↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SWV047+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:04:31 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.76s 3.94s
% Output   : Proof 3.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem    : SWV047+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 12:32:08 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.76/3.94  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.76/3.94  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.76/3.94  Clause #50 (by assumption #[]): Eq true True
% 3.76/3.94  Clause #52 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.76/3.94    (Not
% 3.76/3.94      (And
% 3.76/3.94          (And
% 3.76/3.94            (And (Eq pv78 (sum n0 (minus n135300 n1) (a_select3 q pv79 pv35)))
% 3.76/3.94              (Eq pv82
% 3.76/3.94                (sum n0 (minus n135300 n1)
% 3.76/3.94                  (times (minus (a_select2 x pv83) (a_select2 mu pv35))
% 3.76/3.94                    (times (minus (a_select2 x pv83) (a_select2 mu pv35)) (a_select3 q pv83 pv35))))))
% 3.76/3.94            (leq n0 pv35))
% 3.76/3.94          (leq pv35 (minus n5 n1)) →
% 3.76/3.94        true))
% 3.76/3.94    True
% 3.76/3.94  Clause #92 (by clausification #[52]): Eq
% 3.76/3.94    (And
% 3.76/3.94        (And
% 3.76/3.94          (And (Eq pv78 (sum n0 (minus n135300 n1) (a_select3 q pv79 pv35)))
% 3.76/3.94            (Eq pv82
% 3.76/3.94              (sum n0 (minus n135300 n1)
% 3.76/3.94                (times (minus (a_select2 x pv83) (a_select2 mu pv35))
% 3.76/3.94                  (times (minus (a_select2 x pv83) (a_select2 mu pv35)) (a_select3 q pv83 pv35))))))
% 3.76/3.94          (leq n0 pv35))
% 3.76/3.94        (leq pv35 (minus n5 n1)) →
% 3.76/3.94      true)
% 3.76/3.94    False
% 3.76/3.94  Clause #94 (by clausification #[92]): Eq true False
% 3.76/3.94  Clause #123 (by superposition #[94, 50]): Eq False True
% 3.76/3.94  Clause #124 (by clausification #[123]): False
% 3.76/3.94  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------