%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWC328-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:43:57 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 23 ( 5 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ equalelemsP(sk1)
| ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).
cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
nil = sk3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).
cnf(clause1,axiom,
equalelemsP(nil),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause1) ).
cnf(clause56,axiom,
( ~ ssList(X1)
| segmentP(X1,nil) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause56) ).
cnf(co1_2,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_2) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ equalelemsP(sk1)
| ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = sk3,
co1_7 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
nil = sk3,
co1_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ equalelemsP(sk1)
| ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
sk1 = nil,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
equalelemsP(nil),
clause1 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ ssList(X1)
| segmentP(X1,nil) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause56]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ segmentP(sk2,nil),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ ssList(X1)
| segmentP(X1,nil) ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
ssList(sk2),
co1_2 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWC328-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:19:06 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.50 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.50 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.50 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % new_bool_3 with pid 1016614 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.50 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.50 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.50 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.50 % Search class: FHHSF-FFMM22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.50 % partial match(1): FHHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.50 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1016617 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.50 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.50 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.50 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.50 % Search class: FHHSF-FFMM22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.50 % partial match(1): FHHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.50 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.50
% 0.15/0.50 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.50 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.50 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.50 % Parsed axioms : 193
% 0.15/0.50 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 157
% 0.15/0.50 % Initial clauses : 36
% 0.15/0.50 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Initial clauses in saturation : 36
% 0.15/0.50 % Processed clauses : 13
% 0.15/0.50 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % ...remaining for further processing : 13
% 0.15/0.50 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.15/0.50 % Generated clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.50 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Paramodulations : 1
% 0.15/0.50 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Total rewrite steps : 11
% 0.15/0.50 % ...of those cached : 5
% 0.15/0.50 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.50 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.50 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.50 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.50 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.50 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.50 % Current number of processed clauses : 10
% 0.15/0.50 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.50 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.50 % Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.50 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 23
% 0.15/0.50 % ...number of literals in the above : 99
% 0.15/0.50 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.50 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.15/0.50 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.15/0.50 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.15/0.50 % BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.15/0.50 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2842
% 0.15/0.50 % Search garbage collected termcells : 905
% 0.15/0.50
% 0.15/0.50 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.50 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.50 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.50 % Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.15/0.50 % Maximum resident set size: 3808 pages
% 0.15/0.50
% 0.15/0.50 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.50 % User time : 0.012 s
% 0.15/0.50 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.15/0.50 % Total time : 0.025 s
% 0.15/0.50 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.15/0.50 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------