↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : SWC422-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:02:19 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 86.16s 86.43s
% Output   : Proof 86.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   79 (  53 unt;   5 nHn;  78 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  132 (  51 equ;  50 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    7 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause8,axiom,
    ssList(nil),
    file('SWC001-0.ax',clause8) ).

cnf(clause177,axiom,
    ( nil = U
    | U = V
    | nil = V
    | ~ ssList(V)
    | ~ ssList(U)
    | hd(U) != hd(V)
    | tl(U) != tl(V) ),
    file('SWC001-0.ax',clause177) ).

cnf(co1_5,negated_conjecture,
    sk2 = sk4,
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1_5) ).

cnf(co1_6,negated_conjecture,
    sk1 = sk3,
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1_6) ).

cnf(co1_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( neq(sk2,nil)
    | neq(sk2,nil) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1_7) ).

cnf(co1_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( neq(sk2,nil)
    | ssItem(sk5) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1_10) ).

cnf(co1_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | app(app(C,cons(A,nil)),B) != sk1
    | app(app(B,cons(A,nil)),C) != sk2
    | ~ ssList(C)
    | ~ ssList(B)
    | ~ ssItem(A) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1_15) ).

cnf(co1_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ssItem(sk5) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1_16) ).

cnf(co1_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ssList(sk6) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1_17) ).

cnf(co1_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ssList(sk7) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1_18) ).

cnf(co1_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | app(app(sk6,cons(sk5,nil)),sk7) = sk4 ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1_19) ).

cnf(co1_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | app(app(sk7,cons(sk5,nil)),sk6) = sk3 ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co1_20) ).

cnf(co1_7_simplified,negated_conjecture,
    neq(sk2,nil),
    inference(simplify_clause,[status(thm)],[co1_7]) ).

cnf(equality_1,axiom,
    Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_0,
    theory(equality,[reflexivity]) ).

cnf(equality_2,axiom,
    ( Eq_x_1 = Eq_x_0
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
    theory(equality,[symmetry]) ).

cnf(equality_3,axiom,
    ( Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
    theory(equality,[transitivity]) ).

cnf(equality_67,axiom,
    ( neq(Eq_y_0,Eq_y_1)
    | ~ neq(Eq_x_0,Eq_x_1)
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_y_1
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_y_0 ),
    theory(equality,[substitution_predicates]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    ( ~ ssList(sk6)
    | ~ ssList(sk7)
    | app(app(sk6,cons(sk5,nil)),sk7) != sk2
    | app(app(sk7,cons(sk5,nil)),sk6) != sk1
    | ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ~ ssItem(sk5) ),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[co1_15]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ssItem(sk5) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[co1_16]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    ( nil != nil
    | ~ neq(sk2,nil)
    | sk2 != sk4
    | neq(sk4,nil) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[equality_67]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    sk2 = sk4,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:2)],[co1_5]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t4:2]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    ( ssItem(sk5)
    | neq(sk2,nil) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:3)],[co1_10]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t4:3]) ).

cnf(t10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(reduction,[status(thm),parent(t8:2)],[t8:2,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t11,plain,
    nil = nil,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:4)],[equality_1]) ).

cnf(t12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t11:1)],[t11:1,t4:4]) ).

cnf(t13,plain,
    ( nil != nil
    | ~ neq(sk2,nil)
    | sk2 != sk4
    | neq(sk4,nil) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:2)],[equality_67]) ).

cnf(t14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t13:1)],[t13:1,t1:2]) ).

cnf(t15,plain,
    sk2 = sk4,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t13:2)],[co1_5]) ).

cnf(t16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t15:1)],[t15:1,t13:2]) ).

cnf(t17,plain,
    neq(sk2,nil),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t13:3)],[co1_7_simplified]) ).

cnf(t18,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t17:1)],[t17:1,t13:3]) ).

cnf(t19,plain,
    ( hd(nil) != hd(nil)
    | ~ ssList(nil)
    | ~ ssList(nil)
    | nil = nil
    | nil = nil
    | tl(nil) != tl(nil)
    | nil = nil ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t13:4)],[clause177]) ).

cnf(t20,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t19:1)],[t19:1,t13:4]) ).

cnf(t21,plain,
    tl(nil) = tl(nil),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t19:2)],[equality_1]) ).

cnf(t22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t21:1)],[t21:1,t19:2]) ).

cnf(t23,plain,
    $false,
    inference(reduction,[status(thm),parent(t19:3)],[t19:3,t13:4]) ).

cnf(l12,lemma,
    nil != nil,
    inference(lemma,[status(cth),parent(t19:3),below(t13:4)],[t19:3]) ).

cnf(t24,plain,
    nil != nil,
    inference(lemma_extension,[status(thm),parent(t19:4)],[l12:1]) ).

cnf(t25,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t24:1)],[t24:1,t19:4]) ).

cnf(t26,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t19:5)],[clause8]) ).

cnf(t27,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t26:1)],[t26:1,t19:5]) ).

cnf(l13,lemma,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(lemma,[status(cth),parent(t19:5),below(t13:4)],[t19:5]) ).

cnf(t28,plain,
    ssList(nil),
    inference(lemma_extension,[status(thm),parent(t19:6)],[l13:1]) ).

cnf(t29,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t28:1)],[t28:1,t19:6]) ).

cnf(t30,plain,
    hd(nil) = hd(nil),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t19:7)],[equality_1]) ).

cnf(t31,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t30:1)],[t30:1,t19:7]) ).

cnf(l7,lemma,
    neq(sk4,nil),
    inference(lemma,[status(cth),parent(t1:2),below(0:0)],[t1:2]) ).

cnf(t32,plain,
    ( sk3 != sk1
    | app(app(sk7,cons(sk5,nil)),sk6) != sk3
    | app(app(sk7,cons(sk5,nil)),sk6) = sk1 ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:3)],[equality_3]) ).

cnf(t33,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t32:1)],[t32:1,t1:3]) ).

cnf(t34,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | app(app(sk7,cons(sk5,nil)),sk6) = sk3 ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t32:2)],[co1_20]) ).

cnf(t35,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t34:1)],[t34:1,t32:2]) ).

cnf(t36,plain,
    neq(sk4,nil),
    inference(lemma_extension,[status(thm),parent(t34:2)],[l7:1]) ).

cnf(t37,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t36:1)],[t36:1,t34:2]) ).

cnf(t38,plain,
    ( sk1 != sk3
    | sk3 = sk1 ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t32:3)],[equality_2]) ).

cnf(t39,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t38:1)],[t38:1,t32:3]) ).

cnf(t40,plain,
    sk1 = sk3,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t38:2)],[co1_6]) ).

cnf(t41,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t40:1)],[t40:1,t38:2]) ).

cnf(t42,plain,
    ( sk4 != sk2
    | app(app(sk6,cons(sk5,nil)),sk7) != sk4
    | app(app(sk6,cons(sk5,nil)),sk7) = sk2 ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:4)],[equality_3]) ).

cnf(t43,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t42:1)],[t42:1,t1:4]) ).

cnf(t44,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | app(app(sk6,cons(sk5,nil)),sk7) = sk4 ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t42:2)],[co1_19]) ).

cnf(t45,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t44:1)],[t44:1,t42:2]) ).

cnf(t46,plain,
    neq(sk4,nil),
    inference(lemma_extension,[status(thm),parent(t44:2)],[l7:1]) ).

cnf(t47,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t46:1)],[t46:1,t44:2]) ).

cnf(t48,plain,
    ( sk2 != sk4
    | sk4 = sk2 ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t42:3)],[equality_2]) ).

cnf(t49,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t48:1)],[t48:1,t42:3]) ).

cnf(t50,plain,
    sk2 = sk4,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t48:2)],[co1_5]) ).

cnf(t51,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t50:1)],[t50:1,t48:2]) ).

cnf(t52,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ssList(sk7) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:5)],[co1_18]) ).

cnf(t53,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t52:1)],[t52:1,t1:5]) ).

cnf(t54,plain,
    neq(sk4,nil),
    inference(lemma_extension,[status(thm),parent(t52:2)],[l7:1]) ).

cnf(t55,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t54:1)],[t54:1,t52:2]) ).

cnf(t56,plain,
    ( ~ neq(sk4,nil)
    | ssList(sk6) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:6)],[co1_17]) ).

cnf(t57,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t56:1)],[t56:1,t1:6]) ).

cnf(t58,plain,
    neq(sk4,nil),
    inference(lemma_extension,[status(thm),parent(t56:2)],[l7:1]) ).

cnf(t59,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t58:1)],[t58:1,t56:2]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWC422-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 02:55:27 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 86.16/86.43  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 86.16/86.43  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------