↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWC308-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:45:48 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.77s 0.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   55 (  13 unt;  12 nHn;  55 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  183 (  69 equ; 125 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   66 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(nil,sk2)
    | ~ neq(nil,sk2)
    | hd(sk2) != X4
    | cons(X4,nil) != X3
    | ~ ssItem(X4)
    | app(X2,X3) != X1
    | tl(sk2) != X2
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | sk1 != X1
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).

cnf(clause85,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ssList(app(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause85) ).

cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

cnf(clause100,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | X2 = X1
    | neq(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause100) ).

cnf(clause8,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause8) ).

cnf(co1_2,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_2) ).

cnf(clause76,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | nil = X1
    | ssItem(hd(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause76) ).

cnf(clause75,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | nil = X1
    | ssList(tl(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause75) ).

cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(cons(X1,nil),X2) != sk4
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | app(X2,cons(X1,nil)) = sk3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).

cnf(clause86,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ssList(cons(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause86) ).

cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

cnf(clause120,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | app(cons(X1,nil),X2) = cons(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause120) ).

cnf(clause104,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | nil = X1
    | cons(hd(X1),tl(X1)) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause104) ).

cnf(clause115,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause115) ).

cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sk2,nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(nil,sk2)
    | ~ neq(nil,sk2)
    | hd(sk2) != X4
    | cons(X4,nil) != X3
    | ~ ssItem(X4)
    | app(X2,X3) != X1
    | tl(sk2) != X2
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | sk1 != X1
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(nil,sk2)
    | ~ neq(nil,sk2)
    | hd(sk2) != X4
    | cons(X4,nil) != X3
    | ~ ssItem(X4)
    | app(X2,X3) != X1
    | tl(sk2) != X2
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | sk1 != X1
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ssList(app(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause85]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(nil,sk2)
    | ~ ssItem(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | cons(X4,nil) != X3
    | app(X2,X3) != X1
    | hd(sk2) != X4
    | tl(sk2) != X2
    | sk1 != X1 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    co1_6 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ssList(app(X2,X1)) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | X2 = X1
    | neq(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause100]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(tl(sk2))
    | ~ ssList(cons(hd(sk2),nil))
    | ~ ssItem(hd(sk2))
    | ~ neq(nil,sk2)
    | app(tl(sk2),cons(hd(sk2),nil)) != sk3 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19])])])])]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | X2 = X1
    | neq(X2,X1) ),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    clause8 ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk2),
    co1_2 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | nil = X1
    | ssItem(hd(X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause76]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(tl(sk2))
    | ~ ssList(cons(hd(sk2),nil))
    | ~ ssItem(hd(sk2))
    | app(tl(sk2),cons(hd(sk2),nil)) != sk3
    | sk2 = nil ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | nil = X1
    | ssItem(hd(X1)) ),
    c_0_26 ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | nil = X1
    | ssList(tl(X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause75]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(cons(X1,nil),X2) != sk4
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | app(X2,cons(X1,nil)) = sk3 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(tl(sk2))
    | ~ ssList(cons(hd(sk2),nil))
    | app(tl(sk2),cons(hd(sk2),nil)) != sk3
    | sk2 = nil ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | nil = X1
    | ssList(tl(X1)) ),
    c_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ssList(cons(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause86]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(cons(X1,nil),X2) != sk4
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | app(X2,cons(X1,nil)) = sk3 ),
    c_0_30 ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    co1_5 ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | app(cons(X1,nil),X2) = cons(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause120]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(cons(hd(sk2),nil))
    | app(tl(sk2),cons(hd(sk2),nil)) != sk3
    | sk2 = nil ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ssList(cons(X1,X2)) ),
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X2)
    | app(cons(X2,nil),X1) != sk2
    | app(X1,cons(X2,nil)) = sk3 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | app(cons(X1,nil),X2) = cons(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_36 ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | nil = X1
    | cons(hd(X1),tl(X1)) = X1 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause104]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssItem(hd(sk2))
    | app(tl(sk2),cons(hd(sk2),nil)) != sk3
    | sk2 = nil ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X2)
    | cons(X2,X1) != sk2
    | app(X1,cons(X2,nil)) = sk3 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | nil = X1
    | cons(hd(X1),tl(X1)) = X1 ),
    c_0_41 ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(tl(sk2),cons(hd(sk2),nil)) != sk3
    | sk2 = nil ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_28]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(tl(sk2))
    | ~ ssItem(hd(sk2))
    | sk2 = nil ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44])]),c_0_25])]),c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause115]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(tl(sk2))
    | sk2 = nil ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_28]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    c_0_47 ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sk2,nil),
    co1_7 ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_32]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ neq(X1,X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    neq(nil,nil),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]),c_0_24])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWC308-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.44  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.44  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:09:26 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.44  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.27/0.51  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.27/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.77/0.71  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.77/0.71  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.77/0.71  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.77/0.71  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.77/0.71  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.77/0.71  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.77/0.71  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.77/0.71  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 1862719 completed with status 0
% 0.77/0.71  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.77/0.71  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.77/0.71  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.77/0.71  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.77/0.71  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.77/0.71  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.77/0.71  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.77/0.71  % Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.77/0.71  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.77/0.71  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.77/0.71  % Starting G-E--_107_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q7_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.77/0.71  % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 0.77/0.71  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.77/0.71  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 1862724 completed with status 0
% 0.77/0.71  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.77/0.71  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.77/0.71  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.77/0.71  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.77/0.71  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.77/0.71  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.77/0.71  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.77/0.71  % Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.77/0.71  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.77/0.71  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.77/0.71  % Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 0.77/0.71  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.77/0.71  
% 0.77/0.71  % Proof found!
% 0.77/0.71  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.77/0.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.77/0.71  % Parsed axioms                        : 195
% 0.77/0.71  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.77/0.71  % Initial clauses                      : 195
% 0.77/0.71  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.77/0.71  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 195
% 0.77/0.71  % Processed clauses                    : 683
% 0.77/0.71  % ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.77/0.71  % ...subsumed                          : 184
% 0.77/0.71  % ...remaining for further processing  : 496
% 0.77/0.71  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 123
% 0.77/0.71  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.77/0.71  % Backward-subsumed                    : 16
% 0.77/0.71  % Backward-rewritten                   : 21
% 0.77/0.71  % Generated clauses                    : 1548
% 0.77/0.71  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1312
% 0.77/0.71  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.77/0.71  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 23
% 0.77/0.71  % Paramodulations                      : 1424
% 0.77/0.71  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.77/0.71  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.77/0.71  % Equation resolutions                 : 128
% 0.77/0.71  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.77/0.71  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1334
% 0.77/0.71  % ...of those cached                   : 1242
% 0.77/0.71  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.77/0.71  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.77/0.71  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.77/0.71  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.77/0.71  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.77/0.71  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.77/0.71  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.77/0.71  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.77/0.71  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.77/0.71  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.77/0.71  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.77/0.71  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.77/0.71  % Current number of processed clauses  : 248
% 0.77/0.71  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 65
% 0.77/0.71  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.77/0.71  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.77/0.71  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 181
% 0.77/0.71  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 964
% 0.77/0.71  % ...number of literals in the above   : 6026
% 0.77/0.71  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.77/0.71  % Current number of archived clauses   : 224
% 0.77/0.71  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 15876
% 0.77/0.71  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3103
% 0.77/0.71  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 197
% 0.77/0.71  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 176
% 0.77/0.71  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.77/0.71  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 7
% 0.77/0.71  % BW rewrite match successes           : 7
% 0.77/0.71  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.77/0.71  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.77/0.71  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 38890
% 0.77/0.71  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 557
% 0.77/0.71  
% 0.77/0.71  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.77/0.71  % User time                : 0.107 s
% 0.77/0.71  % System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.77/0.71  % Total time               : 0.115 s
% 0.77/0.71  % Maximum resident set size: 3812 pages
% 0.77/0.71  
% 0.77/0.71  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.77/0.71  % User time                : 0.457 s
% 0.77/0.71  % System time              : 0.042 s
% 0.77/0.71  % Total time               : 0.499 s
% 0.77/0.71  % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.77/0.71  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------