↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWC366+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:44:06 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  210 (  52 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   32 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  269 ( 104   ~;  97   |;  39   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;  26  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   25 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   65 (   0 sgn  37   !;  10   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( ssList(X4)
                 => ( ( ( neq(X4,nil)
                        | ~ neq(X2,nil) )
                      & ( rearsegP(X2,X1)
                        | ? [X5] :
                            ( ? [X6] :
                                ( ? [X7] :
                                    ( neq(nil,X4)
                                    & hd(X4) = X7
                                    & cons(X7,nil) = X6
                                    & ssItem(X7) )
                                & app(X6,X3) = X5
                                & ssList(X6) )
                            & X4 != X5
                            & ssList(X5) )
                        | ~ neq(X2,nil) ) )
                    | X1 != X3
                    | X2 != X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(ax6,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( rearsegP(X1,X2)
          <=> ? [X3] :
                ( app(X3,X2) = X1
                & ssList(X3) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax6) ).

fof(ax26,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ssList(app(X1,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax26) ).

fof(ax16,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssItem(X2)
         => ssList(cons(X2,X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax16) ).

fof(ax15,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( neq(X1,X2)
          <=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax15) ).

fof(ax17,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax17) ).

fof(ax22,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ( nil != X1
       => ssItem(hd(X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001+0.ax',ax22) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( ( ( neq(X4,nil)
                          | ~ neq(X2,nil) )
                        & ( rearsegP(X2,X1)
                          | ? [X5] :
                              ( ? [X6] :
                                  ( ? [X7] :
                                      ( neq(nil,X4)
                                      & hd(X4) = X7
                                      & cons(X7,nil) = X6
                                      & ssItem(X7) )
                                  & app(X6,X3) = X5
                                  & ssList(X6) )
                              & X4 != X5
                              & ssList(X5) )
                          | ~ neq(X2,nil) ) )
                      | X1 != X3
                      | X2 != X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( ( ( neq(X4,nil)
                          | ~ neq(X2,nil) )
                        & ( rearsegP(X2,X1)
                          | ? [X5] :
                              ( ? [X6] :
                                  ( ? [X7] :
                                      ( neq(nil,X4)
                                      & hd(X4) = X7
                                      & cons(X7,nil) = X6
                                      & ssItem(X7) )
                                  & app(X6,X3) = X5
                                  & ssList(X6) )
                              & X4 != X5
                              & ssList(X5) )
                          | ~ neq(X2,nil) ) )
                      | X1 != X3
                      | X2 != X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X256,X257,X258] :
      ( ( ~ rearsegP(esk49_0,esk48_0)
        | ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) )
      & ( ~ rearsegP(esk49_0,esk48_0)
        | neq(esk49_0,nil) )
      & ( ~ neq(nil,esk51_0)
        | hd(esk51_0) != X258
        | cons(X258,nil) != X257
        | ~ ssItem(X258)
        | app(X257,esk50_0) != X256
        | ~ ssList(X257)
        | esk51_0 = X256
        | ~ ssList(X256)
        | ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) )
      & ( ~ neq(nil,esk51_0)
        | hd(esk51_0) != X258
        | cons(X258,nil) != X257
        | ~ ssItem(X258)
        | app(X257,esk50_0) != X256
        | ~ ssList(X257)
        | esk51_0 = X256
        | ~ ssList(X256)
        | neq(esk49_0,nil) )
      & ( neq(esk49_0,nil)
        | ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) )
      & ( neq(esk49_0,nil)
        | neq(esk49_0,nil) )
      & esk48_0 = esk50_0
      & esk49_0 = esk51_0
      & ssList(esk51_0)
      & ssList(esk50_0)
      & ssList(esk49_0)
      & ssList(esk48_0) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( neq(esk49_0,nil)
    | neq(esk49_0,nil) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    neq(esk49_0,nil),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    esk49_0 = esk51_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X25,X26,X28] :
      ( ( ~ ssList(X25)
        | ~ ssList(X26)
        | rearsegP(X25,X26)
        | app(X28,X26) != X25
        | ~ ssList(X28) )
      & ( ~ ssList(X25)
        | ~ ssList(X26)
        | ~ rearsegP(X25,X26)
        | app(esk7_2(X25,X26),X26) = X25 )
      & ( ~ ssList(X25)
        | ~ ssList(X26)
        | ~ rearsegP(X25,X26)
        | ssList(esk7_2(X25,X26)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax6])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X131,X132] :
      ( ssList(app(X131,X132))
      | ~ ssList(X132)
      | ~ ssList(X131) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax26])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(nil,esk51_0)
    | hd(esk51_0) != X3
    | cons(X3,nil) != X2
    | ~ ssItem(X3)
    | app(X2,esk50_0) != X1
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ neq(esk51_0,nil)
    | esk51_0 = X1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    esk48_0 = esk50_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    neq(esk51_0,nil),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | app(X1,X2) != X3
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | rearsegP(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ssList(app(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssItem(hd(esk51_0))
    | ~ neq(nil,esk51_0)
    | ~ ssList(cons(hd(esk51_0),nil))
    | ~ ssList(app(cons(hd(esk51_0),nil),esk48_0))
    | app(cons(hd(esk51_0),nil),esk48_0) = esk51_0 ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk48_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ rearsegP(esk49_0,esk48_0)
    | ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | rearsegP(app(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssItem(hd(esk51_0))
    | ~ neq(nil,esk51_0)
    | ~ ssList(cons(hd(esk51_0),nil))
    | app(cons(hd(esk51_0),nil),esk48_0) = esk51_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_19]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ rearsegP(esk51_0,esk48_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_17]),c_0_12])]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X112,X113] :
      ( ssList(cons(X113,X112))
      | ~ ssItem(X113)
      | ~ ssList(X112) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax16])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ( neq(X1,X2)
          <=> X1 != X2 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax15]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssItem(hd(esk51_0))
    | ~ neq(nil,esk51_0)
    | ~ ssList(cons(hd(esk51_0),nil)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_21])]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ssList(cons(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax17]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X110,X111] :
      ( ( ~ ssList(X110)
        | ~ ssList(X111)
        | neq(X110,X111)
        | X110 = X111 )
      & ( ~ ssList(X110)
        | ~ ssList(X111)
        | X110 != X111
        | ~ neq(X110,X111) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk49_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ( nil != X1
       => ssItem(hd(X1)) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax22]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssItem(hd(esk51_0))
    | ~ neq(nil,esk51_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(esk51_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_37,plain,
    ! [X125] :
      ( ssItem(hd(X125))
      | nil = X125
      | ~ ssList(X125) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssItem(hd(esk51_0))
    | esk51_0 = nil ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]),c_0_30])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ssItem(hd(X1))
    | nil = X1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | X1 != X2
    | ~ neq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    esk51_0 = nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_36])]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( ~ neq(X1,X1)
    | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    neq(nil,nil),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]),c_0_30])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWC366+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:19:11 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.50  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.18/0.50  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.50  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.50  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.50  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.50  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.50  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.50  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 1441248 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.50  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.18/0.50  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.50  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.50  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.50  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.18/0.50  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.50  % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.50  % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.50  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.50  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.50  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.50  % Starting G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.50  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_TT_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.50  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_TT_S0Y with pid 1441265 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.50  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_TT_S0Y
% 0.18/0.50  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.50  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.50  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.50  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.18/0.50  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.50  % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.50  % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.50  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.50  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.50  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.50  % Starting G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.50  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_TT_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.50  % Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.50  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.50  
% 0.18/0.50  % Proof found!
% 0.18/0.50  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.50  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.50  % Parsed axioms                        : 96
% 0.18/0.50  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.18/0.50  % Initial clauses                      : 202
% 0.18/0.50  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.18/0.50  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 200
% 0.18/0.50  % Processed clauses                    : 377
% 0.18/0.50  % ...of these trivial                  : 5
% 0.18/0.50  % ...subsumed                          : 11
% 0.18/0.50  % ...remaining for further processing  : 361
% 0.18/0.50  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 30
% 0.18/0.50  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.18/0.50  % Backward-subsumed                    : 8
% 0.18/0.50  % Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 0.18/0.50  % Generated clauses                    : 103
% 0.18/0.50  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 77
% 0.18/0.50  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.18/0.50  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 0.18/0.50  % Paramodulations                      : 77
% 0.18/0.50  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.18/0.50  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.18/0.50  % Equation resolutions                 : 30
% 0.18/0.50  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.18/0.50  % Total rewrite steps                  : 81
% 0.18/0.50  % ...of those cached                   : 66
% 0.18/0.50  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.18/0.50  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.18/0.50  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.50  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.18/0.50  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.50  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.18/0.50  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.18/0.50  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.18/0.50  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.18/0.50  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.18/0.50  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.18/0.50  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.18/0.50  % Current number of processed clauses  : 132
% 0.18/0.50  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 19
% 0.18/0.50  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.50  %    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.18/0.50  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 110
% 0.18/0.50  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 88
% 0.18/0.50  % ...number of literals in the above   : 426
% 0.18/0.50  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.18/0.50  % Current number of archived clauses   : 205
% 0.18/0.50  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13187
% 0.18/0.50  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3659
% 0.18/0.50  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 20
% 0.18/0.50  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 56
% 0.18/0.50  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.18/0.50  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.18/0.50  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.18/0.50  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.18/0.50  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.18/0.50  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 21231
% 0.18/0.50  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 4339
% 0.18/0.50  
% 0.18/0.50  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.50  % User time                : 0.044 s
% 0.18/0.50  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.50  % Total time               : 0.047 s
% 0.18/0.50  % Maximum resident set size: 4220 pages
% 0.18/0.50  
% 0.18/0.50  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.50  % User time                : 0.205 s
% 0.18/0.50  % System time              : 0.028 s
% 0.18/0.50  % Total time               : 0.233 s
% 0.18/0.50  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.18/0.50  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------