↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SWC331+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:57:30 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 47.08s 6.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 47.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  19 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  145 (  43 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   18 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  165 (  55   ~;  48   |;  45   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  17  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   24 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   0 sgn  25   !;  11   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax28,axiom,
    ! [U] :
      ( ssList(U)
     => app(nil,U) = U ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax28) ).

fof(ax55,axiom,
    ! [U] :
      ( ssList(U)
     => segmentP(U,U) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax55) ).

fof(ax56,axiom,
    ! [U] :
      ( ssList(U)
     => ! [V] :
          ( ssList(V)
         => ! [W] :
              ( ssList(W)
             => ! [X] :
                  ( ssList(X)
                 => ( segmentP(U,V)
                   => segmentP(app(app(W,U),X),V) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax56) ).

fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [U] :
      ( ssList(U)
     => ! [V] :
          ( ssList(V)
         => ! [W] :
              ( ssList(W)
             => ! [X] :
                  ( ssList(X)
                 => ( ( equalelemsP(U)
                      & segmentP(V,U) )
                    | ( nil = W
                      & nil != X )
                    | ! [Y] :
                        ( ssList(Y)
                       => ( ? [Z] :
                              ( ? [X1] :
                                  ( ? [X2] :
                                      ( app(X2,cons(Z,nil)) = W
                                      & ssList(X2) )
                                  & app(cons(Z,nil),X1) = Y
                                  & ssList(X1) )
                              & ssItem(Z) )
                          | ~ equalelemsP(W)
                          | app(W,Y) != X ) )
                    | U != W
                    | V != X ) ) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(co1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [U] :
        ( ssList(U)
       => ! [V] :
            ( ssList(V)
           => ! [W] :
                ( ssList(W)
               => ! [X] :
                    ( ssList(X)
                   => ( ( equalelemsP(U)
                        & segmentP(V,U) )
                      | ( nil = W
                        & nil != X )
                      | ! [Y] :
                          ( ssList(Y)
                         => ( ? [Z] :
                                ( ? [X1] :
                                    ( ? [X2] :
                                        ( app(X2,cons(Z,nil)) = W
                                        & ssList(X2) )
                                    & app(cons(Z,nil),X1) = Y
                                    & ssList(X1) )
                                & ssItem(Z) )
                            | ~ equalelemsP(W)
                            | app(W,Y) != X ) )
                      | U != W
                      | V != X ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).

fof(nnf_87,plain,
    ? [U] :
      ( ? [V] :
          ( ? [W] :
              ( ? [X] :
                  ( ( ~ equalelemsP(U)
                    | ~ segmentP(V,U) )
                  & ( nil != W
                    | nil = X )
                  & ? [Y] :
                      ( ! [Z] :
                          ( ! [X1] :
                              ( ! [X2] :
                                  ( app(X2,cons(Z,nil)) != W
                                  | ~ ssList(X2) )
                              | app(cons(Z,nil),X1) != Y
                              | ~ ssList(X1) )
                          | ~ ssItem(Z) )
                      & equalelemsP(W)
                      & app(W,Y) = X
                      & ssList(Y) )
                  & W = U
                  & X = V
                  & ssList(X) )
              & ssList(W) )
          & ssList(V) )
      & ssList(U) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[co1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_co1_neg_sk,plain,
    ( ( ~ equalelemsP(sK1)
      | ~ segmentP(sK0,sK1) )
    & ( nil != sK2
      | nil = sK4 )
    & ! [Z] :
        ( ! [X1] :
            ( ! [X2] :
                ( app(X2,cons(Z,nil)) != sK2
                | ~ ssList(X2) )
            | app(cons(Z,nil),X1) != sK3
            | ~ ssList(X1) )
        | ~ ssItem(Z) )
    & equalelemsP(sK2)
    & app(sK2,sK3) = sK4
    & ssList(sK3)
    & sK2 = sK1
    & sK4 = sK0
    & ssList(sK4)
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK0)
    & ssList(sK1) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK0,sK2,sK4,sK3]),skolemize(U,sK1),skolemize(V,sK0),skolemize(W,sK2),skolemize(X,sK4),skolemize(Y,sK3)],[nnf_87]) ).

fof(sk_co1_neg,plain,
    ( ( ~ equalelemsP(sK1)
      | ~ segmentP(sK0,sK1) )
    & ( nil != sK2
      | nil = sK4 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( app(VAR_2,cons(VAR_0,nil)) != sK2
        | ~ ssList(VAR_2)
        | app(cons(VAR_0,nil),VAR_1) != sK3
        | ~ ssList(VAR_1)
        | ~ ssItem(VAR_0) )
    & equalelemsP(sK2)
    & app(sK2,sK3) = sK4
    & ssList(sK3)
    & sK2 = sK1
    & sK4 = sK0
    & ssList(sK4)
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK0)
    & ssList(sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg_sk]) ).

cnf(c_169,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ equalelemsP(sK1)
    | ~ segmentP(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_173,negated_conjecture,
    equalelemsP(sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_174,negated_conjecture,
    app(sK2,sK3) = sK4,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_175,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sK3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_176,negated_conjecture,
    sK2 = sK1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_177,negated_conjecture,
    sK4 = sK0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_180,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_181,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sK1),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_176,c_180]) ).

cnf(c_227,plain,
    ( segmentP(app(app(C,A),D),B)
    | ~ segmentP(A,B)
    | ~ ssList(D)
    | ~ ssList(C)
    | ~ ssList(B)
    | ~ ssList(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax56]) ).

cnf(c_228,plain,
    ( segmentP(A,A)
    | ~ ssList(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax55]) ).

cnf(c_265,plain,
    ( app(nil,A) = A
    | ~ ssList(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax28]) ).

fof(ax17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax17) ).

cnf(c_279,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).

cnf(c_4627,negated_conjecture,
    app(sK1,sK3) = sK4,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_176,c_174]) ).

cnf(c_490,negated_conjecture,
    app(sK1,sK3) = sK0,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_177,c_4627]) ).

cnf(c_491,negated_conjecture,
    equalelemsP(sK1),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_176,c_173]) ).

cnf(c_507,plain,
    ( segmentP(app(app(B,A),C),A)
    | ~ segmentP(A,A)
    | ~ ssList(C)
    | ~ ssList(B)
    | ~ ssList(A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_227]) ).

cnf(c_908,negated_conjecture,
    ~ segmentP(sK0,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_491,c_169]) ).

cnf(c_1652,plain,
    segmentP(sK1,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_228,c_181]) ).

cnf(c_1673,plain,
    app(nil,sK1) = sK1,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_265,c_181]) ).

cnf(c_4628,negated_conjecture,
    ( segmentP(app(app(A,sK1),B),sK1)
    | ~ segmentP(sK1,sK1)
    | ~ ssList(B)
    | ~ ssList(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_507,c_181]) ).

cnf(c_4629,negated_conjecture,
    ( segmentP(app(app(nil,sK1),A),sK1)
    | ~ segmentP(sK1,sK1)
    | ~ ssList(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_4628,c_279]) ).

cnf(c_4630,negated_conjecture,
    ( segmentP(app(app(nil,sK1),sK3),sK1)
    | ~ segmentP(sK1,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_4629,c_175]) ).

cnf(c_4631,negated_conjecture,
    segmentP(app(app(nil,sK1),sK3),sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_4630,c_1652]) ).

cnf(c_4632,negated_conjecture,
    segmentP(app(sK1,sK3),sK1),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1673,c_4631]) ).

cnf(c_4633,negated_conjecture,
    segmentP(sK0,sK1),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_490,c_4632]) ).

cnf(c_4626,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_908,c_4633]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SWC331+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.05/0.31  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.05/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.05/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.05/0.31  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.05/0.31  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.05/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.05/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.05/0.31  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 12:48:50 UTC 2026
% 0.05/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.05/0.31  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.05/0.31  % Process 635027 was started by sandbox on n012,
% 0.05/0.31  % Sat Sep 26 12:48:50 2026
% 0.05/0.31  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.05/0.32  
% 0.05/0.32  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 47.08/6.37  
% 47.08/6.37  % given #500 (I,wt=57): 685 -ssList(A) | -ssItem(B) | -ssItem(C) | -ssList(D) | -ssList(E) | app(app(D,cons(B,A)),cons(C,E)) != A | lt(B,C) | lt(C,B) | -lt(f19(A),f18(A)).  [factor(358,a,e)].
% 47.08/6.37  
% 47.08/6.37  % given #1000 (I,wt=56): 1192 -ssList(cons(A,nil)) | -ssItem(B) | -ssItem(C) | -ssList(D) | app(app(D,cons(B,D)),cons(C,D)) != cons(A,nil) | lt(B,C) | lt(C,B) | -ssItem(A).  [factor(696,d,e)].
% 47.08/6.37  
% 47.08/6.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 47.08/6.37  
% 47.08/6.37  % Proof 1 at 5.65 (+ 0.12) seconds.
% 47.08/6.37  % Length of proof is 23.
% 47.08/6.37  % Level of proof is 4.
% 47.08/6.37  % Maximum clause weight is 38.000.
% 47.08/6.37  % Given clauses 1329.
% 47.08/6.37  
% 47.08/6.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------