%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CARINE---0.734 % Problem : SWV018-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : add_equality % Format : carine % Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000 % Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu % Model : i686 i686 % CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz % Memory : 2018MB % OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Sun Nov 28 06:31:11 EST 2010 % Result : Timeout 300.07s % Output : None % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % Command entered: % /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP13146/SWV/SWV018-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000 % CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003) % Initializing tables ... done. % Parsing ......................................... done. % Calculating time slices ... done. % Building Lookup Tables ... done. % Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 150] [nf = 0] [nu = 32] [ut = 37] % Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ... % t = 3 secs [nr = 225913] [nf = 24] [nu = 222888] [ut = 32000] % Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ... % t = 67 secs [nr = 6240122] [nf = 658] [nu = 5689222] [ut = 32000] % Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ... % Entering time slice 2 % Updating parameters ... done. % Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ... % t = 122 secs [nr = 11365912] [nf = 1182] [nu = 9689390] [ut = 32000] % Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ... % t = 126 secs [nr = 11667254] [nf = 1206] [nu = 9987825] [ut = 32000] % Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ... % t = 190 secs [nr = 17649100] [nf = 2014] [nu = 15433459] [ut = 32000] % Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ... % TIME IS UP! % --------------------------------------------- % | Statistics | % --------------------------------------------- % Profile 3: Performance Statistics: % ================================== % Total number of generated clauses: 27929960 % resolvents: 27927137 factors: 2823 % Number of unit clauses generated: 24426287 % % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 87.46 % Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]: % ============================================================= % [0] = 14 [1] = 23 [2] = 31963 % Total = 32000 % Number of generated clauses having [x] literals: % ------------------------------------------------ % [1] = 24426287 [2] = 3472167 [3] = 31309 [4] = 192 [5] = 5 % Average size of a generated clause: 2.0 % Number of unit clauses per predicate list: % ========================================== % [0] a_key_1 (+)1 (-)3 % [1] a_nonce_1 (+)3 (-)1 % [2] a_stored_1 (+)1 (-)0 % [3] b_holds_1 (+)1 (-)0 % [4] b_stored_1 (+)0 (-)0 % [5] fresh_intruder_nonce_1 (+)12 (-)2481 % [6] fresh_to_b_1 (+)3 (-)0 % [7] intruder_holds_1 (+)15 (-)1 % [8] intruder_message_1 (+)5 (-)28419 % [9] message_1 (+)2 (-)1047 % [10] party_of_protocol_1 (+)3 (-)0 % [11] t_holds_1 (+)2 (-)0 % ------------------ % Total: (+)48 (-)31952 % Total number of unit clauses retained: 32000 % Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 2256549 % N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses % because of the shortest resolvents table: 0 % Number of successful unifications: 27929960 % Number of unification failures: 255673288 % Number of unit to unit unification failures: 173982 % N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 63201395 % N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3885674 % N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 33303890 % Max entries in substitution set: 11 % N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 2368 % N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 1 % N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 23080371 % N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0 % Max number of terms in a unit clause: 29 % Max term depth in a unit clause: 12 % Number of states in UCFA table: 410625 % Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 812363 % Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000 % Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.78 % Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.51 % Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 63 % Profile 2: Number of calls to: % ============================== % PTUnify() = 283603248 % ConstructUnitClause() = 34354 % Profile 1: Time spent in: % ========================= % ConstructUnitClause() : 0.14 secs % -------------------------------------------------------- % | | % Inferences per sec: 93100 % | | % -------------------------------------------------------- % Elapsed time: 303 secs % CPU time: 300.01 secs % %------------------------------------------------------------------------------