↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWC384-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:44:11 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.29s 0.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   59 (  21 unt;  14 nHn;  59 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  126 (  39 equ;  67 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause98,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,X2) != nil ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause98) ).

cnf(clause115,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause115) ).

cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sk2,nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).

cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

cnf(co1_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk4
    | cons(sk5,nil) = sk3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_12) ).

cnf(clause8,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause8) ).

cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk4
    | ssItem(sk5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).

cnf(clause116,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,nil) != X2
    | singletonP(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause116) ).

cnf(co1_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1)
    | ~ singletonP(sk1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_22) ).

cnf(co1_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | cons(sk5,nil) = sk3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_18) ).

cnf(co1_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | ssItem(sk5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_9) ).

cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

cnf(co1_3,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_3) ).

cnf(clause172,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ segmentP(X1,X2)
    | segmentP(app(app(X4,X1),X3),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause172) ).

cnf(co1_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | app(app(sk6,sk3),sk7) = sk4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_19) ).

cnf(co1_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | ssList(sk6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_16) ).

cnf(co1_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | ssList(sk7) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_17) ).

cnf(clause57,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | segmentP(X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause57) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,X2) != nil ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause98]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause115]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sk2,nil),
    co1_7 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    co1_5 ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,X2) != nil ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk4
    | cons(sk5,nil) = sk3 ),
    co1_12 ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    clause8 ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk4
    | ssItem(sk5) ),
    co1_8 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sk4,nil),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( sk3 != nil
    | sk4 = nil ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,nil) != X2
    | singletonP(X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause116]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ neq(X1,X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( sk3 != nil
    | neq(nil,nil) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1)
    | ~ singletonP(sk1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,nil) != X2
    | singletonP(X2) ),
    c_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | cons(sk5,nil) = sk3 ),
    co1_18 ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    sk3 != nil,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | ssItem(sk5) ),
    co1_9 ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1)
    | ~ singletonP(sk1) ),
    c_0_32 ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    co1_6 ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(cons(X1,nil))
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | singletonP(cons(X1,nil)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    cons(sk5,nil) = sk3,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(sk5),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk3),
    co1_3 ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ segmentP(X1,X2)
    | segmentP(app(app(X4,X1),X3),X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause172]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | app(app(sk6,sk3),sk7) = sk4 ),
    co1_19 ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | ssList(sk6) ),
    co1_16 ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | ssList(sk7) ),
    co1_17 ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ singletonP(sk3)
    | ~ segmentP(sk4,sk3) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_21]),c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    singletonP(sk3),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_41]),c_0_42])]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ segmentP(X1,X2)
    | segmentP(app(app(X4,X1),X3),X2) ),
    c_0_43 ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    app(app(sk6,sk3),sk7) = sk4,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk6),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk7),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    ~ segmentP(sk4,sk3),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48])]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ segmentP(sk3,X1)
    | segmentP(sk4,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]),c_0_51]),c_0_52]),c_0_42])]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | segmentP(X1,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause57]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    ~ segmentP(sk3,sk3),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]),c_0_42])]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | segmentP(X1,X1) ),
    c_0_55 ).

cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57]),c_0_42])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SWC384-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.47  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.47  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.47  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.47  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.47  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.47  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.48  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.48  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:20:27 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.48  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.48  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.22/0.55  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.55  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.29/0.64  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.29/0.64  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/0.64  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.29/0.64  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.29/0.64  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.64  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.64  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.64  % new_bool_1 with pid 1443608 completed with status 0
% 0.29/0.64  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.29/0.64  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/0.64  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.29/0.64  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.29/0.64  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.64  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.64  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.29/0.64  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.29/0.64  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.29/0.64  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.29/0.64  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.64  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1443611 completed with status 0
% 0.29/0.64  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.29/0.64  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/0.64  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.29/0.64  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.29/0.64  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.64  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.64  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.29/0.64  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.29/0.64  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.29/0.64  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.29/0.64  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.64  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.29/0.64  
% 0.29/0.64  % Proof found!
% 0.29/0.64  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.29/0.64  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.29/0.64  % Parsed axioms                        : 207
% 0.29/0.64  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 135
% 0.29/0.64  % Initial clauses                      : 72
% 0.29/0.64  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.29/0.64  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 72
% 0.29/0.64  % Processed clauses                    : 222
% 0.29/0.64  % ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.29/0.64  % ...subsumed                          : 65
% 0.29/0.64  % ...remaining for further processing  : 154
% 0.29/0.64  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 14
% 0.29/0.64  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.29/0.64  % Backward-subsumed                    : 19
% 0.29/0.64  % Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.29/0.64  % Generated clauses                    : 575
% 0.29/0.64  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 412
% 0.29/0.64  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.29/0.64  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.29/0.64  % Paramodulations                      : 553
% 0.29/0.64  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.29/0.64  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.29/0.64  % Equation resolutions                 : 18
% 0.29/0.64  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.29/0.64  % Total rewrite steps                  : 627
% 0.29/0.64  % ...of those cached                   : 608
% 0.29/0.64  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.29/0.64  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.29/0.64  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.29/0.64  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.29/0.64  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.29/0.64  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.29/0.64  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.29/0.64  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.29/0.64  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.29/0.64  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.29/0.64  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.29/0.64  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.29/0.64  % Current number of processed clauses  : 117
% 0.29/0.64  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 23
% 0.29/0.64  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.29/0.64  %    Negative unit clauses             : 9
% 0.29/0.64  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 85
% 0.29/0.64  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 234
% 0.29/0.64  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1122
% 0.29/0.64  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.29/0.64  % Current number of archived clauses   : 28
% 0.29/0.64  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1686
% 0.29/0.64  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 615
% 0.29/0.64  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 63
% 0.29/0.64  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 205
% 0.29/0.64  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.29/0.64  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 9
% 0.29/0.64  % BW rewrite match successes           : 9
% 0.29/0.64  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.29/0.64  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.29/0.64  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 13316
% 0.29/0.64  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 890
% 0.29/0.64  
% 0.29/0.64  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.64  % User time                : 0.030 s
% 0.29/0.64  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.29/0.64  % Total time               : 0.034 s
% 0.29/0.64  % Maximum resident set size: 4072 pages
% 0.29/0.64  
% 0.29/0.64  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.64  % User time                : 0.037 s
% 0.29/0.64  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.29/0.64  % Total time               : 0.048 s
% 0.29/0.64  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.29/0.64  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------