↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWC389-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:44:12 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 5.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   19
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   66 (  17 unt;  22 nHn;  66 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  149 (  54 equ;  72 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause173,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | app(app(X1,X2),X3) != X4
    | segmentP(X4,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause173) ).

cnf(clause116,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,nil) != X2
    | singletonP(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause116) ).

cnf(co1_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ singletonP(sk1)
    | ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_22) ).

cnf(co1_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | app(app(sk6,sk3),sk7) = sk4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_18) ).

cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

cnf(co1_2,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_2) ).

cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

cnf(co1_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | ssList(sk6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_15) ).

cnf(co1_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | ssList(sk7) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_16) ).

cnf(co1_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | cons(sk5,nil) = sk3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_17) ).

cnf(co1_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | ssItem(sk5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_8) ).

cnf(clause98,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,X2) != nil ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause98) ).

cnf(co1_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk4
    | cons(sk5,nil) = sk3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_11) ).

cnf(co1_1,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).

cnf(clause79,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | nil != X1
    | segmentP(nil,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause79) ).

cnf(co1_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1)
    | neq(sk2,nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_21) ).

cnf(clause8,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause8) ).

cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk4
    | ssItem(sk5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).

cnf(clause115,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause115) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | app(app(X1,X2),X3) != X4
    | segmentP(X4,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause173]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,nil) != X2
    | singletonP(X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause116]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ singletonP(sk1)
    | ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X4)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | app(app(X1,X2),X3) != X4
    | segmentP(X4,X2) ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | app(app(sk6,sk3),sk7) = sk4 ),
    co1_18 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    co1_6 ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk2),
    co1_2 ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    co1_5 ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | ssList(sk6) ),
    co1_15 ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | ssList(sk7) ),
    co1_16 ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,nil) != X2
    | singletonP(X2) ),
    c_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | cons(sk5,nil) = sk3 ),
    co1_17 ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk3
    | ssItem(sk5) ),
    co1_8 ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,X2) != nil ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause98]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk4
    | cons(sk5,nil) = sk3 ),
    co1_11 ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ singletonP(sk1)
    | ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1) ),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(app(app(X1,X2),X3))
    | segmentP(app(app(X1,X2),X3),X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk1
    | app(app(sk6,sk1),sk7) = sk4 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk4),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk1),
    co1_1 ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssList(sk6)
    | nil = sk1 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssList(sk7)
    | nil = sk1 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(cons(X1,nil))
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | singletonP(cons(X1,nil)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk1
    | cons(sk5,nil) = sk1 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_24]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ( ssItem(sk5)
    | nil = sk1 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | nil != X1
    | segmentP(nil,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause79]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1)
    | neq(sk2,nil) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | cons(X1,X2) != nil ),
    c_0_32 ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk4
    | cons(sk5,nil) = sk1 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    clause8 ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil = sk4
    | ssItem(sk5) ),
    co1_7 ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ singletonP(sk1)
    | ~ segmentP(sk4,sk1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    ( segmentP(sk4,sk1)
    | nil = sk1 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37]),c_0_38])]),c_0_39]),c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    ( singletonP(sk1)
    | nil = sk1 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_38])]),c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | nil != X1
    | segmentP(nil,X1) ),
    c_0_44 ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause115]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ segmentP(sk2,sk1)
    | neq(sk2,nil) ),
    c_0_45 ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    ( nil != sk1
    | nil = sk4 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]),c_0_48])]),c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    nil = sk1,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]),c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    segmentP(nil,nil),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_53]),c_0_48])]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ neq(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    c_0_54 ).

cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ segmentP(sk4,sk1)
    | neq(sk4,nil) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_26]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    sk4 = sk1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57]),c_0_57])]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    segmentP(sk1,sk1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_57]),c_0_57]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ neq(X1,X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sk1,sk1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_57]),c_0_61]),c_0_61]),c_0_62])]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_64]),c_0_38])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWC389-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/5.42  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.16/5.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/5.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/5.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/5.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/5.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/5.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/5.42  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:21:11 UTC 2026
% 0.16/5.42  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/5.42  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/5.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/5.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/5.64  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.20/5.64  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/5.64  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/5.64  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/5.64  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.64  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.64  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.64  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 3628136 completed with status 0
% 0.20/5.64  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.20/5.64  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/5.64  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/5.64  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/5.64  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.20/5.64  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/5.64  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/5.64  % Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/5.64  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.64  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.64  % Starting G-E--_107_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q7_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.64  % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.64  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.64  % G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with pid 3628145 completed with status 0
% 0.20/5.64  % Result found by G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k
% 0.20/5.64  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/5.64  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/5.64  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/5.64  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.20/5.64  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/5.64  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/5.64  % Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/5.64  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.64  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.64  % Starting G-E--_107_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q7_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.64  % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/5.64  % Preprocessing time       : 0.006 s
% 0.20/5.64  
% 0.20/5.64  % Proof found!
% 0.20/5.64  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/5.64  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/5.64  % Parsed axioms                        : 207
% 0.20/5.64  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.20/5.64  % Initial clauses                      : 207
% 0.20/5.64  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/5.64  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 207
% 0.20/5.64  % Processed clauses                    : 268
% 0.20/5.64  % ...of these trivial                  : 9
% 0.20/5.64  % ...subsumed                          : 9
% 0.20/5.64  % ...remaining for further processing  : 250
% 0.20/5.64  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 58
% 0.20/5.64  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/5.64  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/5.64  % Backward-rewritten                   : 69
% 0.20/5.64  % Generated clauses                    : 624
% 0.20/5.64  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 571
% 0.20/5.64  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/5.64  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 17
% 0.20/5.64  % Paramodulations                      : 562
% 0.20/5.64  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/5.64  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/5.64  % Equation resolutions                 : 63
% 0.20/5.64  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/5.64  % Total rewrite steps                  : 524
% 0.20/5.64  % ...of those cached                   : 462
% 0.20/5.64  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/5.64  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/5.64  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/5.64  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/5.64  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/5.64  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/5.64  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/5.64  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/5.64  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/5.64  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/5.64  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/5.64  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/5.64  % Current number of processed clauses  : 158
% 0.20/5.64  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 61
% 0.20/5.64  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/5.64  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.20/5.64  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 95
% 0.20/5.64  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 508
% 0.20/5.64  % ...number of literals in the above   : 2499
% 0.20/5.64  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/5.64  % Current number of archived clauses   : 69
% 0.20/5.64  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5779
% 0.20/5.64  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 719
% 0.20/5.64  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 23
% 0.20/5.64  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 168
% 0.20/5.64  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/5.64  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.20/5.64  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.20/5.64  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/5.64  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/5.64  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 18998
% 0.20/5.64  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 551
% 0.20/5.64  
% 0.20/5.64  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/5.64  % User time                : 0.035 s
% 0.20/5.64  % System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.20/5.64  % Total time               : 0.045 s
% 0.20/5.64  % Maximum resident set size: 4072 pages
% 0.20/5.64  
% 0.20/5.64  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/5.64  % User time                : 0.228 s
% 0.20/5.64  % System time              : 0.036 s
% 0.20/5.64  % Total time               : 0.264 s
% 0.20/5.64  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.20/5.64  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------