%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : SWC359+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n011.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:51:01 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 11.69s 2.46s % Output : Proof 18.76s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWC359+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0. % 0.07/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 18:39:26 EDT 2023 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.61 ________ _____ % 0.20/0.61 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.20/0.61 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.20/0.61 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.20/0.61 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.20/0.61 % 0.20/0.61 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.20/0.61 (2023-06-19) % 0.20/0.61 % 0.20/0.61 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.20/0.61 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.20/0.61 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.20/0.61 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.20/0.61 % 0.20/0.61 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.20/0.61 % 0.20/0.61 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.20/0.62 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.20/0.63 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.20/0.63 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.20/0.63 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.20/0.63 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.20/0.63 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.20/0.63 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.20/0.63 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 5.45/1.51 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 5.45/1.55 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 5.45/1.56 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 5.45/1.56 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 5.45/1.56 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 5.45/1.56 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 5.45/1.56 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 11.69/2.41 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 11.69/2.46 Prover 2: proved (1830ms) % 11.69/2.46 % 11.69/2.46 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 11.69/2.46 % 12.46/2.48 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 12.46/2.55 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 13.38/2.55 Prover 5: stopped % 13.38/2.55 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 14.45/2.69 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 14.45/2.73 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 14.45/2.73 Prover 6: stopped % 14.45/2.73 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 14.45/2.74 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 14.45/2.75 Prover 3: stopped % 14.45/2.75 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 14.99/2.77 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 15.71/2.87 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 15.71/2.88 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 15.71/2.89 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 15.71/2.90 Prover 1: Found proof (size 1) % 15.71/2.90 Prover 1: proved (2272ms) % 16.38/2.96 Prover 10: stopped % 16.77/3.00 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 16.77/3.00 Prover 7: stopped % 16.77/3.02 Prover 11: stopped % 17.35/3.16 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 18.00/3.17 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 18.00/3.17 Prover 8: stopped % 18.22/3.24 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ... % 18.22/3.24 Prover 0: stopped % 18.37/3.32 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 18.37/3.32 Prover 4: stopped % 18.37/3.32 % 18.76/3.33 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 18.76/3.33 % 18.76/3.33 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 18.76/3.34 Assumptions after simplification: % 18.76/3.34 --------------------------------- % 18.76/3.34 % 18.76/3.34 (co1) % 18.76/3.35 $false % 18.76/3.35 % 18.76/3.35 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 18.76/3.35 -------------------------------------------- % 18.76/3.35 ax1, ax10, ax11, ax12, ax13, ax14, ax15, ax16, ax17, ax18, ax19, ax2, ax20, % 18.76/3.35 ax21, ax22, ax23, ax24, ax25, ax26, ax27, ax28, ax29, ax3, ax30, ax31, ax32, % 18.76/3.35 ax33, ax34, ax35, ax36, ax37, ax38, ax39, ax4, ax40, ax41, ax42, ax43, ax44, % 18.76/3.35 ax45, ax46, ax47, ax48, ax49, ax5, ax50, ax51, ax52, ax53, ax54, ax55, ax56, % 18.76/3.35 ax57, ax58, ax59, ax6, ax60, ax61, ax62, ax63, ax64, ax65, ax66, ax67, ax68, % 18.76/3.35 ax69, ax7, ax70, ax71, ax72, ax73, ax74, ax75, ax76, ax77, ax78, ax79, ax8, % 18.76/3.35 ax80, ax81, ax82, ax83, ax84, ax85, ax86, ax87, ax88, ax89, ax9, ax90, ax91, % 18.76/3.35 ax92, ax93, ax94, ax95 % 18.76/3.35 % 18.76/3.35 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 18.76/3.35 --------------------------------- % 18.76/3.35 % 18.76/3.35 Begin of proof % 18.76/3.35 | % 18.76/3.35 | CLOSE: (co1) is inconsistent. % 18.76/3.35 | % 18.76/3.35 End of proof % 18.76/3.35 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 18.76/3.35 % 18.76/3.35 2747ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------