%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV021-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:53:32 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.13s 0.42s
% Output : Saturation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_5ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_10ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
consistency_of_add_commutative,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
add(s(X1),X2) = s(add(X1,X2)),
definition_add_s,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
add(n0,X1) = X1,
definition_add_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( s(X1) != s(X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
c_0_5,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
n0 != s(X1),
c_0_6,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
add(X1,s(X2)) = s(add(X2,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
add(X1,n0) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_7]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWV021-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:27:25 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.42 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % new_bool_1 with pid 1460258 completed with status 1
% 0.13/0.42 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.13/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.42 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.42 % Search class: FHUPS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.42 % partial match(1): FHUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.42 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1460265 completed with status 1
% 0.13/0.42 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.13/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.13/0.42 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.13/0.42 % Search class: FHUPS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.42 % partial match(1): FHUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.42 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.42
% 0.13/0.42 % No proof found!
% 0.13/0.42 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.13/0.42 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.42 % Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.13/0.42 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Initial clauses : 5
% 0.13/0.42 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.13/0.42 % Processed clauses : 10
% 0.13/0.42 % ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.13/0.42 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % ...remaining for further processing : 7
% 0.13/0.42 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Generated clauses : 12
% 0.13/0.42 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.13/0.42 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Paramodulations : 11
% 0.13/0.42 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.13/0.42 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.13/0.42 % ...of those cached : 4
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42 % Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.13/0.42 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.13/0.42 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.13/0.42 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.13/0.42 % Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.13/0.42 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.42 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.13/0.42 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.13/0.42 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Termbank termtop insertions : 150
% 0.13/0.42 % Search garbage collected termcells : 5
% 0.13/0.42
% 0.13/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.42 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.13/0.42 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.42 % Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.13/0.42
% 0.13/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.42 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.42 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.13/0.42 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.13/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.13/0.42 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------