3.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.25/3.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 203
% 0.25/3.44 # Processed clauses : 6625
% 0.25/3.44 # ...of these trivial : 114
% 0.25/3.44 # ...subsumed : 4593
% 0.25/3.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 1918
% 0.25/3.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1406
% 0.25/3.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 61801
% 0.25/3.44 # Backward-subsumed : 170
% 0.25/3.44 # Backward-rewritten : 92
% 0.25/3.44 # Generated clauses : 150665
% 0.25/3.44 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 142699
% 0.25/3.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4411
% 0.25/3.44 # Paramodulations : 149096
% 0.25/3.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/3.44 # Equation resolutions : 1559
% 0.25/3.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 1640
% 0.25/3.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 46
% 0.25/3.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/3.44 # Negative unit clauses : 23
% 0.25/3.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 1571
% 0.25/3.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 71456
% 0.25/3.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 552062
% 0.25/3.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/3.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 272
% 0.25/3.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 914196
% 0.25/3.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 114263
% 0.25/3.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 7356
% 0.25/3.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4382
% 0.25/3.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/3.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 11
% 0.25/3.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 11
% 0.25/3.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/3.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/3.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3961492
% 0.25/3.44
% 0.25/3.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/3.44 # User time : 2.735 s
% 0.25/3.44 # System time : 0.077 s
% 0.25/3.44 # Total time : 2.812 s
% 0.25/3.44 # Maximum resident set size: 130284 pages
% 0.25/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.pCannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.inCannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46
% 0.25/23.46 Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.inCannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.inCannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46
% 0.25/23.46
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.pCannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.48
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.pCannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.48
% 0.25/23.48 Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.inCannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.49 Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.49
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.50 eprover: eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.inCannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.inCannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.50
% 0.25/23.50
% 0.25/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------