%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV021-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:53:31 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.20s 0.58s
% Output : Saturation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_6ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_10ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
add(X1,X2) = add(X2,X1),
consistency_of_add_commutative,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
add(s(X1),X2) = s(add(X1,X2)),
definition_add_s,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
add(n0,X1) = X1,
definition_add_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
n0 != s(X1),
c_0_6,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
add(X1,s(X2)) = s(add(X2,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
ifeq(s(X1),s(X2),X1,X2) = X2,
successor_is_injective,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
add(X1,n0) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_7]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SWV021-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.06 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.45 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.45 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:27:54 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.58 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.20/0.58 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.58 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58 % new_bool_3 with pid 477094 completed with status 1
% 0.20/0.58 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.58 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.58 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.20/0.58 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.58 % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.58 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.58 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58 % SubtermCWHack with pid 477100 completed with status 1
% 0.20/0.58 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.20/0.58 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.58 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.20/0.58 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.58 % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.58 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.58 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.58
% 0.20/0.58 % No proof found!
% 0.20/0.58 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.20/0.58 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.58 % Parsed axioms : 6
% 0.20/0.58 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Initial clauses : 6
% 0.20/0.58 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.20/0.58 % Processed clauses : 11
% 0.20/0.58 % ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.20/0.58 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % ...remaining for further processing : 8
% 0.20/0.58 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Generated clauses : 11
% 0.20/0.58 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.20/0.58 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Paramodulations : 11
% 0.20/0.58 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.20/0.58 % ...of those cached : 4
% 0.20/0.58 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.58 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.58 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.58 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.58 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.58 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.58 % Current number of processed clauses : 8
% 0.20/0.58 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.20/0.58 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.20/0.58 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.58 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.58 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.20/0.58 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.20/0.58 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.58 % Termbank termtop insertions : 150
% 0.20/0.58 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.20/0.58
% 0.20/0.58 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.58 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.58 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.58 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.58 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.20/0.58
% 0.20/0.58 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.58 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.58 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.20/0.58 % Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.20/0.58 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.20/0.58 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------