↑ Up

E---3.5.1.SAT-Sat.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV010-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:53:29 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.14s 0.51s
% Output   : Saturation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_13ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_21ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ message(sent(X2,b,pair(X2,X1)))
    | ~ fresh_to_b(X1)
    | message(sent(b,t,triple(b,generate_b_nonce(X1),encrypt(triple(X2,X1,generate_expiration_time(X1)),bt)))) ),
    c_0_8,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    message(sent(a,b,pair(a,an_a_nonce))),
    a_sent_message_i_to_b_3,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    fresh_to_b(an_a_nonce),
    nonce_a_is_fresh_to_b_9,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ t_holds(key(X6,X2))
    | ~ t_holds(key(X5,X1))
    | ~ message(sent(X2,t,triple(X2,X7,encrypt(triple(X1,X3,X4),X6))))
    | message(sent(t,X1,triple(encrypt(quadruple(X2,X3,generate_key(X3),X4),X5),encrypt(triple(X1,generate_key(X3),X4),X6),X7))) ),
    c_0_9,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    message(sent(b,t,triple(b,generate_b_nonce(an_a_nonce),encrypt(triple(a,an_a_nonce,generate_expiration_time(an_a_nonce)),bt)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    t_holds(key(bt,b)),
    t_holds_key_bt_for_b_14,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ message(sent(t,a,triple(encrypt(quadruple(X1,X5,X4,X6),at),X2,X3)))
    | ~ a_stored(pair(X1,X5))
    | message(sent(a,X1,pair(X2,encrypt(X3,X4)))) ),
    c_0_13,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ t_holds(key(X1,a))
    | message(sent(t,a,triple(encrypt(quadruple(b,an_a_nonce,generate_key(an_a_nonce),generate_expiration_time(an_a_nonce)),X1),encrypt(triple(a,generate_key(an_a_nonce),generate_expiration_time(an_a_nonce)),bt),generate_b_nonce(an_a_nonce)))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    a_stored(pair(b,an_a_nonce)),
    a_stored_message_i_4,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    t_holds(key(at,a)),
    t_holds_key_at_for_a_13,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    message(sent(a,b,pair(encrypt(triple(a,generate_key(an_a_nonce),generate_expiration_time(an_a_nonce)),bt),encrypt(generate_b_nonce(an_a_nonce),generate_key(an_a_nonce))))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWV010-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.44  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.44  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:26:40 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.44  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.51  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 473402 completed with status 1
% 0.14/0.51  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.14/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.51  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.51  % Search class: FHUNF-FFSS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.51  % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.51  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 473411 completed with status 1
% 0.14/0.51  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.14/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.51  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.51  % Search class: FHUNF-FFSS32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.51  % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.51  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.51  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.51  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.51  
% 0.14/0.51  % No proof found!
% 0.14/0.51  % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.14/0.51  % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.51  % Parsed axioms                        : 8
% 0.14/0.51  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Initial clauses                      : 8
% 0.14/0.51  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 8
% 0.14/0.51  % Processed clauses                    : 19
% 0.14/0.51  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % ...remaining for further processing  : 19
% 0.14/0.51  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Generated clauses                    : 3
% 0.14/0.51  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.14/0.51  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Paramodulations                      : 3
% 0.14/0.51  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Total rewrite steps                  : 4
% 0.14/0.51  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.51  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.51  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.51  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.51  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.51  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.51  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.51  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.51  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.51  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.51  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.51  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.51  % Current number of processed clauses  : 11
% 0.14/0.51  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
% 0.14/0.51  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.51  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.51  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4
% 0.14/0.51  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.51  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Current number of archived clauses   : 8
% 0.14/0.51  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.14/0.51  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.51  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 567
% 0.14/0.51  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 21
% 0.14/0.51  
% 0.14/0.51  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.51  % User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.51  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.51  % Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.51  % Maximum resident set size: 3392 pages
% 0.14/0.51  
% 0.14/0.51  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.51  % User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.14/0.51  % System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.14/0.51  % Total time               : 0.026 s
% 0.14/0.51  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/0.51  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------