↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SWC385+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:19:26 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.28s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   50 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   56 (  20   ~;  15   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0 sgn   8   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( ssList(X4)
                 => ( X2 != X4
                    | X1 != X3
                    | ~ neq(X2,nil)
                    | ~ segmentP(X4,X3)
                    | ( ~ singletonP(X3)
                      & neq(X4,nil) )
                    | ( singletonP(X1)
                      & segmentP(X2,X1) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( X2 != X4
                      | X1 != X3
                      | ~ neq(X2,nil)
                      | ~ segmentP(X4,X3)
                      | ( ~ singletonP(X3)
                        & neq(X4,nil) )
                      | ( singletonP(X1)
                        & segmentP(X2,X1) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1])]) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssList(esk48_0)
    & ssList(esk49_0)
    & ssList(esk50_0)
    & ssList(esk51_0)
    & esk49_0 = esk51_0
    & esk48_0 = esk50_0
    & neq(esk49_0,nil)
    & segmentP(esk51_0,esk50_0)
    & ( singletonP(esk50_0)
      | ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) )
    & ( ~ singletonP(esk48_0)
      | ~ segmentP(esk49_0,esk48_0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ singletonP(esk48_0)
    | ~ segmentP(esk49_0,esk48_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    esk49_0 = esk51_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    segmentP(esk51_0,esk50_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    esk48_0 = esk50_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    neq(esk49_0,nil),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ segmentP(esk51_0,esk48_0)
    | ~ singletonP(esk48_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    segmentP(esk51_0,esk48_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( singletonP(esk50_0)
    | ~ neq(esk51_0,nil) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    neq(esk51_0,nil),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ singletonP(esk48_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_6]),c_0_11])]),c_0_12]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SWC385+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.32  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 04:48:25 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.28/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.28/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.28/1.72  % Total time : 1.372s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------