↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : SWC350+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:43:54 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 4.71s 4.94s
% Output   : Refutation 4.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SWC350+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu May  9 02:27:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.71/4.94  % Version:  1.5
% 4.71/4.94  % SZS status Theorem
% 4.71/4.94  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 4.71/4.94  fof(co1,conjecture,(![U]:(ssList(U)=>(![V]:(ssList(V)=>(![W]:(ssList(W)=>(![X]:(ssList(X)=>((((((V!=X|U!=W)|(~neq(V,nil)))|(~frontsegP(X,W)))|(~equalelemsP(W)))|(?[Y]:((((ssList(Y)&neq(W,Y))&frontsegP(X,Y))&segmentP(Y,W))&equalelemsP(Y))))|frontsegP(V,U)))))))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', co1)).
% 4.71/4.94  fof(c23,negated_conjecture,(~(![U]:(ssList(U)=>(![V]:(ssList(V)=>(![W]:(ssList(W)=>(![X]:(ssList(X)=>((((((V!=X|U!=W)|(~neq(V,nil)))|(~frontsegP(X,W)))|(~equalelemsP(W)))|(?[Y]:((((ssList(Y)&neq(W,Y))&frontsegP(X,Y))&segmentP(Y,W))&equalelemsP(Y))))|frontsegP(V,U))))))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1])).
% 4.71/4.94  fof(c24,negated_conjecture,(~(![U]:(ssList(U)=>(![V]:(ssList(V)=>(![W]:(ssList(W)=>(![X]:(ssList(X)=>((((((V!=X|U!=W)|~neq(V,nil))|~frontsegP(X,W))|~equalelemsP(W))|(?[Y]:((((ssList(Y)&neq(W,Y))&frontsegP(X,Y))&segmentP(Y,W))&equalelemsP(Y))))|frontsegP(V,U))))))))))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c23])).
% 4.71/4.94  fof(c25,negated_conjecture,(?[U]:(ssList(U)&(?[V]:(ssList(V)&(?[W]:(ssList(W)&(?[X]:(ssList(X)&((((((V=X&U=W)&neq(V,nil))&frontsegP(X,W))&equalelemsP(W))&(![Y]:((((~ssList(Y)|~neq(W,Y))|~frontsegP(X,Y))|~segmentP(Y,W))|~equalelemsP(Y))))&~frontsegP(V,U)))))))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c24])).
% 4.71/4.94  fof(c26,negated_conjecture,(?[X2]:(ssList(X2)&(?[X3]:(ssList(X3)&(?[X4]:(ssList(X4)&(?[X5]:(ssList(X5)&((((((X3=X5&X2=X4)&neq(X3,nil))&frontsegP(X5,X4))&equalelemsP(X4))&(![X6]:((((~ssList(X6)|~neq(X4,X6))|~frontsegP(X5,X6))|~segmentP(X6,X4))|~equalelemsP(X6))))&~frontsegP(X3,X2)))))))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c25])).
% 4.71/4.94  fof(c28,negated_conjecture,(![X6]:(ssList(skolem0001)&(ssList(skolem0002)&(ssList(skolem0003)&(ssList(skolem0004)&((((((skolem0002=skolem0004&skolem0001=skolem0003)&neq(skolem0002,nil))&frontsegP(skolem0004,skolem0003))&equalelemsP(skolem0003))&((((~ssList(X6)|~neq(skolem0003,X6))|~frontsegP(skolem0004,X6))|~segmentP(X6,skolem0003))|~equalelemsP(X6)))&~frontsegP(skolem0002,skolem0001))))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c27,negated_conjecture,(ssList(skolem0001)&(ssList(skolem0002)&(ssList(skolem0003)&(ssList(skolem0004)&((((((skolem0002=skolem0004&skolem0001=skolem0003)&neq(skolem0002,nil))&frontsegP(skolem0004,skolem0003))&equalelemsP(skolem0003))&(![X6]:((((~ssList(X6)|~neq(skolem0003,X6))|~frontsegP(skolem0004,X6))|~segmentP(X6,skolem0003))|~equalelemsP(X6))))&~frontsegP(skolem0002,skolem0001)))))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c26])).])).
% 4.71/4.94  cnf(c39,negated_conjecture,~frontsegP(skolem0002,skolem0001),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c28])).
% 4.71/4.94  cnf(symmetry,axiom,X252!=X253|X253=X252,theory(equality)).
% 4.71/4.94  cnf(c33,negated_conjecture,skolem0002=skolem0004,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c28])).
% 4.71/4.94  cnf(c516,plain,skolem0004=skolem0002,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c33, symmetry])).
% 4.71/4.94  cnf(c34,negated_conjecture,skolem0001=skolem0003,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c28])).
% 4.71/4.94  cnf(c519,plain,skolem0003=skolem0001,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c34, symmetry])).
% 4.71/4.94  cnf(c36,negated_conjecture,frontsegP(skolem0004,skolem0003),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c28])).
% 4.71/4.94  cnf(c9,axiom,X297!=X295|X294!=X296|~frontsegP(X297,X294)|frontsegP(X295,X296),theory(equality)).
% 4.71/4.94  cnf(c582,plain,skolem0004!=X749|skolem0003!=X750|frontsegP(X749,X750),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c9, c36])).
% 4.71/4.94  cnf(c19307,plain,skolem0004!=X751|frontsegP(X751,skolem0001),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c582, c519])).
% 4.71/4.94  cnf(c19319,plain,frontsegP(skolem0002,skolem0001),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c19307, c516])).
% 4.71/4.94  cnf(c19326,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c19319, c39])).
% 4.71/4.94  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 4.71/4.94  
% 4.71/4.94  % Initial clauses    : 227
% 4.71/4.94  % Processed clauses  : 812
% 4.71/4.94  % Factors computed   : 25
% 4.71/4.94  % Resolvents computed: 18795
% 4.71/4.94  % Tautologies deleted: 21
% 4.71/4.94  % Forward subsumed   : 263
% 4.71/4.94  % Backward subsumed  : 1
% 4.71/4.94  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 4.71/4.94  % User time          : 4.535 s
% 4.71/4.94  % System time        : 0.044 s
% 4.71/4.94  % Total time         : 4.579 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------