%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : SWC361+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Thu Aug 31 20:51:02 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 16.66s 3.10s % Output : Proof 26.98s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SWC361+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0. % 0.00/0.11 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 15:25:46 EDT 2023 % 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.18/0.60 ________ _____ % 0.18/0.60 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.18/0.60 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.18/0.60 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.18/0.60 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.18/0.60 % 0.18/0.60 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.18/0.60 (2023-06-19) % 0.18/0.60 % 0.18/0.60 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.18/0.60 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.18/0.60 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.18/0.60 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.18/0.60 % 0.18/0.60 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.18/0.60 % 0.18/0.60 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.18/0.62 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.18/0.64 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.18/0.64 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.18/0.64 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.18/0.64 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.18/0.64 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.18/0.64 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.18/0.64 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 4.11/1.57 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 4.11/1.57 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 4.77/1.64 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 4.77/1.64 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 4.77/1.64 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 4.77/1.65 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 6.43/1.67 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 15.48/3.06 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 16.66/3.09 Prover 2: proved (2459ms) % 16.66/3.10 % 16.66/3.10 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 16.66/3.10 % 16.88/3.11 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 17.01/3.14 Prover 0: stopped % 17.01/3.14 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 18.16/3.36 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 18.81/3.38 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 19.32/3.48 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 19.32/3.48 Prover 5: stopped % 19.32/3.50 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 19.91/3.55 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 19.91/3.56 Prover 6: stopped % 19.91/3.57 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 19.91/3.66 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 19.91/3.67 Prover 3: stopped % 19.91/3.68 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443 % 19.91/3.72 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 20.89/3.79 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 20.89/3.84 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 20.89/3.85 Prover 1: Found proof (size 1) % 22.38/3.86 Prover 1: proved (3220ms) % 22.51/3.90 Prover 10: stopped % 22.85/3.92 Prover 13: Preprocessing ... % 23.07/4.00 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 23.07/4.00 Prover 7: stopped % 24.09/4.13 Prover 13: stopped % 24.73/4.18 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 24.73/4.19 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 24.73/4.19 Prover 8: stopped % 25.15/4.26 Prover 11: stopped % 26.68/4.66 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 26.68/4.66 Prover 4: stopped % 26.68/4.66 % 26.68/4.67 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 26.68/4.67 % 26.98/4.67 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 26.98/4.68 Assumptions after simplification: % 26.98/4.68 --------------------------------- % 26.98/4.68 % 26.98/4.68 (co1) % 26.98/4.68 $false % 26.98/4.68 % 26.98/4.68 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 26.98/4.68 -------------------------------------------- % 26.98/4.68 ax1, ax10, ax11, ax12, ax13, ax14, ax15, ax16, ax17, ax18, ax19, ax2, ax20, % 26.98/4.68 ax21, ax22, ax23, ax24, ax25, ax26, ax27, ax28, ax29, ax3, ax30, ax31, ax32, % 26.98/4.69 ax33, ax34, ax35, ax36, ax37, ax38, ax39, ax4, ax40, ax41, ax42, ax43, ax44, % 26.98/4.69 ax45, ax46, ax47, ax48, ax49, ax5, ax50, ax51, ax52, ax53, ax54, ax55, ax56, % 26.98/4.69 ax57, ax58, ax59, ax6, ax60, ax61, ax62, ax63, ax64, ax65, ax66, ax67, ax68, % 26.98/4.69 ax69, ax7, ax70, ax71, ax72, ax73, ax74, ax75, ax76, ax77, ax78, ax79, ax8, % 26.98/4.69 ax80, ax81, ax82, ax83, ax84, ax85, ax86, ax87, ax88, ax89, ax9, ax90, ax91, % 26.98/4.69 ax92, ax93, ax94, ax95 % 26.98/4.69 % 26.98/4.69 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 26.98/4.69 --------------------------------- % 26.98/4.69 % 26.98/4.69 Begin of proof % 26.98/4.69 | % 26.98/4.69 | CLOSE: (co1) is inconsistent. % 26.98/4.69 | % 26.98/4.69 End of proof % 26.98/4.69 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 26.98/4.69 % 26.98/4.69 4084ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------