↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV008-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:40:55 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.42s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SWV008-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 21:34:11 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.20/0.42  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.42  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.42  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.20/0.42  SPASS derived 31 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 39 clauses.
% 0.20/0.42  SPASS allocated 63119 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.42  SPASS spent	0:00:00.06 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.42  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.20/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 16 :
% 0.20/0.42  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.42  1[0:Inp] || less_than(n,l)*r -> .
% 0.20/0.42  2[0:Inp] ||  -> less_than(one,l)*l.
% 0.20/0.42  3[0:Inp] ||  -> less_than(a(l),a(predecessor(l)))*r.
% 0.20/0.42  4[0:Inp] || less_than(one,n) less_than(a(u),a(predecessor(n)))* -> less_than(u,n) less_than(n,u).
% 0.20/0.42  5[0:Inp] || less_than(u,n) less_than(one,u) less_than(a(u),a(predecessor(u)))*r -> .
% 0.20/0.42  13[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(u,v) less_than(v,u)* less_than(u,v)*.
% 0.20/0.42  14[0:Inp] || less_than(u,u)* -> .
% 0.20/0.42  23[0:Res:13.0,1.0] ||  -> less_than(l,n)*l equal(l,n).
% 0.20/0.42  25[0:Res:4.3,1.0] || less_than(one,n) less_than(a(l),a(predecessor(n)))*r -> less_than(l,n).
% 0.20/0.42  32[0:Res:3.0,5.2] || less_than(one,l)*l less_than(l,n) -> .
% 0.20/0.42  37[0:MRR:32.0,2.0] || less_than(l,n)*l -> .
% 0.20/0.42  38[0:MRR:23.0,37.0] ||  -> equal(l,n)**.
% 0.20/0.42  39[0:Rew:38.0,2.0] ||  -> less_than(one,n)*l.
% 0.20/0.42  43[0:Rew:38.0,3.0] ||  -> less_than(a(n),a(predecessor(n)))*r.
% 0.20/0.42  57[0:Rew:38.0,25.2,38.0,25.1] || less_than(one,n) less_than(a(n),a(predecessor(n)))*r -> less_than(n,n).
% 0.20/0.42  58[0:MRR:57.0,57.1,57.2,39.0,43.0,14.0] ||  -> .
% 0.20/0.42  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.42  Formulae used in the proof : clause_1 clause_2 clause_3 clause_4 clause_5 all_related x_not_less_than_x
% 0.20/0.42  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------