↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SWC386+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:03:45 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.35s 1.05s
% Output   : Refutation 3.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  166 (  71 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  199 (  73   ~;  66   |;  45   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (  29   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ( neq(X0,X1)
          <=> X0 != X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax15) ).

fof(f38,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssItem(X0)
     => ~ memberP(nil,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax38) ).

fof(f96,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ssList(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ssList(X1)
         => ! [X2] :
              ( ssList(X2)
             => ! [X3] :
                  ( ssList(X3)
                 => ( X1 != X3
                    | X0 != X2
                    | ( ! [X4] :
                          ( ssItem(X4)
                         => ( cons(X4,nil) != X2
                            | ~ memberP(X3,X4) ) )
                      & ( nil != X3
                        | nil != X2 ) )
                    | ( ( nil != X1
                        | nil = X0 )
                      & ( ~ neq(X1,nil)
                        | ? [X5] :
                            ( ssItem(X5)
                            & cons(X5,nil) = X0
                            & memberP(X1,X5) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(f97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ssList(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ssList(X1)
           => ! [X2] :
                ( ssList(X2)
               => ! [X3] :
                    ( ssList(X3)
                   => ( X1 != X3
                      | X0 != X2
                      | ( ! [X4] :
                            ( ssItem(X4)
                           => ( cons(X4,nil) != X2
                              | ~ memberP(X3,X4) ) )
                        & ( nil != X3
                          | nil != X2 ) )
                      | ( ( nil != X1
                          | nil = X0 )
                        & ( ~ neq(X1,nil)
                          | ? [X5] :
                              ( ssItem(X5)
                              & cons(X5,nil) = X0
                              & memberP(X1,X5) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f96]) ).

fof(f98,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( X1 = X3
                  & X0 = X2
                  & ( ? [X4] :
                        ( cons(X4,nil) = X2
                        & memberP(X3,X4)
                        & ssItem(X4) )
                    | ( nil = X3
                      & nil = X2 ) )
                  & ( ( nil = X1
                      & nil != X0 )
                    | ( neq(X1,nil)
                      & ! [X5] :
                          ( ~ ssItem(X5)
                          | cons(X5,nil) != X0
                          | ~ memberP(X1,X5) ) ) )
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] :
          ( ? [X2] :
              ( ? [X3] :
                  ( X1 = X3
                  & X0 = X2
                  & ( ? [X4] :
                        ( cons(X4,nil) = X2
                        & memberP(X3,X4)
                        & ssItem(X4) )
                    | ( nil = X3
                      & nil = X2 ) )
                  & ( ( nil = X1
                      & nil != X0 )
                    | ( neq(X1,nil)
                      & ! [X5] :
                          ( ~ ssItem(X5)
                          | cons(X5,nil) != X0
                          | ~ memberP(X1,X5) ) ) )
                  & ssList(X3) )
              & ssList(X2) )
          & ssList(X1) )
      & ssList(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f98]) ).

fof(f107,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( neq(X0,X1)
          <=> X0 != X1 )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f109,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ memberP(nil,X0)
      | ~ ssItem(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f124,plain,
    ( sK1 = sK3
    & sK0 = sK2
    & ( ( sK2 = cons(sK4,nil)
        & memberP(sK3,sK4)
        & ssItem(sK4) )
      | ( nil = sK3
        & nil = sK2 ) )
    & ( ( nil = sK1
        & nil != sK0 )
      | ( neq(sK1,nil)
        & ! [X5] :
            ( ~ ssItem(X5)
            | cons(X5,nil) != sK0
            | ~ memberP(sK1,X5) ) ) )
    & ssList(sK3)
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK1)
    & ssList(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2),skolemize(X3,sK3),skolemize(X4,sK4)],[f99]) ).

fof(f127,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( ( neq(X0,X1)
              | X0 = X1 )
            & ( X0 != X1
              | ~ neq(X0,X1) ) )
          | ~ ssList(X1) )
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f107]) ).

fof(f140,plain,
    ssList(sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f124]) ).

fof(f143,plain,
    ( nil != sK0
    | neq(sK1,nil) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f124]) ).

fof(f144,plain,
    ! [X5] :
      ( nil = sK1
      | ~ ssItem(X5)
      | cons(X5,nil) != sK0
      | ~ memberP(sK1,X5) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f124]) ).

fof(f146,plain,
    ( nil = sK2
    | ssItem(sK4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f124]) ).

fof(f147,plain,
    ( nil = sK3
    | ssItem(sK4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f124]) ).

fof(f148,plain,
    ( memberP(sK3,sK4)
    | nil = sK2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f124]) ).

fof(f149,plain,
    ( memberP(sK3,sK4)
    | nil = sK3 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f124]) ).

fof(f151,plain,
    ( sK2 = cons(sK4,nil)
    | nil = sK3 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f124]) ).

fof(f152,plain,
    sK0 = sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f124]) ).

fof(f153,plain,
    sK1 = sK3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f124]) ).

fof(f165,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 != X1
      | ~ neq(X0,X1)
      | ~ ssList(X1)
      | ~ ssList(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f127]) ).

fof(f170,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ memberP(nil,X0)
      | ~ ssItem(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f109]) ).

fof(f193,plain,
    ! [X5] :
      ( cons(X5,nil) != sK2
      | ~ ssItem(X5)
      | nil = sK3
      | ~ memberP(sK3,X5) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f144,f153,f152,f153]) ).

fof(f194,plain,
    ( nil != sK2
    | neq(sK3,nil) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f143,f152,f153]) ).

fof(f198,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ neq(X1,X1)
      | ~ ssList(X1)
      | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f165]) ).

fof(f207,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ neq(X1,X1)
      | ~ ssList(X1) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f198]) ).

fof(f228,plain,
    ( sK2 != sK2
    | ~ ssItem(sK4)
    | nil = sK3
    | ~ memberP(sK3,sK4)
    | nil = sK3 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f193,f151]) ).

fof(f231,plain,
    ( sK2 != sK2
    | ~ ssItem(sK4)
    | nil = sK3
    | ~ memberP(sK3,sK4) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f228]) ).

fof(f232,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(sK4)
    | nil = sK3
    | ~ memberP(sK3,sK4) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f231]) ).

fof(f234,plain,
    ( nil = sK3
    | ~ memberP(sK3,sK4) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f232,f147]) ).

fof(f236,plain,
    nil = sK3,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f234,f149]) ).

fof(f249,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ memberP(sK3,X0)
      | ~ ssItem(X0) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f170,f236]) ).

fof(f251,plain,
    ( ~ ssItem(sK4)
    | nil = sK2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f249,f148]) ).

fof(f253,plain,
    nil = sK2,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f251,f146]) ).

fof(f254,plain,
    sK2 = sK3,
    inference(superposition,[],[f253,f236]) ).

fof(f260,plain,
    ( sK2 != sK2
    | neq(sK3,sK2) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f194,f253]) ).

fof(f262,plain,
    neq(sK3,sK2),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f260]) ).

fof(f282,plain,
    neq(sK2,sK2),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f262,f254]) ).

fof(f283,plain,
    ~ ssList(sK2),
    inference(resolution,[],[f282,f207]) ).

fof(f285,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f283,f140]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWC386+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.21  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.21  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.21  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.21  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.21  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.21  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.21  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.21  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 09:30:18 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.21  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.21  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.24  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.24  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.35/1.05  % (242423)Detected formulas, will run a generic FOF schedule.
% 3.35/1.05  % (242434)dis-21_1_sil=8000:lcm=predicate:random_seed=3219881233:st=5:avsq=on:i=129:avsqr=1,16:sd=3:aac=none:ep=RS:fsr=off:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/129Mi)
% 3.35/1.05  % (242433)dis-1011_1_sil=16000:fde=unused:s2agt=70:random_seed=2107706121:s2a=on:i=139:gtg=position_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/139Mi)
% 3.35/1.05  % (242432)dis-1010_2:3_sil=16000:sp=reverse_frequency:random_seed=4020802454:i=119:av=off:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/119Mi)
% 3.35/1.05  % (242430)lrs+1010_1_anc=all:sfv=off:to=kbo:ncem=casc2026/models/loop7.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:prc=on:sos=all:bsr=unit_only:sac=on:random_seed=1849045337:i=141695:sd=1:nm=32:gsp=on:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141695Mi)
% 3.35/1.05  % (242429)lrs+11_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:lma=off:spb=units:urr=ec_only:bce=on:s2agt=64:updr=off:random_seed=50994121:i=134677:sd=20:aac=none:nm=16:ss=included:sgt=10_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/134677Mi)
% 3.35/1.05  % (242431)lrs+1010_1_to=lpo:sil=32000:sos=on:spb=goal_then_units:bce=on:random_seed=373743936:i=109:sd=1:ins=1:gsp=on:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/109Mi)
% 3.35/1.05  % (242428)lrs+10_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:tgt=full:npcc=on:drc=off:sp=weighted_frequency:spb=goal:fd=preordered:foolp=on:random_seed=2399967090:i=141193_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141193Mi)
% 3.35/1.05  % (242432)First to succeed.
% 3.35/1.05  % (242434)Instruction limit reached! 
% 3.35/1.05  % (242434)------------------------------
% 3.35/1.05  % (242434)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 3.35/1.05  % (242434)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 3.35/1.05  % (242434)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 3.35/1.05  % (242434)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 3.35/1.05  % (242434)Termination phase: Saturation
% 3.35/1.05  % (242434)Time elapsed: 0.041 s
% 3.35/1.05  % (242434)Peak memory usage: 91 MB
% 3.35/1.05  % (242434)Instructions burned: 132 (million)
% 3.35/1.05  % (242431)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.35/1.05  % (242432)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-242423"
% 3.35/1.05  % (242433)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.35/1.05  % (242442)lrs+10_1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:random_seed=860629653:i=285:sd=3:ss=axioms:sgt=8_2998 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/285Mi)
% 3.35/1.05  % (242442)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.35/1.05  % (242432)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 3.35/1.05  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 3.35/1.05  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 3.35/1.05  % (242432)------------------------------
% 3.35/1.05  % (242432)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 3.35/1.05  % (242432)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 3.35/1.05  % (242432)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 3.35/1.05  % (242432)Termination reason: Refutation
% 3.35/1.05  % (242432)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 3.35/1.05  % (242432)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 3.35/1.05  % (242432)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 3.35/1.05  % (242432)------------------------------
% 3.35/1.05  % (242432)------------------------------
% 3.35/1.05  % (242423)Success in time 0.409 s
% 3.35/1.05  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------