↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWC355-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:44:04 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   39 (  14 unt;   1 nHn;  39 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   85 (  11 equ;  49 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause172,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ segmentP(X1,X2)
    | segmentP(app(app(X4,X1),X3),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause172) ).

cnf(clause74,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(nil,X1) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause74) ).

cnf(co1_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | app(sk3,cons(sk5,nil)) = sk4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_13) ).

cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( neq(sk2,nil)
    | neq(sk2,nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).

cnf(clause8,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause8) ).

cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

cnf(co1_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ssItem(sk5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_12) ).

cnf(co1_1,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).

cnf(clause86,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ssList(cons(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause86) ).

cnf(co1_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_14) ).

cnf(clause57,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | segmentP(X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause57) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ segmentP(X1,X2)
    | segmentP(app(app(X4,X1),X3),X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause172]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(nil,X1) = X1 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause74]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | app(sk3,cons(sk5,nil)) = sk4 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sk2,nil),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ segmentP(X1,X2)
    | segmentP(app(app(X4,X1),X3),X2) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(nil,X1) = X1 ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    clause8 ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | app(sk3,cons(sk5,nil)) = sk4 ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    co1_6 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    co1_5 ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sk2,nil),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ssItem(sk5) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ segmentP(X1,X3)
    | segmentP(app(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    app(sk1,cons(sk5,nil)) = sk2,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk1),
    co1_1 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ssList(cons(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause86]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ssItem(sk5) ),
    c_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(cons(sk5,nil))
    | ~ segmentP(sk1,X1)
    | segmentP(sk2,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ssList(cons(X1,X2)) ),
    c_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(sk5),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | segmentP(X1,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause57]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1) ),
    c_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ segmentP(sk1,X1)
    | segmentP(sk2,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]),c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | segmentP(X1,X1) ),
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_26])]),c_0_37]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWC355-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:18:40 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.43  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % new_bool_3 with pid 453922 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.13/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.43  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.43  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.43  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % SubtermCWHack with pid 453930 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.43  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.43  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.43  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.13/0.43  
% 0.13/0.43  % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.43  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.43  % Parsed axioms                        : 199
% 0.13/0.43  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 156
% 0.13/0.43  % Initial clauses                      : 43
% 0.13/0.43  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 43
% 0.13/0.43  % Processed clauses                    : 123
% 0.13/0.43  % ...of these trivial                  : 4
% 0.13/0.43  % ...subsumed                          : 34
% 0.13/0.43  % ...remaining for further processing  : 85
% 0.13/0.43  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 10
% 0.13/0.43  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Backward-subsumed                    : 8
% 0.13/0.43  % Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.13/0.43  % Generated clauses                    : 304
% 0.13/0.43  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 234
% 0.13/0.43  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4
% 0.13/0.43  % Paramodulations                      : 291
% 0.13/0.43  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Equation resolutions                 : 14
% 0.13/0.43  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Total rewrite steps                  : 257
% 0.13/0.43  % ...of those cached                   : 248
% 0.13/0.43  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43  % Current number of processed clauses  : 69
% 0.13/0.43  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 11
% 0.13/0.43  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.43  %    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.13/0.43  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 54
% 0.13/0.43  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 148
% 0.13/0.43  % ...number of literals in the above   : 792
% 0.13/0.43  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Current number of archived clauses   : 11
% 0.13/0.43  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 482
% 0.13/0.43  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 258
% 0.13/0.43  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 41
% 0.13/0.43  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 0.13/0.43  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.13/0.43  % BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.13/0.43  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 8160
% 0.13/0.43  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 911
% 0.13/0.43  
% 0.13/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.43  % User time                : 0.011 s
% 0.13/0.43  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.13/0.43  % Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.13/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 3760 pages
% 0.13/0.43  
% 0.13/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.43  % User time                : 0.015 s
% 0.13/0.43  % System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.13/0.43  % Total time               : 0.025 s
% 0.13/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.13/0.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------