↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV048+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:18 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.63s 1.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  28 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   88 (  50 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   87 (  35   ~;  24   |;  22   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   19 (  19 usr;  11 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   0 sgn  11   !;   0   ?;   2   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f26,axiom,
    ! [X0] : sum(n0,tptp_minus_1,X0) = n0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',sum_plus_base) ).

fof(f28,axiom,
    succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',succ_tptp_minus_1) ).

fof(f30,axiom,
    ! [X0] : plus(n1,X0) = succ(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',succ_plus_1_l) ).

fof(f39,axiom,
    ! [X0] : minus(X0,n1) = pred(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',pred_minus_1) ).

fof(f40,axiom,
    ! [X0] : pred(succ(X0)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',pred_succ) ).

fof(f51,axiom,
    true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',ttrue) ).

fof(f53,conjecture,
    ( ( leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1))
      & leq(n0,pv35)
      & pv78 = sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35)) )
   => ( ( n0 = pv78
       => true )
      & ( n0 != pv78
       => ( leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1))
          & leq(n0,pv35)
          & pv78 = sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35))
          & n0 = sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),times(a_select3(q,pv81,pv35),a_select2(x,pv81))) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0016) ).

fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1))
        & leq(n0,pv35)
        & pv78 = sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35)) )
     => ( ( n0 = pv78
         => true )
        & ( n0 != pv78
         => ( leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1))
            & leq(n0,pv35)
            & pv78 = sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35))
            & n0 = sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),times(a_select3(q,pv81,pv35),a_select2(x,pv81))) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f53]) ).

fof(f94,plain,
    ( leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1))
    & leq(n0,pv35)
    & pv78 = sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35))
    & ( ( n0 = pv78
        & ~ true )
      | ( n0 != pv78
        & ( ~ leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1))
          | ~ leq(n0,pv35)
          | pv78 != sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35))
          | n0 != sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),times(a_select3(q,pv81,pv35),a_select2(x,pv81))) ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    ( leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1))
    & leq(n0,pv35)
    & pv78 = sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35))
    & ( ( n0 = pv78
        & ~ true )
      | ( n0 != pv78
        & ( ~ leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1))
          | ~ leq(n0,pv35)
          | pv78 != sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35))
          | n0 != sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),times(a_select3(q,pv81,pv35),a_select2(x,pv81))) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f94]) ).

fof(f121,plain,
    leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    leq(n0,pv35),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).

fof(f123,plain,
    pv78 = sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).

fof(f126,plain,
    ( n0 = pv78
    | ~ leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1))
    | ~ leq(n0,pv35)
    | pv78 != sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35))
    | n0 != sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),times(a_select3(q,pv81,pv35),a_select2(x,pv81))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).

fof(f127,plain,
    ( ~ true
    | ~ leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1))
    | ~ leq(n0,pv35)
    | pv78 != sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35))
    | n0 != sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),times(a_select3(q,pv81,pv35),a_select2(x,pv81))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).

fof(f140,plain,
    true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).

fof(f141,plain,
    ! [X0] : n0 = sum(n0,tptp_minus_1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f163,plain,
    ! [X0] : minus(X0,n1) = pred(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f178,plain,
    n0 = succ(tptp_minus_1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f194,plain,
    ! [X0] : succ(X0) = plus(n1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f197,plain,
    ! [X0] : pred(succ(X0)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f211,plain,
    n0 = plus(n1,tptp_minus_1),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f178,f194]) ).

fof(f223,plain,
    ! [X0] : minus(plus(n1,X0),n1) = X0,
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f197,f163,f194]) ).

tcf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ true
    | ~ leq(n0,pv35)
    | ~ leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1))
    | ( sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35)) != pv78 )
    | ( sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),times(a_select3(q,pv81,pv35),a_select2(x,pv81))) != n0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f127]) ).

tcf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( n0 = pv78 )
    | ~ leq(n0,pv35)
    | ~ leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1))
    | ( sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35)) != pv78 )
    | ( sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),times(a_select3(q,pv81,pv35),a_select2(x,pv81))) != n0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

tcf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
    sum(n0,minus(n135300,n1),a_select3(q,pv79,pv35)) = pv78,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f123]) ).

tcf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,pv35),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

tcf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
    leq(pv35,minus(n5,n1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f121]) ).

tcf(c_67,plain,
    true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f140]) ).

tcf(c_68,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : sum(n0,tptp_minus_1,X0) = n0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f141]) ).

tcf(c_104,plain,
    plus(n1,tptp_minus_1) = n0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f211]) ).

tcf(c_122,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : minus(plus(n1,X0),n1) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f223]) ).

tcf(c_156,negated_conjecture,
    sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),times(a_select3(q,pv81,pv35),a_select2(x,pv81))) != n0,
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_67,c_53,c_54,c_52,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_2139,plain,
    minus(n0,n1) = tptp_minus_1,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_104,c_122]) ).

tcf(c_2146,plain,
    sum(n0,tptp_minus_1,times(a_select3(q,pv81,pv35),a_select2(x,pv81))) != n0,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_156,c_2139]) ).

tcf(c_2147,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ground_joinability,[status(thm)],[c_2146,c_68]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SWV048+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.17/0.43  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.43  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 18:29:53 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.43  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.24/0.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.51  
% 0.24/0.51  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.24/0.51  
% 0.24/0.51  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.24/0.52  % Proving...
% 4.63/1.51  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.63/1.51  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.63/1.51  
% 4.63/1.51  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.63/1.51  
% 4.63/1.51  % ------  iProver source info
% 4.63/1.51  
% 4.63/1.51  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.63/1.51  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.63/1.51  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.63/1.51  
% 4.63/1.51  % ------ Parsing...
% 4.63/1.51  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 4.63/1.51  
% 4.63/1.51  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 10  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 4.63/1.51  
% 4.63/1.51  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 4.63/1.51  
% 4.63/1.51  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 4.63/1.51  % ------ Proving...
% 4.63/1.51  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 4.63/1.51  
% 4.63/1.51  % 
% 4.63/1.51  % clauses                               74
% 4.63/1.51  % conjectures                           5
% 4.63/1.51  % EPR                                   43
% 4.63/1.51  % Horn                                  67
% 4.63/1.51  % unary                                 54
% 4.63/1.51  % binary                                10
% 4.63/1.51  % lits                                  119
% 4.63/1.51  % lits eq                               44
% 4.63/1.51  % fd_pure                               0
% 4.63/1.51  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 4.63/1.51  % fd_cond                               6
% 4.63/1.51  % fd_pseudo_cond                        2
% 4.63/1.51  % AC symbols                            0
% 4.63/1.51  
% 4.63/1.51  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 4.63/1.51  
% 4.63/1.51  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 4.63/1.51  
% 4.63/1.51  
% 4.63/1.51  % ------ 
% 4.63/1.51  % Current options:
% 4.63/1.51  % ------ 
% 4.63/1.51  
% 4.63/1.51  
% 4.63/1.51  % 
% 4.63/1.51  
% 4.63/1.51  % ------ Proving...
% 4.63/1.51  % 
% 4.63/1.51  
% 4.63/1.51  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.63/1.51  
% 4.63/1.51  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.63/1.51  
% 4.63/1.51  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------