%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWC418-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 22:00:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 1.49s 1.71s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : SWC418-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 20:34:55 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.37 The process was started by sandbox on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.37 Sat Jun 11 20:34:55 2022
% 0.13/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 9454.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=12.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.37 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.37 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.37 clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssList(tl(A))|nil=A.
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ssList(A)|ssItem(hd(A))|nil=A.
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -leq(A,B)| -ssItem(B)| -ssItem(A)|lt(A,B)|A=B.
% 0.13/0.37 140 back subsumes 139.
% 0.13/0.37 150 back subsumes 144.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 435 during input processing: 0 [copy,435,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 342.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 285.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 284.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 283.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 273.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 260.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 259.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 258.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 217.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 205.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 204.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 203.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 202.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 185.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 182.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 180.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 176.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 173.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 150.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 149.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 148.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 147.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 146.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 138.
% 0.13/0.37 435 back subsumes 137.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.35/0.62
% 0.35/0.62 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.35/0.62
% 0.35/0.62 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.35/0.62
% 0.35/0.62
% 0.35/0.62 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.35/0.62
% 0.35/0.62 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.35/0.62 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.35/0.62 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.35/0.62 number of clauses in intial UL: 336
% 0.35/0.62 number of clauses initially in problem: 402
% 0.35/0.62 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 83
% 0.35/0.62 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 97
% 0.35/0.62 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.35/0.62 absolute distinct symbol count: 73
% 0.35/0.62 distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.35/0.62 distinct function count: 46
% 0.35/0.62 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.35/0.62
% 0.35/0.62 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.35/0.62
% 0.35/0.62
% 0.35/0.62
% 0.35/0.62 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.35/0.62
% 0.35/0.62 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.49/1.71
% 1.49/1.71 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.49/1.71
% 1.49/1.71 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.49/1.71
% 1.49/1.71 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.49/1.71
% 1.49/1.71 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.49/1.71
% 1.49/1.71 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.49/1.71
% 1.49/1.71 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.49/1.71
% 1.49/1.71 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.49/1.71 cons(skac3,app(sk1,nil))=app(cons(skac3,sk1),nil).
% 1.49/1.71
% 1.49/1.71 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 1.49/1.71 42 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 1341.2 K.
% 1.49/1.71 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 1.49/1.71 sym_ent ( 304) 183 0 183 0 54.3 K
% 1.49/1.71 term ( 32) 85981 79949 6032 7 188.7 K
% 1.49/1.71 rel ( 40) 62281 55671 6610 3 258.3 K
% 1.49/1.71 term_ptr ( 16) 25711 3127 22584 51 353.7 K
% 1.49/1.71 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.49/1.71 fpa_head ( 24) 2167 69 2098 4 49.3 K
% 1.49/1.71 fpa_tree ( 56) 13406 13406 0 20 1.1 K
% 1.49/1.71 context (1288) 18593 18593 0 11 13.8 K
% 1.49/1.71 trail ( 24) 105443 105443 0 6 0.1 K
% 1.49/1.71 imd_tree ( 32) 68 16 52 7 1.8 K
% 1.49/1.71 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.49/1.71 is_tree ( 24) 1578 150 1428 33 34.2 K
% 1.49/1.71 is_pos (2424) 68511 68511 0 6 14.2 K
% 1.49/1.71 fsub_pos ( 16) 9542 9542 0 1 0.0 K
% 1.49/1.71 literal ( 32) 20382 16355 4027 0 125.8 K
% 1.49/1.71 clause ( 88) 3665 2674 991 0 85.2 K
% 1.49/1.71 list ( 272) 10 3 7 1 2.1 K
% 1.49/1.71 clash_nd ( 80) 7007 7007 0 9 0.7 K
% 1.49/1.71 clause_ptr ( 16) 942 133 809 4 12.7 K
% 1.49/1.71 int_ptr ( 16) 8585 4411 4174 0 65.2 K
% 1.49/1.71 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.49/1.71 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.49/1.71 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.49/1.71 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.49/1.71 formula( 40) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.49/1.71 formula_ptr( 16) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.49/1.71 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.49/1.71
% 1.49/1.71 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 1.49/1.71
% 1.49/1.71 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 1.49/1.71 delete cl time 0.00
% 1.49/1.71 keep cl time 0.00
% 1.49/1.71 hints time 0.00
% 1.49/1.71 print_cl time 0.00
% 1.49/1.71 conflict time 0.00
% 1.49/1.71 new demod time 0.00
% 1.49/1.71 post_process time 0.00
% 1.49/1.71 back demod time 0.00
% 1.49/1.71 back subsume 0.00
% 1.49/1.71 factor time 0.00
% 1.49/1.71 FINDER time 0.00
% 1.49/1.71 unindex time 0.00
% 1.49/1.71
% 1.49/1.71 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.49/1.71
% 1.49/1.71 true clauses given 1 (12.5%)
% 1.49/1.71 false clauses given 7
% 1.49/1.71
% 1.49/1.71 FALSE TRUE
% 1.49/1.71 2 1 3
% 1.49/1.71 3 35 10
% 1.49/1.71 4 12 3
% 1.49/1.71 5 1 0
% 1.49/1.71 6 0 3
% 1.49/1.71 7 0 29
% 1.49/1.71 9 0 23
% 1.49/1.71 10 0 2
% 1.49/1.71 11 1 43
% 1.49/1.71 12 0 21
% 1.49/1.71 13 0 29
% 1.49/1.71 14 0 8
% 1.49/1.71 15 0 25
% 1.49/1.71 16 0 14
% 1.49/1.71 17 0 13
% 1.49/1.71 19 0 6
% 1.49/1.71 21 0 18
% 1.49/1.71 22 0 11
% 1.49/1.71 23 0 6
% 1.49/1.71 28 0 1
% 1.49/1.71 30 0 3
% 1.49/1.71 32 0 1
% 1.49/1.71 tot: 50 272 (84.5% true)
% 1.49/1.71
% 1.49/1.71
% 1.49/1.71 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.49/1.71
% 1.49/1.71 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 1.49/1.71 1:0 2:0 3:2 4:0 5:11 6:0 7:4 8:0 9:6 10:47
% 1.49/1.71 11:6 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:1
% 1.49/1.71 21:0 22:0 23:1 24:1 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 1.49/1.71 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 1.49/1.71 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 1.49/1.71 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:1 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:1
% 1.49/1.71 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:1 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 1.49/1.71 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 1.49/1.71 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 1.49/1.71 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 1.49/1.71 All others: 618.
% 1.49/1.71
% 1.49/1.71 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 1.49/1.71
% 1.49/1.71 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------