%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWC255-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:43:40 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 8 unt; 1 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 22 ( 4 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| singletonP(sk3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_11) ).
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
( neq(sk2,nil)
| neq(sk2,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(co1_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| ~ singletonP(sk1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_12) ).
cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).
cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| singletonP(sk3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk2,nil),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| ~ singletonP(sk1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| singletonP(sk3) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
co1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
sk2 = sk4,
co1_5 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
neq(sk2,nil),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
| ~ singletonP(sk1) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
singletonP(sk1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWC255-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.21/0.46 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.21/0.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.21/0.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.21/0.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.21/0.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.21/0.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.21/0.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.21/0.46 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:11:13 UTC 2026
% 0.21/0.47 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.55 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.55 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.63 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.23/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.63 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.63 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.63 % new_bool_3 with pid 1415587 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.23/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.63 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.23/0.63 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.63 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.63 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.63 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1415595 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.23/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.63 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.23/0.63 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.63 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.63 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.63 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.63
% 0.23/0.63 % Proof found!
% 0.23/0.63 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/0.63 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.63 % Parsed axioms : 197
% 0.23/0.63 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 162
% 0.23/0.63 % Initial clauses : 35
% 0.23/0.63 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Initial clauses in saturation : 35
% 0.23/0.63 % Processed clauses : 13
% 0.23/0.63 % ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.23/0.63 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % ...remaining for further processing : 10
% 0.23/0.63 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.23/0.63 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Total rewrite steps : 13
% 0.23/0.63 % ...of those cached : 7
% 0.23/0.63 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.63 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.63 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.63 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.63 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.63 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.63 % Current number of processed clauses : 8
% 0.23/0.63 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.23/0.63 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.23/0.63 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 22
% 0.23/0.63 % ...number of literals in the above : 84
% 0.23/0.63 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.23/0.63 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.23/0.63 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.23/0.63 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.63 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2714
% 0.23/0.63 % Search garbage collected termcells : 923
% 0.23/0.63
% 0.23/0.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.63 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.23/0.63 % System time : 0.000 s
% 0.23/0.63 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.23/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 4012 pages
% 0.23/0.63
% 0.23/0.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.63 % User time : 0.017 s
% 0.23/0.63 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.63 % Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.23/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.23/0.63 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------