↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV019-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:53:31 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   37 (  16 unt;   6 nHn;  33 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   84 (   6 equ;  47 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ( maximal_value != array_value_at(array,index_of_maximal)
    | ~ in_array_bounds(array,index_of_maximal)
    | ~ less_than(index_of_maximal,successor(an_index))
    | ~ in_array_bounds(array,an_index)
    | less_than(index_of_maximal,lower_bound)
    | less_than(successor(upper_bound),successor(an_index))
    | less_than(successor(an_index),lower_bound) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(maximal_above_lower_bound,axiom,
    ~ less_than(index_of_maximal,lower_bound),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',maximal_above_lower_bound) ).

cnf(this_is_maximal,axiom,
    ( ~ in_array_bounds(array,index_of_maximal)
    | maximal_value = array_value_at(array,index_of_maximal) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',this_is_maximal) ).

cnf(predecessor_less,axiom,
    ( ~ less_than(successor(X1),successor(X2))
    | less_than(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',predecessor_less) ).

cnf(somewhere_below_upper_bound,axiom,
    ~ less_than(upper_bound,an_index),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',somewhere_below_upper_bound) ).

cnf(transitivity_of_less,axiom,
    ( ~ less_than(X2,X3)
    | ~ less_than(X1,X2)
    | less_than(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitivity_of_less) ).

cnf(somewhere_above_lower_bound,axiom,
    ~ less_than(an_index,lower_bound),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',somewhere_above_lower_bound) ).

cnf(maximal_before_somewhere,axiom,
    less_than(index_of_maximal,an_index),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',maximal_before_somewhere) ).

cnf(successor_greater,axiom,
    less_than(X1,successor(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',successor_greater) ).

cnf(in_bounds,axiom,
    ( in_array_bounds(array,X1)
    | less_than(upper_bound,X1)
    | less_than(X1,lower_bound) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',in_bounds) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( maximal_value != array_value_at(array,index_of_maximal)
    | ~ in_array_bounds(array,index_of_maximal)
    | ~ less_than(index_of_maximal,successor(an_index))
    | ~ in_array_bounds(array,an_index)
    | less_than(index_of_maximal,lower_bound)
    | less_than(successor(upper_bound),successor(an_index))
    | less_than(successor(an_index),lower_bound) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ~ less_than(index_of_maximal,lower_bound),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[maximal_above_lower_bound]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ in_array_bounds(array,index_of_maximal)
    | maximal_value = array_value_at(array,index_of_maximal) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[this_is_maximal]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ less_than(successor(X1),successor(X2))
    | less_than(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[predecessor_less]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( maximal_value != array_value_at(array,index_of_maximal)
    | ~ in_array_bounds(array,index_of_maximal)
    | ~ less_than(index_of_maximal,successor(an_index))
    | ~ in_array_bounds(array,an_index)
    | less_than(index_of_maximal,lower_bound)
    | less_than(successor(upper_bound),successor(an_index))
    | less_than(successor(an_index),lower_bound) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ~ less_than(index_of_maximal,lower_bound),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ in_array_bounds(array,index_of_maximal)
    | maximal_value = array_value_at(array,index_of_maximal) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ~ less_than(upper_bound,an_index),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[somewhere_below_upper_bound]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ less_than(X2,X3)
    | ~ less_than(X1,X2)
    | less_than(X1,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[transitivity_of_less]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ less_than(successor(X1),successor(X2))
    | less_than(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_than(index_of_maximal,successor(an_index))
    | ~ in_array_bounds(array,an_index)
    | ~ in_array_bounds(array,index_of_maximal)
    | less_than(successor(an_index),lower_bound)
    | less_than(successor(upper_bound),successor(an_index)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ~ less_than(upper_bound,an_index),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ~ less_than(an_index,lower_bound),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[somewhere_above_lower_bound]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ less_than(X2,X3)
    | ~ less_than(X1,X2)
    | less_than(X1,X3) ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    less_than(index_of_maximal,an_index),
    maximal_before_somewhere ).

cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
    less_than(X1,successor(X1)),
    successor_greater ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_than(index_of_maximal,successor(an_index))
    | ~ in_array_bounds(array,an_index)
    | ~ in_array_bounds(array,index_of_maximal)
    | less_than(successor(an_index),lower_bound) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
    ( in_array_bounds(array,X1)
    | less_than(upper_bound,X1)
    | less_than(X1,lower_bound) ),
    in_bounds ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ~ less_than(an_index,lower_bound),
    c_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ less_than(X1,index_of_maximal)
    | less_than(X1,an_index) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ less_than(X1,X2)
    | less_than(X1,successor(X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_than(index_of_maximal,successor(an_index))
    | ~ in_array_bounds(array,index_of_maximal)
    | less_than(successor(an_index),lower_bound) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_21]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ~ less_than(upper_bound,index_of_maximal),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ less_than(successor(X1),X2)
    | less_than(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_than(index_of_maximal,successor(an_index))
    | less_than(successor(an_index),lower_bound) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_27]),c_0_32]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less_than(index_of_maximal,successor(an_index)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_30]),c_0_24])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWV019-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:32:22 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.35  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.42  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % new_bool_3 with pid 2023765 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.13/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.42  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.42  % Search class: FGUSF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.42  % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.42  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2023771 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.42  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.42  % Search class: FGUSF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.42  % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.42  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.42  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.42  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.42  % Parsed axioms                        : 10
% 0.13/0.42  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Initial clauses                      : 10
% 0.13/0.42  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 10
% 0.13/0.42  % Processed clauses                    : 82
% 0.13/0.42  % ...of these trivial                  : 6
% 0.13/0.42  % ...subsumed                          : 19
% 0.13/0.42  % ...remaining for further processing  : 57
% 0.13/0.42  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Backward-subsumed                    : 5
% 0.13/0.42  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Generated clauses                    : 299
% 0.13/0.42  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 274
% 0.13/0.42  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.13/0.42  % Paramodulations                      : 299
% 0.13/0.42  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Total rewrite steps                  : 29
% 0.13/0.42  % ...of those cached                   : 20
% 0.13/0.42  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.13/0.42  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.13/0.42  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.42  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.13/0.42  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.42  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.13/0.42  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42  % Current number of processed clauses  : 52
% 0.13/0.42  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 9
% 0.13/0.42  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.42  %    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.13/0.42  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 38
% 0.13/0.42  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 200
% 0.13/0.42  % ...number of literals in the above   : 484
% 0.13/0.42  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Current number of archived clauses   : 5
% 0.13/0.42  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 449
% 0.13/0.42  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 361
% 0.13/0.42  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 24
% 0.13/0.42  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.13/0.42  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 33
% 0.13/0.42  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 4338
% 0.13/0.42  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 25
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.42  % User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.13/0.42  % System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.42  % Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.13/0.42  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.42  % User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.13/0.42  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.42  % Total time               : 0.014 s
% 0.13/0.42  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.13/0.42  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------