↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWC292+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:43:48 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.10s 0.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   98 (  31 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   15 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  112 (  40   ~;  33   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  20  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   0 sgn  23   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( ssList(X4)
                 => ( ( neq(X4,nil)
                      & ! [X5] :
                          ( ssItem(X5)
                         => ( ~ memberP(X4,X5)
                            | cons(X5,nil) != X3 ) ) )
                    | ( nil = X4
                      & nil != X3 )
                    | strictorderedP(X1)
                    | X1 != X3
                    | X2 != X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(ax15,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( neq(X1,X2)
          <=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax15) ).

fof(ax69,axiom,
    strictorderedP(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax69) ).

fof(ax68,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssItem(X1)
     => strictorderedP(cons(X1,nil)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax68) ).

fof(ax17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax17) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( ( neq(X4,nil)
                        & ! [X5] :
                            ( ssItem(X5)
                           => ( ~ memberP(X4,X5)
                              | cons(X5,nil) != X3 ) ) )
                      | ( nil = X4
                        & nil != X3 )
                      | strictorderedP(X1)
                      | X1 != X3
                      | X2 != X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( ( neq(X4,nil)
                        & ! [X5] :
                            ( ssItem(X5)
                           => ( ~ memberP(X4,X5)
                              | cons(X5,nil) != X3 ) ) )
                      | ( nil = X4
                        & nil != X3 )
                      | strictorderedP(X1)
                      | X1 != X3
                      | X2 != X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
      | memberP(esk4_0,esk5_0) )
    & ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
      | cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk3_0 )
    & ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
      | ssItem(esk5_0) )
    & ( nil != esk4_0
      | nil = esk3_0 )
    & ~ strictorderedP(esk1_0)
    & esk1_0 = esk3_0
    & esk2_0 = esk4_0
    & ssList(esk4_0)
    & ssList(esk3_0)
    & ssList(esk2_0)
    & ssList(esk1_0) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( neq(X1,X2)
          <=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax15]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ strictorderedP(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 = esk3_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X14,X15] :
      ( ( ~ ssList(X14)
        | ~ ssList(X15)
        | neq(X14,X15)
        | X14 = X15 )
      & ( ~ ssList(X14)
        | ~ ssList(X15)
        | X14 != X15
        | ~ neq(X14,X15) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ strictorderedP(esk3_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != esk4_0
    | nil = esk3_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    strictorderedP(nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax69]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X60] :
      ( strictorderedP(cons(X60,nil))
      | ~ ssItem(X60) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax68])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
    | cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk3_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    esk4_0 != nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
    | ssItem(esk5_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(X1)
    | strictorderedP(cons(X1,nil)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    cons(esk5_0,nil) = esk3_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_19])]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(esk5_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_19])]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]),c_0_12]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWC292+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.38  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:12:43 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.45  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.10/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.45  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.45  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.45  % new_bool_3 with pid 2395327 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.45  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.10/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.45  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.10/0.45  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.10/0.45  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.45  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.45  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2395330 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.45  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.10/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.45  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.10/0.45  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.10/0.45  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.45  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.45  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.10/0.45  
% 0.10/0.45  % Proof found!
% 0.10/0.45  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.10/0.45  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.45  % Parsed axioms                        : 96
% 0.10/0.45  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 50
% 0.10/0.45  % Initial clauses                      : 87
% 0.10/0.45  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.10/0.45  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 86
% 0.10/0.45  % Processed clauses                    : 53
% 0.10/0.45  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.10/0.45  % ...remaining for further processing  : 51
% 0.10/0.45  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 0.10/0.45  % Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 0.10/0.45  % Generated clauses                    : 20
% 0.10/0.45  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 15
% 0.10/0.45  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.10/0.45  % Paramodulations                      : 20
% 0.10/0.45  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % Total rewrite steps                  : 30
% 0.10/0.45  % ...of those cached                   : 21
% 0.10/0.45  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.10/0.45  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.10/0.45  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.10/0.45  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.10/0.45  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.10/0.45  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.10/0.45  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.10/0.45  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.10/0.45  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.10/0.45  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.10/0.45  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.10/0.45  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.10/0.45  % Current number of processed clauses  : 41
% 0.10/0.45  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 11
% 0.10/0.45  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.45  %    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.10/0.45  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 27
% 0.10/0.45  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 44
% 0.10/0.45  % ...number of literals in the above   : 208
% 0.10/0.45  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % Current number of archived clauses   : 10
% 0.10/0.45  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 47
% 0.10/0.45  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 40
% 0.10/0.45  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6
% 0.10/0.45  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
% 0.10/0.45  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
% 0.10/0.45  % BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.10/0.45  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 8115
% 0.10/0.45  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2181
% 0.10/0.45  
% 0.10/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.45  % User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.10/0.45  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.10/0.45  % Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.10/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 4268 pages
% 0.10/0.45  
% 0.10/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.45  % User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.10/0.45  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.10/0.45  % Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.10/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.10/0.45  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------