↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SWC398+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:57:42 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 35.42s 5.70s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 35.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  128 (  40 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   19 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  150 (  45   ~;  40   |;  49   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  15  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   24 (   7 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (   0 sgn  24   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax36,axiom,
    ! [U] :
      ( ssItem(U)
     => ! [V] :
          ( ssList(V)
         => ! [W] :
              ( ssList(W)
             => ( memberP(app(V,W),U)
              <=> ( memberP(W,U)
                  | memberP(V,U) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax36) ).

fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [U] :
      ( ssList(U)
     => ! [V] :
          ( ssList(V)
         => ! [W] :
              ( ssList(W)
             => ! [X] :
                  ( ssList(X)
                 => ( ( nil = W
                      & nil != X )
                    | ! [X3] :
                        ( ssItem(X3)
                       => ( memberP(V,X3)
                          | ~ memberP(U,X3) ) )
                    | ! [Y] :
                        ( ssList(Y)
                       => ( ? [Z] :
                              ( ? [X1] :
                                  ( ? [X2] :
                                      ( app(X2,cons(Z,nil)) = W
                                      & ssList(X2) )
                                  & app(cons(Z,nil),X1) = Y
                                  & ssList(X1) )
                              & ssItem(Z) )
                          | ~ equalelemsP(W)
                          | app(W,Y) != X ) )
                    | U != W
                    | V != X ) ) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(co1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [U] :
        ( ssList(U)
       => ! [V] :
            ( ssList(V)
           => ! [W] :
                ( ssList(W)
               => ! [X] :
                    ( ssList(X)
                   => ( ( nil = W
                        & nil != X )
                      | ! [X3] :
                          ( ssItem(X3)
                         => ( memberP(V,X3)
                            | ~ memberP(U,X3) ) )
                      | ! [Y] :
                          ( ssList(Y)
                         => ( ? [Z] :
                                ( ? [X1] :
                                    ( ? [X2] :
                                        ( app(X2,cons(Z,nil)) = W
                                        & ssList(X2) )
                                    & app(cons(Z,nil),X1) = Y
                                    & ssList(X1) )
                                & ssItem(Z) )
                            | ~ equalelemsP(W)
                            | app(W,Y) != X ) )
                      | U != W
                      | V != X ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).

cnf(c_258,plain,
    ( ~ memberP(B,A)
    | memberP(app(B,C),A)
    | ~ ssList(C)
    | ~ ssList(B)
    | ~ ssItem(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax36]) ).

fof(nnf_87,plain,
    ? [U] :
      ( ? [V] :
          ( ? [W] :
              ( ? [X] :
                  ( ( nil != W
                    | nil = X )
                  & ? [X3] :
                      ( ~ memberP(V,X3)
                      & memberP(U,X3)
                      & ssItem(X3) )
                  & ? [Y] :
                      ( ! [Z] :
                          ( ! [X1] :
                              ( ! [X2] :
                                  ( app(X2,cons(Z,nil)) != W
                                  | ~ ssList(X2) )
                              | app(cons(Z,nil),X1) != Y
                              | ~ ssList(X1) )
                          | ~ ssItem(Z) )
                      & equalelemsP(W)
                      & app(W,Y) = X
                      & ssList(Y) )
                  & W = U
                  & X = V
                  & ssList(X) )
              & ssList(W) )
          & ssList(V) )
      & ssList(U) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[co1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_co1_neg_sk,plain,
    ( ( nil != sK3
      | nil = sK1 )
    & ~ memberP(sK2,sK5)
    & memberP(sK0,sK5)
    & ssItem(sK5)
    & ! [Z] :
        ( ! [X1] :
            ( ! [X2] :
                ( app(X2,cons(Z,nil)) != sK3
                | ~ ssList(X2) )
            | app(cons(Z,nil),X1) != sK4
            | ~ ssList(X1) )
        | ~ ssItem(Z) )
    & equalelemsP(sK3)
    & app(sK3,sK4) = sK1
    & ssList(sK4)
    & sK3 = sK0
    & sK1 = sK2
    & ssList(sK1)
    & ssList(sK3)
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK2,sK3,sK1,sK4,sK5]),skolemize(U,sK0),skolemize(V,sK2),skolemize(W,sK3),skolemize(X,sK1),skolemize(Y,sK4),skolemize(X3,sK5)],[nnf_87]) ).

fof(sk_co1_neg,plain,
    ( ( nil != sK3
      | nil = sK1 )
    & ~ memberP(sK2,sK5)
    & memberP(sK0,sK5)
    & ssItem(sK5)
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( app(VAR_2,cons(VAR_0,nil)) != sK3
        | ~ ssList(VAR_2)
        | app(cons(VAR_0,nil),VAR_1) != sK4
        | ~ ssList(VAR_1)
        | ~ ssItem(VAR_0) )
    & equalelemsP(sK3)
    & app(sK3,sK4) = sK1
    & ssList(sK4)
    & sK3 = sK0
    & sK1 = sK2
    & ssList(sK1)
    & ssList(sK3)
    & ssList(sK2)
    & ssList(sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg_sk]) ).

cnf(c_329,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_333,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 = sK2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_334,negated_conjecture,
    sK3 = sK0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_335,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sK4),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_336,negated_conjecture,
    app(sK3,sK4) = sK1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_3742,negated_conjecture,
    app(sK0,sK4) = sK1,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_334,c_336]) ).

cnf(c_337,negated_conjecture,
    app(sK0,sK4) = sK2,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_333,c_3742]) ).

cnf(c_340,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(sK5),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_341,negated_conjecture,
    memberP(sK0,sK5),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_342,negated_conjecture,
    ~ memberP(sK2,sK5),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_co1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_3743,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ memberP(A,sK5)
    | memberP(app(A,B),sK5)
    | ~ ssList(B)
    | ~ ssList(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_258,c_340]) ).

cnf(c_3744,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ memberP(sK0,sK5)
    | memberP(app(sK0,A),sK5)
    | ~ ssList(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_3743,c_329]) ).

cnf(c_3745,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ memberP(sK0,sK5)
    | memberP(app(sK0,sK4),sK5) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_3744,c_335]) ).

cnf(c_3746,negated_conjecture,
    memberP(app(sK0,sK4),sK5),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_3745,c_341]) ).

cnf(c_3747,negated_conjecture,
    memberP(sK2,sK5),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_337,c_3746]) ).

cnf(c_3741,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_342,c_3747]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWC398+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 12:58:02 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.38  % Process 3209981 was started by sandbox2 on n014,
% 0.10/0.38  % Sat Sep 26 12:58:02 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 35.42/5.70  
% 35.42/5.70  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 35.42/5.70  
% 35.42/5.70  % Proof 1 at 4.60 (+ 0.14) seconds.
% 35.42/5.70  % Length of proof is 13.
% 35.42/5.70  % Level of proof is 3.
% 35.42/5.70  % Maximum clause weight is 24.000.
% 35.42/5.70  % Given clauses 165.
% 35.42/5.70  
% 35.42/5.70  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------