%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV007-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:53:28 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 14 unt; 2 nHn; 22 RR)
% Number of literals : 46 ( 3 equ; 25 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(anti_symmetry_of_less_than,axiom,
( ~ less_than(X2,X1)
| ~ less_than(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV001-0.ax',anti_symmetry_of_less_than) ).
cnf(clause_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ less_than(a(X1),a(k))
| ~ less_than(X1,successor(n))
| less_than(X1,i) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_11) ).
cnf(clause_5,negated_conjecture,
less_than(i,m),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_5) ).
cnf(transitivity_of_less_than,axiom,
( ~ less_than(X3,X2)
| ~ less_than(X1,X3)
| less_than(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV001-0.ax',transitivity_of_less_than) ).
cnf(clause_8,negated_conjecture,
less_than(a(m),a(k)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_8) ).
cnf(less_than_successor,axiom,
less_than(X1,successor(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV001-0.ax',less_than_successor) ).
cnf(clause_4,negated_conjecture,
~ less_than(n,m),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_4) ).
cnf(all_related,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| less_than(X2,X1)
| less_than(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV001-0.ax',all_related) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ less_than(X2,X1)
| ~ less_than(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[anti_symmetry_of_less_than]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ less_than(a(X1),a(k))
| ~ less_than(X1,successor(n))
| less_than(X1,i) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ less_than(X2,X1)
| ~ less_than(X1,X2) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
less_than(i,m),
clause_5 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ less_than(X3,X2)
| ~ less_than(X1,X3)
| less_than(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[transitivity_of_less_than]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ less_than(a(X1),a(k))
| ~ less_than(X1,successor(n))
| less_than(X1,i) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
less_than(a(m),a(k)),
clause_8 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ less_than(m,i),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ less_than(X3,X2)
| ~ less_than(X1,X3)
| less_than(X1,X2) ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
less_than(X1,successor(X1)),
less_than_successor ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ less_than(m,successor(n)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ less_than(X1,X2)
| less_than(X1,successor(X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ less_than(n,m),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ less_than(m,n),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| less_than(X2,X1)
| less_than(X1,X2) ),
all_related ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ less_than(n,m),
c_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
m = n,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_24]),c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV007-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:27:19 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % new_bool_3 with pid 2489339 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.11/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.44 % Search class: FGHSM-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2489342 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.11/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.44 % Search class: FGHSM-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.44
% 0.11/0.44 % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.44 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.11/0.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 23
% 0.11/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Initial clauses : 23
% 0.11/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.11/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 21
% 0.11/0.44 % Processed clauses : 90
% 0.11/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % ...subsumed : 29
% 0.11/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 61
% 0.11/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4
% 0.11/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 8
% 0.11/0.44 % Generated clauses : 190
% 0.11/0.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 148
% 0.11/0.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Paramodulations : 182
% 0.11/0.44 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.11/0.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Equation resolutions : 6
% 0.11/0.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Total rewrite steps : 28
% 0.11/0.44 % ...of those cached : 13
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 53
% 0.11/0.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 0.11/0.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Negative unit clauses : 22
% 0.11/0.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 16
% 0.11/0.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 78
% 0.11/0.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 206
% 0.11/0.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 0.11/0.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 73
% 0.11/0.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 59
% 0.11/0.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.11/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30
% 0.11/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.11/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.11/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1895
% 0.11/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 52
% 0.11/0.44
% 0.11/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.44 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.11/0.44 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.44 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.11/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3592 pages
% 0.11/0.44
% 0.11/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.44 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.11/0.44 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.44 % Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.11/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.11/0.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------