↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWC310+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:43:53 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 5.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   62 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  272 ( 115 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   44 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  342 ( 132   ~; 126   |;  54   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  28  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   31 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   82 (   0 sgn  50   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( ( ( ? [X7] :
                          ( ? [X8] :
                              ( ? [X9] :
                                  ( neq(nil,X2)
                                  & ? [X10] :
                                      ( neq(nil,X2)
                                      & hd(X2) = X10
                                      & cons(X10,nil) = X9
                                      & ssItem(X10) )
                                  & app(X8,X9) = X7
                                  & tl(X2) = X8
                                  & ssList(X9) )
                              & ssList(X8) )
                          & X1 = X7
                          & ssList(X7) )
                      | ~ neq(X2,nil) )
                    & ( nil = X1
                      | nil != X2 ) )
                  | ( neq(X4,nil)
                    & ! [X5] :
                        ( ssItem(X5)
                       => ! [X6] :
                            ( app(X6,cons(X5,nil)) != X3
                            | app(cons(X5,nil),X6) != X4
                            | ~ ssList(X6) ) ) )
                  | ( nil = X4
                    & nil != X3 )
                  | X1 != X3
                  | X2 != X4
                  | ~ ssList(X4) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(ax81,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssItem(X2)
         => cons(X2,X1) = app(cons(X2,nil),X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax81) ).

fof(ax15,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( neq(X1,X2)
          <=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax15) ).

fof(ax21,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssItem(X2)
         => nil != cons(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax21) ).

fof(ax17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax17) ).

fof(ax23,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssItem(X2)
         => hd(cons(X2,X1)) = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax23) ).

fof(ax25,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssItem(X2)
         => tl(cons(X2,X1)) = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax25) ).

fof(ax16,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssItem(X2)
         => ssList(cons(X2,X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax16) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ( ( ? [X7] :
                            ( ? [X8] :
                                ( ? [X9] :
                                    ( neq(nil,X2)
                                    & ? [X10] :
                                        ( neq(nil,X2)
                                        & hd(X2) = X10
                                        & cons(X10,nil) = X9
                                        & ssItem(X10) )
                                    & app(X8,X9) = X7
                                    & tl(X2) = X8
                                    & ssList(X9) )
                                & ssList(X8) )
                            & X1 = X7
                            & ssList(X7) )
                        | ~ neq(X2,nil) )
                      & ( nil = X1
                        | nil != X2 ) )
                    | ( neq(X4,nil)
                      & ! [X5] :
                          ( ssItem(X5)
                         => ! [X6] :
                              ( app(X6,cons(X5,nil)) != X3
                              | app(cons(X5,nil),X6) != X4
                              | ~ ssList(X6) ) ) )
                    | ( nil = X4
                      & nil != X3 )
                    | X1 != X3
                    | X2 != X4
                    | ~ ssList(X4) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ( ( ? [X7] :
                            ( ? [X8] :
                                ( ? [X9] :
                                    ( neq(nil,X2)
                                    & ? [X10] :
                                        ( neq(nil,X2)
                                        & hd(X2) = X10
                                        & cons(X10,nil) = X9
                                        & ssItem(X10) )
                                    & app(X8,X9) = X7
                                    & tl(X2) = X8
                                    & ssList(X9) )
                                & ssList(X8) )
                            & X1 = X7
                            & ssList(X7) )
                        | ~ neq(X2,nil) )
                      & ( nil = X1
                        | nil != X2 ) )
                    | ( neq(X4,nil)
                      & ! [X5] :
                          ( ssItem(X5)
                         => ! [X6] :
                              ( app(X6,cons(X5,nil)) != X3
                              | app(cons(X5,nil),X6) != X4
                              | ~ ssList(X6) ) ) )
                    | ( nil = X4
                      & nil != X3 )
                    | X1 != X3
                    | X2 != X4
                    | ~ ssList(X4) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X17,X18,X19,X20] :
      ( ( nil != esk1_0
        | ~ neq(nil,esk2_0)
        | ~ neq(nil,esk2_0)
        | hd(esk2_0) != X20
        | cons(X20,nil) != X19
        | ~ ssItem(X20)
        | app(X18,X19) != X17
        | tl(esk2_0) != X18
        | ~ ssList(X19)
        | ~ ssList(X18)
        | esk1_0 != X17
        | ~ ssList(X17) )
      & ( nil != esk1_0
        | neq(esk2_0,nil) )
      & ( nil = esk2_0
        | ~ neq(nil,esk2_0)
        | ~ neq(nil,esk2_0)
        | hd(esk2_0) != X20
        | cons(X20,nil) != X19
        | ~ ssItem(X20)
        | app(X18,X19) != X17
        | tl(esk2_0) != X18
        | ~ ssList(X19)
        | ~ ssList(X18)
        | esk1_0 != X17
        | ~ ssList(X17) )
      & ( nil = esk2_0
        | neq(esk2_0,nil) )
      & ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
        | app(esk6_0,cons(esk5_0,nil)) = esk3_0 )
      & ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
        | app(cons(esk5_0,nil),esk6_0) = esk4_0 )
      & ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
        | ssList(esk6_0) )
      & ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
        | ssItem(esk5_0) )
      & ( nil != esk4_0
        | nil = esk3_0 )
      & esk1_0 = esk3_0
      & esk2_0 = esk4_0
      & ssList(esk4_0)
      & ssList(esk3_0)
      & ssList(esk2_0)
      & ssList(esk1_0) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
    | app(cons(esk5_0,nil),esk6_0) = esk4_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = esk4_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X51,X52] :
      ( cons(X52,X51) = app(cons(X52,nil),X51)
      | ~ ssItem(X52)
      | ~ ssList(X51) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax81])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
    | ssItem(esk5_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
    | ssList(esk6_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( neq(X1,X2)
          <=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax15]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssItem(X2)
         => nil != cons(X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax21]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(esk2_0,nil)
    | app(cons(esk5_0,nil),esk6_0) = esk2_0 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | cons(X2,X1) = app(cons(X2,nil),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(esk2_0,nil)
    | ssItem(esk5_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(esk2_0,nil)
    | ssList(esk6_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X23,X24] :
      ( ( ~ ssList(X23)
        | ~ ssList(X24)
        | neq(X23,X24)
        | X23 = X24 )
      & ( ~ ssList(X23)
        | ~ ssList(X24)
        | X23 != X24
        | ~ neq(X23,X24) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X28,X29] :
      ( nil != cons(X29,X28)
      | ~ ssItem(X29)
      | ~ ssList(X28) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(esk2_0,nil)
    | cons(esk5_0,esk6_0) = esk2_0 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != esk1_0
    | neq(esk2_0,nil) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != esk4_0
    | nil = esk3_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 = esk3_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( nil != cons(X2,X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk1_0 != nil
    | cons(esk5_0,esk6_0) = esk2_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk1_0 != nil
    | ssItem(esk5_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk1_0 != nil
    | ssList(esk6_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk2_0 != nil
    | esk1_0 = nil ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = esk2_0
    | neq(esk2_0,nil) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_37,plain,
    ! [X31,X32] :
      ( hd(cons(X32,X31)) = X32
      | ~ ssItem(X32)
      | ~ ssList(X31) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax23])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk2_0 = nil
    | cons(esk5_0,esk6_0) = esk2_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_28]),c_0_29]),c_0_30])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 != nil,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]),c_0_34]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssList(esk6_0)
    | esk2_0 = nil ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssItem(esk5_0)
    | esk2_0 = nil ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_36]) ).

fof(c_0_42,plain,
    ! [X71,X72] :
      ( tl(cons(X72,X71)) = X71
      | ~ ssItem(X72)
      | ~ ssList(X71) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax25])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(esk4_0,nil)
    | app(esk6_0,cons(esk5_0,nil)) = esk3_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(nil,esk2_0)
    | ~ neq(nil,esk2_0)
    | hd(esk2_0) != X4
    | cons(X4,nil) != X3
    | ~ ssItem(X4)
    | app(X2,X3) != X1
    | tl(esk2_0) != X2
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | esk1_0 != X1
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | nil = esk2_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | hd(cons(X2,X1)) = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    cons(esk5_0,esk6_0) = esk2_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk6_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(esk5_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | tl(cons(X2,X1)) = X1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(esk2_0,nil)
    | app(esk6_0,cons(esk5_0,nil)) = esk1_0 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_27]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    neq(esk2_0,nil),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(nil,esk2_0)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssItem(X4)
    | cons(X4,nil) != X3
    | app(X2,X3) != X1
    | tl(esk2_0) != X2
    | hd(esk2_0) != X4
    | esk1_0 != X1
    | esk2_0 = nil ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    hd(esk2_0) = esk5_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),c_0_47]),c_0_48])]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    tl(esk2_0) = esk6_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_46]),c_0_47]),c_0_48])]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    app(esk6_0,cons(esk5_0,nil)) = esk1_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51])]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(nil,esk2_0)
    | ~ ssList(cons(esk5_0,nil)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]),c_0_54]),c_0_39])])])])]),c_0_55]),c_0_47]),c_0_55]),c_0_56]),c_0_48])]) ).

fof(c_0_58,plain,
    ! [X40,X41] :
      ( ssList(cons(X41,X40))
      | ~ ssItem(X41)
      | ~ ssList(X40) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax16])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ssList(cons(esk5_0,nil)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_28]),c_0_30]),c_0_29])]),c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ssList(cons(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_58]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_60]),c_0_29]),c_0_48])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWC310+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/5.38  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/5.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/5.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/5.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/5.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/5.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/5.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/5.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:14:26 UTC 2026
% 0.14/5.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/5.39  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/5.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/5.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/5.46  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.16/5.46  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.46  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.46  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.46  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.46  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.46  % new_bool_3 with pid 338260 completed with status 0
% 0.16/5.46  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.16/5.46  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.46  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.46  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.46  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.16/5.46  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/5.46  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/5.46  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/5.46  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.46  % SubtermCWHack with pid 338263 completed with status 0
% 0.16/5.46  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.16/5.46  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.46  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.46  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.46  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.16/5.46  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/5.46  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/5.46  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/5.46  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.46  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.16/5.46  
% 0.16/5.46  % Proof found!
% 0.16/5.46  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/5.46  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/5.46  % Parsed axioms                        : 96
% 0.16/5.46  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 67
% 0.16/5.46  % Initial clauses                      : 54
% 0.16/5.46  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.16/5.46  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 54
% 0.16/5.46  % Processed clauses                    : 169
% 0.16/5.46  % ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.16/5.46  % ...subsumed                          : 42
% 0.16/5.46  % ...remaining for further processing  : 125
% 0.16/5.46  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 26
% 0.16/5.46  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.16/5.46  % Backward-subsumed                    : 21
% 0.16/5.46  % Backward-rewritten                   : 10
% 0.16/5.46  % Generated clauses                    : 455
% 0.16/5.46  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 319
% 0.16/5.46  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.16/5.46  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 11
% 0.16/5.46  % Paramodulations                      : 424
% 0.16/5.46  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.16/5.46  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.16/5.46  % Equation resolutions                 : 31
% 0.16/5.46  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.16/5.46  % Total rewrite steps                  : 441
% 0.16/5.46  % ...of those cached                   : 424
% 0.16/5.46  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.16/5.46  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.16/5.46  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/5.46  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.16/5.46  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/5.46  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.16/5.46  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.16/5.46  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.16/5.46  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.16/5.46  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.16/5.46  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.16/5.46  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.16/5.46  % Current number of processed clauses  : 86
% 0.16/5.46  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 20
% 0.16/5.46  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/5.46  %    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 0.16/5.46  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 60
% 0.16/5.46  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 182
% 0.16/5.46  % ...number of literals in the above   : 939
% 0.16/5.46  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.16/5.46  % Current number of archived clauses   : 35
% 0.16/5.46  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 668
% 0.16/5.46  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 341
% 0.16/5.46  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 42
% 0.16/5.46  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31
% 0.16/5.46  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.16/5.46  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 8
% 0.16/5.46  % BW rewrite match successes           : 8
% 0.16/5.46  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.16/5.46  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.16/5.46  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 12121
% 0.16/5.46  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1651
% 0.16/5.46  
% 0.16/5.46  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/5.46  % User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.16/5.46  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.16/5.46  % Total time               : 0.014 s
% 0.16/5.46  % Maximum resident set size: 3764 pages
% 0.16/5.46  
% 0.16/5.46  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/5.46  % User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.16/5.46  % System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.16/5.46  % Total time               : 0.022 s
% 0.16/5.46  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.16/5.46  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------