↑ Up

ePrincess---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : SWV032+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 17:49:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 24.41s 7.19s
% Output   : Proof 58.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SWV032+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.36  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 23:37:54 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.63/0.62          ____       _                          
% 0.63/0.62    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.63/0.62   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.63/0.62  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.63/0.62  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.63/0.62  
% 0.63/0.62  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.63/0.62  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.63/0.62  
% 0.63/0.62  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.63/0.62  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.63/0.62  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.63/0.62  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.63/0.62  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.63/0.62  
% 0.63/0.62  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.63/0.62  
% 0.63/0.62  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.66/0.70  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 2.24/1.12  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 4.00/1.62  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.41/1.65  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 19.55/5.99  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 20.15/6.13  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 20.88/6.33  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 20.88/6.34  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 24.41/7.19  Prover 1: proved (1201ms)
% 24.41/7.19  Prover 0: stopped
% 24.41/7.19  
% 24.41/7.19  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 24.41/7.19  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 24.41/7.19  
% 24.41/7.19  Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 57.16/21.28  found it (size 666)
% 57.16/21.28  
% 57.16/21.28  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 57.16/21.29  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 57.16/21.29  | (0)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] :  ? [v16] : ( ~ (def = use) & minus(n330, n1) = v1 & minus(n410, n1) = v0 & minus(pv1376, n1) = v2 & tptp_const_array2(v6, v7, init) = v8 & a_select3(v8, pv19, pv20) = v9 & a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n2) = v5 & a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n1) = v4 & a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n0) = v3 & dim(n0, v1) = v7 & dim(n0, v0) = v6 & succ(n4) = n5 & succ(n3) = n4 & succ(n2) = n3 & succ(n1) = n2 & succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0 & succ(n0) = n1 & leq(pv1376, n3) = 0 & leq(pv20, v1) = 0 & leq(pv19, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, pv1376) = 0 & leq(n0, pv20) = 0 & leq(n0, pv19) = 0 & gt(n330, n5) = 0 & gt(n330, n4) = 0 & gt(n330, n3) = 0 & gt(n330, n2) = 0 & gt(n330, n1) = 0 & gt(n330, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n330, n0) = 0 & gt(n410, n330) = 0 & gt(n410, n5) = 0 & gt(n410, n4) = 0 & gt(n410, n3) = 0 & gt(n410, n2) = 0 & gt(n410, n1) = 0 & gt(n410, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n410, n0) = 0 & gt(n5, n4) = 0 & gt(n5, n3) = 0 & gt(n5, n2) = 0 & gt(n5, n1) = 0 & gt(n5, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n5, n0) = 0 & gt(n4, n3) = 0 & gt(n4, n2) = 0 & gt(n4, n1) = 0 & gt(n4, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n4, n0) = 0 & gt(n3, n2) = 0 & gt(n3, n1) = 0 & gt(n3, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n3, n0) = 0 & gt(n2, n1) = 0 & gt(n2, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n2, n0) = 0 & gt(n1, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n1, n0) = 0 & gt(n0, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & true &  ? [v17] :  ? [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] :  ! [v26] :  ! [v27] :  ! [v28] :  ! [v29] :  ! [v30] :  ! [v31] :  ! [v32] :  ! [v33] :  ! [v34] :  ! [v35] :  ! [v36] :  ! [v37] :  ! [v38] : ( ~ (tptp_mmul(v31, v32) = v33) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v24, v28) = v29) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v23, v29) = v30) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v22, v25) = v26) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v21, v26) = v27) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v20, v33) = v34) |  ~ (tptp_madd(v27, v30) = v31) |  ~ (tptp_madd(v19, v34) = v35) |  ~ (trans(v23) = v28) |  ~ (trans(v21) = v25) |  ~ (trans(v20) = v32) |  ~ (a_select3(v35, v36, v37) = v38) |  ? [v39] :  ? [v40] :  ? [v41] :  ? [v42] :  ? [v43] :  ? [v44] :  ? [v45] :  ? [v46] : ((v44 = 0 & v43 = 0 & v42 = 0 & v41 = 0 &  ~ (v46 = v45) & a_select3(v24, v40, v39) = v46 & a_select3(v24, v39, v40) = v45 & leq(v40, v17) = 0 & leq(v39, v17) = 0 & leq(n0, v40) = 0 & leq(n0, v39) = 0) | (v44 = 0 & v43 = 0 & v42 = 0 & v41 = 0 &  ~ (v46 = v45) & a_select3(v22, v40, v39) = v46 & a_select3(v22, v39, v40) = v45 & leq(v40, v18) = 0 & leq(v39, v18) = 0 & leq(n0, v40) = 0 & leq(n0, v39) = 0) | (v44 = 0 & v43 = 0 & v42 = 0 & v41 = 0 &  ~ (v46 = v45) & a_select3(v19, v40, v39) = v46 & a_select3(v19, v39, v40) = v45 & leq(v40, v17) = 0 & leq(v39, v17) = 0 & leq(n0, v40) = 0 & leq(n0, v39) = 0) | (a_select3(v35, v37, v36) = v43 & leq(v37, v17) = v42 & leq(v36, v17) = v40 & leq(n0, v37) = v41 & leq(n0, v36) = v39 & ( ~ (v42 = 0) |  ~ (v41 = 0) |  ~ (v40 = 0) |  ~ (v39 = 0) | v43 = v38)))) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] :  ! [v26] :  ! [v27] : (v27 = v23 |  ~ (tptp_const_array2(v24, v25, v23) = v26) |  ~ (a_select3(v26, v17, v20) = v27) |  ~ (dim(v21, v22) = v25) |  ~ (dim(v18, v19) = v24) |  ? [v28] :  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] :  ? [v31] : (leq(v21, v20) = v30 & leq(v20, v22) = v31 & leq(v18, v17) = v28 & leq(v17, v19) = v29 & ( ~ (v31 = 0) |  ~ (v30 = 0) |  ~ (v29 = 0) |  ~ (v28 = 0)))) &  ? [v17] :  ? [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] :  ! [v26] : ( ~ (tptp_mmul(v20, v21) = v22) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v19, v22) = v23) |  ~ (trans(v19) = v21) |  ~ (a_select3(v23, v24, v25) = v26) |  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] :  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] :  ? [v31] :  ? [v32] :  ? [v33] :  ? [v34] : ((v32 = 0 & v31 = 0 & v30 = 0 & v29 = 0 &  ~ (v34 = v33) & a_select3(v20, v28, v27) = v34 & a_select3(v20, v27, v28) = v33 & leq(v28, v18) = 0 & leq(v27, v18) = 0 & leq(n0, v28) = 0 & leq(n0, v27) = 0) | (a_select3(v23, v25, v24) = v31 & leq(v25, v17) = v30 & leq(v24, v17) = v28 & leq(n0, v25) = v29 & leq(n0, v24) = v27 & ( ~ (v30 = 0) |  ~ (v29 = 0) |  ~ (v28 = 0) |  ~ (v27 = 0) | v31 = v26)))) &  ? [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] :  ! [v25] : ( ~ (tptp_mmul(v19, v20) = v21) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v18, v21) = v22) |  ~ (trans(v18) = v20) |  ~ (a_select3(v22, v23, v24) = v25) |  ? [v26] :  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] :  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] :  ? [v31] :  ? [v32] :  ? [v33] : ((v31 = 0 & v30 = 0 & v29 = 0 & v28 = 0 &  ~ (v33 = v32) & a_select3(v19, v27, v26) = v33 & a_select3(v19, v26, v27) = v32 & leq(v27, v17) = 0 & leq(v26, v17) = 0 & leq(n0, v27) = 0 & leq(n0, v26) = 0) | (a_select3(v22, v24, v23) = v30 & leq(v24, v17) = v29 & leq(v23, v17) = v27 & leq(n0, v24) = v28 & leq(n0, v23) = v26 & ( ~ (v29 = 0) |  ~ (v28 = 0) |  ~ (v27 = 0) |  ~ (v26 = 0) | v30 = v25)))) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : (v24 = v22 |  ~ (tptp_update3(v21, v19, v20, v22) = v23) |  ~ (a_select3(v23, v17, v18) = v24) |  ? [v25] :  ? [v26] :  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] :  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] :  ? [v31] : ((v30 = 0 & v29 = 0 & v28 = 0 & v27 = 0 &  ~ (v31 = v22) & a_select3(v21, v25, v26) = v31 & leq(v26, v20) = 0 & leq(v25, v19) = 0 & leq(n0, v26) = 0 & leq(n0, v25) = 0) | (leq(v18, v20) = v28 & leq(v17, v19) = v26 & leq(n0, v18) = v27 & leq(n0, v17) = v25 & ( ~ (v28 = 0) |  ~ (v27 = 0) |  ~ (v26 = 0) |  ~ (v25 = 0))))) &  ? [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : (v24 = v17 | v20 = v18 |  ~ (tptp_update3(v21, v18, v19, v22) = v23) |  ~ (a_select3(v23, v20, v19) = v24) |  ? [v25] : ( ~ (v25 = v17) & a_select3(v21, v20, v19) = v25)) &  ? [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] :  ! [v24] : ( ~ (tptp_update3(v18, v21, v21, v22) = v23) |  ~ (a_select3(v23, v19, v20) = v24) |  ? [v25] :  ? [v26] :  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] :  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] :  ? [v31] :  ? [v32] : ((v30 = 0 & v29 = 0 & v28 = 0 & v27 = 0 &  ~ (v32 = v31) & a_select3(v18, v26, v25) = v32 & a_select3(v18, v25, v26) = v31 & leq(v26, v17) = 0 & leq(v25, v17) = 0 & leq(n0, v26) = 0 & leq(n0, v25) = 0) | (a_select3(v23, v20, v19) = v31 & leq(v21, v17) = v30 & leq(v20, v17) = v28 & leq(v19, v17) = v26 & leq(n0, v21) = v29 & leq(n0, v20) = v27 & leq(n0, v19) = v25 & ( ~ (v30 = 0) |  ~ (v29 = 0) |  ~ (v28 = 0) |  ~ (v27 = 0) |  ~ (v26 = 0) |  ~ (v25 = 0) | v31 = v24)))) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v23 = v20 |  ~ (dim(v18, v19) = v21) |  ~ (tptp_const_array1(v21, v20) = v22) |  ~ (a_select2(v22, v17) = v23) |  ? [v24] :  ? [v25] : (leq(v18, v17) = v24 & leq(v17, v19) = v25 & ( ~ (v25 = 0) |  ~ (v24 = 0)))) &  ? [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : (v23 = v17 | v19 = v18 |  ~ (tptp_update2(v20, v18, v21) = v22) |  ~ (a_select2(v22, v19) = v23) |  ? [v24] : ( ~ (v24 = v17) & a_select2(v20, v19) = v24)) &  ? [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (tptp_msub(v18, v19) = v20) |  ~ (a_select3(v20, v21, v22) = v23) |  ? [v24] :  ? [v25] :  ? [v26] :  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] :  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] :  ? [v31] : ((v29 = 0 & v28 = 0 & v27 = 0 & v26 = 0 &  ~ (v31 = v30) & a_select3(v19, v25, v24) = v31 & a_select3(v19, v24, v25) = v30 & leq(v25, v17) = 0 & leq(v24, v17) = 0 & leq(n0, v25) = 0 & leq(n0, v24) = 0) | (v29 = 0 & v28 = 0 & v27 = 0 & v26 = 0 &  ~ (v31 = v30) & a_select3(v18, v25, v24) = v31 & a_select3(v18, v24, v25) = v30 & leq(v25, v17) = 0 & leq(v24, v17) = 0 & leq(n0, v25) = 0 & leq(n0, v24) = 0) | (a_select3(v20, v22, v21) = v28 & leq(v22, v17) = v27 & leq(v21, v17) = v25 & leq(n0, v22) = v26 & leq(n0, v21) = v24 & ( ~ (v27 = 0) |  ~ (v26 = 0) |  ~ (v25 = 0) |  ~ (v24 = 0) | v28 = v23)))) &  ? [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] :  ! [v23] : ( ~ (tptp_madd(v18, v19) = v20) |  ~ (a_select3(v20, v21, v22) = v23) |  ? [v24] :  ? [v25] :  ? [v26] :  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] :  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] :  ? [v31] : ((v29 = 0 & v28 = 0 & v27 = 0 & v26 = 0 &  ~ (v31 = v30) & a_select3(v19, v25, v24) = v31 & a_select3(v19, v24, v25) = v30 & leq(v25, v17) = 0 & leq(v24, v17) = 0 & leq(n0, v25) = 0 & leq(n0, v24) = 0) | (v29 = 0 & v28 = 0 & v27 = 0 & v26 = 0 &  ~ (v31 = v30) & a_select3(v18, v25, v24) = v31 & a_select3(v18, v24, v25) = v30 & leq(v25, v17) = 0 & leq(v24, v17) = 0 & leq(n0, v25) = 0 & leq(n0, v24) = 0) | (a_select3(v20, v22, v21) = v28 & leq(v22, v17) = v27 & leq(v21, v17) = v25 & leq(n0, v22) = v26 & leq(n0, v21) = v24 & ( ~ (v27 = 0) |  ~ (v26 = 0) |  ~ (v25 = 0) |  ~ (v24 = 0) | v28 = v23)))) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : (v22 = v20 |  ~ (tptp_update2(v19, v18, v20) = v21) |  ~ (a_select2(v21, v17) = v22) |  ? [v23] :  ? [v24] :  ? [v25] :  ? [v26] : ((v25 = 0 & v24 = 0 &  ~ (v26 = v20) & a_select2(v19, v23) = v26 & leq(v23, v18) = 0 & leq(n0, v23) = 0) | (leq(v17, v18) = v24 & leq(n0, v17) = v23 & ( ~ (v24 = 0) |  ~ (v23 = 0))))) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : (v22 = v20 |  ~ (tptp_update3(v17, v18, v19, v20) = v21) |  ~ (a_select3(v21, v18, v19) = v22)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (tptp_update3(v22, v21, v20, v19) = v18) |  ~ (tptp_update3(v22, v21, v20, v19) = v17)) &  ? [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : ( ~ (inv(v18) = v19) |  ~ (a_select3(v19, v20, v21) = v22) |  ? [v23] :  ? [v24] :  ? [v25] :  ? [v26] :  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] :  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] : ((v28 = 0 & v27 = 0 & v26 = 0 & v25 = 0 &  ~ (v30 = v29) & a_select3(v18, v24, v23) = v30 & a_select3(v18, v23, v24) = v29 & leq(v24, v17) = 0 & leq(v23, v17) = 0 & leq(n0, v24) = 0 & leq(n0, v23) = 0) | (a_select3(v19, v21, v20) = v27 & leq(v21, v17) = v26 & leq(v20, v17) = v24 & leq(n0, v21) = v25 & leq(n0, v20) = v23 & ( ~ (v26 = 0) |  ~ (v25 = 0) |  ~ (v24 = 0) |  ~ (v23 = 0) | v27 = v22)))) &  ? [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] :  ! [v22] : ( ~ (trans(v18) = v19) |  ~ (a_select3(v19, v20, v21) = v22) |  ? [v23] :  ? [v24] :  ? [v25] :  ? [v26] :  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] :  ? [v29] :  ? [v30] : ((v28 = 0 & v27 = 0 & v26 = 0 & v25 = 0 &  ~ (v30 = v29) & a_select3(v18, v24, v23) = v30 & a_select3(v18, v23, v24) = v29 & leq(v24, v17) = 0 & leq(v23, v17) = 0 & leq(n0, v24) = 0 & leq(n0, v23) = 0) | (a_select3(v19, v21, v20) = v27 & leq(v21, v17) = v26 & leq(v20, v17) = v24 & leq(n0, v21) = v25 & leq(n0, v20) = v23 & ( ~ (v26 = 0) |  ~ (v25 = 0) |  ~ (v24 = 0) |  ~ (v23 = 0) | v27 = v22)))) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] : (v21 = v19 |  ~ (tptp_update2(v17, v18, v19) = v20) |  ~ (a_select2(v20, v18) = v21)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] : (v21 = 0 |  ~ (succ(v18) = v20) |  ~ (succ(v17) = v19) |  ~ (leq(v19, v20) = v21) |  ? [v22] : ( ~ (v22 = 0) & leq(v17, v18) = v22)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (tptp_update2(v21, v20, v19) = v18) |  ~ (tptp_update2(v21, v20, v19) = v17)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (sum(v21, v20, v19) = v18) |  ~ (sum(v21, v20, v19) = v17)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (tptp_const_array2(v21, v20, v19) = v18) |  ~ (tptp_const_array2(v21, v20, v19) = v17)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (a_select3(v21, v20, v19) = v18) |  ~ (a_select3(v21, v20, v19) = v17)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] : (v20 = 0 |  ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v18, v17) = v19) |  ~ (leq(v19, v17) = v20) |  ? [v21] : ( ~ (v21 = 0) & leq(n0, v17) = v21)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] : (v20 = 0 |  ~ (succ(v18) = v19) |  ~ (leq(v17, v19) = v20) |  ? [v21] : ( ~ (v21 = 0) & leq(v17, v18) = v21)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] : (v20 = 0 |  ~ (succ(v18) = v19) |  ~ (gt(v19, v17) = v20) |  ? [v21] : ( ~ (v21 = 0) & leq(v17, v18) = v21)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] : (v20 = 0 |  ~ (pred(v18) = v19) |  ~ (leq(v17, v19) = v20) |  ? [v21] : ( ~ (v21 = 0) & gt(v18, v17) = v21)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] : (v20 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v17, v19) = v20) |  ~ (leq(v17, v18) = 0) |  ? [v21] : ( ~ (v21 = 0) & leq(v18, v19) = v21)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] : (v20 = 0 |  ~ (gt(v17, v19) = v20) |  ~ (gt(v17, v18) = 0) |  ? [v21] : ( ~ (v21 = 0) & gt(v18, v19) = v21)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (minus(v20, v19) = v18) |  ~ (minus(v20, v19) = v17)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (plus(v20, v19) = v18) |  ~ (plus(v20, v19) = v17)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v20, v19) = v18) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v20, v19) = v17)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (tptp_msub(v20, v19) = v18) |  ~ (tptp_msub(v20, v19) = v17)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (tptp_madd(v20, v19) = v18) |  ~ (tptp_madd(v20, v19) = v17)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (dim(v20, v19) = v18) |  ~ (dim(v20, v19) = v17)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (tptp_const_array1(v20, v19) = v18) |  ~ (tptp_const_array1(v20, v19) = v17)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (a_select2(v20, v19) = v18) |  ~ (a_select2(v20, v19) = v17)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v20, v19) = v18) |  ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v20, v19) = v17)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (geq(v20, v19) = v18) |  ~ (geq(v20, v19) = v17)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (lt(v20, v19) = v18) |  ~ (lt(v20, v19) = v17)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (leq(v20, v19) = v18) |  ~ (leq(v20, v19) = v17)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (gt(v20, v19) = v18) |  ~ (gt(v20, v19) = v17)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] : ( ~ (succ(v18) = v20) |  ~ (succ(v17) = v19) |  ~ (leq(v19, v20) = 0) | leq(v17, v18) = 0) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] : (v19 = init |  ~ (a_select3(simplex7_init, v18, v17) = v19) |  ~ (leq(v17, n2) = 0) |  ? [v20] :  ? [v21] : (( ~ (v20 = 0) & leq(n0, v17) = v20) | (leq(v18, n3) = v21 & leq(n0, v18) = v20 & ( ~ (v21 = 0) |  ~ (v20 = 0))))) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] : (v19 = 0 | v18 = v17 |  ~ (gt(v18, v17) = v19) |  ? [v20] : ( ~ (v20 = 0) & leq(v17, v18) = v20)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] : (v19 = 0 | v18 = v17 |  ~ (gt(v17, v18) = v19) | gt(v18, v17) = 0) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] : (v19 = 0 |  ~ (succ(v17) = v18) |  ~ (gt(v18, v17) = v19)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] : (v19 = 0 |  ~ (geq(v17, v18) = v19) |  ? [v20] : ( ~ (v20 = 0) & leq(v18, v17) = v20)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] : (v19 = 0 |  ~ (lt(v17, v18) = v19) |  ? [v20] : ( ~ (v20 = 0) & gt(v18, v17) = v20)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (inv(v19) = v18) |  ~ (inv(v19) = v17)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (trans(v19) = v18) |  ~ (trans(v19) = v17)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (succ(v19) = v18) |  ~ (succ(v19) = v17)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] : (v18 = v17 |  ~ (pred(v19) = v18) |  ~ (pred(v19) = v17)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] : ( ~ (minus(v17, v18) = v19) |  ~ (leq(v19, v17) = 0) | leq(n0, v18) = 0) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] : ( ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v18, v17) = v19) |  ? [v20] :  ? [v21] : (leq(n0, v19) = v21 & leq(n0, v17) = v20 & ( ~ (v20 = 0) | v21 = 0))) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] : ( ~ (succ(v18) = v19) |  ~ (gt(v19, v17) = 0) | leq(v17, v18) = 0) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] : ( ~ (succ(v17) = v19) |  ~ (leq(v19, v18) = 0) | gt(v18, v17) = 0) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] : ( ~ (pred(v18) = v19) |  ~ (leq(v17, v19) = 0) | gt(v18, v17) = 0) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : (v18 = tptp_float_0_0 |  ~ (sum(n0, tptp_minus_1, v17) = v18)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : (v18 = n0 |  ~ (sum(n0, tptp_minus_1, v17) = v18)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : (v18 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v17, v17) = v18)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : ( ~ (minus(v17, n1) = v18) | pred(v17) = v18) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : ( ~ (plus(v17, n5) = v18) |  ? [v19] :  ? [v20] :  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] : (succ(v22) = v18 & succ(v21) = v22 & succ(v20) = v21 & succ(v19) = v20 & succ(v17) = v19)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : ( ~ (plus(v17, n4) = v18) |  ? [v19] :  ? [v20] :  ? [v21] : (succ(v21) = v18 & succ(v20) = v21 & succ(v19) = v20 & succ(v17) = v19)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : ( ~ (plus(v17, n3) = v18) |  ? [v19] :  ? [v20] : (succ(v20) = v18 & succ(v19) = v20 & succ(v17) = v19)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : ( ~ (plus(v17, n2) = v18) |  ? [v19] : (succ(v19) = v18 & succ(v17) = v19)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : ( ~ (plus(v17, n1) = v18) | succ(v17) = v18) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : ( ~ (plus(n5, v17) = v18) |  ? [v19] :  ? [v20] :  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] : (succ(v22) = v18 & succ(v21) = v22 & succ(v20) = v21 & succ(v19) = v20 & succ(v17) = v19)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : ( ~ (plus(n4, v17) = v18) |  ? [v19] :  ? [v20] :  ? [v21] : (succ(v21) = v18 & succ(v20) = v21 & succ(v19) = v20 & succ(v17) = v19)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : ( ~ (plus(n3, v17) = v18) |  ? [v19] :  ? [v20] : (succ(v20) = v18 & succ(v19) = v20 & succ(v17) = v19)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : ( ~ (plus(n2, v17) = v18) |  ? [v19] : (succ(v19) = v18 & succ(v17) = v19)) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : ( ~ (plus(n1, v17) = v18) | succ(v17) = v18) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : ( ~ (succ(v17) = v18) | pred(v18) = v17) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : ( ~ (pred(v17) = v18) | succ(v18) = v17) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : ( ~ (geq(v17, v18) = 0) | leq(v18, v17) = 0) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : ( ~ (lt(v17, v18) = 0) | gt(v18, v17) = 0) &  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : ( ~ (gt(v18, v17) = 0) | leq(v17, v18) = 0) &  ! [v17] : (v17 = n5 | v17 = n4 | v17 = n3 | v17 = n2 | v17 = n1 | v17 = n0 |  ~ (leq(v17, n5) = 0) |  ? [v18] : ( ~ (v18 = 0) & leq(n0, v17) = v18)) &  ! [v17] : (v17 = n4 | v17 = n3 | v17 = n2 | v17 = n1 | v17 = n0 |  ~ (leq(v17, n4) = 0) |  ? [v18] : ( ~ (v18 = 0) & leq(n0, v17) = v18)) &  ! [v17] : (v17 = n3 | v17 = n2 | v17 = n1 | v17 = n0 |  ~ (leq(v17, n3) = 0) |  ? [v18] : ( ~ (v18 = 0) & leq(n0, v17) = v18)) &  ! [v17] : (v17 = n2 | v17 = n1 | v17 = n0 |  ~ (leq(v17, n2) = 0) |  ? [v18] : ( ~ (v18 = 0) & leq(n0, v17) = v18)) &  ! [v17] : (v17 = n1 | v17 = n0 |  ~ (leq(v17, n1) = 0) |  ? [v18] : ( ~ (v18 = 0) & leq(n0, v17) = v18)) &  ! [v17] : (v17 = n0 |  ~ (leq(n0, v17) = 0) |  ? [v18] : ( ~ (v18 = 0) & leq(v17, n0) = v18)) &  ! [v17] : ( ~ (leq(v17, v2) = 0) |  ? [v18] :  ? [v19] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, v17) = v19 & leq(n0, v17) = v18 & ( ~ (v18 = 0) | v19 = init))) &  ! [v17] :  ~ (gt(v17, v17) = 0) & ( ~ (v9 = init) |  ~ (v5 = init) |  ~ (v4 = init) |  ~ (v3 = init) | (v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 &  ~ (v16 = init) & a_select3(simplex7_init, v13, v10) = v16 & leq(v13, n3) = 0 & leq(v10, n2) = 0 & leq(n0, v13) = 0 & leq(n0, v10) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 &  ~ (v13 = init) & a_select2(s_values7_init, v10) = v13 & leq(v10, v2) = 0 & leq(n0, v10) = 0)))
% 57.25/21.36  | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_0_10_10, all_0_11_11, all_0_12_12, all_0_13_13, all_0_14_14, all_0_15_15, all_0_16_16 yields:
% 57.25/21.36  | (1)  ~ (def = use) & minus(n330, n1) = all_0_15_15 & minus(n410, n1) = all_0_16_16 & minus(pv1376, n1) = all_0_14_14 & tptp_const_array2(all_0_10_10, all_0_9_9, init) = all_0_8_8 & a_select3(all_0_8_8, pv19, pv20) = all_0_7_7 & a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n2) = all_0_11_11 & a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n1) = all_0_12_12 & a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n0) = all_0_13_13 & dim(n0, all_0_15_15) = all_0_9_9 & dim(n0, all_0_16_16) = all_0_10_10 & succ(n4) = n5 & succ(n3) = n4 & succ(n2) = n3 & succ(n1) = n2 & succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0 & succ(n0) = n1 & leq(pv1376, n3) = 0 & leq(pv20, all_0_15_15) = 0 & leq(pv19, all_0_16_16) = 0 & leq(n0, pv1376) = 0 & leq(n0, pv20) = 0 & leq(n0, pv19) = 0 & gt(n330, n5) = 0 & gt(n330, n4) = 0 & gt(n330, n3) = 0 & gt(n330, n2) = 0 & gt(n330, n1) = 0 & gt(n330, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n330, n0) = 0 & gt(n410, n330) = 0 & gt(n410, n5) = 0 & gt(n410, n4) = 0 & gt(n410, n3) = 0 & gt(n410, n2) = 0 & gt(n410, n1) = 0 & gt(n410, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n410, n0) = 0 & gt(n5, n4) = 0 & gt(n5, n3) = 0 & gt(n5, n2) = 0 & gt(n5, n1) = 0 & gt(n5, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n5, n0) = 0 & gt(n4, n3) = 0 & gt(n4, n2) = 0 & gt(n4, n1) = 0 & gt(n4, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n4, n0) = 0 & gt(n3, n2) = 0 & gt(n3, n1) = 0 & gt(n3, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n3, n0) = 0 & gt(n2, n1) = 0 & gt(n2, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n2, n0) = 0 & gt(n1, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & gt(n1, n0) = 0 & gt(n0, tptp_minus_1) = 0 & true &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] :  ! [v16] :  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] : ( ~ (tptp_mmul(v14, v15) = v16) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v7, v11) = v12) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v6, v12) = v13) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v5, v8) = v9) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v4, v9) = v10) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v3, v16) = v17) |  ~ (tptp_madd(v10, v13) = v14) |  ~ (tptp_madd(v2, v17) = v18) |  ~ (trans(v6) = v11) |  ~ (trans(v4) = v8) |  ~ (trans(v3) = v15) |  ~ (a_select3(v18, v19, v20) = v21) |  ? [v22] :  ? [v23] :  ? [v24] :  ? [v25] :  ? [v26] :  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] :  ? [v29] : ((v27 = 0 & v26 = 0 & v25 = 0 & v24 = 0 &  ~ (v29 = v28) & a_select3(v7, v23, v22) = v29 & a_select3(v7, v22, v23) = v28 & leq(v23, v0) = 0 & leq(v22, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v23) = 0 & leq(n0, v22) = 0) | (v27 = 0 & v26 = 0 & v25 = 0 & v24 = 0 &  ~ (v29 = v28) & a_select3(v5, v23, v22) = v29 & a_select3(v5, v22, v23) = v28 & leq(v23, v1) = 0 & leq(v22, v1) = 0 & leq(n0, v23) = 0 & leq(n0, v22) = 0) | (v27 = 0 & v26 = 0 & v25 = 0 & v24 = 0 &  ~ (v29 = v28) & a_select3(v2, v23, v22) = v29 & a_select3(v2, v22, v23) = v28 & leq(v23, v0) = 0 & leq(v22, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v23) = 0 & leq(n0, v22) = 0) | (a_select3(v18, v20, v19) = v26 & leq(v20, v0) = v25 & leq(v19, v0) = v23 & leq(n0, v20) = v24 & leq(n0, v19) = v22 & ( ~ (v25 = 0) |  ~ (v24 = 0) |  ~ (v23 = 0) |  ~ (v22 = 0) | v26 = v21)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = v6 |  ~ (tptp_const_array2(v7, v8, v6) = v9) |  ~ (a_select3(v9, v0, v3) = v10) |  ~ (dim(v4, v5) = v8) |  ~ (dim(v1, v2) = v7) |  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] : (leq(v4, v3) = v13 & leq(v3, v5) = v14 & leq(v1, v0) = v11 & leq(v0, v2) = v12 & ( ~ (v14 = 0) |  ~ (v13 = 0) |  ~ (v12 = 0) |  ~ (v11 = 0)))) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (tptp_mmul(v3, v4) = v5) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v2, v5) = v6) |  ~ (trans(v2) = v4) |  ~ (a_select3(v6, v7, v8) = v9) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] :  ? [v16] :  ? [v17] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 &  ~ (v17 = v16) & a_select3(v3, v11, v10) = v17 & a_select3(v3, v10, v11) = v16 & leq(v11, v1) = 0 & leq(v10, v1) = 0 & leq(n0, v11) = 0 & leq(n0, v10) = 0) | (a_select3(v6, v8, v7) = v14 & leq(v8, v0) = v13 & leq(v7, v0) = v11 & leq(n0, v8) = v12 & leq(n0, v7) = v10 & ( ~ (v13 = 0) |  ~ (v12 = 0) |  ~ (v11 = 0) |  ~ (v10 = 0) | v14 = v9)))) &  ? [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (tptp_mmul(v2, v3) = v4) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v1, v4) = v5) |  ~ (trans(v1) = v3) |  ~ (a_select3(v5, v6, v7) = v8) |  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] :  ? [v16] : ((v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 &  ~ (v16 = v15) & a_select3(v2, v10, v9) = v16 & a_select3(v2, v9, v10) = v15 & leq(v10, v0) = 0 & leq(v9, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v10) = 0 & leq(n0, v9) = 0) | (a_select3(v5, v7, v6) = v13 & leq(v7, v0) = v12 & leq(v6, v0) = v10 & leq(n0, v7) = v11 & leq(n0, v6) = v9 & ( ~ (v12 = 0) |  ~ (v11 = 0) |  ~ (v10 = 0) |  ~ (v9 = 0) | v13 = v8)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : (v7 = v5 |  ~ (tptp_update3(v4, v2, v3, v5) = v6) |  ~ (a_select3(v6, v0, v1) = v7) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 &  ~ (v14 = v5) & a_select3(v4, v8, v9) = v14 & leq(v9, v3) = 0 & leq(v8, v2) = 0 & leq(n0, v9) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0) | (leq(v1, v3) = v11 & leq(v0, v2) = v9 & leq(n0, v1) = v10 & leq(n0, v0) = v8 & ( ~ (v11 = 0) |  ~ (v10 = 0) |  ~ (v9 = 0) |  ~ (v8 = 0))))) &  ? [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : (v7 = v0 | v3 = v1 |  ~ (tptp_update3(v4, v1, v2, v5) = v6) |  ~ (a_select3(v6, v3, v2) = v7) |  ? [v8] : ( ~ (v8 = v0) & a_select3(v4, v3, v2) = v8)) &  ? [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (tptp_update3(v1, v4, v4, v5) = v6) |  ~ (a_select3(v6, v2, v3) = v7) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 &  ~ (v15 = v14) & a_select3(v1, v9, v8) = v15 & a_select3(v1, v8, v9) = v14 & leq(v9, v0) = 0 & leq(v8, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v9) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0) | (a_select3(v6, v3, v2) = v14 & leq(v4, v0) = v13 & leq(v3, v0) = v11 & leq(v2, v0) = v9 & leq(n0, v4) = v12 & leq(n0, v3) = v10 & leq(n0, v2) = v8 & ( ~ (v13 = 0) |  ~ (v12 = 0) |  ~ (v11 = 0) |  ~ (v10 = 0) |  ~ (v9 = 0) |  ~ (v8 = 0) | v14 = v7)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = v3 |  ~ (dim(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (tptp_const_array1(v4, v3) = v5) |  ~ (a_select2(v5, v0) = v6) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (leq(v1, v0) = v7 & leq(v0, v2) = v8 & ( ~ (v8 = 0) |  ~ (v7 = 0)))) &  ? [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = v0 | v2 = v1 |  ~ (tptp_update2(v3, v1, v4) = v5) |  ~ (a_select2(v5, v2) = v6) |  ? [v7] : ( ~ (v7 = v0) & a_select2(v3, v2) = v7)) &  ? [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (tptp_msub(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (a_select3(v3, v4, v5) = v6) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] : ((v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 &  ~ (v14 = v13) & a_select3(v2, v8, v7) = v14 & a_select3(v2, v7, v8) = v13 & leq(v8, v0) = 0 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 &  ~ (v14 = v13) & a_select3(v1, v8, v7) = v14 & a_select3(v1, v7, v8) = v13 & leq(v8, v0) = 0 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0) | (a_select3(v3, v5, v4) = v11 & leq(v5, v0) = v10 & leq(v4, v0) = v8 & leq(n0, v5) = v9 & leq(n0, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v10 = 0) |  ~ (v9 = 0) |  ~ (v8 = 0) |  ~ (v7 = 0) | v11 = v6)))) &  ? [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (tptp_madd(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (a_select3(v3, v4, v5) = v6) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] : ((v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 &  ~ (v14 = v13) & a_select3(v2, v8, v7) = v14 & a_select3(v2, v7, v8) = v13 & leq(v8, v0) = 0 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 &  ~ (v14 = v13) & a_select3(v1, v8, v7) = v14 & a_select3(v1, v7, v8) = v13 & leq(v8, v0) = 0 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0) | (a_select3(v3, v5, v4) = v11 & leq(v5, v0) = v10 & leq(v4, v0) = v8 & leq(n0, v5) = v9 & leq(n0, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v10 = 0) |  ~ (v9 = 0) |  ~ (v8 = 0) |  ~ (v7 = 0) | v11 = v6)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = v3 |  ~ (tptp_update2(v2, v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (a_select2(v4, v0) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ((v8 = 0 & v7 = 0 &  ~ (v9 = v3) & a_select2(v2, v6) = v9 & leq(v6, v1) = 0 & leq(n0, v6) = 0) | (leq(v0, v1) = v7 & leq(n0, v0) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = v3 |  ~ (tptp_update3(v0, v1, v2, v3) = v4) |  ~ (a_select3(v4, v1, v2) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (tptp_update3(v5, v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (tptp_update3(v5, v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ? [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (inv(v1) = v2) |  ~ (a_select3(v2, v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & v8 = 0 &  ~ (v13 = v12) & a_select3(v1, v7, v6) = v13 & a_select3(v1, v6, v7) = v12 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(v6, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0 & leq(n0, v6) = 0) | (a_select3(v2, v4, v3) = v10 & leq(v4, v0) = v9 & leq(v3, v0) = v7 & leq(n0, v4) = v8 & leq(n0, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v9 = 0) |  ~ (v8 = 0) |  ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v10 = v5)))) &  ? [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (trans(v1) = v2) |  ~ (a_select3(v2, v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & v8 = 0 &  ~ (v13 = v12) & a_select3(v1, v7, v6) = v13 & a_select3(v1, v6, v7) = v12 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(v6, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0 & leq(n0, v6) = 0) | (a_select3(v2, v4, v3) = v10 & leq(v4, v0) = v9 & leq(v3, v0) = v7 & leq(n0, v4) = v8 & leq(n0, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v9 = 0) |  ~ (v8 = 0) |  ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v10 = v5)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = v2 |  ~ (tptp_update2(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (a_select2(v3, v1) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (succ(v1) = v3) |  ~ (succ(v0) = v2) |  ~ (leq(v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (tptp_update2(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (tptp_update2(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sum(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (sum(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (tptp_const_array2(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (tptp_const_array2(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (a_select3(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (a_select3(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (leq(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (succ(v1) = v2) |  ~ (leq(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (succ(v1) = v2) |  ~ (gt(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (pred(v1) = v2) |  ~ (leq(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & gt(v1, v0) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (leq(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(v1, v2) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (gt(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (gt(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & gt(v1, v2) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (minus(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (minus(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (plus(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (plus(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (tptp_msub(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (tptp_msub(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (tptp_madd(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (tptp_madd(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (dim(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (dim(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (tptp_const_array1(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (tptp_const_array1(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (a_select2(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (a_select2(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (geq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (geq(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (lt(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (lt(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (leq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (leq(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (gt(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (gt(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (succ(v1) = v3) |  ~ (succ(v0) = v2) |  ~ (leq(v2, v3) = 0) | leq(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = init |  ~ (a_select3(simplex7_init, v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (leq(v0, n2) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v3) | (leq(v1, n3) = v4 & leq(n0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = v0 |  ~ (gt(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = v0 |  ~ (gt(v0, v1) = v2) | gt(v1, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (succ(v0) = v1) |  ~ (gt(v1, v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (geq(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & leq(v1, v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (lt(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & gt(v1, v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (inv(v2) = v1) |  ~ (inv(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (trans(v2) = v1) |  ~ (trans(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (succ(v2) = v1) |  ~ (succ(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (pred(v2) = v1) |  ~ (pred(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (minus(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ (leq(v2, v0) = 0) | leq(n0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (leq(n0, v2) = v4 & leq(n0, v0) = v3 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (succ(v1) = v2) |  ~ (gt(v2, v0) = 0) | leq(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (succ(v0) = v2) |  ~ (leq(v2, v1) = 0) | gt(v1, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (pred(v1) = v2) |  ~ (leq(v0, v2) = 0) | gt(v1, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = tptp_float_0_0 |  ~ (sum(n0, tptp_minus_1, v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = n0 |  ~ (sum(n0, tptp_minus_1, v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (minus(v0, n1) = v1) | pred(v0) = v1) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(v0, n5) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : (succ(v5) = v1 & succ(v4) = v5 & succ(v3) = v4 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(v0, n4) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (succ(v4) = v1 & succ(v3) = v4 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(v0, n3) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (succ(v3) = v1 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(v0, n2) = v1) |  ? [v2] : (succ(v2) = v1 & succ(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(v0, n1) = v1) | succ(v0) = v1) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(n5, v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : (succ(v5) = v1 & succ(v4) = v5 & succ(v3) = v4 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(n4, v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (succ(v4) = v1 & succ(v3) = v4 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(n3, v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (succ(v3) = v1 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(n2, v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : (succ(v2) = v1 & succ(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(n1, v0) = v1) | succ(v0) = v1) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (succ(v0) = v1) | pred(v1) = v0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (pred(v0) = v1) | succ(v1) = v0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (geq(v0, v1) = 0) | leq(v1, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (lt(v0, v1) = 0) | gt(v1, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (gt(v1, v0) = 0) | leq(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] : (v0 = n5 | v0 = n4 | v0 = n3 | v0 = n2 | v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 |  ~ (leq(v0, n5) = 0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] : (v0 = n4 | v0 = n3 | v0 = n2 | v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 |  ~ (leq(v0, n4) = 0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] : (v0 = n3 | v0 = n2 | v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 |  ~ (leq(v0, n3) = 0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] : (v0 = n2 | v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 |  ~ (leq(v0, n2) = 0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] : (v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 |  ~ (leq(v0, n1) = 0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] : (v0 = n0 |  ~ (leq(n0, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(v0, n0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (leq(v0, all_0_14_14) = 0) |  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, v0) = v2 & leq(n0, v0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = init))) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (gt(v0, v0) = 0) & ( ~ (all_0_7_7 = init) |  ~ (all_0_11_11 = init) |  ~ (all_0_12_12 = init) |  ~ (all_0_13_13 = init) | (all_0_1_1 = 0 & all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init) & a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0 & leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0 & leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init) & a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0))
% 57.71/21.39  |
% 57.71/21.39  | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields:
% 57.71/21.39  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(v0, n4) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (succ(v4) = v1 & succ(v3) = v4 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2))
% 57.71/21.39  | (3) gt(n330, n5) = 0
% 57.71/21.39  | (4) leq(n0, pv1376) = 0
% 57.71/21.39  | (5)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(n3, v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (succ(v3) = v1 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2))
% 57.71/21.39  | (6)  ? [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (tptp_mmul(v2, v3) = v4) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v1, v4) = v5) |  ~ (trans(v1) = v3) |  ~ (a_select3(v5, v6, v7) = v8) |  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] :  ? [v16] : ((v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 &  ~ (v16 = v15) & a_select3(v2, v10, v9) = v16 & a_select3(v2, v9, v10) = v15 & leq(v10, v0) = 0 & leq(v9, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v10) = 0 & leq(n0, v9) = 0) | (a_select3(v5, v7, v6) = v13 & leq(v7, v0) = v12 & leq(v6, v0) = v10 & leq(n0, v7) = v11 & leq(n0, v6) = v9 & ( ~ (v12 = 0) |  ~ (v11 = 0) |  ~ (v10 = 0) |  ~ (v9 = 0) | v13 = v8))))
% 57.71/21.39  | (7) gt(n3, n0) = 0
% 57.71/21.39  | (8) tptp_const_array2(all_0_10_10, all_0_9_9, init) = all_0_8_8
% 57.71/21.39  | (9) succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0
% 57.71/21.39  | (10)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (minus(v0, n1) = v1) | pred(v0) = v1)
% 57.71/21.39  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (tptp_madd(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (tptp_madd(v3, v2) = v0))
% 57.71/21.39  | (12) gt(n2, n0) = 0
% 57.71/21.39  | (13)  ? [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (trans(v1) = v2) |  ~ (a_select3(v2, v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & v8 = 0 &  ~ (v13 = v12) & a_select3(v1, v7, v6) = v13 & a_select3(v1, v6, v7) = v12 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(v6, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0 & leq(n0, v6) = 0) | (a_select3(v2, v4, v3) = v10 & leq(v4, v0) = v9 & leq(v3, v0) = v7 & leq(n0, v4) = v8 & leq(n0, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v9 = 0) |  ~ (v8 = 0) |  ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v10 = v5))))
% 57.71/21.39  | (14)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] :  ! [v16] :  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] :  ! [v20] :  ! [v21] : ( ~ (tptp_mmul(v14, v15) = v16) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v7, v11) = v12) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v6, v12) = v13) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v5, v8) = v9) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v4, v9) = v10) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v3, v16) = v17) |  ~ (tptp_madd(v10, v13) = v14) |  ~ (tptp_madd(v2, v17) = v18) |  ~ (trans(v6) = v11) |  ~ (trans(v4) = v8) |  ~ (trans(v3) = v15) |  ~ (a_select3(v18, v19, v20) = v21) |  ? [v22] :  ? [v23] :  ? [v24] :  ? [v25] :  ? [v26] :  ? [v27] :  ? [v28] :  ? [v29] : ((v27 = 0 & v26 = 0 & v25 = 0 & v24 = 0 &  ~ (v29 = v28) & a_select3(v7, v23, v22) = v29 & a_select3(v7, v22, v23) = v28 & leq(v23, v0) = 0 & leq(v22, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v23) = 0 & leq(n0, v22) = 0) | (v27 = 0 & v26 = 0 & v25 = 0 & v24 = 0 &  ~ (v29 = v28) & a_select3(v5, v23, v22) = v29 & a_select3(v5, v22, v23) = v28 & leq(v23, v1) = 0 & leq(v22, v1) = 0 & leq(n0, v23) = 0 & leq(n0, v22) = 0) | (v27 = 0 & v26 = 0 & v25 = 0 & v24 = 0 &  ~ (v29 = v28) & a_select3(v2, v23, v22) = v29 & a_select3(v2, v22, v23) = v28 & leq(v23, v0) = 0 & leq(v22, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v23) = 0 & leq(n0, v22) = 0) | (a_select3(v18, v20, v19) = v26 & leq(v20, v0) = v25 & leq(v19, v0) = v23 & leq(n0, v20) = v24 & leq(n0, v19) = v22 & ( ~ (v25 = 0) |  ~ (v24 = 0) |  ~ (v23 = 0) |  ~ (v22 = 0) | v26 = v21))))
% 57.71/21.39  | (15) succ(n1) = n2
% 57.71/21.39  | (16)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (succ(v1) = v3) |  ~ (succ(v0) = v2) |  ~ (leq(v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v5))
% 57.77/21.40  | (17) gt(n2, n1) = 0
% 57.77/21.40  | (18) gt(n2, tptp_minus_1) = 0
% 57.77/21.40  | (19) gt(n410, n1) = 0
% 57.77/21.40  | (20)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (succ(v0) = v2) |  ~ (leq(v2, v1) = 0) | gt(v1, v0) = 0)
% 57.77/21.40  | (21) gt(n4, tptp_minus_1) = 0
% 57.77/21.40  | (22) gt(n410, tptp_minus_1) = 0
% 57.77/21.40  | (23) gt(n330, n0) = 0
% 57.77/21.40  | (24) gt(n3, n1) = 0
% 57.77/21.40  | (25)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (leq(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(v1, v2) = v4))
% 57.77/21.40  | (26)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (tptp_update3(v5, v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (tptp_update3(v5, v4, v3, v2) = v0))
% 57.77/21.40  | (27)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (leq(v0, v0) = v1))
% 57.77/21.40  | (28)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (tptp_msub(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (tptp_msub(v3, v2) = v0))
% 57.77/21.40  | (29)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sum(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (sum(v4, v3, v2) = v0))
% 57.77/21.40  | (30)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = v3 |  ~ (tptp_update2(v2, v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (a_select2(v4, v0) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ((v8 = 0 & v7 = 0 &  ~ (v9 = v3) & a_select2(v2, v6) = v9 & leq(v6, v1) = 0 & leq(n0, v6) = 0) | (leq(v0, v1) = v7 & leq(n0, v0) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0)))))
% 57.77/21.40  | (31)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = init |  ~ (a_select3(simplex7_init, v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (leq(v0, n2) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v3) | (leq(v1, n3) = v4 & leq(n0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 57.77/21.40  | (32) gt(n3, n2) = 0
% 57.77/21.40  | (33) gt(n5, tptp_minus_1) = 0
% 57.77/21.40  | (34)  ~ (def = use)
% 57.77/21.40  | (35)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(v0, n1) = v1) | succ(v0) = v1)
% 57.77/21.40  | (36)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (minus(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (minus(v3, v2) = v0))
% 57.77/21.40  | (37)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (leq(v0, all_0_14_14) = 0) |  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, v0) = v2 & leq(n0, v0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = init)))
% 57.77/21.40  | (38) gt(n410, n4) = 0
% 57.77/21.40  | (39) gt(n4, n2) = 0
% 57.77/21.40  | (40)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = tptp_float_0_0 |  ~ (sum(n0, tptp_minus_1, v0) = v1))
% 57.77/21.40  | (41)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (succ(v1) = v2) |  ~ (gt(v2, v0) = 0) | leq(v0, v1) = 0)
% 57.77/21.40  | (42) gt(n1, tptp_minus_1) = 0
% 57.77/21.40  | (43) gt(n410, n0) = 0
% 57.77/21.40  | (44)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (leq(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v4))
% 57.77/21.40  | (45) leq(n0, pv20) = 0
% 57.77/21.40  | (46) a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n2) = all_0_11_11
% 57.77/21.40  | (47)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v3, v2) = v0))
% 57.77/21.40  | (48)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (pred(v2) = v1) |  ~ (pred(v2) = v0))
% 57.77/21.40  | (49)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (lt(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (lt(v3, v2) = v0))
% 57.77/21.40  | (50) gt(n410, n3) = 0
% 57.77/21.40  | (51)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (gt(v1, v0) = 0) | leq(v0, v1) = 0)
% 57.77/21.40  | (52)  ! [v0] : (v0 = n4 | v0 = n3 | v0 = n2 | v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 |  ~ (leq(v0, n4) = 0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1))
% 57.77/21.40  | (53)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (gt(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (gt(v3, v2) = v0))
% 57.77/21.40  | (54) gt(n5, n3) = 0
% 57.77/21.40  | (55) minus(pv1376, n1) = all_0_14_14
% 57.77/21.40  | (56) dim(n0, all_0_16_16) = all_0_10_10
% 57.77/21.40  | (57) dim(n0, all_0_15_15) = all_0_9_9
% 57.77/21.40  | (58)  ! [v0] : (v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 |  ~ (leq(v0, n1) = 0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1))
% 57.77/21.40  | (59)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (geq(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & leq(v1, v0) = v3))
% 57.77/21.40  | (60)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (trans(v2) = v1) |  ~ (trans(v2) = v0))
% 57.77/21.40  | (61)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(v0, n3) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (succ(v3) = v1 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2))
% 57.77/21.40  | (62) gt(n4, n3) = 0
% 57.77/21.40  | (63)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (lt(v0, v1) = 0) | gt(v1, v0) = 0)
% 57.77/21.40  | (64)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (gt(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (gt(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & gt(v1, v2) = v4))
% 57.77/21.40  | (65)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = v6 |  ~ (tptp_const_array2(v7, v8, v6) = v9) |  ~ (a_select3(v9, v0, v3) = v10) |  ~ (dim(v4, v5) = v8) |  ~ (dim(v1, v2) = v7) |  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] : (leq(v4, v3) = v13 & leq(v3, v5) = v14 & leq(v1, v0) = v11 & leq(v0, v2) = v12 & ( ~ (v14 = 0) |  ~ (v13 = 0) |  ~ (v12 = 0) |  ~ (v11 = 0))))
% 57.77/21.40  | (66) leq(pv1376, n3) = 0
% 57.77/21.40  | (67)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (a_select3(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (a_select3(v4, v3, v2) = v0))
% 57.77/21.40  | (68)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = v0 |  ~ (gt(v0, v1) = v2) | gt(v1, v0) = 0)
% 57.77/21.40  | (69) gt(n410, n330) = 0
% 57.77/21.40  | (70) succ(n2) = n3
% 57.77/21.40  | (71)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (pred(v1) = v2) |  ~ (leq(v0, v2) = 0) | gt(v1, v0) = 0)
% 57.77/21.40  | (72)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = v3 |  ~ (tptp_update3(v0, v1, v2, v3) = v4) |  ~ (a_select3(v4, v1, v2) = v5))
% 57.77/21.40  | (73) a_select3(all_0_8_8, pv19, pv20) = all_0_7_7
% 57.77/21.40  | (74)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(v0, n2) = v1) |  ? [v2] : (succ(v2) = v1 & succ(v0) = v2))
% 57.77/21.40  | (75) leq(n0, pv19) = 0
% 57.77/21.40  | (76)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(v0, n5) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : (succ(v5) = v1 & succ(v4) = v5 & succ(v3) = v4 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2))
% 57.77/21.40  | (77)  ? [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = v0 | v2 = v1 |  ~ (tptp_update2(v3, v1, v4) = v5) |  ~ (a_select2(v5, v2) = v6) |  ? [v7] : ( ~ (v7 = v0) & a_select2(v3, v2) = v7))
% 57.77/21.40  | (78) gt(n3, tptp_minus_1) = 0
% 57.77/21.40  | (79) gt(n330, n4) = 0
% 57.77/21.41  | (80) gt(n4, n0) = 0
% 57.77/21.41  | (81)  ! [v0] : (v0 = n2 | v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 |  ~ (leq(v0, n2) = 0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1))
% 57.82/21.41  | (82)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (succ(v1) = v2) |  ~ (gt(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v4))
% 57.82/21.41  | (83)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (succ(v0) = v1) |  ~ (gt(v1, v0) = v2))
% 57.82/21.41  | (84) a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n1) = all_0_12_12
% 57.82/21.41  | (85)  ! [v0] : (v0 = n3 | v0 = n2 | v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 |  ~ (leq(v0, n3) = 0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1))
% 57.82/21.41  | (86)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (succ(v2) = v1) |  ~ (succ(v2) = v0))
% 57.82/21.41  | (87)  ! [v0] : (v0 = n0 |  ~ (leq(n0, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(v0, n0) = v1))
% 57.82/21.41  | (88) gt(n5, n1) = 0
% 57.82/21.41  | (89)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (inv(v2) = v1) |  ~ (inv(v2) = v0))
% 57.82/21.41  | (90) true
% 57.82/21.41  | (91)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (tptp_mmul(v3, v4) = v5) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v2, v5) = v6) |  ~ (trans(v2) = v4) |  ~ (a_select3(v6, v7, v8) = v9) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] :  ? [v16] :  ? [v17] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 &  ~ (v17 = v16) & a_select3(v3, v11, v10) = v17 & a_select3(v3, v10, v11) = v16 & leq(v11, v1) = 0 & leq(v10, v1) = 0 & leq(n0, v11) = 0 & leq(n0, v10) = 0) | (a_select3(v6, v8, v7) = v14 & leq(v8, v0) = v13 & leq(v7, v0) = v11 & leq(n0, v8) = v12 & leq(n0, v7) = v10 & ( ~ (v13 = 0) |  ~ (v12 = 0) |  ~ (v11 = 0) |  ~ (v10 = 0) | v14 = v9))))
% 57.82/21.41  | (92)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : (v7 = v5 |  ~ (tptp_update3(v4, v2, v3, v5) = v6) |  ~ (a_select3(v6, v0, v1) = v7) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 &  ~ (v14 = v5) & a_select3(v4, v8, v9) = v14 & leq(v9, v3) = 0 & leq(v8, v2) = 0 & leq(n0, v9) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0) | (leq(v1, v3) = v11 & leq(v0, v2) = v9 & leq(n0, v1) = v10 & leq(n0, v0) = v8 & ( ~ (v11 = 0) |  ~ (v10 = 0) |  ~ (v9 = 0) |  ~ (v8 = 0)))))
% 57.82/21.41  | (93) minus(n330, n1) = all_0_15_15
% 57.82/21.41  | (94)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(n1, v0) = v1) | succ(v0) = v1)
% 57.82/21.41  | (95)  ? [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : (v7 = v0 | v3 = v1 |  ~ (tptp_update3(v4, v1, v2, v5) = v6) |  ~ (a_select3(v6, v3, v2) = v7) |  ? [v8] : ( ~ (v8 = v0) & a_select3(v4, v3, v2) = v8))
% 57.82/21.41  | (96) gt(n1, n0) = 0
% 57.82/21.41  | (97) gt(n330, tptp_minus_1) = 0
% 57.82/21.41  | (98) a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n0) = all_0_13_13
% 57.82/21.41  | (99)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (lt(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & gt(v1, v0) = v3))
% 57.82/21.41  | (100) gt(n410, n2) = 0
% 57.82/21.41  | (101)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (tptp_update2(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (tptp_update2(v4, v3, v2) = v0))
% 57.82/21.41  | (102)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (dim(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (dim(v3, v2) = v0))
% 57.82/21.41  | (103) succ(n0) = n1
% 57.82/21.41  | (104)  ? [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (tptp_msub(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (a_select3(v3, v4, v5) = v6) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] : ((v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 &  ~ (v14 = v13) & a_select3(v2, v8, v7) = v14 & a_select3(v2, v7, v8) = v13 & leq(v8, v0) = 0 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 &  ~ (v14 = v13) & a_select3(v1, v8, v7) = v14 & a_select3(v1, v7, v8) = v13 & leq(v8, v0) = 0 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0) | (a_select3(v3, v5, v4) = v11 & leq(v5, v0) = v10 & leq(v4, v0) = v8 & leq(n0, v5) = v9 & leq(n0, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v10 = 0) |  ~ (v9 = 0) |  ~ (v8 = 0) |  ~ (v7 = 0) | v11 = v6))))
% 57.82/21.41  | (105)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (tptp_const_array1(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (tptp_const_array1(v3, v2) = v0))
% 57.82/21.41  | (106)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 | v1 = v0 |  ~ (gt(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v3))
% 57.82/21.41  | (107)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (a_select2(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (a_select2(v3, v2) = v0))
% 57.82/21.41  | (108) gt(n330, n3) = 0
% 57.82/21.41  | (109)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (uniform_int_rnd(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (leq(n0, v2) = v4 & leq(n0, v0) = v3 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0)))
% 57.82/21.41  | (110) gt(n330, n1) = 0
% 57.82/21.41  | (111) gt(n5, n0) = 0
% 57.82/21.41  | (112)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = v3 |  ~ (dim(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (tptp_const_array1(v4, v3) = v5) |  ~ (a_select2(v5, v0) = v6) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (leq(v1, v0) = v7 & leq(v0, v2) = v8 & ( ~ (v8 = 0) |  ~ (v7 = 0))))
% 57.82/21.41  | (113) gt(n0, tptp_minus_1) = 0
% 57.82/21.41  | (114)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (geq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (geq(v3, v2) = v0))
% 57.82/21.41  | (115)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (succ(v1) = v3) |  ~ (succ(v0) = v2) |  ~ (leq(v2, v3) = 0) | leq(v0, v1) = 0)
% 57.82/21.41  | (116)  ? [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (tptp_update3(v1, v4, v4, v5) = v6) |  ~ (a_select3(v6, v2, v3) = v7) |  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v13 = 0 & v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 &  ~ (v15 = v14) & a_select3(v1, v9, v8) = v15 & a_select3(v1, v8, v9) = v14 & leq(v9, v0) = 0 & leq(v8, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v9) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0) | (a_select3(v6, v3, v2) = v14 & leq(v4, v0) = v13 & leq(v3, v0) = v11 & leq(v2, v0) = v9 & leq(n0, v4) = v12 & leq(n0, v3) = v10 & leq(n0, v2) = v8 & ( ~ (v13 = 0) |  ~ (v12 = 0) |  ~ (v11 = 0) |  ~ (v10 = 0) |  ~ (v9 = 0) |  ~ (v8 = 0) | v14 = v7))))
% 57.82/21.41  | (117)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (pred(v1) = v2) |  ~ (leq(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & gt(v1, v0) = v4))
% 57.82/21.41  | (118)  ! [v0] :  ~ (gt(v0, v0) = 0)
% 57.82/21.41  | (119) gt(n5, n2) = 0
% 57.82/21.41  | (120) minus(n410, n1) = all_0_16_16
% 57.82/21.41  | (121)  ? [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (tptp_madd(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (a_select3(v3, v4, v5) = v6) |  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] : ((v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 &  ~ (v14 = v13) & a_select3(v2, v8, v7) = v14 & a_select3(v2, v7, v8) = v13 & leq(v8, v0) = 0 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0) | (v12 = 0 & v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 &  ~ (v14 = v13) & a_select3(v1, v8, v7) = v14 & a_select3(v1, v7, v8) = v13 & leq(v8, v0) = 0 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v8) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0) | (a_select3(v3, v5, v4) = v11 & leq(v5, v0) = v10 & leq(v4, v0) = v8 & leq(n0, v5) = v9 & leq(n0, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v10 = 0) |  ~ (v9 = 0) |  ~ (v8 = 0) |  ~ (v7 = 0) | v11 = v6))))
% 57.82/21.42  | (122) leq(pv19, all_0_16_16) = 0
% 57.82/21.42  | (123)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = v2 |  ~ (tptp_update2(v0, v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (a_select2(v3, v1) = v4))
% 57.82/21.42  | (124)  ~ (all_0_7_7 = init) |  ~ (all_0_11_11 = init) |  ~ (all_0_12_12 = init) |  ~ (all_0_13_13 = init) | (all_0_1_1 = 0 & all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init) & a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0 & leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0 & leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init) & a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0)
% 57.82/21.42  | (125)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (succ(v1) = v2) |  ~ (leq(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & leq(v0, v1) = v4))
% 57.82/21.42  | (126) succ(n3) = n4
% 57.82/21.42  | (127)  ! [v0] : (v0 = n5 | v0 = n4 | v0 = n3 | v0 = n2 | v0 = n1 | v0 = n0 |  ~ (leq(v0, n5) = 0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & leq(n0, v0) = v1))
% 57.82/21.42  | (128) gt(n4, n1) = 0
% 57.82/21.42  | (129)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(n2, v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : (succ(v2) = v1 & succ(v0) = v2))
% 57.82/21.42  | (130)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(n4, v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (succ(v4) = v1 & succ(v3) = v4 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2))
% 57.82/21.42  | (131)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (tptp_const_array2(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (tptp_const_array2(v4, v3, v2) = v0))
% 57.82/21.42  | (132) gt(n5, n4) = 0
% 57.82/21.42  | (133) succ(n4) = n5
% 57.82/21.42  | (134)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (geq(v0, v1) = 0) | leq(v1, v0) = 0)
% 57.82/21.42  | (135) leq(pv20, all_0_15_15) = 0
% 57.82/21.42  | (136) gt(n330, n2) = 0
% 57.82/21.42  | (137)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (pred(v0) = v1) | succ(v1) = v0)
% 57.82/21.42  | (138)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (succ(v0) = v1) | pred(v1) = v0)
% 57.82/21.42  | (139) gt(n410, n5) = 0
% 57.82/21.42  | (140)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (minus(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ (leq(v2, v0) = 0) | leq(n0, v1) = 0)
% 57.82/21.42  | (141)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (tptp_mmul(v3, v2) = v0))
% 57.82/21.42  | (142)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (plus(n5, v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : (succ(v5) = v1 & succ(v4) = v5 & succ(v3) = v4 & succ(v2) = v3 & succ(v0) = v2))
% 57.82/21.42  | (143)  ? [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (inv(v1) = v2) |  ~ (a_select3(v2, v3, v4) = v5) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v11 = 0 & v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & v8 = 0 &  ~ (v13 = v12) & a_select3(v1, v7, v6) = v13 & a_select3(v1, v6, v7) = v12 & leq(v7, v0) = 0 & leq(v6, v0) = 0 & leq(n0, v7) = 0 & leq(n0, v6) = 0) | (a_select3(v2, v4, v3) = v10 & leq(v4, v0) = v9 & leq(v3, v0) = v7 & leq(n0, v4) = v8 & leq(n0, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v9 = 0) |  ~ (v8 = 0) |  ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v10 = v5))))
% 57.82/21.42  | (144)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = n0 |  ~ (sum(n0, tptp_minus_1, v0) = v1))
% 57.82/21.42  | (145)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (leq(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (leq(v3, v2) = v0))
% 57.82/21.42  | (146)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (plus(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (plus(v3, v2) = v0))
% 57.82/21.42  |
% 57.82/21.42  | Instantiating formula (67) with simplex7_init, pv1376, n1, all_0_12_12, all_0_11_11 and discharging atoms a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n1) = all_0_12_12, yields:
% 57.82/21.42  | (147) all_0_11_11 = all_0_12_12 |  ~ (a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n1) = all_0_11_11)
% 57.82/21.42  |
% 57.82/21.42  | Instantiating formula (67) with simplex7_init, pv1376, n0, all_0_13_13, all_0_11_11 and discharging atoms a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n0) = all_0_13_13, yields:
% 57.82/21.42  | (148) all_0_11_11 = all_0_13_13 |  ~ (a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n0) = all_0_11_11)
% 57.82/21.42  |
% 57.82/21.42  | Instantiating formula (67) with simplex7_init, pv1376, n0, all_0_13_13, all_0_12_12 and discharging atoms a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n0) = all_0_13_13, yields:
% 57.82/21.42  | (149) all_0_12_12 = all_0_13_13 |  ~ (a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n0) = all_0_12_12)
% 57.82/21.42  |
% 57.82/21.42  | Instantiating formula (118) with n3 yields:
% 57.82/21.42  | (150)  ~ (gt(n3, n3) = 0)
% 57.82/21.42  |
% 57.82/21.42  | Instantiating formula (118) with n2 yields:
% 57.82/21.42  | (151)  ~ (gt(n2, n2) = 0)
% 57.82/21.42  |
% 57.82/21.42  | Instantiating formula (118) with n1 yields:
% 57.82/21.42  | (152)  ~ (gt(n1, n1) = 0)
% 57.82/21.42  |
% 57.82/21.42  | Instantiating formula (118) with tptp_minus_1 yields:
% 57.82/21.42  | (153)  ~ (gt(tptp_minus_1, tptp_minus_1) = 0)
% 57.82/21.42  |
% 57.82/21.42  | Using (24) and (150) yields:
% 57.82/21.42  | (154)  ~ (n3 = n1)
% 57.82/21.42  |
% 57.82/21.42  | Using (7) and (150) yields:
% 57.82/21.42  | (155)  ~ (n3 = n0)
% 57.82/21.42  |
% 57.82/21.42  | Using (42) and (152) yields:
% 57.82/21.42  | (156)  ~ (n1 = tptp_minus_1)
% 57.82/21.42  |
% 57.82/21.42  | Using (96) and (152) yields:
% 57.82/21.42  | (157)  ~ (n1 = n0)
% 57.82/21.42  |
% 57.82/21.42  | Using (113) and (153) yields:
% 57.82/21.42  | (158)  ~ (tptp_minus_1 = n0)
% 57.82/21.42  |
% 57.82/21.42  | Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_15_15, n330 and discharging atoms minus(n330, n1) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 57.82/21.42  | (159) pred(n330) = all_0_15_15
% 57.82/21.42  |
% 57.82/21.42  | Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_16_16, n410 and discharging atoms minus(n410, n1) = all_0_16_16, yields:
% 57.82/21.42  | (160) pred(n410) = all_0_16_16
% 57.82/21.42  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_14_14, pv1376 and discharging atoms minus(pv1376, n1) = all_0_14_14, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (161) pred(pv1376) = all_0_14_14
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (65) with all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_0_10_10, init, all_0_15_15, n0, pv20, all_0_16_16, n0, pv19 and discharging atoms tptp_const_array2(all_0_10_10, all_0_9_9, init) = all_0_8_8, a_select3(all_0_8_8, pv19, pv20) = all_0_7_7, dim(n0, all_0_15_15) = all_0_9_9, dim(n0, all_0_16_16) = all_0_10_10, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (162) all_0_7_7 = init |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (leq(pv20, all_0_15_15) = v3 & leq(pv19, all_0_16_16) = v1 & leq(n0, pv20) = v2 & leq(n0, pv19) = v0 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) |  ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (138) with n3, n2 and discharging atoms succ(n2) = n3, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (163) pred(n3) = n2
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (138) with n2, n1 and discharging atoms succ(n1) = n2, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (164) pred(n2) = n1
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (138) with n0, tptp_minus_1 and discharging atoms succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (165) pred(n0) = tptp_minus_1
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (138) with n1, n0 and discharging atoms succ(n0) = n1, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (166) pred(n1) = n0
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (85) with pv1376 and discharging atoms leq(pv1376, n3) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (167) pv1376 = n3 | pv1376 = n2 | pv1376 = n1 | pv1376 = n0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0)
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (87) with n3 yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (168) n3 = n0 |  ~ (leq(n0, n3) = 0) |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n3, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (37) with pv1376 yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (169)  ~ (leq(pv1376, all_0_14_14) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, pv1376) = v1 & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = init))
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (20) with n1, all_0_16_16, n0 and discharging atoms succ(n0) = n1, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (170)  ~ (leq(n1, all_0_16_16) = 0) | gt(all_0_16_16, n0) = 0
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (20) with n0, pv1376, tptp_minus_1 and discharging atoms succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0, leq(n0, pv1376) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (171) gt(pv1376, tptp_minus_1) = 0
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (87) with pv1376 and discharging atoms leq(n0, pv1376) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (172) pv1376 = n0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(pv1376, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (37) with n0 yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (173)  ~ (leq(n0, all_0_14_14) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, n0) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = init))
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (31) with all_0_13_13, pv1376, n0 and discharging atoms a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n0) = all_0_13_13, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (174) all_0_13_13 = init |  ~ (leq(n0, n2) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, n0) = v0) | (leq(pv1376, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0))))
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (51) with n330, n3 and discharging atoms gt(n330, n3) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (175) leq(n3, n330) = 0
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (51) with n410, n3 and discharging atoms gt(n410, n3) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (176) leq(n3, n410) = 0
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (51) with n5, n3 and discharging atoms gt(n5, n3) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (177) leq(n3, n5) = 0
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (51) with n4, n3 and discharging atoms gt(n4, n3) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (178) leq(n3, n4) = 0
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (41) with n3, n2, n2 and discharging atoms succ(n2) = n3, gt(n3, n2) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (179) leq(n2, n2) = 0
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (51) with n3, tptp_minus_1 and discharging atoms gt(n3, tptp_minus_1) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (180) leq(tptp_minus_1, n3) = 0
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (51) with n3, n0 and discharging atoms gt(n3, n0) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (181) leq(n0, n3) = 0
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (51) with n2, n1 and discharging atoms gt(n2, n1) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (182) leq(n1, n2) = 0
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (51) with n2, tptp_minus_1 and discharging atoms gt(n2, tptp_minus_1) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (183) leq(tptp_minus_1, n2) = 0
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (51) with n2, n0 and discharging atoms gt(n2, n0) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (184) leq(n0, n2) = 0
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (51) with n1, tptp_minus_1 and discharging atoms gt(n1, tptp_minus_1) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (185) leq(tptp_minus_1, n1) = 0
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  | Instantiating formula (51) with n1, n0 and discharging atoms gt(n1, n0) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.43  | (186) leq(n0, n1) = 0
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (162), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.43  |-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.43  | (187) all_0_7_7 = init
% 57.82/21.43  |
% 57.82/21.43  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (168), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.43  	|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.43  	| (188)  ~ (leq(n0, n3) = 0)
% 57.82/21.43  	|
% 57.82/21.43  		| Using (181) and (188) yields:
% 57.82/21.43  		| (189) $false
% 57.82/21.43  		|
% 57.82/21.43  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.43  	|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.43  	| (181) leq(n0, n3) = 0
% 57.82/21.43  	| (191) n3 = n0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n3, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.43  	|
% 57.82/21.43  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (174), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.43  		|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.43  		| (192)  ~ (leq(n0, n2) = 0)
% 57.82/21.43  		|
% 57.82/21.43  			| Using (184) and (192) yields:
% 57.82/21.43  			| (189) $false
% 57.82/21.43  			|
% 57.82/21.43  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.43  		|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.43  		| (184) leq(n0, n2) = 0
% 57.82/21.43  		| (195) all_0_13_13 = init |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, n0) = v0) | (leq(pv1376, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0))))
% 57.82/21.43  		|
% 57.82/21.43  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (195), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.43  			|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.43  			| (196) all_0_13_13 = init
% 57.82/21.43  			|
% 57.82/21.43  				| From (196) and (98) follows:
% 57.82/21.43  				| (197) a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n0) = init
% 57.82/21.44  				|
% 57.82/21.44  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (191), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.44  				|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.44  				| (198) n3 = n0
% 57.82/21.44  				|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Equations (198) can reduce 155 to:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.44  				|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.44  				| (155)  ~ (n3 = n0)
% 57.82/21.44  				| (201)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n3, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.44  				|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating (201) with all_55_0_29 yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (202)  ~ (all_55_0_29 = 0) & leq(n3, n0) = all_55_0_29
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Applying alpha-rule on (202) yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (203)  ~ (all_55_0_29 = 0)
% 57.82/21.44  					| (204) leq(n3, n0) = all_55_0_29
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (48) with n3, n2, all_0_14_14 and discharging atoms pred(n3) = n2, yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (205) all_0_14_14 = n2 |  ~ (pred(n3) = all_0_14_14)
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (48) with n2, n1, all_0_14_14 and discharging atoms pred(n2) = n1, yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (206) all_0_14_14 = n1 |  ~ (pred(n2) = all_0_14_14)
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (48) with n1, n0, all_0_14_14 and discharging atoms pred(n1) = n0, yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (207) all_0_14_14 = n0 |  ~ (pred(n1) = all_0_14_14)
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (48) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_0_14_14 and discharging atoms pred(n0) = tptp_minus_1, yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (208) all_0_14_14 = tptp_minus_1 |  ~ (pred(n0) = all_0_14_14)
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (137) with all_0_15_15, n330 and discharging atoms pred(n330) = all_0_15_15, yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (209) succ(all_0_15_15) = n330
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (137) with all_0_16_16, n410 and discharging atoms pred(n410) = all_0_16_16, yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (210) succ(all_0_16_16) = n410
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (137) with all_0_14_14, pv1376 and discharging atoms pred(pv1376) = all_0_14_14, yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (211) succ(all_0_14_14) = pv1376
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (37) with n3 yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (212)  ~ (leq(n3, all_0_14_14) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = init))
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (117) with all_55_0_29, n0, n1, n3 and discharging atoms pred(n1) = n0, leq(n3, n0) = all_55_0_29, yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (213) all_55_0_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & gt(n1, n3) = v0)
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (25) with all_55_0_29, n0, n330, n3 and discharging atoms leq(n3, n330) = 0, leq(n3, n0) = all_55_0_29, yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (214) all_55_0_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n330, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (25) with all_55_0_29, n0, n410, n3 and discharging atoms leq(n3, n410) = 0, leq(n3, n0) = all_55_0_29, yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (215) all_55_0_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n410, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (25) with all_55_0_29, n0, n5, n3 and discharging atoms leq(n3, n5) = 0, leq(n3, n0) = all_55_0_29, yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (216) all_55_0_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n5, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (25) with all_55_0_29, n0, n4, n3 and discharging atoms leq(n3, n4) = 0, leq(n3, n0) = all_55_0_29, yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (217) all_55_0_29 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n4, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (37) with n2 yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (218)  ~ (leq(n2, all_0_14_14) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = init))
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (71) with n2, pv1376, n2 and discharging atoms leq(n2, n2) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (219)  ~ (pred(pv1376) = n2) | gt(pv1376, n2) = 0
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (31) with all_0_11_11, pv1376, n2 and discharging atoms a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n2) = all_0_11_11, leq(n2, n2) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (220) all_0_11_11 = init |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, n2) = v0) | (leq(pv1376, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0))))
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (31) with all_0_12_12, pv1376, n1 and discharging atoms a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n1) = all_0_12_12, leq(n1, n2) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (221) all_0_12_12 = init |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, n1) = v0) | (leq(pv1376, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0))))
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (37) with tptp_minus_1 yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (222)  ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_14_14) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = init))
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (85) with tptp_minus_1 and discharging atoms leq(tptp_minus_1, n3) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (223) n3 = tptp_minus_1 | n2 = tptp_minus_1 | n1 = tptp_minus_1 | tptp_minus_1 = n0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (81) with tptp_minus_1 and discharging atoms leq(tptp_minus_1, n2) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (224) n2 = tptp_minus_1 | n1 = tptp_minus_1 | tptp_minus_1 = n0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (58) with tptp_minus_1 and discharging atoms leq(tptp_minus_1, n1) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (225) n1 = tptp_minus_1 | tptp_minus_1 = n0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					| Instantiating formula (87) with n1 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (226) n1 = n0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n1, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (215), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.44  					|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (227) all_55_0_29 = 0
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  						| Equations (227) can reduce 203 to:
% 57.82/21.44  						| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.44  						|
% 57.82/21.44  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.44  					|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.44  					| (203)  ~ (all_55_0_29 = 0)
% 57.82/21.44  					| (230)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n410, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.44  					|
% 57.82/21.44  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (214), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.44  						|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.44  						| (227) all_55_0_29 = 0
% 57.82/21.44  						|
% 57.82/21.44  							| Equations (227) can reduce 203 to:
% 57.82/21.44  							| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.44  							|
% 57.82/21.44  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.44  						|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.44  						| (203)  ~ (all_55_0_29 = 0)
% 57.82/21.45  						| (234)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n330, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.45  						|
% 57.82/21.45  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (216), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.45  							|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.45  							| (227) all_55_0_29 = 0
% 57.82/21.45  							|
% 57.82/21.45  								| Equations (227) can reduce 203 to:
% 57.82/21.45  								| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.45  								|
% 57.82/21.45  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.45  							|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.45  							| (203)  ~ (all_55_0_29 = 0)
% 57.82/21.45  							| (238)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n5, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.45  							|
% 57.82/21.45  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (217), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.45  								|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.45  								| (227) all_55_0_29 = 0
% 57.82/21.45  								|
% 57.82/21.45  									| Equations (227) can reduce 203 to:
% 57.82/21.45  									| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.45  									|
% 57.82/21.45  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.45  								|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.45  								| (203)  ~ (all_55_0_29 = 0)
% 57.82/21.45  								| (242)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n4, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.45  								|
% 57.82/21.45  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (226), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.45  									|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.45  									| (243) n1 = n0
% 57.82/21.45  									|
% 57.82/21.45  										| Equations (243) can reduce 157 to:
% 57.82/21.45  										| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.45  										|
% 57.82/21.45  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.45  									|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.45  									| (157)  ~ (n1 = n0)
% 57.82/21.45  									| (246)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n1, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.45  									|
% 57.82/21.45  										| Instantiating (246) with all_114_0_38 yields:
% 57.82/21.45  										| (247)  ~ (all_114_0_38 = 0) & leq(n1, n0) = all_114_0_38
% 57.82/21.45  										|
% 57.82/21.45  										| Applying alpha-rule on (247) yields:
% 57.82/21.45  										| (248)  ~ (all_114_0_38 = 0)
% 57.82/21.45  										| (249) leq(n1, n0) = all_114_0_38
% 57.82/21.45  										|
% 57.82/21.45  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (213), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.45  										|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.45  										| (227) all_55_0_29 = 0
% 57.82/21.45  										|
% 57.82/21.45  											| Equations (227) can reduce 203 to:
% 57.82/21.45  											| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.45  											|
% 57.82/21.45  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.45  										|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.45  										| (203)  ~ (all_55_0_29 = 0)
% 57.82/21.45  										| (253)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & gt(n1, n3) = v0)
% 57.82/21.45  										|
% 57.82/21.45  											| Instantiating (253) with all_119_0_39 yields:
% 57.82/21.45  											| (254)  ~ (all_119_0_39 = 0) & gt(n1, n3) = all_119_0_39
% 57.82/21.45  											|
% 57.82/21.45  											| Applying alpha-rule on (254) yields:
% 57.82/21.45  											| (255)  ~ (all_119_0_39 = 0)
% 57.82/21.45  											| (256) gt(n1, n3) = all_119_0_39
% 57.82/21.45  											|
% 57.82/21.45  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (221), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.45  											|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.45  											| (257) all_0_12_12 = init
% 57.82/21.45  											|
% 57.82/21.45  												| From (257) and (84) follows:
% 57.82/21.45  												| (258) a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n1) = init
% 57.82/21.45  												|
% 57.82/21.45  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (225), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.45  												|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.45  												| (259) tptp_minus_1 = n0
% 57.82/21.45  												|
% 57.82/21.45  													| Equations (259) can reduce 158 to:
% 57.82/21.45  													| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.45  													|
% 57.82/21.45  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.45  												|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.45  												| (158)  ~ (tptp_minus_1 = n0)
% 57.82/21.45  												| (262) n1 = tptp_minus_1 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 57.82/21.45  												|
% 57.82/21.45  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (224), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.45  													|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.45  													| (259) tptp_minus_1 = n0
% 57.82/21.45  													|
% 57.82/21.45  														| Equations (259) can reduce 158 to:
% 57.82/21.45  														| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.45  														|
% 57.82/21.45  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.45  													|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.45  													| (158)  ~ (tptp_minus_1 = n0)
% 57.82/21.45  													| (266) n2 = tptp_minus_1 | n1 = tptp_minus_1 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 57.82/21.45  													|
% 57.82/21.45  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (223), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.45  														|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.45  														| (259) tptp_minus_1 = n0
% 57.82/21.45  														|
% 57.82/21.45  															| Equations (259) can reduce 158 to:
% 57.82/21.45  															| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.45  															|
% 57.82/21.45  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.45  														|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.45  														| (158)  ~ (tptp_minus_1 = n0)
% 57.82/21.45  														| (270) n3 = tptp_minus_1 | n2 = tptp_minus_1 | n1 = tptp_minus_1 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 57.82/21.45  														|
% 57.82/21.45  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (220), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.45  															|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.45  															| (271) all_0_11_11 = init
% 57.82/21.45  															|
% 57.82/21.45  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (270), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.45  																|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.45  																| (272) n1 = tptp_minus_1
% 57.82/21.45  																|
% 57.82/21.45  																	| Equations (272) can reduce 156 to:
% 57.82/21.45  																	| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.45  																	|
% 57.82/21.45  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.45  																|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.45  																| (156)  ~ (n1 = tptp_minus_1)
% 57.82/21.45  																| (275) n3 = tptp_minus_1 | n2 = tptp_minus_1 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 57.82/21.45  																|
% 57.82/21.45  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (262), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.45  																	|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.45  																	| (272) n1 = tptp_minus_1
% 57.82/21.45  																	|
% 57.82/21.45  																		| Equations (272) can reduce 156 to:
% 57.82/21.45  																		| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.45  																		|
% 57.82/21.45  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.45  																	|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.45  																	| (156)  ~ (n1 = tptp_minus_1)
% 57.82/21.45  																	| (279)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 57.82/21.45  																	|
% 57.82/21.45  																		| Instantiating (279) with all_170_0_43 yields:
% 57.82/21.45  																		| (280)  ~ (all_170_0_43 = 0) & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_170_0_43
% 57.82/21.45  																		|
% 57.82/21.45  																		| Applying alpha-rule on (280) yields:
% 57.82/21.45  																		| (281)  ~ (all_170_0_43 = 0)
% 57.82/21.45  																		| (282) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_170_0_43
% 57.82/21.45  																		|
% 57.82/21.45  																		| Instantiating formula (86) with n2, pv1376, n3 and discharging atoms succ(n2) = n3, yields:
% 57.82/21.45  																		| (283) pv1376 = n3 |  ~ (succ(n2) = pv1376)
% 57.82/21.45  																		|
% 57.82/21.45  																		| Instantiating formula (86) with n0, pv1376, n1 and discharging atoms succ(n0) = n1, yields:
% 57.82/21.45  																		| (284) pv1376 = n1 |  ~ (succ(n0) = pv1376)
% 57.82/21.45  																		|
% 57.82/21.45  																		| Instantiating formula (41) with pv1376, all_0_14_14, n3 and discharging atoms succ(all_0_14_14) = pv1376, yields:
% 57.82/21.45  																		| (285)  ~ (gt(pv1376, n3) = 0) | leq(n3, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 57.82/21.45  																		|
% 57.82/21.45  																		| Instantiating formula (41) with pv1376, all_0_14_14, n2 and discharging atoms succ(all_0_14_14) = pv1376, yields:
% 57.82/21.45  																		| (286)  ~ (gt(pv1376, n2) = 0) | leq(n2, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 57.82/21.46  																		|
% 57.82/21.46  																		| Instantiating formula (41) with pv1376, all_0_14_14, tptp_minus_1 and discharging atoms succ(all_0_14_14) = pv1376, gt(pv1376, tptp_minus_1) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																		| (287) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 57.82/21.46  																		|
% 57.82/21.46  																		| Instantiating formula (41) with n3, all_0_14_14, n2 and discharging atoms gt(n3, n2) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																		| (288)  ~ (succ(all_0_14_14) = n3) | leq(n2, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 57.82/21.46  																		|
% 57.82/21.46  																		| Instantiating formula (41) with n3, all_0_14_14, n0 and discharging atoms gt(n3, n0) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																		| (289)  ~ (succ(all_0_14_14) = n3) | leq(n0, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 57.82/21.46  																		|
% 57.82/21.46  																		| Instantiating formula (41) with n2, all_0_14_14, n0 and discharging atoms gt(n2, n0) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																		| (290)  ~ (succ(all_0_14_14) = n2) | leq(n0, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 57.82/21.46  																		|
% 57.82/21.46  																		| Instantiating formula (41) with n1, all_0_14_14, n0 and discharging atoms gt(n1, n0) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																		| (291)  ~ (succ(all_0_14_14) = n1) | leq(n0, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 57.82/21.46  																		|
% 57.82/21.46  																		| Instantiating formula (41) with n330, all_0_15_15, n1 and discharging atoms succ(all_0_15_15) = n330, gt(n330, n1) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																		| (292) leq(n1, all_0_15_15) = 0
% 57.82/21.46  																		|
% 57.82/21.46  																		| Instantiating formula (41) with n410, all_0_16_16, n1 and discharging atoms succ(all_0_16_16) = n410, gt(n410, n1) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																		| (293) leq(n1, all_0_16_16) = 0
% 57.82/21.46  																		|
% 57.82/21.46  																		| Instantiating formula (16) with all_114_0_38, n0, n1, all_0_14_14, n0 and discharging atoms succ(n0) = n1, leq(n1, n0) = all_114_0_38, yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																		| (294) all_114_0_38 = 0 |  ~ (succ(all_0_14_14) = n0) |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, all_0_14_14) = v0)
% 57.82/21.46  																		|
% 57.82/21.46  																		| Instantiating formula (117) with all_114_0_38, n0, n1, n1 and discharging atoms pred(n1) = n0, leq(n1, n0) = all_114_0_38, yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																		| (295) all_114_0_38 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & gt(n1, n1) = v0)
% 57.82/21.46  																		|
% 57.82/21.46  																		| Instantiating formula (25) with all_114_0_38, n0, all_0_15_15, n1 and discharging atoms leq(n1, n0) = all_114_0_38, yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																		| (296) all_114_0_38 = 0 |  ~ (leq(n1, all_0_15_15) = 0) |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(all_0_15_15, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.46  																		|
% 57.82/21.46  																		| Instantiating formula (25) with all_114_0_38, n0, all_0_16_16, n1 and discharging atoms leq(n1, n0) = all_114_0_38, yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																		| (297) all_114_0_38 = 0 |  ~ (leq(n1, all_0_16_16) = 0) |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(all_0_16_16, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.46  																		|
% 57.82/21.46  																		| Instantiating formula (117) with all_170_0_43, tptp_minus_1, n0, n0 and discharging atoms pred(n0) = tptp_minus_1, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_170_0_43, yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																		| (298) all_170_0_43 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & gt(n0, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.46  																		|
% 57.82/21.46  																		| Instantiating formula (25) with all_170_0_43, tptp_minus_1, pv1376, n0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, pv1376) = 0, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_170_0_43, yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																		| (299) all_170_0_43 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(pv1376, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 57.82/21.46  																		|
% 57.82/21.46  																		| Instantiating formula (64) with all_119_0_39, n3, n0, n1 and discharging atoms gt(n1, n3) = all_119_0_39, gt(n1, n0) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																		| (300) all_119_0_39 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & gt(n0, n3) = v0)
% 57.82/21.46  																		|
% 57.82/21.46  																		| Instantiating formula (106) with all_119_0_39, n1, n3 and discharging atoms gt(n1, n3) = all_119_0_39, yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																		| (301) all_119_0_39 = 0 | n3 = n1 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n3, n1) = v0)
% 57.82/21.46  																		|
% 57.82/21.46  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (170), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.46  																		|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.46  																		| (302)  ~ (leq(n1, all_0_16_16) = 0)
% 57.82/21.46  																		|
% 57.82/21.46  																			| Using (293) and (302) yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																			| (189) $false
% 57.82/21.46  																			|
% 57.82/21.46  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.46  																		|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.46  																		| (293) leq(n1, all_0_16_16) = 0
% 57.82/21.46  																		| (305) gt(all_0_16_16, n0) = 0
% 57.82/21.46  																		|
% 57.82/21.46  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (298), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.46  																			|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.46  																			| (306) all_170_0_43 = 0
% 57.82/21.46  																			|
% 57.82/21.46  																				| Equations (306) can reduce 281 to:
% 57.82/21.46  																				| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.46  																				|
% 57.82/21.46  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.46  																			|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.46  																			| (281)  ~ (all_170_0_43 = 0)
% 57.82/21.46  																			| (309)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & gt(n0, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.46  																			|
% 57.82/21.46  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (299), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.46  																				|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.46  																				| (306) all_170_0_43 = 0
% 57.82/21.46  																				|
% 57.82/21.46  																					| Equations (306) can reduce 281 to:
% 57.82/21.46  																					| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.46  																					|
% 57.82/21.46  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.46  																				|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.46  																				| (281)  ~ (all_170_0_43 = 0)
% 57.82/21.46  																				| (313)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(pv1376, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 57.82/21.46  																				|
% 57.82/21.46  																					| Instantiating (313) with all_218_0_45 yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																					| (314)  ~ (all_218_0_45 = 0) & leq(pv1376, tptp_minus_1) = all_218_0_45
% 57.82/21.46  																					|
% 57.82/21.46  																					| Applying alpha-rule on (314) yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																					| (315)  ~ (all_218_0_45 = 0)
% 57.82/21.46  																					| (316) leq(pv1376, tptp_minus_1) = all_218_0_45
% 57.82/21.46  																					|
% 57.82/21.46  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (300), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.46  																					|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.46  																					| (317) all_119_0_39 = 0
% 57.82/21.46  																					|
% 57.82/21.46  																						| Equations (317) can reduce 255 to:
% 57.82/21.46  																						| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.46  																						|
% 57.82/21.46  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.46  																					|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.46  																					| (255)  ~ (all_119_0_39 = 0)
% 57.82/21.46  																					| (320)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & gt(n0, n3) = v0)
% 57.82/21.46  																					|
% 57.82/21.46  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (301), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.46  																						|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.46  																						| (317) all_119_0_39 = 0
% 57.82/21.46  																						|
% 57.82/21.46  																							| Equations (317) can reduce 255 to:
% 57.82/21.46  																							| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.46  																							|
% 57.82/21.46  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.46  																						|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.46  																						| (255)  ~ (all_119_0_39 = 0)
% 57.82/21.46  																						| (324) n3 = n1 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n3, n1) = v0)
% 57.82/21.46  																						|
% 57.82/21.46  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (324), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.46  																							|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.46  																							| (325) n3 = n1
% 57.82/21.46  																							|
% 57.82/21.46  																								| Equations (325) can reduce 154 to:
% 57.82/21.46  																								| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.46  																								|
% 57.82/21.46  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.46  																							|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.46  																							| (154)  ~ (n3 = n1)
% 57.82/21.46  																							| (328)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n3, n1) = v0)
% 57.82/21.46  																							|
% 57.82/21.46  																								| Instantiating (328) with all_291_0_57 yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																								| (329)  ~ (all_291_0_57 = 0) & leq(n3, n1) = all_291_0_57
% 57.82/21.46  																								|
% 57.82/21.46  																								| Applying alpha-rule on (329) yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																								| (330)  ~ (all_291_0_57 = 0)
% 57.82/21.46  																								| (331) leq(n3, n1) = all_291_0_57
% 57.82/21.46  																								|
% 57.82/21.46  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (296), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.46  																								|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.46  																								| (332)  ~ (leq(n1, all_0_15_15) = 0)
% 57.82/21.46  																								|
% 57.82/21.46  																									| Using (292) and (332) yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																									| (189) $false
% 57.82/21.46  																									|
% 57.82/21.46  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.46  																								|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.46  																								| (292) leq(n1, all_0_15_15) = 0
% 57.82/21.46  																								| (335) all_114_0_38 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(all_0_15_15, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.46  																								|
% 57.82/21.46  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (297), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.46  																									|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.46  																									| (302)  ~ (leq(n1, all_0_16_16) = 0)
% 57.82/21.46  																									|
% 57.82/21.46  																										| Using (293) and (302) yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																										| (189) $false
% 57.82/21.46  																										|
% 57.82/21.46  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.46  																									|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.46  																									| (293) leq(n1, all_0_16_16) = 0
% 57.82/21.46  																									| (339) all_114_0_38 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(all_0_16_16, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.46  																									|
% 57.82/21.46  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (295), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.46  																										|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.46  																										| (340) all_114_0_38 = 0
% 57.82/21.46  																										|
% 57.82/21.46  																											| Equations (340) can reduce 248 to:
% 57.82/21.46  																											| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.46  																											|
% 57.82/21.46  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.46  																										|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.46  																										| (248)  ~ (all_114_0_38 = 0)
% 57.82/21.46  																										| (343)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & gt(n1, n1) = v0)
% 57.82/21.46  																										|
% 57.82/21.46  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (222), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.46  																											|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.46  																											| (344)  ~ (leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_14_14) = 0)
% 57.82/21.46  																											|
% 57.82/21.46  																												| Using (287) and (344) yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																												| (189) $false
% 57.82/21.46  																												|
% 57.82/21.46  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.46  																											|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.46  																											| (287) leq(tptp_minus_1, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 57.82/21.46  																											| (347)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, tptp_minus_1) = v1 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = init))
% 57.82/21.46  																											|
% 57.82/21.46  																												| Instantiating (347) with all_323_0_59, all_323_1_60 yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																												| (348) a_select2(s_values7_init, tptp_minus_1) = all_323_0_59 & leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_323_1_60 & ( ~ (all_323_1_60 = 0) | all_323_0_59 = init)
% 57.82/21.46  																												|
% 57.82/21.46  																												| Applying alpha-rule on (348) yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																												| (349) a_select2(s_values7_init, tptp_minus_1) = all_323_0_59
% 57.82/21.46  																												| (350) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_323_1_60
% 57.82/21.46  																												| (351)  ~ (all_323_1_60 = 0) | all_323_0_59 = init
% 57.82/21.46  																												|
% 57.82/21.46  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (335), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.46  																												|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.46  																												| (340) all_114_0_38 = 0
% 57.82/21.46  																												|
% 57.82/21.46  																													| Equations (340) can reduce 248 to:
% 57.82/21.46  																													| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.46  																													|
% 57.82/21.46  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.46  																												|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.46  																												| (248)  ~ (all_114_0_38 = 0)
% 57.82/21.46  																												| (355)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(all_0_15_15, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.46  																												|
% 57.82/21.46  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (339), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.46  																													|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.46  																													| (340) all_114_0_38 = 0
% 57.82/21.46  																													|
% 57.82/21.46  																														| Equations (340) can reduce 248 to:
% 57.82/21.46  																														| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.46  																														|
% 57.82/21.46  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.46  																													|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.46  																													| (248)  ~ (all_114_0_38 = 0)
% 57.82/21.46  																													| (359)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(all_0_16_16, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.46  																													|
% 57.82/21.46  																														| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_218_0_45, all_170_0_43 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_170_0_43, yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																														| (360) all_218_0_45 = all_170_0_43 |  ~ (leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_218_0_45)
% 57.82/21.46  																														|
% 57.82/21.46  																														| Instantiating formula (145) with n3, n1, all_291_0_57, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n3, n1) = all_291_0_57, yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																														| (361) all_291_0_57 = 0 |  ~ (leq(n3, n1) = 0)
% 57.82/21.46  																														|
% 57.82/21.46  																														| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_323_1_60, all_170_0_43 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_323_1_60, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_170_0_43, yields:
% 57.82/21.46  																														| (362) all_323_1_60 = all_170_0_43
% 57.82/21.47  																														|
% 57.82/21.47  																														| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, tptp_minus_1, all_323_1_60, all_218_0_45 and discharging atoms leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_323_1_60, yields:
% 57.82/21.47  																														| (363) all_323_1_60 = all_218_0_45 |  ~ (leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_218_0_45)
% 57.82/21.47  																														|
% 57.82/21.47  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (124), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.47  																														|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.47  																														| (364)  ~ (all_0_7_7 = init)
% 57.82/21.47  																														|
% 57.82/21.47  																															| Equations (187) can reduce 364 to:
% 57.82/21.47  																															| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.47  																															|
% 57.82/21.47  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.47  																														|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.47  																														| (187) all_0_7_7 = init
% 57.82/21.47  																														| (367)  ~ (all_0_11_11 = init) |  ~ (all_0_12_12 = init) |  ~ (all_0_13_13 = init) | (all_0_1_1 = 0 & all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init) & a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0 & leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0 & leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init) & a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0)
% 57.82/21.47  																														|
% 57.82/21.47  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (149), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.47  																															|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.47  																															| (368)  ~ (a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n0) = all_0_12_12)
% 57.82/21.47  																															|
% 57.82/21.47  																																| From (257) and (368) follows:
% 57.82/21.47  																																| (369)  ~ (a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n0) = init)
% 57.82/21.47  																																|
% 57.82/21.47  																																| Using (197) and (369) yields:
% 57.82/21.47  																																| (189) $false
% 57.82/21.47  																																|
% 57.82/21.47  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.47  																															|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.47  																															| (371) a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n0) = all_0_12_12
% 57.82/21.47  																															| (372) all_0_12_12 = all_0_13_13
% 57.82/21.47  																															|
% 57.82/21.47  																																| Combining equations (257,372) yields a new equation:
% 57.82/21.47  																																| (196) all_0_13_13 = init
% 57.82/21.47  																																|
% 57.82/21.47  																																| Combining equations (196,372) yields a new equation:
% 57.82/21.47  																																| (257) all_0_12_12 = init
% 57.82/21.47  																																|
% 57.82/21.47  																																| From (257) and (371) follows:
% 57.82/21.47  																																| (197) a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n0) = init
% 57.82/21.47  																																|
% 57.82/21.47  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (148), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.47  																																|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.47  																																| (376)  ~ (a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n0) = all_0_11_11)
% 57.82/21.47  																																|
% 57.82/21.47  																																	| From (271) and (376) follows:
% 57.82/21.47  																																	| (369)  ~ (a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n0) = init)
% 57.82/21.47  																																	|
% 57.82/21.47  																																	| Using (197) and (369) yields:
% 57.82/21.47  																																	| (189) $false
% 57.82/21.47  																																	|
% 57.82/21.47  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.47  																																|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.47  																																| (379) a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n0) = all_0_11_11
% 57.82/21.47  																																| (380) all_0_11_11 = all_0_13_13
% 57.82/21.47  																																|
% 57.82/21.47  																																	| Combining equations (271,380) yields a new equation:
% 57.82/21.47  																																	| (196) all_0_13_13 = init
% 57.82/21.47  																																	|
% 57.82/21.47  																																	| Combining equations (196,380) yields a new equation:
% 57.82/21.47  																																	| (271) all_0_11_11 = init
% 57.82/21.47  																																	|
% 57.82/21.47  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (147), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.47  																																	|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.47  																																	| (383)  ~ (a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n1) = all_0_11_11)
% 57.82/21.47  																																	|
% 57.82/21.47  																																		| From (271) and (383) follows:
% 57.82/21.47  																																		| (384)  ~ (a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n1) = init)
% 57.82/21.47  																																		|
% 57.82/21.47  																																		| Using (258) and (384) yields:
% 57.82/21.47  																																		| (189) $false
% 57.82/21.47  																																		|
% 57.82/21.47  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.47  																																	|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.47  																																	| (386) a_select3(simplex7_init, pv1376, n1) = all_0_11_11
% 57.82/21.47  																																	| (387) all_0_11_11 = all_0_12_12
% 57.82/21.47  																																	|
% 57.82/21.47  																																		| Combining equations (271,387) yields a new equation:
% 57.82/21.47  																																		| (257) all_0_12_12 = init
% 57.82/21.47  																																		|
% 57.82/21.47  																																		| Combining equations (257,387) yields a new equation:
% 57.82/21.47  																																		| (271) all_0_11_11 = init
% 57.82/21.47  																																		|
% 57.82/21.47  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (173), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.47  																																		|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.47  																																		| (390)  ~ (leq(n0, all_0_14_14) = 0)
% 57.82/21.47  																																		|
% 57.82/21.47  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (289), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.47  																																			|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.47  																																			| (391) leq(n0, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 57.82/21.47  																																			|
% 57.82/21.47  																																				| Using (391) and (390) yields:
% 57.82/21.47  																																				| (189) $false
% 57.82/21.47  																																				|
% 57.82/21.47  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.47  																																			|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.47  																																			| (390)  ~ (leq(n0, all_0_14_14) = 0)
% 57.82/21.47  																																			| (394)  ~ (succ(all_0_14_14) = n3)
% 57.82/21.47  																																			|
% 57.82/21.47  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (290), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.47  																																				|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.47  																																				| (391) leq(n0, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 57.82/21.47  																																				|
% 57.82/21.47  																																					| Using (391) and (390) yields:
% 57.82/21.47  																																					| (189) $false
% 57.82/21.47  																																					|
% 57.82/21.47  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.47  																																				|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.47  																																				| (390)  ~ (leq(n0, all_0_14_14) = 0)
% 57.82/21.47  																																				| (398)  ~ (succ(all_0_14_14) = n2)
% 57.82/21.47  																																				|
% 57.82/21.47  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (291), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.47  																																					|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.47  																																					| (391) leq(n0, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 57.82/21.47  																																					|
% 57.82/21.47  																																						| Using (391) and (390) yields:
% 57.82/21.47  																																						| (189) $false
% 57.82/21.47  																																						|
% 57.82/21.47  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.47  																																					|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.47  																																					| (390)  ~ (leq(n0, all_0_14_14) = 0)
% 57.82/21.47  																																					| (402)  ~ (succ(all_0_14_14) = n1)
% 57.82/21.47  																																					|
% 57.82/21.47  																																						| Using (211) and (394) yields:
% 57.82/21.47  																																						| (403)  ~ (pv1376 = n3)
% 57.82/21.47  																																						|
% 57.82/21.47  																																						| Using (211) and (398) yields:
% 57.82/21.47  																																						| (404)  ~ (pv1376 = n2)
% 57.82/21.47  																																						|
% 57.82/21.47  																																						| Using (211) and (402) yields:
% 57.82/21.47  																																						| (405)  ~ (pv1376 = n1)
% 57.82/21.47  																																						|
% 57.82/21.47  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (167), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.47  																																						|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.47  																																						| (406) pv1376 = n0
% 57.82/21.47  																																						|
% 57.82/21.47  																																							| From (406) and (161) follows:
% 57.82/21.47  																																							| (407) pred(n0) = all_0_14_14
% 57.82/21.47  																																							|
% 57.82/21.47  																																							| From (406) and (316) follows:
% 57.82/21.47  																																							| (408) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_218_0_45
% 57.82/21.47  																																							|
% 57.82/21.47  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.47  																																							|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.47  																																							| (409)  ~ (pred(n0) = all_0_14_14)
% 57.82/21.47  																																							|
% 57.82/21.47  																																								| Using (407) and (409) yields:
% 57.82/21.47  																																								| (189) $false
% 57.82/21.47  																																								|
% 57.82/21.47  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.47  																																							|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.47  																																							| (407) pred(n0) = all_0_14_14
% 57.82/21.47  																																							| (412) all_0_14_14 = tptp_minus_1
% 57.82/21.47  																																							|
% 57.82/21.47  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (360), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.47  																																								|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.47  																																								| (413)  ~ (leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_218_0_45)
% 57.82/21.47  																																								|
% 57.82/21.47  																																									| Using (408) and (413) yields:
% 57.82/21.47  																																									| (189) $false
% 57.82/21.47  																																									|
% 57.82/21.47  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.47  																																								|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.47  																																								| (408) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_218_0_45
% 57.82/21.47  																																								| (416) all_218_0_45 = all_170_0_43
% 57.82/21.47  																																								|
% 57.82/21.47  																																									| Equations (416) can reduce 315 to:
% 57.82/21.47  																																									| (281)  ~ (all_170_0_43 = 0)
% 57.82/21.47  																																									|
% 57.82/21.47  																																									| From (416) and (408) follows:
% 57.82/21.47  																																									| (282) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_170_0_43
% 57.82/21.47  																																									|
% 57.82/21.47  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (363), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.47  																																									|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.47  																																									| (413)  ~ (leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_218_0_45)
% 57.82/21.47  																																									|
% 57.82/21.47  																																										| From (416) and (413) follows:
% 57.82/21.47  																																										| (420)  ~ (leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_170_0_43)
% 57.82/21.47  																																										|
% 57.82/21.47  																																										| Using (282) and (420) yields:
% 57.82/21.47  																																										| (189) $false
% 57.82/21.47  																																										|
% 57.82/21.47  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.47  																																									|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.47  																																									| (408) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_218_0_45
% 57.82/21.47  																																									| (423) all_323_1_60 = all_218_0_45
% 57.82/21.47  																																									|
% 57.82/21.47  																																										| Combining equations (423,362) yields a new equation:
% 57.82/21.47  																																										| (424) all_218_0_45 = all_170_0_43
% 57.82/21.47  																																										|
% 57.82/21.47  																																										| Simplifying 424 yields:
% 57.82/21.47  																																										| (416) all_218_0_45 = all_170_0_43
% 57.82/21.47  																																										|
% 57.82/21.47  																																										| From (416) and (408) follows:
% 57.82/21.47  																																										| (282) leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_170_0_43
% 57.82/21.47  																																										|
% 57.82/21.47  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (367), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.47  																																										|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.47  																																										| (427)  ~ (all_0_11_11 = init)
% 57.82/21.47  																																										|
% 57.82/21.47  																																											| Equations (271) can reduce 427 to:
% 57.82/21.47  																																											| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.47  																																											|
% 57.82/21.47  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.47  																																										|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.47  																																										| (271) all_0_11_11 = init
% 57.82/21.47  																																										| (430)  ~ (all_0_12_12 = init) |  ~ (all_0_13_13 = init) | (all_0_1_1 = 0 & all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init) & a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0 & leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0 & leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init) & a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0)
% 57.82/21.47  																																										|
% 57.82/21.47  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (430), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.47  																																											|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.47  																																											| (431)  ~ (all_0_12_12 = init)
% 57.82/21.47  																																											|
% 57.82/21.47  																																												| Equations (257) can reduce 431 to:
% 57.82/21.47  																																												| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.47  																																												|
% 57.82/21.47  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.47  																																											|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.47  																																											| (257) all_0_12_12 = init
% 57.82/21.47  																																											| (434)  ~ (all_0_13_13 = init) | (all_0_1_1 = 0 & all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init) & a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0 & leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0 & leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init) & a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0)
% 57.82/21.47  																																											|
% 57.82/21.47  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (434), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.47  																																												|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.47  																																												| (435)  ~ (all_0_13_13 = init)
% 57.82/21.47  																																												|
% 57.82/21.47  																																													| Equations (196) can reduce 435 to:
% 57.82/21.47  																																													| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.47  																																													|
% 57.82/21.47  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.47  																																												|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.47  																																												| (196) all_0_13_13 = init
% 57.82/21.47  																																												| (438) (all_0_1_1 = 0 & all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init) & a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0 & leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0 & leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init) & a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0)
% 57.82/21.48  																																												|
% 57.82/21.48  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (438), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.48  																																													|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.48  																																													| (439) all_0_1_1 = 0 & all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init) & a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0 & leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0 & leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																													|
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (439) yields:
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (440) leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (441) all_0_2_2 = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (442) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (443) all_0_5_5 = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (444) leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (445) leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (446) a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (447) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (448) leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (449)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init)
% 57.82/21.48  																																														|
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| Instantiating formula (31) with all_0_0_0, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0, leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (450) all_0_0_0 = init |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v0) | (leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0))))
% 57.82/21.48  																																														|
% 57.82/21.48  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (450), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.48  																																														|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (451) all_0_0_0 = init
% 57.82/21.48  																																														|
% 57.82/21.48  																																															| Equations (451) can reduce 449 to:
% 57.82/21.48  																																															| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.48  																																															|
% 57.82/21.48  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.48  																																														|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (449)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init)
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (454)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v0) | (leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0))))
% 57.82/21.48  																																														|
% 57.82/21.48  																																															| Instantiating (454) with all_2725_0_466, all_2725_1_467 yields:
% 57.82/21.48  																																															| (455) ( ~ (all_2725_1_467 = 0) & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2725_1_467) | (leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = all_2725_0_466 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = all_2725_1_467 & ( ~ (all_2725_0_466 = 0) |  ~ (all_2725_1_467 = 0)))
% 57.82/21.48  																																															|
% 57.82/21.48  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (455), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.48  																																															|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.48  																																															| (456)  ~ (all_2725_1_467 = 0) & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2725_1_467
% 57.82/21.48  																																															|
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (456) yields:
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| (457)  ~ (all_2725_1_467 = 0)
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| (458) leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2725_1_467
% 57.82/21.48  																																																|
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, all_0_6_6, all_2725_1_467, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2725_1_467, leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| (459) all_2725_1_467 = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																																|
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| Equations (459) can reduce 457 to:
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.48  																																																|
% 57.82/21.48  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.48  																																															|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.48  																																															| (461) leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = all_2725_0_466 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = all_2725_1_467 & ( ~ (all_2725_0_466 = 0) |  ~ (all_2725_1_467 = 0))
% 57.82/21.48  																																															|
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (461) yields:
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| (462) leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = all_2725_0_466
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| (463) leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = all_2725_1_467
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| (464)  ~ (all_2725_0_466 = 0) |  ~ (all_2725_1_467 = 0)
% 57.82/21.48  																																																|
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| Instantiating formula (145) with all_0_3_3, n3, all_2725_0_466, 0 and discharging atoms leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = all_2725_0_466, leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| (465) all_2725_0_466 = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																																|
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, all_0_3_3, all_2725_1_467, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = all_2725_1_467, leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| (459) all_2725_1_467 = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																																|
% 57.82/21.48  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (464), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.48  																																																|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| (467)  ~ (all_2725_0_466 = 0)
% 57.82/21.48  																																																|
% 57.82/21.48  																																																	| Equations (465) can reduce 467 to:
% 57.82/21.48  																																																	| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.48  																																																	|
% 57.82/21.48  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.48  																																																|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| (465) all_2725_0_466 = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| (457)  ~ (all_2725_1_467 = 0)
% 57.82/21.48  																																																|
% 57.82/21.48  																																																	| Equations (459) can reduce 457 to:
% 57.82/21.48  																																																	| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.48  																																																	|
% 57.82/21.48  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.48  																																													|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.48  																																													| (472) all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init) & a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																													|
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (472) yields:
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (442) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (443) all_0_5_5 = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (444) leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (476) a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (477)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init)
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (478) leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																														|
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| From (412) and (478) follows:
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (479) leq(all_0_6_6, tptp_minus_1) = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																														|
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| Instantiating formula (37) with all_0_6_6 yields:
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (480)  ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = init))
% 57.82/21.48  																																														|
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| Instantiating formula (25) with all_170_0_43, tptp_minus_1, all_0_6_6, n0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0, leq(n0, tptp_minus_1) = all_170_0_43, yields:
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (481) all_170_0_43 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(all_0_6_6, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 57.82/21.48  																																														|
% 57.82/21.48  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (480), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.48  																																														|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (482)  ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0)
% 57.82/21.48  																																														|
% 57.82/21.48  																																															| From (412) and (482) follows:
% 57.82/21.48  																																															| (483)  ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, tptp_minus_1) = 0)
% 57.82/21.48  																																															|
% 57.82/21.48  																																															| Using (479) and (483) yields:
% 57.82/21.48  																																															| (189) $false
% 57.82/21.48  																																															|
% 57.82/21.48  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.48  																																														|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (478) leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																														| (486)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = init))
% 57.82/21.48  																																														|
% 57.82/21.48  																																															| From (412) and (478) follows:
% 57.82/21.48  																																															| (479) leq(all_0_6_6, tptp_minus_1) = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																															|
% 57.82/21.48  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (481), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.48  																																															|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.48  																																															| (306) all_170_0_43 = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																															|
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| Equations (306) can reduce 281 to:
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.48  																																																|
% 57.82/21.48  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.48  																																															|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.48  																																															| (281)  ~ (all_170_0_43 = 0)
% 57.82/21.48  																																															| (491)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(all_0_6_6, tptp_minus_1) = v0)
% 57.82/21.48  																																															|
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| Instantiating (491) with all_2747_0_490 yields:
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| (492)  ~ (all_2747_0_490 = 0) & leq(all_0_6_6, tptp_minus_1) = all_2747_0_490
% 57.82/21.48  																																																|
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (492) yields:
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| (493)  ~ (all_2747_0_490 = 0)
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| (494) leq(all_0_6_6, tptp_minus_1) = all_2747_0_490
% 57.82/21.48  																																																|
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| Instantiating formula (145) with all_0_6_6, tptp_minus_1, all_2747_0_490, 0 and discharging atoms leq(all_0_6_6, tptp_minus_1) = all_2747_0_490, leq(all_0_6_6, tptp_minus_1) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| (495) all_2747_0_490 = 0
% 57.82/21.48  																																																|
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| Equations (495) can reduce 493 to:
% 57.82/21.48  																																																| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.48  																																																|
% 57.82/21.48  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.48  																																						|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.48  																																						| (497)  ~ (pv1376 = n0)
% 57.82/21.48  																																						| (498) pv1376 = n3 | pv1376 = n2 | pv1376 = n1 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0)
% 57.82/21.48  																																						|
% 57.82/21.48  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (498), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.48  																																							|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.48  																																							| (499) pv1376 = n1
% 57.82/21.48  																																							|
% 57.82/21.48  																																								| Equations (499) can reduce 405 to:
% 57.82/21.48  																																								| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.48  																																								|
% 57.82/21.48  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.48  																																							|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.48  																																							| (405)  ~ (pv1376 = n1)
% 57.82/21.48  																																							| (502) pv1376 = n3 | pv1376 = n2 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0)
% 57.82/21.48  																																							|
% 57.82/21.48  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (502), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.48  																																								|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.48  																																								| (503) pv1376 = n2
% 57.82/21.48  																																								|
% 57.82/21.48  																																									| Equations (503) can reduce 404 to:
% 57.82/21.48  																																									| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.48  																																									|
% 57.82/21.48  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.48  																																								|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.48  																																								| (404)  ~ (pv1376 = n2)
% 57.82/21.48  																																								| (506) pv1376 = n3 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0)
% 57.82/21.48  																																								|
% 57.82/21.48  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (506), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.48  																																									|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.48  																																									| (507) pv1376 = n3
% 57.82/21.48  																																									|
% 57.82/21.48  																																										| Equations (507) can reduce 403 to:
% 57.82/21.48  																																										| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.48  																																										|
% 57.82/21.48  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.48  																																									|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.48  																																									| (403)  ~ (pv1376 = n3)
% 57.82/21.48  																																									| (510)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0)
% 57.82/21.48  																																									|
% 57.82/21.48  																																										| Instantiating (510) with all_655_0_498 yields:
% 57.82/21.49  																																										| (511)  ~ (all_655_0_498 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = all_655_0_498
% 57.82/21.49  																																										|
% 57.82/21.49  																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (511) yields:
% 57.82/21.49  																																										| (512)  ~ (all_655_0_498 = 0)
% 57.82/21.49  																																										| (513) leq(n0, pv1376) = all_655_0_498
% 57.82/21.49  																																										|
% 57.82/21.49  																																										| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, pv1376, all_655_0_498, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, pv1376) = all_655_0_498, leq(n0, pv1376) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.49  																																										| (514) all_655_0_498 = 0
% 57.82/21.49  																																										|
% 57.82/21.49  																																										| Equations (514) can reduce 512 to:
% 57.82/21.49  																																										| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.49  																																										|
% 57.82/21.49  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.49  																																		|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.49  																																		| (391) leq(n0, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 57.82/21.49  																																		| (517)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, n0) = v1 & leq(n0, n0) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = init))
% 57.82/21.49  																																		|
% 57.82/21.49  																																			| Instantiating (517) with all_579_0_500, all_579_1_501 yields:
% 57.82/21.49  																																			| (518) a_select2(s_values7_init, n0) = all_579_0_500 & leq(n0, n0) = all_579_1_501 & ( ~ (all_579_1_501 = 0) | all_579_0_500 = init)
% 57.82/21.49  																																			|
% 57.82/21.49  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (518) yields:
% 57.82/21.49  																																			| (519) a_select2(s_values7_init, n0) = all_579_0_500
% 57.82/21.49  																																			| (520) leq(n0, n0) = all_579_1_501
% 57.82/21.49  																																			| (521)  ~ (all_579_1_501 = 0) | all_579_0_500 = init
% 57.82/21.49  																																			|
% 57.82/21.49  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (294), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.49  																																			|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.49  																																			| (522)  ~ (succ(all_0_14_14) = n0)
% 57.82/21.49  																																			|
% 57.82/21.49  																																				| Instantiating formula (27) with all_579_1_501, n0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n0) = all_579_1_501, yields:
% 57.82/21.49  																																				| (523) all_579_1_501 = 0
% 57.82/21.49  																																				|
% 57.82/21.49  																																				| Using (211) and (522) yields:
% 57.82/21.49  																																				| (497)  ~ (pv1376 = n0)
% 57.82/21.49  																																				|
% 57.82/21.49  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (521), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.49  																																				|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.49  																																				| (525)  ~ (all_579_1_501 = 0)
% 57.82/21.49  																																				|
% 57.82/21.49  																																					| Equations (523) can reduce 525 to:
% 57.82/21.49  																																					| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.49  																																					|
% 57.82/21.49  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.49  																																				|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.49  																																				| (523) all_579_1_501 = 0
% 57.82/21.49  																																				| (528) all_579_0_500 = init
% 57.82/21.49  																																				|
% 57.82/21.49  																																					| From (528) and (519) follows:
% 57.82/21.49  																																					| (529) a_select2(s_values7_init, n0) = init
% 57.82/21.49  																																					|
% 57.82/21.49  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (172), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.49  																																					|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.49  																																					| (406) pv1376 = n0
% 57.82/21.49  																																					|
% 57.82/21.49  																																						| Equations (406) can reduce 497 to:
% 57.82/21.49  																																						| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.49  																																						|
% 57.82/21.49  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.49  																																					|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.49  																																					| (497)  ~ (pv1376 = n0)
% 57.82/21.49  																																					| (533)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(pv1376, n0) = v0)
% 57.82/21.49  																																					|
% 57.82/21.49  																																						| Instantiating (533) with all_596_0_502 yields:
% 57.82/21.49  																																						| (534)  ~ (all_596_0_502 = 0) & leq(pv1376, n0) = all_596_0_502
% 57.82/21.49  																																						|
% 57.82/21.49  																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (534) yields:
% 57.82/21.49  																																						| (535)  ~ (all_596_0_502 = 0)
% 57.82/21.49  																																						| (536) leq(pv1376, n0) = all_596_0_502
% 57.82/21.49  																																						|
% 57.82/21.49  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (169), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.49  																																						|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.49  																																						| (537)  ~ (leq(pv1376, all_0_14_14) = 0)
% 57.82/21.49  																																						|
% 57.82/21.49  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (167), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.49  																																							|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.49  																																							| (406) pv1376 = n0
% 57.82/21.49  																																							|
% 57.82/21.49  																																								| Equations (406) can reduce 497 to:
% 57.82/21.49  																																								| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.49  																																								|
% 57.82/21.49  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.49  																																							|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.49  																																							| (497)  ~ (pv1376 = n0)
% 57.82/21.49  																																							| (498) pv1376 = n3 | pv1376 = n2 | pv1376 = n1 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0)
% 57.82/21.49  																																							|
% 57.82/21.49  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (207), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.49  																																								|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.49  																																								| (542)  ~ (pred(n1) = all_0_14_14)
% 57.82/21.49  																																								|
% 57.82/21.49  																																									| Using (161) and (542) yields:
% 57.82/21.49  																																									| (405)  ~ (pv1376 = n1)
% 57.82/21.49  																																									|
% 57.82/21.49  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (218), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.49  																																									|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.49  																																									| (544)  ~ (leq(n2, all_0_14_14) = 0)
% 57.82/21.49  																																									|
% 57.82/21.49  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (286), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.49  																																										|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.49  																																										| (545) leq(n2, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 57.82/21.49  																																										|
% 57.82/21.49  																																											| Using (545) and (544) yields:
% 57.82/21.49  																																											| (189) $false
% 57.82/21.49  																																											|
% 57.82/21.49  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.49  																																										|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.49  																																										| (544)  ~ (leq(n2, all_0_14_14) = 0)
% 57.82/21.49  																																										| (548)  ~ (gt(pv1376, n2) = 0)
% 57.82/21.49  																																										|
% 57.82/21.49  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (288), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.49  																																											|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.49  																																											| (545) leq(n2, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 57.82/21.49  																																											|
% 57.82/21.49  																																												| Using (545) and (544) yields:
% 57.82/21.49  																																												| (189) $false
% 57.82/21.49  																																												|
% 57.82/21.49  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.49  																																											|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.49  																																											| (544)  ~ (leq(n2, all_0_14_14) = 0)
% 57.82/21.49  																																											| (394)  ~ (succ(all_0_14_14) = n3)
% 57.82/21.49  																																											|
% 57.82/21.49  																																												| Using (211) and (394) yields:
% 57.82/21.49  																																												| (403)  ~ (pv1376 = n3)
% 57.82/21.49  																																												|
% 57.82/21.49  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (498), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.49  																																												|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.49  																																												| (499) pv1376 = n1
% 57.82/21.49  																																												|
% 57.82/21.49  																																													| Equations (499) can reduce 405 to:
% 57.82/21.49  																																													| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.49  																																													|
% 57.82/21.49  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.49  																																												|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.49  																																												| (405)  ~ (pv1376 = n1)
% 57.82/21.49  																																												| (502) pv1376 = n3 | pv1376 = n2 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0)
% 57.82/21.49  																																												|
% 57.82/21.49  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (502), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.49  																																													|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.49  																																													| (503) pv1376 = n2
% 57.82/21.49  																																													|
% 57.82/21.49  																																														| From (503) and (161) follows:
% 57.82/21.49  																																														| (559) pred(n2) = all_0_14_14
% 57.82/21.49  																																														|
% 57.82/21.49  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (206), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.49  																																														|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.49  																																														| (560)  ~ (pred(n2) = all_0_14_14)
% 57.82/21.49  																																														|
% 57.82/21.49  																																															| Using (559) and (560) yields:
% 57.82/21.49  																																															| (189) $false
% 57.82/21.49  																																															|
% 57.82/21.49  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.49  																																														|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.49  																																														| (559) pred(n2) = all_0_14_14
% 57.82/21.49  																																														| (563) all_0_14_14 = n1
% 57.82/21.49  																																														|
% 57.82/21.49  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (367), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.49  																																															|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.49  																																															| (427)  ~ (all_0_11_11 = init)
% 57.82/21.49  																																															|
% 57.82/21.49  																																																| Equations (271) can reduce 427 to:
% 57.82/21.49  																																																| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.49  																																																|
% 57.82/21.49  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.49  																																															|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.49  																																															| (271) all_0_11_11 = init
% 57.82/21.49  																																															| (430)  ~ (all_0_12_12 = init) |  ~ (all_0_13_13 = init) | (all_0_1_1 = 0 & all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init) & a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0 & leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0 & leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init) & a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0)
% 57.82/21.49  																																															|
% 57.82/21.49  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (430), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.49  																																																|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.49  																																																| (431)  ~ (all_0_12_12 = init)
% 57.82/21.49  																																																|
% 57.82/21.49  																																																	| Equations (257) can reduce 431 to:
% 57.82/21.49  																																																	| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.49  																																																	|
% 57.82/21.49  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.49  																																																|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.49  																																																| (257) all_0_12_12 = init
% 57.82/21.49  																																																| (434)  ~ (all_0_13_13 = init) | (all_0_1_1 = 0 & all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init) & a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0 & leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0 & leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init) & a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0)
% 57.82/21.49  																																																|
% 57.82/21.49  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (434), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.49  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.49  																																																	| (435)  ~ (all_0_13_13 = init)
% 57.82/21.49  																																																	|
% 57.82/21.49  																																																		| Equations (196) can reduce 435 to:
% 57.82/21.49  																																																		| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.49  																																																		|
% 57.82/21.49  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.49  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.49  																																																	| (196) all_0_13_13 = init
% 57.82/21.49  																																																	| (438) (all_0_1_1 = 0 & all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init) & a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0 & leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0 & leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init) & a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0)
% 57.82/21.49  																																																	|
% 57.82/21.49  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (438), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.49  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.49  																																																		| (439) all_0_1_1 = 0 & all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init) & a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0 & leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0 & leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 57.82/21.49  																																																		|
% 57.82/21.49  																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (439) yields:
% 57.82/21.49  																																																			| (440) leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0
% 57.82/21.49  																																																			| (441) all_0_2_2 = 0
% 57.82/21.49  																																																			| (442) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 57.82/21.49  																																																			| (443) all_0_5_5 = 0
% 57.82/21.49  																																																			| (444) leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 57.82/21.49  																																																			| (445) leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0
% 57.82/21.49  																																																			| (446) a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0
% 57.82/21.49  																																																			| (447) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 57.82/21.49  																																																			| (448) leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 57.82/21.49  																																																			| (449)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init)
% 57.82/21.49  																																																			|
% 57.82/21.49  																																																			| Instantiating formula (31) with all_0_0_0, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0, leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.49  																																																			| (450) all_0_0_0 = init |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v0) | (leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0))))
% 57.82/21.49  																																																			|
% 57.82/21.50  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (450), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.50  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.50  																																																			| (451) all_0_0_0 = init
% 57.82/21.50  																																																			|
% 57.82/21.50  																																																				| Equations (451) can reduce 449 to:
% 57.82/21.50  																																																				| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.50  																																																				|
% 57.82/21.50  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.50  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.50  																																																			| (449)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init)
% 57.82/21.50  																																																			| (454)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v0) | (leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0))))
% 57.82/21.50  																																																			|
% 57.82/21.50  																																																				| Instantiating (454) with all_2817_0_593, all_2817_1_594 yields:
% 57.82/21.50  																																																				| (592) ( ~ (all_2817_1_594 = 0) & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2817_1_594) | (leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = all_2817_0_593 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = all_2817_1_594 & ( ~ (all_2817_0_593 = 0) |  ~ (all_2817_1_594 = 0)))
% 57.82/21.50  																																																				|
% 57.82/21.50  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (592), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.50  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.50  																																																				| (593)  ~ (all_2817_1_594 = 0) & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2817_1_594
% 57.82/21.50  																																																				|
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (593) yields:
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					| (594)  ~ (all_2817_1_594 = 0)
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					| (595) leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2817_1_594
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					|
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, all_0_6_6, all_2817_1_594, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2817_1_594, leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					| (596) all_2817_1_594 = 0
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					|
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					| Equations (596) can reduce 594 to:
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					|
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.50  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.50  																																																				| (598) leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = all_2817_0_593 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = all_2817_1_594 & ( ~ (all_2817_0_593 = 0) |  ~ (all_2817_1_594 = 0))
% 57.82/21.50  																																																				|
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (598) yields:
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					| (599) leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = all_2817_0_593
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					| (600) leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = all_2817_1_594
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					| (601)  ~ (all_2817_0_593 = 0) |  ~ (all_2817_1_594 = 0)
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					|
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					| Instantiating formula (145) with all_0_3_3, n3, all_2817_0_593, 0 and discharging atoms leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = all_2817_0_593, leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					| (602) all_2817_0_593 = 0
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					|
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, all_0_3_3, all_2817_1_594, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = all_2817_1_594, leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					| (596) all_2817_1_594 = 0
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					|
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (601), into two cases.
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					| (604)  ~ (all_2817_0_593 = 0)
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					|
% 57.82/21.50  																																																						| Equations (602) can reduce 604 to:
% 57.82/21.50  																																																						| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.50  																																																						|
% 57.82/21.50  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					| (602) all_2817_0_593 = 0
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					| (594)  ~ (all_2817_1_594 = 0)
% 57.82/21.50  																																																					|
% 57.82/21.50  																																																						| Equations (596) can reduce 594 to:
% 57.82/21.50  																																																						| (199) $false
% 57.82/21.50  																																																						|
% 57.82/21.50  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 57.82/21.50  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 57.82/21.50  																																																		| (472) all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init) & a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 57.82/21.50  																																																		|
% 57.82/21.50  																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (472) yields:
% 57.82/21.50  																																																			| (442) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 57.82/21.50  																																																			| (443) all_0_5_5 = 0
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| (444) leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| (476) a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| (477)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init)
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| (478) leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| From (563) and (478) follows:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| (616) leq(all_0_6_6, n1) = 0
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| Instantiating formula (37) with all_0_6_6 yields:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| (480)  ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = init))
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (480), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| (482)  ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0)
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				| From (563) and (482) follows:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				| (619)  ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, n1) = 0)
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				| Using (616) and (619) yields:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				| (189) $false
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| (478) leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| (486)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = init))
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				| Instantiating (486) with all_2817_0_621, all_2817_1_622 yields:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				| (623) a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_2817_0_621 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2817_1_622 & ( ~ (all_2817_1_622 = 0) | all_2817_0_621 = init)
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (623) yields:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				| (624) a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_2817_0_621
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				| (625) leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2817_1_622
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				| (626)  ~ (all_2817_1_622 = 0) | all_2817_0_621 = init
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				| Instantiating formula (107) with s_values7_init, all_0_6_6, all_2817_0_621, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_2817_0_621, a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				| (627) all_2817_0_621 = all_0_3_3
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, all_0_6_6, all_2817_1_622, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2817_1_622, leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				| (628) all_2817_1_622 = 0
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (626), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				| (629)  ~ (all_2817_1_622 = 0)
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																					| Equations (628) can reduce 629 to:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																					| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.50  																																																					|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				| (628) all_2817_1_622 = 0
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				| (632) all_2817_0_621 = init
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																					| Combining equations (632,627) yields a new equation:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																					| (633) all_0_3_3 = init
% 58.27/21.50  																																																					|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																					| Equations (633) can reduce 477 to:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																					| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.50  																																																					|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.50  																																													|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.50  																																													| (404)  ~ (pv1376 = n2)
% 58.27/21.50  																																													| (506) pv1376 = n3 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0)
% 58.27/21.50  																																													|
% 58.27/21.50  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (506), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.50  																																														|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.50  																																														| (507) pv1376 = n3
% 58.27/21.50  																																														|
% 58.27/21.50  																																															| Equations (507) can reduce 403 to:
% 58.27/21.50  																																															| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.50  																																															|
% 58.27/21.50  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.50  																																														|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.50  																																														| (403)  ~ (pv1376 = n3)
% 58.27/21.50  																																														| (510)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0)
% 58.27/21.50  																																														|
% 58.27/21.50  																																															| Instantiating (510) with all_859_0_631 yields:
% 58.27/21.50  																																															| (641)  ~ (all_859_0_631 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = all_859_0_631
% 58.27/21.50  																																															|
% 58.27/21.50  																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (641) yields:
% 58.27/21.50  																																															| (642)  ~ (all_859_0_631 = 0)
% 58.27/21.50  																																															| (643) leq(n0, pv1376) = all_859_0_631
% 58.27/21.50  																																															|
% 58.27/21.50  																																															| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, pv1376, all_859_0_631, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, pv1376) = all_859_0_631, leq(n0, pv1376) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.50  																																															| (644) all_859_0_631 = 0
% 58.27/21.50  																																															|
% 58.27/21.50  																																															| Equations (644) can reduce 642 to:
% 58.27/21.50  																																															| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.50  																																															|
% 58.27/21.50  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.50  																																									|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.50  																																									| (545) leq(n2, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 58.27/21.50  																																									| (647)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, n2) = v1 & leq(n0, n2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = init))
% 58.27/21.50  																																									|
% 58.27/21.50  																																										| Using (545) and (537) yields:
% 58.27/21.50  																																										| (404)  ~ (pv1376 = n2)
% 58.27/21.50  																																										|
% 58.27/21.50  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (498), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.50  																																										|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.50  																																										| (499) pv1376 = n1
% 58.27/21.50  																																										|
% 58.27/21.50  																																											| Equations (499) can reduce 405 to:
% 58.27/21.50  																																											| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.50  																																											|
% 58.27/21.50  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.50  																																										|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.50  																																										| (405)  ~ (pv1376 = n1)
% 58.27/21.50  																																										| (502) pv1376 = n3 | pv1376 = n2 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0)
% 58.27/21.50  																																										|
% 58.27/21.50  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (502), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.50  																																											|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.50  																																											| (503) pv1376 = n2
% 58.27/21.50  																																											|
% 58.27/21.50  																																												| Equations (503) can reduce 404 to:
% 58.27/21.50  																																												| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.50  																																												|
% 58.27/21.50  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.50  																																											|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.50  																																											| (404)  ~ (pv1376 = n2)
% 58.27/21.50  																																											| (506) pv1376 = n3 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0)
% 58.27/21.50  																																											|
% 58.27/21.50  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (506), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.50  																																												|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.50  																																												| (507) pv1376 = n3
% 58.27/21.50  																																												|
% 58.27/21.50  																																													| From (507) and (161) follows:
% 58.27/21.50  																																													| (658) pred(n3) = all_0_14_14
% 58.27/21.50  																																													|
% 58.27/21.50  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (205), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.50  																																													|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.50  																																													| (659)  ~ (pred(n3) = all_0_14_14)
% 58.27/21.50  																																													|
% 58.27/21.50  																																														| Using (658) and (659) yields:
% 58.27/21.50  																																														| (189) $false
% 58.27/21.50  																																														|
% 58.27/21.50  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.50  																																													|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.50  																																													| (658) pred(n3) = all_0_14_14
% 58.27/21.50  																																													| (662) all_0_14_14 = n2
% 58.27/21.50  																																													|
% 58.27/21.50  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (367), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.50  																																														|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.50  																																														| (427)  ~ (all_0_11_11 = init)
% 58.27/21.50  																																														|
% 58.27/21.50  																																															| Equations (271) can reduce 427 to:
% 58.27/21.50  																																															| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.50  																																															|
% 58.27/21.50  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.50  																																														|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.50  																																														| (271) all_0_11_11 = init
% 58.27/21.50  																																														| (430)  ~ (all_0_12_12 = init) |  ~ (all_0_13_13 = init) | (all_0_1_1 = 0 & all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init) & a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0 & leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0 & leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init) & a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0)
% 58.27/21.50  																																														|
% 58.27/21.50  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (430), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.50  																																															|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.50  																																															| (431)  ~ (all_0_12_12 = init)
% 58.27/21.50  																																															|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																| Equations (257) can reduce 431 to:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.50  																																																|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.50  																																															|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.50  																																															| (257) all_0_12_12 = init
% 58.27/21.50  																																															| (434)  ~ (all_0_13_13 = init) | (all_0_1_1 = 0 & all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init) & a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0 & leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0 & leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init) & a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0)
% 58.27/21.50  																																															|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (434), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.50  																																																|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																| (435)  ~ (all_0_13_13 = init)
% 58.27/21.50  																																																|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																	| Equations (196) can reduce 435 to:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																	| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.50  																																																	|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.50  																																																|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																| (196) all_0_13_13 = init
% 58.27/21.50  																																																| (438) (all_0_1_1 = 0 & all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init) & a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0 & leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0 & leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init) & a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0)
% 58.27/21.50  																																																|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (438), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.50  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																	| (439) all_0_1_1 = 0 & all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init) & a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0 & leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0 & leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 58.27/21.50  																																																	|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (439) yields:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		| (440) leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		| (441) all_0_2_2 = 0
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		| (442) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		| (443) all_0_5_5 = 0
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		| (444) leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		| (445) leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		| (446) a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		| (447) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		| (448) leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		| (449)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init)
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		| Instantiating formula (31) with all_0_0_0, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0, leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		| (450) all_0_0_0 = init |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v0) | (leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0))))
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		| Instantiating formula (37) with all_0_6_6 yields:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		| (480)  ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = init))
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (480), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		| (482)  ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0)
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| From (662) and (482) follows:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| (689)  ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0)
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| Using (445) and (689) yields:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| (189) $false
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		| (478) leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		| (486)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = init))
% 58.27/21.50  																																																		|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| Instantiating (486) with all_2839_0_723, all_2839_1_724 yields:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| (693) a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_2839_0_723 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2839_1_724 & ( ~ (all_2839_1_724 = 0) | all_2839_0_723 = init)
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (693) yields:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| (694) a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_2839_0_723
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| (695) leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2839_1_724
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| (696)  ~ (all_2839_1_724 = 0) | all_2839_0_723 = init
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (450), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			| (451) all_0_0_0 = init
% 58.27/21.50  																																																			|
% 58.27/21.50  																																																				| Equations (451) can reduce 449 to:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			| (449)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init)
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			| (454)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v0) | (leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0))))
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				| Instantiating (454) with all_2865_0_729, all_2865_1_730 yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				| (701) ( ~ (all_2865_1_730 = 0) & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2865_1_730) | (leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = all_2865_0_729 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = all_2865_1_730 & ( ~ (all_2865_0_729 = 0) |  ~ (all_2865_1_730 = 0)))
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (701), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				| (702)  ~ (all_2865_1_730 = 0) & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2865_1_730
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (702) yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| (703)  ~ (all_2865_1_730 = 0)
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| (704) leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2865_1_730
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, all_0_6_6, all_2865_1_730, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2865_1_730, leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| (705) all_2865_1_730 = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, all_0_6_6, all_2839_1_724, all_2865_1_730 and discharging atoms leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2865_1_730, leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2839_1_724, yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| (706) all_2865_1_730 = all_2839_1_724
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| Combining equations (705,706) yields a new equation:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| (707) all_2839_1_724 = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| Combining equations (707,706) yields a new equation:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| (705) all_2865_1_730 = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| Equations (705) can reduce 703 to:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				| (710) leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = all_2865_0_729 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = all_2865_1_730 & ( ~ (all_2865_0_729 = 0) |  ~ (all_2865_1_730 = 0))
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (710) yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| (711) leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = all_2865_0_729
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| (712) leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = all_2865_1_730
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| (713)  ~ (all_2865_0_729 = 0) |  ~ (all_2865_1_730 = 0)
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| Instantiating formula (145) with all_0_3_3, n3, all_2865_0_729, 0 and discharging atoms leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = all_2865_0_729, leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| (714) all_2865_0_729 = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, all_0_3_3, all_2865_1_730, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = all_2865_1_730, leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| (705) all_2865_1_730 = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (713), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| (716)  ~ (all_2865_0_729 = 0)
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																						| Equations (714) can reduce 716 to:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																						| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.51  																																																						|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| (714) all_2865_0_729 = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					| (703)  ~ (all_2865_1_730 = 0)
% 58.27/21.51  																																																					|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																						| Equations (705) can reduce 703 to:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																						| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.51  																																																						|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.51  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																	| (472) all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init) & a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																																	|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (472) yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		| (442) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		| (443) all_0_5_5 = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		| (444) leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		| (476) a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		| (477)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init)
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		| (478) leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		| From (662) and (478) follows:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		| (445) leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		| Instantiating formula (37) with all_0_6_6 yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		| (480)  ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = init))
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (480), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		| (482)  ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0)
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			| From (662) and (482) follows:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			| (689)  ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0)
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			| Using (445) and (689) yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			| (189) $false
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		| (478) leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		| (486)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = init))
% 58.27/21.51  																																																		|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			| Instantiating (486) with all_2805_0_743, all_2805_1_744 yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			| (735) a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_2805_0_743 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2805_1_744 & ( ~ (all_2805_1_744 = 0) | all_2805_0_743 = init)
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (735) yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			| (736) a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_2805_0_743
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			| (737) leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2805_1_744
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			| (738)  ~ (all_2805_1_744 = 0) | all_2805_0_743 = init
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			| Instantiating formula (107) with s_values7_init, all_0_6_6, all_2805_0_743, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_2805_0_743, a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			| (739) all_2805_0_743 = all_0_3_3
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, all_0_6_6, all_2805_1_744, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2805_1_744, leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			| (740) all_2805_1_744 = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (738), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			| (741)  ~ (all_2805_1_744 = 0)
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				| Equations (740) can reduce 741 to:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			| (740) all_2805_1_744 = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			| (744) all_2805_0_743 = init
% 58.27/21.51  																																																			|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				| Combining equations (744,739) yields a new equation:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				| (633) all_0_3_3 = init
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				| Equations (633) can reduce 477 to:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.51  																																												|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.51  																																												| (403)  ~ (pv1376 = n3)
% 58.27/21.51  																																												| (510)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0)
% 58.27/21.51  																																												|
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| Instantiating (510) with all_849_0_753 yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (749)  ~ (all_849_0_753 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = all_849_0_753
% 58.27/21.51  																																													|
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (749) yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (750)  ~ (all_849_0_753 = 0)
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (751) leq(n0, pv1376) = all_849_0_753
% 58.27/21.51  																																													|
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, pv1376, all_849_0_753, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, pv1376) = all_849_0_753, leq(n0, pv1376) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (752) all_849_0_753 = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																													|
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| Equations (752) can reduce 750 to:
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.51  																																													|
% 58.27/21.51  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.51  																																								|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.51  																																								| (754) pred(n1) = all_0_14_14
% 58.27/21.51  																																								| (755) all_0_14_14 = n0
% 58.27/21.51  																																								|
% 58.27/21.51  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (367), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.51  																																									|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.51  																																									| (427)  ~ (all_0_11_11 = init)
% 58.27/21.51  																																									|
% 58.27/21.51  																																										| Equations (271) can reduce 427 to:
% 58.27/21.51  																																										| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.51  																																										|
% 58.27/21.51  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.51  																																									|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.51  																																									| (271) all_0_11_11 = init
% 58.27/21.51  																																									| (430)  ~ (all_0_12_12 = init) |  ~ (all_0_13_13 = init) | (all_0_1_1 = 0 & all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init) & a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0 & leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0 & leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init) & a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0)
% 58.27/21.51  																																									|
% 58.27/21.51  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (430), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.51  																																										|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.51  																																										| (431)  ~ (all_0_12_12 = init)
% 58.27/21.51  																																										|
% 58.27/21.51  																																											| Equations (257) can reduce 431 to:
% 58.27/21.51  																																											| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.51  																																											|
% 58.27/21.51  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.51  																																										|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.51  																																										| (257) all_0_12_12 = init
% 58.27/21.51  																																										| (434)  ~ (all_0_13_13 = init) | (all_0_1_1 = 0 & all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init) & a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0 & leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0 & leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init) & a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0)
% 58.27/21.51  																																										|
% 58.27/21.51  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (434), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.51  																																											|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.51  																																											| (435)  ~ (all_0_13_13 = init)
% 58.27/21.51  																																											|
% 58.27/21.51  																																												| Equations (196) can reduce 435 to:
% 58.27/21.51  																																												| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.51  																																												|
% 58.27/21.51  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.51  																																											|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.51  																																											| (196) all_0_13_13 = init
% 58.27/21.51  																																											| (438) (all_0_1_1 = 0 & all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init) & a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0 & leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0 & leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init) & a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0)
% 58.27/21.51  																																											|
% 58.27/21.51  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (438), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.51  																																												|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.51  																																												| (439) all_0_1_1 = 0 & all_0_2_2 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init) & a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0 & leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0 & leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																												|
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (439) yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (440) leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (441) all_0_2_2 = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (442) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (443) all_0_5_5 = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (444) leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (445) leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (446) a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (447) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (448) leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (449)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init)
% 58.27/21.51  																																													|
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| Instantiating formula (31) with all_0_0_0, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms a_select3(simplex7_init, all_0_3_3, all_0_6_6) = all_0_0_0, leq(all_0_6_6, n2) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (450) all_0_0_0 = init |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v0) | (leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0))))
% 58.27/21.51  																																													|
% 58.27/21.51  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (450), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.51  																																													|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (451) all_0_0_0 = init
% 58.27/21.51  																																													|
% 58.27/21.51  																																														| Equations (451) can reduce 449 to:
% 58.27/21.51  																																														| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.51  																																														|
% 58.27/21.51  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.51  																																													|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (449)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = init)
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (454)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v0) | (leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0))))
% 58.27/21.51  																																													|
% 58.27/21.51  																																														| Instantiating (454) with all_2818_0_885, all_2818_1_886 yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																														| (784) ( ~ (all_2818_1_886 = 0) & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2818_1_886) | (leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = all_2818_0_885 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = all_2818_1_886 & ( ~ (all_2818_0_885 = 0) |  ~ (all_2818_1_886 = 0)))
% 58.27/21.51  																																														|
% 58.27/21.51  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (784), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.51  																																														|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.51  																																														| (785)  ~ (all_2818_1_886 = 0) & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2818_1_886
% 58.27/21.51  																																														|
% 58.27/21.51  																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (785) yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																															| (786)  ~ (all_2818_1_886 = 0)
% 58.27/21.51  																																															| (787) leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2818_1_886
% 58.27/21.51  																																															|
% 58.27/21.51  																																															| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, all_0_6_6, all_2818_1_886, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = all_2818_1_886, leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																															| (788) all_2818_1_886 = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																															|
% 58.27/21.51  																																															| Equations (788) can reduce 786 to:
% 58.27/21.51  																																															| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.51  																																															|
% 58.27/21.51  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.51  																																														|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.51  																																														| (790) leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = all_2818_0_885 & leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = all_2818_1_886 & ( ~ (all_2818_0_885 = 0) |  ~ (all_2818_1_886 = 0))
% 58.27/21.51  																																														|
% 58.27/21.51  																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (790) yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																															| (791) leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = all_2818_0_885
% 58.27/21.51  																																															| (792) leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = all_2818_1_886
% 58.27/21.51  																																															| (793)  ~ (all_2818_0_885 = 0) |  ~ (all_2818_1_886 = 0)
% 58.27/21.51  																																															|
% 58.27/21.51  																																															| Instantiating formula (145) with all_0_3_3, n3, all_2818_0_885, 0 and discharging atoms leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = all_2818_0_885, leq(all_0_3_3, n3) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																															| (794) all_2818_0_885 = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																															|
% 58.27/21.51  																																															| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, all_0_3_3, all_2818_1_886, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = all_2818_1_886, leq(n0, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																															| (788) all_2818_1_886 = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																															|
% 58.27/21.51  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (793), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.51  																																															|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.51  																																															| (796)  ~ (all_2818_0_885 = 0)
% 58.27/21.51  																																															|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																| Equations (794) can reduce 796 to:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.51  																																																|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.51  																																															|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.51  																																															| (794) all_2818_0_885 = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																															| (786)  ~ (all_2818_1_886 = 0)
% 58.27/21.51  																																															|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																| Equations (788) can reduce 786 to:
% 58.27/21.51  																																																| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.51  																																																|
% 58.27/21.51  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.51  																																												|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.51  																																												| (472) all_0_4_4 = 0 & all_0_5_5 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init) & a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3 & leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																												|
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (472) yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (442) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (443) all_0_5_5 = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (444) leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (476) a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = all_0_3_3
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (477)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = init)
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (478) leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																													|
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| From (755) and (478) follows:
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (808) leq(all_0_6_6, n0) = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																													|
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| Instantiating formula (107) with s_values7_init, n0, all_0_3_3, init and discharging atoms a_select2(s_values7_init, n0) = init, yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (809) all_0_3_3 = init |  ~ (a_select2(s_values7_init, n0) = all_0_3_3)
% 58.27/21.51  																																													|
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| Instantiating formula (37) with all_0_6_6 yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (480)  ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = init))
% 58.27/21.51  																																													|
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| Instantiating formula (87) with all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (811) all_0_6_6 = n0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(all_0_6_6, n0) = v0)
% 58.27/21.51  																																													|
% 58.27/21.51  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (480), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.51  																																													|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (482)  ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0)
% 58.27/21.51  																																													|
% 58.27/21.51  																																														| From (755) and (482) follows:
% 58.27/21.51  																																														| (813)  ~ (leq(all_0_6_6, n0) = 0)
% 58.27/21.51  																																														|
% 58.27/21.51  																																														| Using (808) and (813) yields:
% 58.27/21.51  																																														| (189) $false
% 58.27/21.51  																																														|
% 58.27/21.51  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.51  																																													|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (478) leq(all_0_6_6, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 58.27/21.51  																																													| (486)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, all_0_6_6) = v1 & leq(n0, all_0_6_6) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = init))
% 58.27/21.52  																																													|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| From (755) and (478) follows:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (808) leq(all_0_6_6, n0) = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (811), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (818) all_0_6_6 = n0
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| From (818) and (476) follows:
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| (819) a_select2(s_values7_init, n0) = all_0_3_3
% 58.27/21.52  																																															|
% 58.27/21.52  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (809), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.52  																																															|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| (820)  ~ (a_select2(s_values7_init, n0) = all_0_3_3)
% 58.27/21.52  																																															|
% 58.27/21.52  																																																| Using (819) and (820) yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																																| (189) $false
% 58.27/21.52  																																																|
% 58.27/21.52  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.52  																																															|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| (819) a_select2(s_values7_init, n0) = all_0_3_3
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| (633) all_0_3_3 = init
% 58.27/21.52  																																															|
% 58.27/21.52  																																																| Equations (633) can reduce 477 to:
% 58.27/21.52  																																																| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.52  																																																|
% 58.27/21.52  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (825)  ~ (all_0_6_6 = n0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (826)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(all_0_6_6, n0) = v0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| Instantiating (826) with all_2810_0_909 yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| (827)  ~ (all_2810_0_909 = 0) & leq(all_0_6_6, n0) = all_2810_0_909
% 58.27/21.52  																																															|
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (827) yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| (828)  ~ (all_2810_0_909 = 0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| (829) leq(all_0_6_6, n0) = all_2810_0_909
% 58.27/21.52  																																															|
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| Instantiating formula (145) with all_0_6_6, n0, all_2810_0_909, 0 and discharging atoms leq(all_0_6_6, n0) = all_2810_0_909, leq(all_0_6_6, n0) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| (830) all_2810_0_909 = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																															|
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| Equations (830) can reduce 828 to:
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.52  																																															|
% 58.27/21.52  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.52  																																						|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.52  																																						| (832) leq(pv1376, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																						| (833)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, pv1376) = v1 & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = init))
% 58.27/21.52  																																						|
% 58.27/21.52  																																							| Instantiating (833) with all_615_0_916, all_615_1_917 yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																							| (834) a_select2(s_values7_init, pv1376) = all_615_0_916 & leq(n0, pv1376) = all_615_1_917 & ( ~ (all_615_1_917 = 0) | all_615_0_916 = init)
% 58.27/21.52  																																							|
% 58.27/21.52  																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (834) yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																							| (835) a_select2(s_values7_init, pv1376) = all_615_0_916
% 58.27/21.52  																																							| (836) leq(n0, pv1376) = all_615_1_917
% 58.27/21.52  																																							| (837)  ~ (all_615_1_917 = 0) | all_615_0_916 = init
% 58.27/21.52  																																							|
% 58.27/21.52  																																							| Instantiating formula (145) with pv1376, n0, 0, all_596_0_502 and discharging atoms leq(pv1376, n0) = all_596_0_502, yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																							| (838) all_596_0_502 = 0 |  ~ (leq(pv1376, n0) = 0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																							|
% 58.27/21.52  																																							| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, pv1376, all_615_1_917, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, pv1376) = all_615_1_917, leq(n0, pv1376) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																							| (839) all_615_1_917 = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																							|
% 58.27/21.52  																																							| From (839) and (836) follows:
% 58.27/21.52  																																							| (4) leq(n0, pv1376) = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																							|
% 58.27/21.52  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (167), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.52  																																							|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.52  																																							| (406) pv1376 = n0
% 58.27/21.52  																																							|
% 58.27/21.52  																																								| Equations (406) can reduce 497 to:
% 58.27/21.52  																																								| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.52  																																								|
% 58.27/21.52  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.52  																																							|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.52  																																							| (497)  ~ (pv1376 = n0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																							| (498) pv1376 = n3 | pv1376 = n2 | pv1376 = n1 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																							|
% 58.27/21.52  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (207), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.52  																																								|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.52  																																								| (542)  ~ (pred(n1) = all_0_14_14)
% 58.27/21.52  																																								|
% 58.27/21.52  																																									| Using (161) and (542) yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																									| (405)  ~ (pv1376 = n1)
% 58.27/21.52  																																									|
% 58.27/21.52  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (212), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.52  																																									|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.52  																																									| (847)  ~ (leq(n3, all_0_14_14) = 0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																									|
% 58.27/21.52  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (285), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.52  																																										|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.52  																																										| (848) leq(n3, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																										|
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| Using (848) and (847) yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| (189) $false
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.52  																																										|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.52  																																										| (847)  ~ (leq(n3, all_0_14_14) = 0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																										| (851)  ~ (gt(pv1376, n3) = 0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																										|
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| Using (832) and (847) yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| (403)  ~ (pv1376 = n3)
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|
% 58.27/21.52  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (498), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| (499) pv1376 = n1
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|
% 58.27/21.52  																																												| Equations (499) can reduce 405 to:
% 58.27/21.52  																																												| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.52  																																												|
% 58.27/21.52  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| (405)  ~ (pv1376 = n1)
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| (502) pv1376 = n3 | pv1376 = n2 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|
% 58.27/21.52  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (502), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.52  																																												|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.52  																																												| (503) pv1376 = n2
% 58.27/21.52  																																												|
% 58.27/21.52  																																													| From (503) and (161) follows:
% 58.27/21.52  																																													| (559) pred(n2) = all_0_14_14
% 58.27/21.52  																																													|
% 58.27/21.52  																																													| From (503) and (832) follows:
% 58.27/21.52  																																													| (545) leq(n2, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																													|
% 58.27/21.52  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (219), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.52  																																													|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.52  																																													| (860) gt(pv1376, n2) = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																													|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| From (503) and (860) follows:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (861) gt(n2, n2) = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| Using (861) and (151) yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (189) $false
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.52  																																													|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.52  																																													| (548)  ~ (gt(pv1376, n2) = 0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																													| (864)  ~ (pred(pv1376) = n2)
% 58.27/21.52  																																													|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| From (503) and (548) follows:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (151)  ~ (gt(n2, n2) = 0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (206), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (560)  ~ (pred(n2) = all_0_14_14)
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| Using (559) and (560) yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| (189) $false
% 58.27/21.52  																																															|
% 58.27/21.52  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (559) pred(n2) = all_0_14_14
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (563) all_0_14_14 = n1
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| From (563) and (559) follows:
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| (164) pred(n2) = n1
% 58.27/21.52  																																															|
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| From (563) and (545) follows:
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| (871) leq(n2, n1) = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																															|
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| Instantiating formula (71) with n1, n2, n2 and discharging atoms pred(n2) = n1, leq(n2, n1) = 0,  ~ (gt(n2, n2) = 0), yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| (189) $false
% 58.27/21.52  																																															|
% 58.27/21.52  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.52  																																												|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.52  																																												| (404)  ~ (pv1376 = n2)
% 58.27/21.52  																																												| (506) pv1376 = n3 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																												|
% 58.27/21.52  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (506), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.52  																																													|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.52  																																													| (507) pv1376 = n3
% 58.27/21.52  																																													|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| Equations (507) can reduce 403 to:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.52  																																													|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.52  																																													| (403)  ~ (pv1376 = n3)
% 58.27/21.52  																																													| (510)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																													|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| Instantiating (510) with all_887_0_924 yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (879)  ~ (all_887_0_924 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = all_887_0_924
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (879) yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (880)  ~ (all_887_0_924 = 0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (881) leq(n0, pv1376) = all_887_0_924
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, pv1376, all_887_0_924, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, pv1376) = all_887_0_924, leq(n0, pv1376) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (882) all_887_0_924 = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| Equations (882) can reduce 880 to:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.52  																																									|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.52  																																									| (848) leq(n3, all_0_14_14) = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																									| (885)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (a_select2(s_values7_init, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, n3) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = init))
% 58.27/21.52  																																									|
% 58.27/21.52  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (205), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.52  																																										|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.52  																																										| (659)  ~ (pred(n3) = all_0_14_14)
% 58.27/21.52  																																										|
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| Using (161) and (659) yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| (403)  ~ (pv1376 = n3)
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|
% 58.27/21.52  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (498), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| (499) pv1376 = n1
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|
% 58.27/21.52  																																												| Equations (499) can reduce 405 to:
% 58.27/21.52  																																												| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.52  																																												|
% 58.27/21.52  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| (405)  ~ (pv1376 = n1)
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| (502) pv1376 = n3 | pv1376 = n2 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|
% 58.27/21.52  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (502), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.52  																																												|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.52  																																												| (503) pv1376 = n2
% 58.27/21.52  																																												|
% 58.27/21.52  																																													| From (503) and (161) follows:
% 58.27/21.52  																																													| (559) pred(n2) = all_0_14_14
% 58.27/21.52  																																													|
% 58.27/21.52  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (206), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.52  																																													|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.52  																																													| (560)  ~ (pred(n2) = all_0_14_14)
% 58.27/21.52  																																													|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| Using (559) and (560) yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (189) $false
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.52  																																													|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.52  																																													| (559) pred(n2) = all_0_14_14
% 58.27/21.52  																																													| (563) all_0_14_14 = n1
% 58.27/21.52  																																													|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| From (563) and (848) follows:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (898) leq(n3, n1) = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (361), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (899)  ~ (leq(n3, n1) = 0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| Using (898) and (899) yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| (189) $false
% 58.27/21.52  																																															|
% 58.27/21.52  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (898) leq(n3, n1) = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (902) all_291_0_57 = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| Equations (902) can reduce 330 to:
% 58.27/21.52  																																															| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.52  																																															|
% 58.27/21.52  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.52  																																												|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.52  																																												| (404)  ~ (pv1376 = n2)
% 58.27/21.52  																																												| (506) pv1376 = n3 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																												|
% 58.27/21.52  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (506), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.52  																																													|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.52  																																													| (507) pv1376 = n3
% 58.27/21.52  																																													|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| Equations (507) can reduce 403 to:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.52  																																													|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.52  																																													| (403)  ~ (pv1376 = n3)
% 58.27/21.52  																																													| (510)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																													|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| Instantiating (510) with all_911_0_930 yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (910)  ~ (all_911_0_930 = 0) & leq(n0, pv1376) = all_911_0_930
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (910) yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (911)  ~ (all_911_0_930 = 0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (912) leq(n0, pv1376) = all_911_0_930
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, pv1376, all_911_0_930, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, pv1376) = all_911_0_930, leq(n0, pv1376) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (913) all_911_0_930 = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| Equations (913) can reduce 911 to:
% 58.27/21.52  																																														| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|
% 58.27/21.52  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.52  																																										|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.52  																																										| (658) pred(n3) = all_0_14_14
% 58.27/21.52  																																										| (662) all_0_14_14 = n2
% 58.27/21.52  																																										|
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| From (662) and (211) follows:
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| (917) succ(n2) = pv1376
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| From (662) and (161) follows:
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| (918) pred(pv1376) = n2
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| From (662) and (832) follows:
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| (919) leq(pv1376, n2) = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|
% 58.27/21.52  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (283), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| (920)  ~ (succ(n2) = pv1376)
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|
% 58.27/21.52  																																												| Using (917) and (920) yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																												| (189) $false
% 58.27/21.52  																																												|
% 58.27/21.52  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| (917) succ(n2) = pv1376
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| (507) pv1376 = n3
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|
% 58.27/21.52  																																												| From (507) and (918) follows:
% 58.27/21.52  																																												| (163) pred(n3) = n2
% 58.27/21.52  																																												|
% 58.27/21.52  																																												| From (507) and (919) follows:
% 58.27/21.52  																																												| (925) leq(n3, n2) = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																												|
% 58.27/21.52  																																												| Instantiating formula (71) with n2, n3, n3 and discharging atoms pred(n3) = n2, leq(n3, n2) = 0,  ~ (gt(n3, n3) = 0), yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																												| (189) $false
% 58.27/21.52  																																												|
% 58.27/21.52  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.52  																																								|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.52  																																								| (754) pred(n1) = all_0_14_14
% 58.27/21.52  																																								| (755) all_0_14_14 = n0
% 58.27/21.52  																																								|
% 58.27/21.52  																																									| From (755) and (211) follows:
% 58.27/21.52  																																									| (929) succ(n0) = pv1376
% 58.27/21.52  																																									|
% 58.27/21.52  																																									| From (755) and (832) follows:
% 58.27/21.52  																																									| (930) leq(pv1376, n0) = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																									|
% 58.27/21.52  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (284), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.52  																																									|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.52  																																									| (931)  ~ (succ(n0) = pv1376)
% 58.27/21.52  																																									|
% 58.27/21.52  																																										| Using (929) and (931) yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																										| (189) $false
% 58.27/21.52  																																										|
% 58.27/21.52  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.52  																																									|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.52  																																									| (929) succ(n0) = pv1376
% 58.27/21.52  																																									| (499) pv1376 = n1
% 58.27/21.52  																																									|
% 58.27/21.52  																																										| From (499) and (930) follows:
% 58.27/21.52  																																										| (935) leq(n1, n0) = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																										|
% 58.27/21.52  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (838), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.52  																																										|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.52  																																										| (936)  ~ (leq(pv1376, n0) = 0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																										|
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| From (499) and (936) follows:
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| (937)  ~ (leq(n1, n0) = 0)
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| Using (935) and (937) yields:
% 58.27/21.52  																																											| (189) $false
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|
% 58.27/21.52  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.52  																																										|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.52  																																										| (930) leq(pv1376, n0) = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																										| (940) all_596_0_502 = 0
% 58.27/21.52  																																										|
% 58.27/21.53  																																											| Equations (940) can reduce 535 to:
% 58.27/21.53  																																											| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.53  																																											|
% 58.27/21.53  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.53  																																			|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.53  																																			| (942) succ(all_0_14_14) = n0
% 58.27/21.53  																																			| (943) all_114_0_38 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, all_0_14_14) = v0)
% 58.27/21.53  																																			|
% 58.27/21.53  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (943), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.53  																																				|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.53  																																				| (340) all_114_0_38 = 0
% 58.27/21.53  																																				|
% 58.27/21.53  																																					| Equations (340) can reduce 248 to:
% 58.27/21.53  																																					| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.53  																																					|
% 58.27/21.53  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.53  																																				|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.53  																																				| (248)  ~ (all_114_0_38 = 0)
% 58.27/21.53  																																				| (947)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, all_0_14_14) = v0)
% 58.27/21.53  																																				|
% 58.27/21.53  																																					| Instantiating (947) with all_617_0_943 yields:
% 58.27/21.53  																																					| (948)  ~ (all_617_0_943 = 0) & leq(n0, all_0_14_14) = all_617_0_943
% 58.27/21.53  																																					|
% 58.27/21.53  																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (948) yields:
% 58.27/21.53  																																					| (949)  ~ (all_617_0_943 = 0)
% 58.27/21.53  																																					| (950) leq(n0, all_0_14_14) = all_617_0_943
% 58.27/21.53  																																					|
% 58.27/21.53  																																					| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, all_0_14_14, 0, all_617_0_943 and discharging atoms leq(n0, all_0_14_14) = all_617_0_943, leq(n0, all_0_14_14) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.53  																																					| (951) all_617_0_943 = 0
% 58.27/21.53  																																					|
% 58.27/21.53  																																					| Equations (951) can reduce 949 to:
% 58.27/21.53  																																					| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.53  																																					|
% 58.27/21.53  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.53  															|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.53  															| (427)  ~ (all_0_11_11 = init)
% 58.27/21.53  															| (954)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, n2) = v0) | (leq(pv1376, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0))))
% 58.27/21.53  															|
% 58.27/21.53  																| Instantiating (954) with all_158_0_962, all_158_1_963 yields:
% 58.27/21.53  																| (955) ( ~ (all_158_1_963 = 0) & leq(n0, n2) = all_158_1_963) | (leq(pv1376, n3) = all_158_0_962 & leq(n0, pv1376) = all_158_1_963 & ( ~ (all_158_0_962 = 0) |  ~ (all_158_1_963 = 0)))
% 58.27/21.53  																|
% 58.27/21.53  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (955), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.53  																|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.53  																| (956)  ~ (all_158_1_963 = 0) & leq(n0, n2) = all_158_1_963
% 58.27/21.53  																|
% 58.27/21.53  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (956) yields:
% 58.27/21.53  																	| (957)  ~ (all_158_1_963 = 0)
% 58.27/21.53  																	| (958) leq(n0, n2) = all_158_1_963
% 58.27/21.53  																	|
% 58.27/21.53  																	| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, n2, all_158_1_963, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n2) = all_158_1_963, leq(n0, n2) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.53  																	| (959) all_158_1_963 = 0
% 58.27/21.53  																	|
% 58.27/21.53  																	| Equations (959) can reduce 957 to:
% 58.27/21.53  																	| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.53  																	|
% 58.27/21.53  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.53  																|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.53  																| (961) leq(pv1376, n3) = all_158_0_962 & leq(n0, pv1376) = all_158_1_963 & ( ~ (all_158_0_962 = 0) |  ~ (all_158_1_963 = 0))
% 58.27/21.53  																|
% 58.27/21.53  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (961) yields:
% 58.27/21.53  																	| (962) leq(pv1376, n3) = all_158_0_962
% 58.27/21.53  																	| (963) leq(n0, pv1376) = all_158_1_963
% 58.27/21.53  																	| (964)  ~ (all_158_0_962 = 0) |  ~ (all_158_1_963 = 0)
% 58.27/21.53  																	|
% 58.27/21.53  																	| Instantiating formula (145) with pv1376, n3, all_158_0_962, 0 and discharging atoms leq(pv1376, n3) = all_158_0_962, leq(pv1376, n3) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.53  																	| (965) all_158_0_962 = 0
% 58.27/21.53  																	|
% 58.27/21.53  																	| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, pv1376, all_158_1_963, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, pv1376) = all_158_1_963, leq(n0, pv1376) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.53  																	| (959) all_158_1_963 = 0
% 58.27/21.53  																	|
% 58.27/21.53  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (964), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.53  																	|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.53  																	| (967)  ~ (all_158_0_962 = 0)
% 58.27/21.53  																	|
% 58.27/21.53  																		| Equations (965) can reduce 967 to:
% 58.27/21.53  																		| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.53  																		|
% 58.27/21.53  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.53  																	|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.53  																	| (965) all_158_0_962 = 0
% 58.27/21.53  																	| (957)  ~ (all_158_1_963 = 0)
% 58.27/21.53  																	|
% 58.27/21.53  																		| Equations (959) can reduce 957 to:
% 58.27/21.53  																		| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.53  																		|
% 58.27/21.53  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.53  											|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.53  											| (431)  ~ (all_0_12_12 = init)
% 58.27/21.53  											| (973)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, n1) = v0) | (leq(pv1376, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0))))
% 58.27/21.53  											|
% 58.27/21.53  												| Instantiating (973) with all_134_0_969, all_134_1_970 yields:
% 58.27/21.53  												| (974) ( ~ (all_134_1_970 = 0) & leq(n0, n1) = all_134_1_970) | (leq(pv1376, n3) = all_134_0_969 & leq(n0, pv1376) = all_134_1_970 & ( ~ (all_134_0_969 = 0) |  ~ (all_134_1_970 = 0)))
% 58.27/21.53  												|
% 58.27/21.53  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (974), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.53  												|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.53  												| (975)  ~ (all_134_1_970 = 0) & leq(n0, n1) = all_134_1_970
% 58.27/21.53  												|
% 58.27/21.53  													| Applying alpha-rule on (975) yields:
% 58.27/21.53  													| (976)  ~ (all_134_1_970 = 0)
% 58.27/21.53  													| (977) leq(n0, n1) = all_134_1_970
% 58.27/21.53  													|
% 58.27/21.53  													| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, n1, all_134_1_970, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n1) = all_134_1_970, leq(n0, n1) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.53  													| (978) all_134_1_970 = 0
% 58.27/21.53  													|
% 58.27/21.53  													| Equations (978) can reduce 976 to:
% 58.27/21.53  													| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.53  													|
% 58.27/21.53  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.53  												|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.53  												| (980) leq(pv1376, n3) = all_134_0_969 & leq(n0, pv1376) = all_134_1_970 & ( ~ (all_134_0_969 = 0) |  ~ (all_134_1_970 = 0))
% 58.27/21.53  												|
% 58.27/21.53  													| Applying alpha-rule on (980) yields:
% 58.27/21.53  													| (981) leq(pv1376, n3) = all_134_0_969
% 58.27/21.53  													| (982) leq(n0, pv1376) = all_134_1_970
% 58.27/21.53  													| (983)  ~ (all_134_0_969 = 0) |  ~ (all_134_1_970 = 0)
% 58.27/21.53  													|
% 58.27/21.53  													| Instantiating formula (145) with pv1376, n3, all_134_0_969, 0 and discharging atoms leq(pv1376, n3) = all_134_0_969, leq(pv1376, n3) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.53  													| (984) all_134_0_969 = 0
% 58.27/21.53  													|
% 58.27/21.53  													| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, pv1376, all_134_1_970, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, pv1376) = all_134_1_970, leq(n0, pv1376) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.53  													| (978) all_134_1_970 = 0
% 58.27/21.53  													|
% 58.27/21.53  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (983), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.53  													|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.53  													| (986)  ~ (all_134_0_969 = 0)
% 58.27/21.53  													|
% 58.27/21.53  														| Equations (984) can reduce 986 to:
% 58.27/21.53  														| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.53  														|
% 58.27/21.53  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.53  													|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.53  													| (984) all_134_0_969 = 0
% 58.27/21.53  													| (976)  ~ (all_134_1_970 = 0)
% 58.27/21.53  													|
% 58.27/21.53  														| Equations (978) can reduce 976 to:
% 58.27/21.53  														| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.53  														|
% 58.27/21.53  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.53  			|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.53  			| (435)  ~ (all_0_13_13 = init)
% 58.27/21.53  			| (992)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & leq(n0, n0) = v0) | (leq(pv1376, n3) = v1 & leq(n0, pv1376) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0))))
% 58.27/21.53  			|
% 58.27/21.53  				| Instantiating (992) with all_52_0_976, all_52_1_977 yields:
% 58.27/21.53  				| (993) ( ~ (all_52_1_977 = 0) & leq(n0, n0) = all_52_1_977) | (leq(pv1376, n3) = all_52_0_976 & leq(n0, pv1376) = all_52_1_977 & ( ~ (all_52_0_976 = 0) |  ~ (all_52_1_977 = 0)))
% 58.27/21.53  				|
% 58.27/21.53  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (993), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.53  				|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.53  				| (994)  ~ (all_52_1_977 = 0) & leq(n0, n0) = all_52_1_977
% 58.27/21.53  				|
% 58.27/21.53  					| Applying alpha-rule on (994) yields:
% 58.27/21.53  					| (995)  ~ (all_52_1_977 = 0)
% 58.27/21.53  					| (996) leq(n0, n0) = all_52_1_977
% 58.27/21.53  					|
% 58.27/21.53  					| Instantiating formula (27) with all_52_1_977, n0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, n0) = all_52_1_977, yields:
% 58.27/21.53  					| (997) all_52_1_977 = 0
% 58.27/21.53  					|
% 58.27/21.53  					| Equations (997) can reduce 995 to:
% 58.27/21.53  					| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.53  					|
% 58.27/21.53  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.53  				|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.53  				| (999) leq(pv1376, n3) = all_52_0_976 & leq(n0, pv1376) = all_52_1_977 & ( ~ (all_52_0_976 = 0) |  ~ (all_52_1_977 = 0))
% 58.27/21.53  				|
% 58.27/21.53  					| Applying alpha-rule on (999) yields:
% 58.27/21.53  					| (1000) leq(pv1376, n3) = all_52_0_976
% 58.27/21.53  					| (1001) leq(n0, pv1376) = all_52_1_977
% 58.27/21.53  					| (1002)  ~ (all_52_0_976 = 0) |  ~ (all_52_1_977 = 0)
% 58.27/21.53  					|
% 58.27/21.53  					| Instantiating formula (145) with pv1376, n3, all_52_0_976, 0 and discharging atoms leq(pv1376, n3) = all_52_0_976, leq(pv1376, n3) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.53  					| (1003) all_52_0_976 = 0
% 58.27/21.53  					|
% 58.27/21.53  					| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, pv1376, all_52_1_977, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, pv1376) = all_52_1_977, leq(n0, pv1376) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.53  					| (997) all_52_1_977 = 0
% 58.27/21.53  					|
% 58.27/21.53  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1002), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.53  					|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.53  					| (1005)  ~ (all_52_0_976 = 0)
% 58.27/21.53  					|
% 58.27/21.53  						| Equations (1003) can reduce 1005 to:
% 58.27/21.53  						| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.53  						|
% 58.27/21.53  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.53  					|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.53  					| (1003) all_52_0_976 = 0
% 58.27/21.53  					| (995)  ~ (all_52_1_977 = 0)
% 58.27/21.53  					|
% 58.27/21.53  						| Equations (997) can reduce 995 to:
% 58.27/21.53  						| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.53  						|
% 58.27/21.53  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.53  |-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.53  | (364)  ~ (all_0_7_7 = init)
% 58.27/21.53  | (1011)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (leq(pv20, all_0_15_15) = v3 & leq(pv19, all_0_16_16) = v1 & leq(n0, pv20) = v2 & leq(n0, pv19) = v0 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) |  ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 58.27/21.53  |
% 58.27/21.53  	| Instantiating (1011) with all_41_0_979, all_41_1_980, all_41_2_981, all_41_3_982 yields:
% 58.27/21.53  	| (1012) leq(pv20, all_0_15_15) = all_41_0_979 & leq(pv19, all_0_16_16) = all_41_2_981 & leq(n0, pv20) = all_41_1_980 & leq(n0, pv19) = all_41_3_982 & ( ~ (all_41_0_979 = 0) |  ~ (all_41_1_980 = 0) |  ~ (all_41_2_981 = 0) |  ~ (all_41_3_982 = 0))
% 58.27/21.53  	|
% 58.27/21.53  	| Applying alpha-rule on (1012) yields:
% 58.27/21.53  	| (1013) leq(n0, pv20) = all_41_1_980
% 58.27/21.53  	| (1014) leq(n0, pv19) = all_41_3_982
% 58.27/21.53  	| (1015)  ~ (all_41_0_979 = 0) |  ~ (all_41_1_980 = 0) |  ~ (all_41_2_981 = 0) |  ~ (all_41_3_982 = 0)
% 58.27/21.53  	| (1016) leq(pv20, all_0_15_15) = all_41_0_979
% 58.27/21.53  	| (1017) leq(pv19, all_0_16_16) = all_41_2_981
% 58.27/21.53  	|
% 58.27/21.53  	| Instantiating formula (145) with pv20, all_0_15_15, all_41_0_979, 0 and discharging atoms leq(pv20, all_0_15_15) = all_41_0_979, leq(pv20, all_0_15_15) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.53  	| (1018) all_41_0_979 = 0
% 58.27/21.53  	|
% 58.27/21.53  	| Instantiating formula (145) with pv19, all_0_16_16, all_41_2_981, 0 and discharging atoms leq(pv19, all_0_16_16) = all_41_2_981, leq(pv19, all_0_16_16) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.53  	| (1019) all_41_2_981 = 0
% 58.27/21.53  	|
% 58.27/21.53  	| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, pv20, all_41_1_980, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, pv20) = all_41_1_980, leq(n0, pv20) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.53  	| (1020) all_41_1_980 = 0
% 58.27/21.53  	|
% 58.27/21.53  	| Instantiating formula (145) with n0, pv19, all_41_3_982, 0 and discharging atoms leq(n0, pv19) = all_41_3_982, leq(n0, pv19) = 0, yields:
% 58.27/21.53  	| (1021) all_41_3_982 = 0
% 58.27/21.53  	|
% 58.27/21.53  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1015), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.53  	|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.53  	| (1022)  ~ (all_41_0_979 = 0)
% 58.27/21.53  	|
% 58.27/21.53  		| Equations (1018) can reduce 1022 to:
% 58.27/21.53  		| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.53  		|
% 58.27/21.53  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.53  	|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.53  	| (1018) all_41_0_979 = 0
% 58.27/21.53  	| (1025)  ~ (all_41_1_980 = 0) |  ~ (all_41_2_981 = 0) |  ~ (all_41_3_982 = 0)
% 58.27/21.53  	|
% 58.27/21.53  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1025), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.53  		|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.53  		| (1026)  ~ (all_41_1_980 = 0)
% 58.27/21.53  		|
% 58.27/21.53  			| Equations (1020) can reduce 1026 to:
% 58.27/21.53  			| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.53  			|
% 58.27/21.53  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.53  		|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.53  		| (1020) all_41_1_980 = 0
% 58.27/21.53  		| (1029)  ~ (all_41_2_981 = 0) |  ~ (all_41_3_982 = 0)
% 58.27/21.53  		|
% 58.27/21.53  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1029), into two cases.
% 58.27/21.53  			|-Branch one:
% 58.27/21.53  			| (1030)  ~ (all_41_2_981 = 0)
% 58.27/21.53  			|
% 58.27/21.53  				| Equations (1019) can reduce 1030 to:
% 58.27/21.53  				| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.53  				|
% 58.27/21.53  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.53  			|-Branch two:
% 58.27/21.53  			| (1019) all_41_2_981 = 0
% 58.27/21.53  			| (1033)  ~ (all_41_3_982 = 0)
% 58.27/21.53  			|
% 58.27/21.53  				| Equations (1021) can reduce 1033 to:
% 58.27/21.53  				| (199) $false
% 58.27/21.53  				|
% 58.27/21.53  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.27/21.53  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 58.27/21.53  
% 58.27/21.53  20894ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------