↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SWV056+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:20:05 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.07s 0.25s
% Output   : Refutation 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  23 unt;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   64 (  21 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   46 (  18   ~;  13   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   0 sgn   9   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f26,axiom,
    ! [X0] : sum(n0,tptp_minus_1,X0) = n0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',sum_plus_base) ).

fof(f28,axiom,
    succ(tptp_minus_1) = n0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',succ_tptp_minus_1) ).

fof(f29,axiom,
    ! [X0] : plus(X0,n1) = succ(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',succ_plus_1_r) ).

fof(f39,axiom,
    ! [X0] : minus(X0,n1) = pred(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',pred_minus_1) ).

fof(f40,axiom,
    ! [X0] : pred(succ(X0)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',pred_succ) ).

fof(f53,conjecture,
    ( ( leq(n0,pv25)
      & leq(pv25,minus(n5,n1)) )
   => ( n0 = sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),a_select3(q,pv77,pv25))
      & leq(n0,pv25)
      & leq(pv25,minus(n5,n1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0040) ).

fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( leq(n0,pv25)
        & leq(pv25,minus(n5,n1)) )
     => ( n0 = sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),a_select3(q,pv77,pv25))
        & leq(n0,pv25)
        & leq(pv25,minus(n5,n1)) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f53]) ).

fof(f136,plain,
    ( ( n0 != sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),a_select3(q,pv77,pv25))
      | ~ leq(n0,pv25)
      | ~ leq(pv25,minus(n5,n1)) )
    & leq(n0,pv25)
    & leq(pv25,minus(n5,n1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f137,plain,
    ( ( n0 != sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),a_select3(q,pv77,pv25))
      | ~ leq(n0,pv25)
      | ~ leq(pv25,minus(n5,n1)) )
    & leq(n0,pv25)
    & leq(pv25,minus(n5,n1)) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f136]) ).

fof(f267,plain,
    ! [X0] : n0 = sum(n0,tptp_minus_1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f269,plain,
    n0 = succ(tptp_minus_1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f270,plain,
    ! [X0] : succ(X0) = plus(X0,n1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f280,plain,
    ! [X0] : minus(X0,n1) = pred(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f281,plain,
    ! [X0] : pred(succ(X0)) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f300,plain,
    leq(pv25,minus(n5,n1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f137]) ).

fof(f301,plain,
    leq(n0,pv25),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f137]) ).

fof(f302,plain,
    ( n0 != sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),a_select3(q,pv77,pv25))
    | ~ leq(n0,pv25)
    | ~ leq(pv25,minus(n5,n1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f137]) ).

fof(f341,plain,
    n0 = plus(tptp_minus_1,n1),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f269,f270]) ).

fof(f351,plain,
    ! [X0] : minus(plus(X0,n1),n1) = X0,
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f281,f280,f270]) ).

fof(f365,definition,
    ( spl31_1
  <=> leq(pv25,minus(n5,n1)) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl31_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f369,definition,
    ( spl31_2
  <=> leq(n0,pv25) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl31_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f373,definition,
    ( spl31_3
  <=> n0 = sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),a_select3(q,pv77,pv25)) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl31_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f375,plain,
    ( n0 != sum(n0,minus(n0,n1),a_select3(q,pv77,pv25))
    | spl31_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f373]) ).

fof(f376,plain,
    ( ~ spl31_1
    | ~ spl31_2
    | ~ spl31_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f302,f373,f369,f365]) ).

fof(f377,plain,
    spl31_2,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f301,f369]) ).

fof(f378,plain,
    spl31_1,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f300,f365]) ).

fof(f405,plain,
    tptp_minus_1 = minus(n0,n1),
    inference(superposition,[],[f351,f341]) ).

fof(f422,plain,
    ( n0 != sum(n0,tptp_minus_1,a_select3(q,pv77,pv25))
    | spl31_3 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f375,f405]) ).

fof(f425,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl31_3 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f422,f267]) ).

fof(f426,plain,
    spl31_3,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f425]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( ~ spl31_1
    | ~ spl31_2
    | ~ spl31_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f376]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    spl31_2,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f377]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    spl31_1,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f378]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    spl31_3,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f426]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s4,s2,s3]) ).

fof(f427,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s5]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWV056+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.07/0.18  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 09:47:09 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.18  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.07/0.21  Running first-order model finding
% 0.07/0.21  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.25  % (3269413)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.07/0.25  % (3269421)dis+10_1_sil=32000:sp=arity:random_seed=4210619410:i=103:fgj=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/103Mi)
% 0.07/0.25  % (3269421) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-3269413-3269421"...
% 0.07/0.25  % (3269421)...printing done.
% 0.07/0.25  % (3269418)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=3577951636_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/0Mi)
% 0.07/0.25  % (3269420)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=3278638844:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.07/0.25  % (3269422)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=3568684586:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.07/0.25  % (3269423)ott+1_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=reverse_arity:erd=off:random_seed=2767512622:i=131_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/131Mi)
% 0.07/0.25  % (3269424)ott-3_16_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=arity:fd=off:rp=on:random_seed=3965739542:i=159:bs=unit_only:nicw=on:fsr=off:amm=off_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/159Mi)
% 0.07/0.25  % (3269421)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.07/0.25  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.07/0.25  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.26  % (3269421)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.26  % (3269421)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.07/0.26  % (3269421)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.07/0.26  % (3269421)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.07/0.26  % (3269421)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.07/0.26  % (3269421)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.07/0.26  % (3269421)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.07/0.26  % (3269421)Instructions burned: 13 (million)
% 0.07/0.26  % (3269413)Success in time 0.034 s
% 0.07/0.26  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------