↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SWC381+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:05:48 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.26s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  12 unt;   5 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  145 (  27 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   15 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  173 (  71   ~;  59   |;  28   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   6 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   0 sgn  16   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( X1 != X3
                    | X0 != X2
                    | ( ( ~ neq(X1,nil)
                        | ? [X4] :
                            ( ssItem(X4)
                            & cons(X4,nil) = X0
                            & memberP(X1,X4) )
                        | ! [X5] :
                            ( ssItem(X5)
                           => ( cons(X5,nil) != X2
                              | ~ memberP(X3,X5) ) ) )
                      & ( ~ neq(X1,nil)
                        | neq(X3,nil) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( X1 != X3
                      | X0 != X2
                      | ( ( ~ neq(X1,nil)
                          | ? [X4] :
                              ( ssItem(X4)
                              & cons(X4,nil) = X0
                              & memberP(X1,X4) )
                          | ! [X5] :
                              ( ssItem(X5)
                             => ( cons(X5,nil) != X2
                                | ~ memberP(X3,X5) ) ) )
                        & ( ~ neq(X1,nil)
                          | neq(X3,nil) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f96]) ).

fof(f221,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( X1 = X3
                  & X0 = X2
                  & ( ( neq(X1,nil)
                      & ! [X4] :
                          ( ~ ssItem(X4)
                          | cons(X4,nil) != X0
                          | ~ memberP(X1,X4) )
                      & ? [X5] :
                          ( cons(X5,nil) = X2
                          & memberP(X3,X5)
                          & ssItem(X5) ) )
                    | ( neq(X1,nil)
                      & ~ neq(X3,nil) ) )
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f222,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( X1 = X3
                  & X0 = X2
                  & ( ( neq(X1,nil)
                      & ! [X4] :
                          ( ~ ssItem(X4)
                          | cons(X4,nil) != X0
                          | ~ memberP(X1,X4) )
                      & ? [X5] :
                          ( cons(X5,nil) = X2
                          & memberP(X3,X5)
                          & ssItem(X5) ) )
                    | ( neq(X1,nil)
                      & ~ neq(X3,nil) ) )
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f221]) ).

fof(f411,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ~ neq(sK50,nil)
      | ~ memberP(sK48,X4)
      | cons(X4,nil) != sK47
      | ~ ssItem(X4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f222]) ).

fof(f413,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK50,nil)
    | ssItem(sK51) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f222]) ).

fof(f414,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK50,nil)
    | memberP(sK50,sK51) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f222]) ).

fof(f415,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sK50,nil)
    | sK49 = cons(sK51,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f222]) ).

fof(f419,plain,
    neq(sK48,nil),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f222]) ).

fof(f422,plain,
    sK47 = sK49,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f222]) ).

fof(f423,plain,
    sK48 = sK50,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f222]) ).

fof(f430,plain,
    neq(sK50,nil),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f419,f423]) ).

fof(f435,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ~ neq(sK50,nil)
      | ~ memberP(sK50,X4)
      | cons(X4,nil) != sK49
      | ~ ssItem(X4) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f411,f423,f422]) ).

fof(f469,definition,
    ( spl52_1
  <=> ! [X4] :
        ( ~ memberP(sK50,X4)
        | ~ ssItem(X4)
        | cons(X4,nil) != sK49 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl52_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f470,plain,
    ( ! [X4] :
        ( ~ memberP(sK50,X4)
        | ~ ssItem(X4)
        | cons(X4,nil) != sK49 )
    | ~ spl52_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f469]) ).

fof(f472,definition,
    ( spl52_2
  <=> neq(sK50,nil) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl52_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f475,plain,
    ( spl52_1
    | ~ spl52_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f435,f472,f469]) ).

fof(f478,definition,
    ( spl52_3
  <=> ssItem(sK51) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl52_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f480,plain,
    ( ssItem(sK51)
    | ~ spl52_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f478]) ).

fof(f481,plain,
    ( spl52_3
    | ~ spl52_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f413,f472,f478]) ).

fof(f483,definition,
    ( spl52_4
  <=> memberP(sK50,sK51) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl52_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f485,plain,
    ( memberP(sK50,sK51)
    | ~ spl52_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f483]) ).

fof(f486,plain,
    ( spl52_4
    | ~ spl52_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f414,f472,f483]) ).

fof(f488,definition,
    ( spl52_5
  <=> sK49 = cons(sK51,nil) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl52_5])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f490,plain,
    ( sK49 = cons(sK51,nil)
    | ~ spl52_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f488]) ).

fof(f491,plain,
    ( spl52_5
    | ~ spl52_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f415,f472,f488]) ).

fof(f495,plain,
    spl52_2,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f430,f472]) ).

fof(f528,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(sK51)
    | sK49 != cons(sK51,nil)
    | ~ spl52_1
    | ~ spl52_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f470,f485]) ).

fof(f529,plain,
    ( sK49 != cons(sK51,nil)
    | ~ spl52_1
    | ~ spl52_3
    | ~ spl52_4 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f528,f480]) ).

fof(f530,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl52_1
    | ~ spl52_3
    | ~ spl52_4
    | ~ spl52_5 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f529,f490]) ).

fof(f531,plain,
    ( ~ spl52_1
    | ~ spl52_3
    | ~ spl52_4
    | ~ spl52_5 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f530]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( spl52_1
    | ~ spl52_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f475]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ( ~ spl52_2
    | spl52_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f481]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    ( ~ spl52_2
    | spl52_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f486]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    ( ~ spl52_2
    | spl52_5 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f491]) ).

cnf(s9,plain,
    spl52_2,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f495]) ).

cnf(s18,plain,
    ( ~ spl52_1
    | ~ spl52_3
    | ~ spl52_4
    | ~ spl52_5 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f531]) ).

cnf(s22,plain,
    spl52_5,
    inference(rat,[],[s5,s9]) ).

cnf(s23,plain,
    spl52_4,
    inference(rat,[],[s4,s9]) ).

cnf(s24,plain,
    spl52_3,
    inference(rat,[],[s3,s9]) ).

cnf(s25,plain,
    ~ spl52_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s18,s22,s23,s24]) ).

cnf(s26,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s9,s25]) ).

fof(f532,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s26]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWC381+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.08/0.18  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 09:22:22 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.18  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.08/0.21  Running first-order model finding
% 0.08/0.21  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.26  % (227063)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.19/0.26  % (227072)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=1862552363:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.19/0.26  % (227069)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.19/0.26  % (227072) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-227063-227072"...
% 0.19/0.26  % (227072)...printing done.
% 0.19/0.26  % (227071)dis+10_1_sil=32000:sp=arity:random_seed=1406273778:i=103:fgj=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/103Mi)
% 0.19/0.26  % (227068)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=855274871_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/0Mi)
% 0.19/0.26  % (227069)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=176115732:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/135531Mi)
% 0.19/0.26  % (227072)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.26  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.26  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.27  % (227072)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.27  % (227072)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.19/0.27  % (227072)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.19/0.27  % (227072)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.19/0.27  % (227072)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.27  % (227072)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.27  % (227072)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.19/0.27  % (227072)Instructions burned: 18 (million)
% 0.19/0.27  % (227063)Success in time 0.043 s
% 0.19/0.27  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------