↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV031+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:41:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 5.92s 6.11s
% Output   : Refutation 5.92s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SWV031+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 03:08:42 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 5.92/6.11  
% 5.92/6.11  SPASS V 3.9 
% 5.92/6.11  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 5.92/6.11  % SZS status Theorem
% 5.92/6.11  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 5.92/6.11  SPASS derived 8071 clauses, backtracked 255 clauses, performed 3 splits and kept 4828 clauses.
% 5.92/6.11  SPASS allocated 93762 KBytes.
% 5.92/6.11  SPASS spent	0:00:05.71 on the problem.
% 5.92/6.11  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 5.92/6.11  		0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 5.92/6.11  		0:00:00.07 for inferences.
% 5.92/6.11  		0:00:00.08 for the backtracking.
% 5.92/6.11  		0:00:05.30 for the reduction.
% 5.92/6.11  
% 5.92/6.11  
% 5.92/6.11  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 29 :
% 5.92/6.11  % SZS output start Refutation
% 5.92/6.11  1[0:Inp] ||  -> SkC0*.
% 5.92/6.11  5[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,skc3)*r.
% 5.92/6.11  7[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,pv9)*r.
% 5.92/6.11  8[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(n0,pv10)*r.
% 5.92/6.11  51[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(pv9,minus(n410,n1))*r.
% 5.92/6.11  52[0:Inp] ||  -> leq(pv10,minus(n330,n1))*r.
% 5.92/6.11  77[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(minus(u,n1),pred(u))**.
% 5.92/6.11  120[0:Inp] || leq(u,n3) leq(n0,u) -> equal(a_select2(s_values7_init,u),init)**.
% 5.92/6.11  140[0:Inp] || leq(u,v) leq(w,u) leq(x,y) leq(y,z) -> equal(a_select3(tptp_const_array2(dim(x,z),dim(w,v),x1),y,u),x1)**.
% 5.92/6.11  148[0:Inp] || equal(init,init) equal(a_select3(tptp_const_array2(dim(n0,minus(n410,n1)),dim(n0,minus(n330,n1)),init),pv9,pv10),init)** leq(n0,pv9) leq(pv9,minus(n410,n1)) SkC0 -> leq(skc3,n3).
% 5.92/6.11  153[0:Inp] || equal(a_select2(s_values7_init,skc3),init) equal(init,init) equal(a_select3(tptp_const_array2(dim(n0,minus(n410,n1)),dim(n0,minus(n330,n1)),init),pv9,pv10),init)** leq(n0,pv9) leq(pv9,minus(n410,n1)) SkC0 -> .
% 5.92/6.11  175[0:Rew:77.0,52.0] ||  -> leq(pv10,pred(n330))*r.
% 5.92/6.11  176[0:Rew:77.0,51.0] ||  -> leq(pv9,pred(n410))*r.
% 5.92/6.11  178[0:Obv:153.1] || equal(a_select2(s_values7_init,skc3),init) equal(a_select3(tptp_const_array2(dim(n0,minus(n410,n1)),dim(n0,minus(n330,n1)),init),pv9,pv10),init)** leq(n0,pv9) leq(pv9,minus(n410,n1)) SkC0 -> .
% 5.92/6.11  179[0:Rew:77.0,178.3,77.0,178.1,77.0,178.1] || equal(a_select2(s_values7_init,skc3),init) equal(a_select3(tptp_const_array2(dim(n0,pred(n410)),dim(n0,pred(n330)),init),pv9,pv10),init)** leq(n0,pv9) leq(pv9,pred(n410)) SkC0 -> .
% 5.92/6.11  180[0:MRR:179.2,179.3,179.4,7.0,176.0,1.0] || equal(a_select2(s_values7_init,skc3),init) equal(a_select3(tptp_const_array2(dim(n0,pred(n410)),dim(n0,pred(n330)),init),pv9,pv10),init)** -> .
% 5.92/6.11  181[0:Obv:148.0] || equal(a_select3(tptp_const_array2(dim(n0,minus(n410,n1)),dim(n0,minus(n330,n1)),init),pv9,pv10),init)** leq(n0,pv9) leq(pv9,minus(n410,n1)) SkC0 -> leq(skc3,n3).
% 5.92/6.11  182[0:Rew:77.0,181.2,77.0,181.0,77.0,181.0] || equal(a_select3(tptp_const_array2(dim(n0,pred(n410)),dim(n0,pred(n330)),init),pv9,pv10),init)** leq(n0,pv9) leq(pv9,pred(n410)) SkC0 -> leq(skc3,n3).
% 5.92/6.11  183[0:MRR:182.1,182.2,182.3,7.0,176.0,1.0] || equal(a_select3(tptp_const_array2(dim(n0,pred(n410)),dim(n0,pred(n330)),init),pv9,pv10),init)** -> leq(skc3,n3).
% 5.92/6.11  10742[0:SpL:140.4,180.1] || leq(pv10,pred(n330)) leq(n0,pv10) leq(n0,pv9) leq(pv9,pred(n410)) equal(a_select2(s_values7_init,skc3),init)** equal(init,init) -> .
% 5.92/6.11  10743[0:Obv:10742.5] || leq(pv10,pred(n330)) leq(n0,pv10) leq(n0,pv9) leq(pv9,pred(n410)) equal(a_select2(s_values7_init,skc3),init)** -> .
% 5.92/6.11  10744[0:MRR:10743.0,10743.1,10743.2,10743.3,175.0,8.0,7.0,176.0] || equal(a_select2(s_values7_init,skc3),init)** -> .
% 5.92/6.11  10745[0:SpL:120.2,10744.0] || leq(skc3,n3) leq(n0,skc3) equal(init,init)* -> .
% 5.92/6.11  10746[0:Obv:10745.2] || leq(skc3,n3)*l leq(n0,skc3) -> .
% 5.92/6.11  10747[0:MRR:10746.1,5.0] || leq(skc3,n3)*l -> .
% 5.92/6.11  10748[0:MRR:183.1,10747.0] || equal(a_select3(tptp_const_array2(dim(n0,pred(n410)),dim(n0,pred(n330)),init),pv9,pv10),init)** -> .
% 5.92/6.11  10799[0:SpL:140.4,10748.0] || leq(pv10,pred(n330))*r leq(n0,pv10) leq(n0,pv9) leq(pv9,pred(n410)) equal(init,init) -> .
% 5.92/6.11  10800[0:Obv:10799.4] || leq(pv10,pred(n330))*r leq(n0,pv10) leq(n0,pv9) leq(pv9,pred(n410)) -> .
% 5.92/6.11  10801[0:MRR:10800.0,10800.1,10800.2,10800.3,175.0,8.0,7.0,176.0] ||  -> .
% 5.92/6.11  % SZS output end Refutation
% 5.92/6.11  Formulae used in the proof : gauss_init_0037 gt_succ leq_succ_gt_equiv pred_minus_1 const_array2_select
% 5.92/6.11  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------