↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWC417-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:44:20 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.25s 0.66s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   45 (  18 unt;   1 nHn;  45 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   91 (  29 equ;  52 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( neq(sk2,nil)
    | neq(sk2,nil) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).

cnf(co1_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | app(app(X3,cons(X1,nil)),X2) != sk1
    | app(app(X2,cons(X1,nil)),X3) != sk2
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_14) ).

cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

cnf(co1_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | app(sk6,cons(sk5,nil)) = sk3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_18) ).

cnf(co1_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ssItem(sk5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_15) ).

cnf(co1_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ssList(sk6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_16) ).

cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

cnf(clause73,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(X1,nil) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause73) ).

cnf(co1_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | app(cons(sk5,nil),sk6) = sk4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_17) ).

cnf(clause8,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause8) ).

cnf(co1_1,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co1_1) ).

cnf(clause74,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(nil,X1) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause74) ).

cnf(clause86,axiom,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ssList(cons(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWC001-0.ax',clause86) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sk2,nil),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | app(app(X3,cons(X1,nil)),X2) != sk1
    | app(app(X2,cons(X1,nil)),X3) != sk2
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sk2,nil),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    co1_5 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | app(sk6,cons(sk5,nil)) = sk3 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ssItem(sk5) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ssList(sk6) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | app(app(X3,cons(X1,nil)),X2) != sk1
    | app(app(X2,cons(X1,nil)),X3) != sk2
    | ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sk4,nil),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | app(sk6,cons(sk5,nil)) = sk3 ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    co1_6 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ssItem(sk5) ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ssList(sk6) ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(X3)
    | ~ ssList(X1)
    | ~ ssItem(X2)
    | app(app(X3,cons(X2,nil)),X1) != sk4
    | app(app(X1,cons(X2,nil)),X3) != sk1 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_16]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    app(sk6,cons(sk5,nil)) = sk1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ssItem(sk5),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk6),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(X1,nil) = X1 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause73]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | app(cons(sk5,nil),sk6) = sk4 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[co1_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(sk1,X1) != sk1
    | app(app(X1,cons(sk5,nil)),sk6) != sk4 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(X1,nil) = X1 ),
    c_0_30 ).

cnf(c_0_34,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    clause8 ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ssList(sk1),
    co1_1 ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(nil,X1) = X1 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause74]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | app(cons(sk5,nil),sk6) = sk4 ),
    c_0_31 ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    app(app(nil,cons(sk5,nil)),sk6) != sk4,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]),c_0_35])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X1)
    | app(nil,X1) = X1 ),
    c_0_36 ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    app(cons(sk5,nil),sk6) = sk4,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ssList(cons(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause86]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ssList(cons(sk5,nil)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_40])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(X2)
    | ~ ssItem(X1)
    | ssList(cons(X1,X2)) ),
    c_0_41 ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]),c_0_28]),c_0_34])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWC417-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.44  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.44  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:18:26 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.45  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.55  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.55  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.66  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.25/0.66  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.66  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.66  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.66  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.66  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.66  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.66  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1880739 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.66  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.25/0.66  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.66  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.66  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.66  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.25/0.66  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.25/0.66  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.66  % Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.25/0.66  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.66  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.66  % Starting G-E--_107_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q7_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.66  % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.66  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.66  % G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with pid 1880749 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.66  % Result found by G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k
% 0.25/0.66  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.66  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.66  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.66  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.25/0.66  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.25/0.66  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.66  % Scheduled 10 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.25/0.66  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.66  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.66  % Starting G-E--_107_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q7_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.66  % Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.66  % Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 0.25/0.66  
% 0.25/0.66  % Proof found!
% 0.25/0.66  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.25/0.66  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/0.66  % Parsed axioms                        : 203
% 0.25/0.66  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.25/0.66  % Initial clauses                      : 203
% 0.25/0.66  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.25/0.66  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 203
% 0.25/0.66  % Processed clauses                    : 218
% 0.25/0.66  % ...of these trivial                  : 8
% 0.25/0.66  % ...subsumed                          : 6
% 0.25/0.66  % ...remaining for further processing  : 204
% 0.25/0.66  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 58
% 0.25/0.66  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.25/0.66  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.25/0.66  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.60/0.66  % Generated clauses                    : 406
% 0.60/0.66  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 319
% 0.60/0.66  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.60/0.66  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.60/0.66  % Paramodulations                      : 344
% 0.60/0.66  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.60/0.66  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.60/0.66  % Equation resolutions                 : 63
% 0.60/0.66  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.60/0.66  % Total rewrite steps                  : 306
% 0.60/0.66  % ...of those cached                   : 270
% 0.60/0.66  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.60/0.66  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.60/0.66  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.60/0.66  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.60/0.66  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.60/0.66  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.60/0.66  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.60/0.66  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.60/0.66  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.60/0.66  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.60/0.66  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.60/0.66  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.60/0.66  % Current number of processed clauses  : 181
% 0.60/0.66  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 64
% 0.60/0.66  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.60/0.66  %    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 0.60/0.66  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 111
% 0.60/0.66  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 304
% 0.60/0.66  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1477
% 0.60/0.66  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.60/0.66  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.60/0.66  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4421
% 0.60/0.66  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 572
% 0.60/0.66  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 0.60/0.66  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 134
% 0.60/0.66  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.60/0.66  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.60/0.66  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.60/0.66  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.60/0.66  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.60/0.66  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 14927
% 0.60/0.66  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 548
% 0.60/0.66  
% 0.60/0.66  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.66  % User time                : 0.039 s
% 0.60/0.66  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.60/0.66  % Total time               : 0.046 s
% 0.60/0.66  % Maximum resident set size: 3816 pages
% 0.60/0.66  
% 0.60/0.66  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.66  % User time                : 0.152 s
% 0.60/0.66  % System time              : 0.033 s
% 0.60/0.66  % Total time               : 0.185 s
% 0.60/0.66  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.60/0.66  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------