↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNK-Non.f

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWC387-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:00:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 0.72s 0.90s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SWC387-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 12 21:07:08 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.44  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.44  The process was started by sandbox2 on n009.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.44  Sun Jun 12 21:07:08 2022
% 0.21/0.44  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 28309.
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.44  set(auto).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.44  clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  list(usable).
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.21/0.44  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.21/0.44  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.21/0.44  clauses in usable.
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.21/0.44     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.21/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.21/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.21/0.44  143 back subsumes 142.
% 0.21/0.44  153 back subsumes 147.
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.44    Following clause subsumed by 432 during input processing: 0 [copy,432,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 340.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 284.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 283.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 282.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 272.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 259.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 258.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 257.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 220.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 208.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 207.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 206.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 205.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 188.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 185.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 183.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 179.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 176.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 153.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 152.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 151.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 150.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 149.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 141.
% 0.21/0.44  432 back subsumes 140.
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.50  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.50  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.50  number of clauses in intial UL: 336
% 0.21/0.50  number of clauses initially in problem: 399
% 0.21/0.50  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.21/0.50  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 95
% 0.21/0.50  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.50  absolute distinct symbol count: 74
% 0.21/0.50     distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.21/0.50     distinct function count: 46
% 0.21/0.50     distinct constant count: 8
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.72/0.89  
% 0.72/0.89  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.72/0.89  
% 0.72/0.89  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.72/0.89  
% 0.72/0.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.72/0.89  
% 0.72/0.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.72/0.89  
% 0.72/0.89  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.72/0.89  cons(skac2,app(sk1,nil))=app(cons(skac2,sk1),nil).
% 0.72/0.89  
% 0.72/0.89  ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.72/0.89  37 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 1181.5 K.
% 0.72/0.89    type (bytes each)        gets      frees     in use      avail      bytes
% 0.72/0.89  sym_ent ( 304)              181          0        181          0     53.7 K
% 0.72/0.89  term (  32)               77145      71938       5207          7    162.9 K
% 0.72/0.89  rel (  40)                56121      50541       5580          3    218.1 K
% 0.72/0.89  term_ptr (  16)           21954       1976      19978         51    313.0 K
% 0.72/0.89  formula_ptr_2 (  56)          0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 0.72/0.89  fpa_head (  24)            2156         63       2093          4     49.1 K
% 0.72/0.89  fpa_tree (  56)           12103      12103          0         20      1.1 K
% 0.72/0.89  context (1288)            16229      16229          0         11     13.8 K
% 0.72/0.89  trail (  24)              87495      87495          0          6      0.1 K
% 0.72/0.89  imd_tree (  32)              68         16         52          7      1.8 K
% 0.72/0.89  imd_pos (4024)                0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 0.72/0.89  is_tree (  24)             1529        122       1407         33     33.8 K
% 0.72/0.89  is_pos (2424)             54524      54524          0          6     14.2 K
% 0.72/0.89  fsub_pos (  16)            7480       7480          0          1      0.0 K
% 0.72/0.89  literal (  32)            17783      14493       3290          0    102.8 K
% 0.72/0.89  clause (  88)              3178       2334        844          0     72.5 K
% 0.72/0.89  list ( 272)                  10          3          7          1      2.1 K
% 0.72/0.89  clash_nd (  80)            6604       6604          0          9      0.7 K
% 0.72/0.89  clause_ptr (  16)           768        108        660          4     10.4 K
% 0.72/0.89  int_ptr (  16)             6426       3680       2746          0     42.9 K
% 0.72/0.89  ci_ptr (  24)                 0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 0.72/0.89  link_node ( 120)              0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 0.72/0.89  ans_lit_node(  24)            0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 0.72/0.89  formula_box( 168)             0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 0.72/0.89  formula(  40)                 0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 0.72/0.89  formula_ptr(  16)             0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 0.72/0.89  cl_attribute(  24)            0          0          0          0      0.0 K
% 0.72/0.89  
% 0.72/0.89  ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.72/0.89  time         0.00
% 0.72/0.89    print_cl time        0.00
% 0.72/0.89    conflict time        0.00
% 0.72/0.89    new demod time       0.00
% 0.72/0.89  post_process time      0.00
% 0.72/0.89    back demod time      0.00
% 0.72/0.89    back subsume         0.00
% 0.72/0.89    factor time          0.00
% 0.72/0.89  FINDER time            0.00
% 0.72/0.89    unindex time         0.00
% 0.72/0.89  
% 0.72/0.89  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.72/0.89  
% 0.72/0.89  true clauses given           1      (20.0%)
% 0.72/0.89  false clauses given          4
% 0.72/0.89  
% 0.72/0.89        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.72/0.89     2  1         6
% 0.72/0.89     3  35        9
% 0.72/0.89     4  10        5
% 0.72/0.89     5  0         2
% 0.72/0.89     6  2         2
% 0.72/0.89     7  0         11
% 0.72/0.89     8  0         1
% 0.72/0.89     9  1         10
% 0.72/0.89    11  0         19
% 0.72/0.89    12  0         16
% 0.72/0.89    13  0         14
% 0.72/0.89    14  0         4
% 0.72/0.89    15  0         13
% 0.72/0.89    16  0         7
% 0.72/0.89    17  0         7
% 0.72/0.89    19  0         3
% 0.72/0.89    21  0         9
% 0.72/0.89    22  0         5
% 0.72/0.89    23  0         3
% 0.72/0.89  tot:  49        146      (74.9% true)
% 0.72/0.89  
% 0.72/0.89  
% 0.72/0.89  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.72/0.89  
% 0.72/0.89  Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.72/0.89   1:0     2:0     3:2     4:0     5:11    6:0     7:4     8:0     9:6    10:47  
% 0.72/0.89  11:6    12:0    13:0    14:0    15:0    16:0    17:0    18:0    19:0    20:1   
% 0.72/0.89  21:0    22:0    23:1    24:1    25:0    26:0    27:0    28:0    29:0    30:0   
% 0.72/0.89  31:0    32:0    33:0    34:0    35:0    36:0    37:0    38:0    39:0    40:0   
% 0.72/0.89  41:0    42:0    43:0    44:0    45:0    46:0    47:0    48:0    49:0    50:0   
% 0.72/0.89  51:0    52:0    53:0    54:0    55:0    56:1    57:0    58:0    59:0    60:1   
% 0.72/0.89  61:0    62:0    63:0    64:0    65:0    66:0    67:1    68:0    69:0    70:0   
% 0.72/0.89  71:0    72:0    73:0    74:0    75:0    76:0    77:0    78:0    79:0    80:0   
% 0.72/0.89  81:0    82:0    83:0    84:0    85:0    86:0    87:0    88:0    89:0    90:0   
% 0.72/0.89  91:0    92:0    93:0    94:0    95:0    96:0    97:0    98:0    99:0    
% 0.72/0.89  All others: 493.
% 0.72/0.89  
% 0.72/0.89  ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.72/0.89  
% 0.72/0.89  ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------