↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SWC279+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:19:00 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.34s 1.76s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  121 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   33 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  150 (  52   ~;  50   |;  32   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  16  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   25 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   0 sgn  20   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( ssList(X4)
                 => ( X2 != X4
                    | X1 != X3
                    | ? [X5] :
                        ( ssItem(X5)
                        & ? [X6] :
                            ( ssList(X6)
                            & ? [X7] :
                                ( ssList(X7)
                                & app(app(X6,cons(X5,nil)),X7) = X3
                                & ? [X8] :
                                    ( ssItem(X8)
                                    & ( ( ~ leq(X5,X8)
                                        & memberP(X7,X8) )
                                      | ( ~ leq(X8,X5)
                                        & memberP(X6,X8) ) ) ) ) ) )
                    | ! [X9] :
                        ( ssItem(X9)
                       => ! [X10] :
                            ( ssList(X10)
                           => ! [X11] :
                                ( ssList(X11)
                               => ( app(app(X10,cons(X9,nil)),X11) != X1
                                  | ! [X12] :
                                      ( ssItem(X12)
                                     => ( ( ~ memberP(X10,X12)
                                          | leq(X12,X9) )
                                        & ( ~ memberP(X11,X12)
                                          | leq(X9,X12) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( X2 != X4
                      | X1 != X3
                      | ? [X5] :
                          ( ssItem(X5)
                          & ? [X6] :
                              ( ssList(X6)
                              & ? [X7] :
                                  ( ssList(X7)
                                  & app(app(X6,cons(X5,nil)),X7) = X3
                                  & ? [X8] :
                                      ( ssItem(X8)
                                      & ( ( ~ leq(X5,X8)
                                          & memberP(X7,X8) )
                                        | ( ~ leq(X8,X5)
                                          & memberP(X6,X8) ) ) ) ) ) )
                      | ! [X9] :
                          ( ssItem(X9)
                         => ! [X10] :
                              ( ssList(X10)
                             => ! [X11] :
                                  ( ssList(X11)
                                 => ( app(app(X10,cons(X9,nil)),X11) != X1
                                    | ! [X12] :
                                        ( ssItem(X12)
                                       => ( ( ~ memberP(X10,X12)
                                            | leq(X12,X9) )
                                          & ( ~ memberP(X11,X12)
                                            | leq(X9,X12) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1])]) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X476,X477,X478,X479] :
      ( ssList(esk48_0)
      & ssList(esk49_0)
      & ssList(esk50_0)
      & ssList(esk51_0)
      & esk49_0 = esk51_0
      & esk48_0 = esk50_0
      & ( leq(X476,X479)
        | ~ memberP(X478,X479)
        | ~ ssItem(X479)
        | ~ ssList(X478)
        | app(app(X477,cons(X476,nil)),X478) != esk50_0
        | ~ ssList(X477)
        | ~ ssItem(X476) )
      & ( leq(X479,X476)
        | ~ memberP(X477,X479)
        | ~ ssItem(X479)
        | ~ ssList(X478)
        | app(app(X477,cons(X476,nil)),X478) != esk50_0
        | ~ ssList(X477)
        | ~ ssItem(X476) )
      & ssItem(esk52_0)
      & ssList(esk53_0)
      & ssList(esk54_0)
      & app(app(esk53_0,cons(esk52_0,nil)),esk54_0) = esk48_0
      & ssItem(esk55_0)
      & ( memberP(esk54_0,esk55_0)
        | memberP(esk53_0,esk55_0) )
      & ( ~ leq(esk52_0,esk55_0)
        | memberP(esk53_0,esk55_0) )
      & ( memberP(esk54_0,esk55_0)
        | ~ leq(esk55_0,esk52_0) )
      & ( ~ leq(esk52_0,esk55_0)
        | ~ leq(esk55_0,esk52_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    app(app(esk53_0,cons(esk52_0,nil)),esk54_0) = esk48_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    esk48_0 = esk50_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ memberP(X3,X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | app(app(X4,cons(X1,nil)),X3) != esk50_0
    | ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    app(app(esk53_0,cons(esk52_0,nil)),esk54_0) = esk50_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk53_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk54_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(esk52_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ memberP(X3,X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X4)
    | app(app(X3,cons(X2,nil)),X4) != esk50_0
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssItem(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( leq(esk52_0,X1)
    | ~ memberP(esk54_0,X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( memberP(esk54_0,esk55_0)
    | memberP(esk53_0,esk55_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(esk55_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( memberP(esk53_0,esk55_0)
    | ~ leq(esk52_0,esk55_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( leq(X1,esk52_0)
    | ~ memberP(esk53_0,X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_6]),c_0_8]),c_0_7]),c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    memberP(esk53_0,esk55_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( memberP(esk54_0,esk55_0)
    | ~ leq(esk55_0,esk52_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    leq(esk55_0,esk52_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(esk52_0,esk55_0)
    | ~ leq(esk55_0,esk52_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    memberP(esk54_0,esk55_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(esk52_0,esk55_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_20]),c_0_13])]),c_0_21]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13  % Problem    : SWC279+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 04:41:53 EDT 2026
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.35  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.34/1.76  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.34/1.76  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.34/1.76  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.34/1.76  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.34/1.76  % Total time : 1.372s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------