↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWC379+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:03:41 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.68s 1.89s
% Output   : Refutation 1.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SWC379+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 20:38:01 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.68/1.89  
% 1.68/1.89  SPASS V 3.9 
% 1.68/1.89  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 1.68/1.89  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.68/1.89  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 1.68/1.89  SPASS derived 3662 clauses, backtracked 835 clauses, performed 64 splits and kept 2648 clauses.
% 1.68/1.89  SPASS allocated 102587 KBytes.
% 1.68/1.89  SPASS spent	0:00:01.47 on the problem.
% 1.68/1.89  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 1.68/1.89  		0:00:00.07 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 1.68/1.89  		0:00:00.03 for inferences.
% 1.68/1.89  		0:00:00.03 for the backtracking.
% 1.68/1.89  		0:00:01.12 for the reduction.
% 1.68/1.89  
% 1.68/1.89  
% 1.68/1.89  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 88 :
% 1.68/1.89  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.68/1.89  1[0:Inp] ||  -> ssItem(skc9)*.
% 1.68/1.89  2[0:Inp] ||  -> ssItem(skc8)*.
% 1.68/1.89  3[0:Inp] ||  -> ssList(skc7)*.
% 1.68/1.89  4[0:Inp] ||  -> ssList(skc6)*.
% 1.68/1.89  15[0:Inp] ||  -> ssItem(skf44(u))*.
% 1.68/1.89  61[0:Inp] ||  -> memberP(skc6,skc8) memberP(skc7,skc8)*.
% 1.68/1.89  70[0:Inp] ssItem(u) || memberP(nil,u)* -> .
% 1.68/1.89  85[0:Inp] ssItem(u) || memberP(skc6,u) -> memberP(skc7,u)*.
% 1.68/1.89  97[0:Inp] || memberP(skc6,skc8) memberP(skc7,skc8) -> memberP(skc7,skc9)*.
% 1.68/1.89  98[0:Inp] || memberP(skc6,skc8) memberP(skc7,skc8) -> leq(skc9,skc8)*.
% 1.68/1.89  106[0:Inp] || memberP(skc6,skc8) memberP(skc7,skc8)* equal(skc9,skc8) -> .
% 1.68/1.89  121[0:Inp] ssItem(u) || memberP(skc7,u) -> memberP(skc6,u) memberP(skc7,skf44(u))*.
% 1.68/1.89  122[0:Inp] ssItem(u) || memberP(skc7,u) -> memberP(skc6,u) leq(skf44(u),u)*.
% 1.68/1.89  131[0:Inp] ssItem(u) || memberP(skc7,u)* equal(skf44(u),u) -> memberP(skc6,u).
% 1.68/1.89  140[0:Inp] ssItem(u) || leq(u,skc8)* memberP(skc7,u) -> equal(skc8,u) memberP(skc6,skc8).
% 1.68/1.89  158[0:Inp] ssList(u) ssItem(v) || strictorderedP(cons(v,u))* -> lt(v,hd(u)) equal(nil,u).
% 1.68/1.89  185[0:Inp] ssItem(u) ssItem(v) || leq(v,u)* memberP(skc7,v) memberP(skc6,u) -> equal(u,v).
% 1.68/1.89  313[0:Res:4.0,158.1] ssItem(u) || strictorderedP(cons(u,skc6))* -> lt(u,hd(skc6)) equal(skc6,nil).
% 1.68/1.89  484[0:Res:3.0,158.1] ssItem(u) || strictorderedP(cons(u,skc7))* -> lt(u,hd(skc7)) equal(skc7,nil).
% 1.68/1.89  557[1:Spt:484.3] ||  -> equal(skc7,nil)**.
% 1.68/1.89  561[1:Rew:557.0,97.1] || memberP(skc6,skc8) memberP(nil,skc8) -> memberP(skc7,skc9)*.
% 1.68/1.89  563[1:Rew:557.0,61.1] ||  -> memberP(skc6,skc8)* memberP(nil,skc8).
% 1.68/1.89  570[1:Rew:557.0,85.2] ssItem(u) || memberP(skc6,u)* -> memberP(nil,u).
% 1.68/1.89  738[1:MRR:570.2,70.1] ssItem(u) || memberP(skc6,u)* -> .
% 1.68/1.89  743[1:Rew:557.0,561.2] || memberP(skc6,skc8)* memberP(nil,skc8) -> memberP(nil,skc9).
% 1.68/1.89  828[2:Spt:313.3] ||  -> equal(skc6,nil)**.
% 1.68/1.89  976[2:Rew:828.0,743.0] || memberP(nil,skc8) memberP(nil,skc8) -> memberP(nil,skc9)*.
% 1.68/1.89  977[2:Rew:828.0,563.0] ||  -> memberP(nil,skc8)* memberP(nil,skc8)*.
% 1.68/1.89  980[2:Obv:977.0] ||  -> memberP(nil,skc8)*.
% 1.68/1.89  1010[2:Obv:976.0] || memberP(nil,skc8) -> memberP(nil,skc9)*.
% 1.68/1.89  1011[2:MRR:1010.0,980.0] ||  -> memberP(nil,skc9)*.
% 1.68/1.89  1077[2:Res:1011.0,70.1] ssItem(skc9) ||  -> .
% 1.68/1.89  1079[2:SSi:1077.0,1.0] ||  -> .
% 1.68/1.89  1080[2:Spt:1079.0,313.3,828.0] || equal(skc6,nil)** -> .
% 1.68/1.89  1081[2:Spt:1079.0,313.0,313.1,313.2] ssItem(u) || strictorderedP(cons(u,skc6))* -> lt(u,hd(skc6)).
% 1.68/1.89  1106[3:Spt:563.0] ||  -> memberP(skc6,skc8)*.
% 1.68/1.89  1113[3:Res:1106.0,738.1] ssItem(skc8) ||  -> .
% 1.68/1.89  1114[3:SSi:1113.0,2.0] ||  -> .
% 1.68/1.89  1115[3:Spt:1114.0,563.0,1106.0] || memberP(skc6,skc8)* -> .
% 1.68/1.89  1116[3:Spt:1114.0,563.1] ||  -> memberP(nil,skc8)*.
% 1.68/1.89  1117[3:Res:1116.0,70.1] ssItem(skc8) ||  -> .
% 1.68/1.89  1118[3:SSi:1117.0,2.0] ||  -> .
% 1.68/1.89  1119[1:Spt:1118.0,484.3,557.0] || equal(skc7,nil)** -> .
% 1.68/1.89  1120[1:Spt:1118.0,484.0,484.1,484.2] ssItem(u) || strictorderedP(cons(u,skc7))* -> lt(u,hd(skc7)).
% 1.68/1.89  1906[2:Spt:140.0,140.1,140.2,140.3] ssItem(u) || leq(u,skc8)* memberP(skc7,u) -> equal(skc8,u).
% 1.68/1.89  1908[3:Spt:61.0] ||  -> memberP(skc6,skc8)*.
% 1.68/1.89  1909[3:MRR:98.0,1908.0] || memberP(skc7,skc8) -> leq(skc9,skc8)*.
% 1.68/1.89  1910[3:MRR:97.0,1908.0] || memberP(skc7,skc8) -> memberP(skc7,skc9)*.
% 1.68/1.89  1911[3:MRR:106.0,1908.0] || memberP(skc7,skc8)* equal(skc9,skc8) -> .
% 1.68/1.89  1937[4:Spt:1909.0] || memberP(skc7,skc8)* -> .
% 1.68/1.89  1957[4:Res:85.2,1937.0] ssItem(skc8) || memberP(skc6,skc8)* -> .
% 1.68/1.89  1958[4:SSi:1957.0,2.0] || memberP(skc6,skc8)* -> .
% 1.68/1.89  1959[4:MRR:1958.0,1908.0] ||  -> .
% 1.68/1.89  1960[4:Spt:1959.0,1909.0,1937.0] ||  -> memberP(skc7,skc8)*.
% 1.68/1.89  1961[4:Spt:1959.0,1909.1] ||  -> leq(skc9,skc8)*.
% 1.68/1.89  1962[4:MRR:1910.0,1960.0] ||  -> memberP(skc7,skc9)*.
% 1.68/1.89  1963[4:MRR:1911.0,1960.0] || equal(skc9,skc8)** -> .
% 1.68/1.89  1964[4:Res:1961.0,1906.1] ssItem(skc9) || memberP(skc7,skc9)* -> equal(skc9,skc8).
% 1.68/1.89  1965[4:SSi:1964.0,1.0] || memberP(skc7,skc9)* -> equal(skc9,skc8).
% 1.68/1.89  1966[4:MRR:1965.0,1965.1,1962.0,1963.0] ||  -> .
% 1.68/1.89  1967[3:Spt:1966.0,61.0,1908.0] || memberP(skc6,skc8)* -> .
% 1.68/1.89  1968[3:Spt:1966.0,61.1] ||  -> memberP(skc7,skc8)*.
% 1.68/1.89  2764[2:Res:122.3,1906.1] ssItem(skc8) ssItem(skf44(skc8)) || memberP(skc7,skc8) memberP(skc7,skf44(skc8))* -> memberP(skc6,skc8) equal(skf44(skc8),skc8).
% 1.68/1.89  2765[2:SSi:2764.1,2764.0,15.0,2.0,2.0] || memberP(skc7,skc8) memberP(skc7,skf44(skc8))* -> memberP(skc6,skc8) equal(skf44(skc8),skc8).
% 1.68/1.89  2766[3:MRR:2765.0,2765.2,1968.0,1967.0] || memberP(skc7,skf44(skc8))* -> equal(skf44(skc8),skc8).
% 1.68/1.89  2768[3:Res:121.3,2766.0] ssItem(skc8) || memberP(skc7,skc8)* -> memberP(skc6,skc8) equal(skf44(skc8),skc8).
% 1.68/1.89  2770[3:SSi:2768.0,2.0] || memberP(skc7,skc8)* -> memberP(skc6,skc8) equal(skf44(skc8),skc8).
% 1.68/1.89  2771[3:MRR:2770.0,2770.1,1968.0,1967.0] ||  -> equal(skf44(skc8),skc8)**.
% 1.68/1.89  2909[3:Res:1968.0,131.1] ssItem(skc8) || equal(skf44(skc8),skc8) -> memberP(skc6,skc8)*.
% 1.68/1.89  2911[3:Rew:2771.0,2909.1] ssItem(skc8) || equal(skc8,skc8) -> memberP(skc6,skc8)*.
% 1.68/1.89  2912[3:Obv:2911.1] ssItem(skc8) ||  -> memberP(skc6,skc8)*.
% 1.68/1.89  2913[3:SSi:2912.0,2.0] ||  -> memberP(skc6,skc8)*.
% 1.68/1.89  2914[3:MRR:2913.0,1967.0] ||  -> .
% 1.68/1.89  2916[2:Spt:2914.0,140.4] ||  -> memberP(skc6,skc8)*.
% 1.68/1.89  2917[2:MRR:97.0,2916.0] || memberP(skc7,skc8) -> memberP(skc7,skc9)*.
% 1.68/1.89  2918[2:MRR:98.0,2916.0] || memberP(skc7,skc8) -> leq(skc9,skc8)*.
% 1.68/1.89  2919[2:MRR:106.0,2916.0] || memberP(skc7,skc8)* equal(skc9,skc8) -> .
% 1.68/1.89  2972[3:Spt:2917.0] || memberP(skc7,skc8)* -> .
% 1.68/1.89  2973[3:Res:85.2,2972.0] ssItem(skc8) || memberP(skc6,skc8)* -> .
% 1.68/1.89  2974[3:SSi:2973.0,2.0] || memberP(skc6,skc8)* -> .
% 1.68/1.89  2975[3:MRR:2974.0,2916.0] ||  -> .
% 1.68/1.89  2976[3:Spt:2975.0,2917.0,2972.0] ||  -> memberP(skc7,skc8)*.
% 1.68/1.89  2977[3:Spt:2975.0,2917.1] ||  -> memberP(skc7,skc9)*.
% 1.68/1.89  2978[3:MRR:2918.0,2976.0] ||  -> leq(skc9,skc8)*.
% 1.68/1.89  2979[3:MRR:2919.0,2976.0] || equal(skc9,skc8)** -> .
% 1.68/1.89  5554[3:Res:2978.0,185.2] ssItem(skc8) ssItem(skc9) || memberP(skc7,skc9)* memberP(skc6,skc8) -> equal(skc9,skc8).
% 1.68/1.89  5560[3:SSi:5554.1,5554.0,1.0,2.0] || memberP(skc7,skc9)* memberP(skc6,skc8) -> equal(skc9,skc8).
% 1.68/1.89  5561[3:MRR:5560.0,5560.1,5560.2,2977.0,2916.0,2979.0] ||  -> .
% 1.68/1.89  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.68/1.89  Formulae used in the proof : co1 ax2 ax38 ax70
% 1.68/1.89  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------