↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWC324-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:45:52 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.28s 0.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   58 (  18 unt;   3 nHn;  52 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  152 (  60 equ;  98 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   71 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause145,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | nil != X2
    | nil != X1
    | app(X1,X2) = nil ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause145) ).

cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(cons(X1,nil),X2) != sk4
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | app(X2,cons(X1,nil)) = sk3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).

cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(X2,X1) != sk1
    | app(X1,X2) != sk2
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).

cnf(clause86,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ssList(cons(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause86) ).

cnf(clause120,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | app(cons(X1,nil),X2) = cons(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause120) ).

cnf(clause157,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,app(X2,X3)) = app(cons(X1,X2),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause157) ).

cnf(clause8,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause8) ).

cnf(clause116,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,nil) != X2
    | singletonP(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause116) ).

cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

cnf(clause101,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ singletonP(X1)
    | cons(skaf44(X1),nil) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause101) ).

cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sk4
    | nil = sk3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).

cnf(clause47,axiom,
    ssItem(skaf44(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause47) ).

cnf(clause109,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | nil = X1
    | cons(skaf83(X1),skaf82(X1)) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause109) ).

cnf(co1_2,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_2) ).

cnf(clause12,axiom,
    ssItem(skaf83(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause12) ).

cnf(clause13,axiom,
    ssList(skaf82(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause13) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | nil != X2
    | nil != X1
    | app(X1,X2) = nil ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause145]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(cons(X1,nil),X2) != sk4
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | app(X2,cons(X1,nil)) = sk3 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(X2,X1) != sk1
    | app(X1,X2) != sk2
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ssList(cons(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause86]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | app(cons(X1,nil),X2) = cons(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause120]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,app(X2,X3)) = app(cons(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause157]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | nil != X2
    | nil != X1
    | app(X1,X2) = nil ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    clause8 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,nil) != X2
    | singletonP(X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause116]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(cons(X1,nil),X2) != sk4
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | app(X2,cons(X1,nil)) = sk3 ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    co1_6 ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ singletonP(X1)
    | cons(skaf44(X1),nil) = X1 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause101]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( app(X2,X1) != sk1
    | app(X1,X2) != sk2
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    co1_5 ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ssList(cons(X1,X2)) ),
    c_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | app(cons(X1,nil),X2) = cons(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,app(X2,X3)) = app(cons(X1,X2),X3) ),
    c_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    app(nil,nil) = nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,nil) != X2
    | singletonP(X2) ),
    c_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sk4
    | nil = sk3 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X2)
    | app(cons(X2,nil),X1) != sk4
    | app(X1,cons(X2,nil)) = sk1 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ singletonP(X1)
    | cons(skaf44(X1),nil) = X1 ),
    c_0_28 ).

cnf(c_0_39,axiom,
    ssItem(skaf44(X1)),
    clause47 ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(X2,X1) != sk4
    | app(X1,X2) != sk1 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ssList(app(cons(X1,nil),X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(X1)
    | app(cons(X1,nil),nil) = cons(X1,nil) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(cons(X1,nil))
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | singletonP(cons(X1,nil)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sk4
    | nil = sk3 ),
    c_0_36 ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ singletonP(X1)
    | app(X1,X2) != sk4 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39])]),c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ssList(cons(X1,nil)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(X1)
    | singletonP(cons(X1,nil)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_31]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | nil = X1
    | cons(skaf83(X1),skaf82(X1)) = X1 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause109]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk2),
    co1_2 ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sk4
    | nil = sk1 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,X2) != sk4 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_32]),c_0_46]),c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | nil = X1
    | cons(skaf83(X1),skaf82(X1)) = X1 ),
    c_0_48 ).

cnf(c_0_53,axiom,
    ssItem(skaf83(X1)),
    clause12 ).

cnf(c_0_54,axiom,
    ssList(skaf82(X1)),
    clause13 ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk4),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    nil != sk4,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_34]),c_0_34]),c_0_24])]),c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]),c_0_53]),c_0_54])])]),c_0_55])]),c_0_56]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SWC324-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.48  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.48  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.48  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.48  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.48  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.48  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.48  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.48  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:15:18 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.49  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.49  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.57  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.57  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/0.72  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.28/0.72  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.72  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.72  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.72  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.72  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.72  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.72  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 2991156 completed with status 0
% 0.28/0.72  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.28/0.72  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.72  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.72  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.72  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.28/0.72  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.28/0.72  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.28/0.72  % Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.28/0.72  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.72  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.72  % Starting G-E--_107_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q7_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.72  % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.72  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.72  % G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with pid 2991165 completed with status 0
% 0.28/0.72  % Result found by G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k
% 0.28/0.72  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.72  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.72  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.72  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.28/0.72  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.28/0.72  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.28/0.72  % Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.28/0.72  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.72  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.72  % Starting G-E--_107_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q7_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.72  % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.72  % Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 0.28/0.72  
% 0.28/0.72  % Proof found!
% 0.28/0.72  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.28/0.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.28/0.72  % Parsed axioms                        : 194
% 0.28/0.72  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.28/0.72  % Initial clauses                      : 194
% 0.28/0.72  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.28/0.72  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 194
% 0.28/0.72  % Processed clauses                    : 661
% 0.28/0.72  % ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.28/0.72  % ...subsumed                          : 293
% 0.28/0.72  % ...remaining for further processing  : 366
% 0.28/0.72  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 156
% 0.28/0.72  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.28/0.72  % Backward-subsumed                    : 9
% 0.28/0.72  % Backward-rewritten                   : 12
% 0.28/0.72  % Generated clauses                    : 1550
% 0.28/0.72  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1261
% 0.28/0.72  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.28/0.72  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 21
% 0.28/0.72  % Paramodulations                      : 1387
% 0.28/0.72  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.28/0.72  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.28/0.72  % Equation resolutions                 : 164
% 0.28/0.72  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.28/0.72  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1404
% 0.28/0.72  % ...of those cached                   : 1314
% 0.28/0.72  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.28/0.72  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.28/0.72  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.28/0.72  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.28/0.72  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.28/0.72  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.28/0.72  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.28/0.72  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.28/0.72  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.28/0.72  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.28/0.72  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.28/0.72  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.28/0.72  % Current number of processed clauses  : 322
% 0.28/0.72  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 64
% 0.28/0.72  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.28/0.72  %    Negative unit clauses             : 12
% 0.28/0.72  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 246
% 0.28/0.72  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 744
% 0.28/0.72  % ...number of literals in the above   : 4404
% 0.28/0.72  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.28/0.72  % Current number of archived clauses   : 21
% 0.28/0.72  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13804
% 0.28/0.72  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3364
% 0.28/0.72  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 216
% 0.28/0.72  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 274
% 0.28/0.72  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.28/0.72  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
% 0.28/0.72  % BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.28/0.72  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.28/0.72  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.28/0.72  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 35137
% 0.28/0.72  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 542
% 0.28/0.72  
% 0.28/0.72  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.72  % User time                : 0.090 s
% 0.28/0.72  % System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.28/0.72  % Total time               : 0.099 s
% 0.28/0.72  % Maximum resident set size: 4064 pages
% 0.28/0.72  
% 0.28/0.72  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.72  % User time                : 0.389 s
% 0.28/0.72  % System time              : 0.040 s
% 0.28/0.72  % Total time               : 0.429 s
% 0.28/0.72  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.28/0.72  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------