%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CARINE---0.734 % Problem : SWV011-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : add_equality % Format : carine % Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000 % Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu % Model : i686 i686 % CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz % Memory : 2006MB % OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Sun Nov 28 06:31:53 EST 2010 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s % Output : Refutation 0.16s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % Command entered: % /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP11278/SWV/SWV011-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000 % CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003) % Initializing tables ... done. % Parsing ... done. % Calculating time slices ... done. % Building Lookup Tables ... done. % Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ... % +================================================+ % | | % | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. | % | | % +================================================+ % Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof: % ============================================ % Base Clauses: % ------------- % B0: ~a_holds_1(key_2(x0,b_0())) | ~b_holds_1(key_2(x0,a_0())) % Unit Clauses: % -------------- % U0: < d0 v0 dv0 f2 c2 t4 td3 b > a_holds_1(key_2(generate_key_1(an_a_nonce_0()),b_0())) % U1: < d0 v0 dv0 f2 c2 t4 td3 b > b_holds_1(key_2(generate_key_1(an_a_nonce_0()),a_0())) % U2: < d1 v0 dv0 f2 c2 t4 td3 > ~b_holds_1(key_2(generate_key_1(an_a_nonce_0()),a_0())) % --------------- Start of Proof --------------- % Derivation of unit clause U0: % a_holds_1(key_2(generate_key_1(an_a_nonce_0()),b_0())) ....... U0 % Derivation of unit clause U1: % b_holds_1(key_2(generate_key_1(an_a_nonce_0()),a_0())) ....... U1 % Derivation of unit clause U2: % ~a_holds_1(key_2(x0,b_0())) | ~b_holds_1(key_2(x0,a_0())) ....... B0 % a_holds_1(key_2(generate_key_1(an_a_nonce_0()),b_0())) ....... U0 % ~b_holds_1(key_2(generate_key_1(an_a_nonce_0()), a_0())) ....... R1 [B0:L0, U0:L0] % Derivation of the empty clause: % ~b_holds_1(key_2(generate_key_1(an_a_nonce_0()),a_0())) ....... U2 % b_holds_1(key_2(generate_key_1(an_a_nonce_0()),a_0())) ....... U1 % [] ....... R1 [U2:L0, U1:L0] % --------------- End of Proof --------------- % PROOF FOUND! % --------------------------------------------- % | Statistics | % --------------------------------------------- % Profile 3: Performance Statistics: % ================================== % Total number of generated clauses: 1 % resolvents: 1 factors: 0 % Number of unit clauses generated: 1 % % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 100.00 % Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]: % ============================================================= % [0] = 2 [1] = 1 % Total = 3 % Number of generated clauses having [x] literals: % ------------------------------------------------ % [1] = 1 % Average size of a generated clause: 1.0 % Number of unit clauses per predicate list: % ========================================== % [0] a_holds_1 (+)1 (-)0 % [1] b_holds_1 (+)1 (-)1 % ------------------ % Total: (+)2 (-)1 % Total number of unit clauses retained: 3 % Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 0 % N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses % because of the shortest resolvents table: 0 % Number of successful unifications: 2 % Number of unification failures: 0 % Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0 % N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 0 % N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 0 % N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0 % Max entries in substitution set: 0 % N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0 % N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0 % N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0 % N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0 % Max number of terms in a unit clause: 4 % Max term depth in a unit clause: 3 % Number of states in UCFA table: 15 % Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 12 % Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 112000 % Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00 % Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.25 % Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 41 % Profile 2: Number of calls to: % ============================== % PTUnify() = 2 % ConstructUnitClause() = 1 % Profile 1: Time spent in: % ========================= % ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs % -------------------------------------------------------- % | | % Inferences per sec: inf % | | % -------------------------------------------------------- % Elapsed time: 0 secs % CPU time: 0.15 secs % %------------------------------------------------------------------------------