↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWC405+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:44:17 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.26s 0.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   68 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   15 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   81 (  26   ~;  21   |;  19   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  15  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   0 sgn  16   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(co1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ssList(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ssList(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ssList(X3)
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( ssList(X4)
                 => ( ! [X6] :
                        ( ssItem(X6)
                       => ( memberP(X2,X6)
                          | ~ memberP(X1,X6) ) )
                    | ? [X5] :
                        ( ( ( memberP(X4,X5)
                            & ~ memberP(X3,X5) )
                          | ( memberP(X3,X5)
                            & ~ memberP(X4,X5) ) )
                        & ssItem(X5) )
                    | X1 != X3
                    | X2 != X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1) ).

fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( ! [X6] :
                          ( ssItem(X6)
                         => ( memberP(X2,X6)
                            | ~ memberP(X1,X6) ) )
                      | ? [X5] :
                          ( ( ( memberP(X4,X5)
                              & ~ memberP(X3,X5) )
                            | ( memberP(X3,X5)
                              & ~ memberP(X4,X5) ) )
                          & ssItem(X5) )
                      | X1 != X3
                      | X2 != X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co1]) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ssList(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ssList(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( ssList(X3)
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( ssList(X4)
                   => ( ! [X6] :
                          ( ssItem(X6)
                         => ( memberP(X2,X6)
                            | ~ memberP(X1,X6) ) )
                      | ? [X5] :
                          ( ( ( memberP(X4,X5)
                              & ~ memberP(X3,X5) )
                            | ( memberP(X3,X5)
                              & ~ memberP(X4,X5) ) )
                          & ssItem(X5) )
                      | X1 != X3
                      | X2 != X4 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X11] :
      ( ~ memberP(esk2_0,esk5_0)
      & memberP(esk1_0,esk5_0)
      & ssItem(esk5_0)
      & ( ~ ssItem(X11)
        | ~ memberP(esk4_0,X11)
        | memberP(esk3_0,X11) )
      & ( ~ ssItem(X11)
        | ~ memberP(esk3_0,X11)
        | memberP(esk4_0,X11) )
      & esk1_0 = esk3_0
      & esk2_0 = esk4_0
      & ssList(esk4_0)
      & ssList(esk3_0)
      & ssList(esk2_0)
      & ssList(esk1_0) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    memberP(esk1_0,esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 = esk3_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ memberP(esk2_0,esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = esk4_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ~ memberP(esk3_0,X1)
    | memberP(esk4_0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    memberP(esk3_0,esk5_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ memberP(esk4_0,esk5_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),c_0_11]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SWC405+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.42  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.43  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:21:48 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.43  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.50  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/0.58  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/0.58  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.58  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.58  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.58  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.58  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.58  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.58  % new_bool_3 with pid 3006334 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.26/0.58  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.58  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.58  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.58  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.58  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.26/0.58  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.26/0.58  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.58  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.58  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.58  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3006342 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.26/0.58  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.58  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.58  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.58  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.58  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.26/0.58  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.26/0.58  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.58  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.58  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.58  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.26/0.58  
% 0.26/0.58  % Proof found!
% 0.26/0.58  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/0.58  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.58  % Parsed axioms                        : 96
% 0.26/0.58  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 75
% 0.26/0.58  % Initial clauses                      : 45
% 0.26/0.58  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 45
% 0.26/0.58  % Processed clauses                    : 20
% 0.26/0.58  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % ...remaining for further processing  : 20
% 0.26/0.58  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.26/0.58  % Generated clauses                    : 2
% 0.26/0.58  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Paramodulations                      : 2
% 0.26/0.58  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Total rewrite steps                  : 7
% 0.26/0.58  % ...of those cached                   : 2
% 0.26/0.58  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.26/0.58  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.26/0.58  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.58  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.26/0.58  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.58  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.26/0.58  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.26/0.58  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.26/0.58  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.26/0.58  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.26/0.58  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.26/0.58  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.26/0.58  % Current number of processed clauses  : 18
% 0.26/0.58  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 9
% 0.26/0.58  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.58  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.26/0.58  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 7
% 0.26/0.58  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 25
% 0.26/0.58  % ...number of literals in the above   : 111
% 0.26/0.58  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.26/0.58  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3
% 0.26/0.58  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.26/0.58  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.26/0.58  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.26/0.58  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 4464
% 0.26/0.58  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1474
% 0.26/0.58  
% 0.26/0.58  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.58  % User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.26/0.58  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.26/0.58  % Total time               : 0.013 s
% 0.26/0.58  % Maximum resident set size: 3760 pages
% 0.26/0.58  
% 0.26/0.58  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.58  % User time                : 0.015 s
% 0.26/0.58  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.26/0.58  % Total time               : 0.026 s
% 0.26/0.58  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.26/0.58  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------