↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SWC255+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:57:17 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.18s 0.82s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   71 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   81 (  26   ~;  19   |;  28   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0 sgn   8   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [U] :
      ( ssList(U)
     => ! [V] :
          ( ssList(V)
         => ! [W] :
              ( ssList(W)
             => ! [X] :
                  ( ssList(X)
                 => ( ( ( neq(X,nil)
                        | ~ neq(V,nil) )
                      & ( singletonP(U)
                        | ~ singletonP(W)
                        | ~ neq(V,nil) ) )
                    | U != W
                    | V != X ) ) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(co1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [U] :
        ( ssList(U)
       => ! [V] :
            ( ssList(V)
           => ! [W] :
                ( ssList(W)
               => ! [X] :
                    ( ssList(X)
                   => ( ( ( neq(X,nil)
                          | ~ neq(V,nil) )
                        & ( singletonP(U)
                          | ~ singletonP(W)
                          | ~ neq(V,nil) ) )
                      | U != W
                      | V != X ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).

fof(nnf_87,plain,
    ? [U] :
      ( ? [V] :
          ( ? [W] :
              ( ? [X] :
                  ( ( ( ~ neq(X,nil)
                      & neq(V,nil) )
                    | ( ~ singletonP(U)
                      & singletonP(W)
                      & neq(V,nil) ) )
                  & W = U
                  & X = V
                  & ssList(X) )
              & ssList(W) )
          & ssList(V) )
      & ssList(U) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[co1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_co1_neg_sk,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ neq(sK1,nil)
        & neq(sK3,nil) )
      | ( ~ singletonP(sK0)
        & singletonP(sK2)
        & neq(sK3,nil) ) )
    & sK2 = sK0
    & sK1 = sK3
    & ssList(sK1)
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK3)
    & ssList(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK3,sK2,sK1]),skolemize(U,sK0),skolemize(V,sK3),skolemize(W,sK2),skolemize(X,sK1)],[nnf_87]) ).

fof(sk_co1_neg,plain,
    ( ( ~ neq(sK1,nil)
      | ~ singletonP(sK0) )
    & ( ~ neq(sK1,nil)
      | singletonP(sK2) )
    & neq(sK3,nil)
    & sK2 = sK0
    & sK1 = sK3
    & ssList(sK1)
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK3)
    & ssList(sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg_sk]) ).

cnf(c_190,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK1,nil)
    | ~ singletonP(sK0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_191,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK1,nil)
    | singletonP(sK2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_192,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sK3,nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_193,negated_conjecture,
    sK2 = sK0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_194,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 = sK3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_545,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK1,nil)
    | singletonP(sK0) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_193,c_191]) ).

cnf(c_546,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | singletonP(sK0) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_194,c_545]) ).

cnf(c_543,negated_conjecture,
    singletonP(sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_192,c_546]) ).

cnf(c_547,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sK3,nil)
    | ~ singletonP(sK0) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_194,c_190]) ).

cnf(c_548,negated_conjecture,
    ~ neq(sK3,nil),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_543,c_547]) ).

cnf(c_544,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_192,c_548]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SWC255+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.38  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.38  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 12:36:36 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.39  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.13/0.39  % Process 2755526 was started by sandbox2 on n013,
% 0.13/0.39  % Sat Sep 26 12:36:36 2026
% 0.13/0.39  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.18/0.41  
% 0.18/0.41  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 3.18/0.82  
% 3.18/0.82  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 3.18/0.82  
% 3.18/0.82  % Proof 1 at 0.39 (+ 0.02) seconds.
% 3.18/0.82  % Length of proof is 8.
% 3.18/0.82  % Level of proof is 3.
% 3.18/0.82  % Maximum clause weight is 10.000.
% 3.18/0.82  % Given clauses 0.
% 3.18/0.82  
% 3.18/0.82  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------