%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWC258+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:43:41 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.16s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 94 ( 37 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 29 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 112 ( 34 ~; 36 |; 26 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 16 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 22 ( 7 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn 18 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( ( ( nil != X3
| nil != X4 )
& ! [X5] :
( ssItem(X5)
=> ( ? [X6] :
( leq(X6,X5)
& memberP(X4,X6)
& X5 != X6
& ssItem(X6) )
| ~ memberP(X4,X5)
| cons(X5,nil) != X3 ) ) )
| totalorderedP(X1)
| X1 != X3
| X2 != X4 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).
fof(ax65,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ssItem(X1)
=> totalorderedP(cons(X1,nil)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax65) ).
fof(ax66,axiom,
totalorderedP(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax66) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( ( ( nil != X3
| nil != X4 )
& ! [X5] :
( ssItem(X5)
=> ( ? [X6] :
( leq(X6,X5)
& memberP(X4,X6)
& X5 != X6
& ssItem(X6) )
| ~ memberP(X4,X5)
| cons(X5,nil) != X3 ) ) )
| totalorderedP(X1)
| X1 != X3
| X2 != X4 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ssList(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( ssList(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ssList(X3)
=> ! [X4] :
( ssList(X4)
=> ( ( ( nil != X3
| nil != X4 )
& ! [X5] :
( ssItem(X5)
=> ( ? [X6] :
( leq(X6,X5)
& memberP(X4,X6)
& X5 != X6
& ssItem(X6) )
| ~ memberP(X4,X5)
| cons(X5,nil) != X3 ) ) )
| totalorderedP(X1)
| X1 != X3
| X2 != X4 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X12] :
( ( ~ leq(X12,esk5_0)
| ~ memberP(esk4_0,X12)
| esk5_0 = X12
| ~ ssItem(X12)
| nil = esk3_0 )
& ( ~ leq(X12,esk5_0)
| ~ memberP(esk4_0,X12)
| esk5_0 = X12
| ~ ssItem(X12)
| nil = esk4_0 )
& ( memberP(esk4_0,esk5_0)
| nil = esk3_0 )
& ( memberP(esk4_0,esk5_0)
| nil = esk4_0 )
& ( cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk3_0
| nil = esk3_0 )
& ( cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk3_0
| nil = esk4_0 )
& ( ssItem(esk5_0)
| nil = esk3_0 )
& ( ssItem(esk5_0)
| nil = esk4_0 )
& ~ totalorderedP(esk1_0)
& esk1_0 = esk3_0
& esk2_0 = esk4_0
& ssList(esk4_0)
& ssList(esk3_0)
& ssList(esk2_0)
& ssList(esk1_0) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X70] :
( totalorderedP(cons(X70,nil))
| ~ ssItem(X70) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax65])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ totalorderedP(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 = esk3_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ ssItem(X1)
| totalorderedP(cons(X1,nil)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk3_0
| nil = esk3_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ totalorderedP(esk3_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ssItem(esk5_0)
| nil = esk3_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
esk3_0 = nil,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
totalorderedP(nil),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax66]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWC258+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.38 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:10:02 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.48 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.16/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % new_bool_1 with pid 2453948 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.16/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.16/0.48 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.48 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.48 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2453955 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.16/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.16/0.48 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.48 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.48 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.48
% 0.16/0.48 % Proof found!
% 0.16/0.48 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.48 % Parsed axioms : 96
% 0.16/0.48 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 52
% 0.16/0.48 % Initial clauses : 87
% 0.16/0.48 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.16/0.48 % Initial clauses in saturation : 86
% 0.16/0.48 % Processed clauses : 23
% 0.16/0.48 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % ...remaining for further processing : 23
% 0.16/0.48 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Backward-rewritten : 9
% 0.16/0.48 % Generated clauses : 1
% 0.16/0.48 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.16/0.48 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.16/0.48 % Paramodulations : 1
% 0.16/0.48 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Total rewrite steps : 7
% 0.16/0.48 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.16/0.48 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 % Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.16/0.48 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.16/0.48 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.16/0.48 % Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.16/0.48 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 65
% 0.16/0.48 % ...number of literals in the above : 270
% 0.16/0.48 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.16/0.48 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.16/0.48 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.16/0.48 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.16/0.48 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.16/0.48 % BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.16/0.48 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.48 % Termbank termtop insertions : 7621
% 0.16/0.48 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2183
% 0.16/0.48
% 0.16/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.48 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.16/0.48 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.48 % Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.16/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 4016 pages
% 0.16/0.48
% 0.16/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.48 % User time : 0.012 s
% 0.16/0.48 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.16/0.48 % Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.16/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.16/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------