%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV059+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:53:37 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 0.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 30 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 14 ~; 5 |; 7 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 9 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(cl5_nebula_norm_0049,conjecture,
( geq(pv72,tptp_float_0_001)
=> ( ( gt(plus(n1,loopcounter),n1)
=> true )
& ( ~ gt(plus(n1,loopcounter),n1)
=> true ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_norm_0049) ).
fof(ttrue,axiom,
true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',ttrue) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( geq(pv72,tptp_float_0_001)
=> ( ( gt(plus(n1,loopcounter),n1)
=> true )
& ( ~ gt(plus(n1,loopcounter),n1)
=> true ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_norm_0049]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( geq(pv72,tptp_float_0_001)
=> ( ( gt(plus(n1,loopcounter),n1)
=> true )
& ( ~ gt(plus(n1,loopcounter),n1)
=> true ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ true
| ~ true )
& ( ~ true
| gt(plus(n1,loopcounter),n1) )
& ( ~ gt(plus(n1,loopcounter),n1)
| ~ true )
& ( ~ gt(plus(n1,loopcounter),n1)
| gt(plus(n1,loopcounter),n1) )
& geq(pv72,tptp_float_0_001) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ true
| ~ true ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ true,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
true,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ttrue]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWV059+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.46 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.46 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 08:29:25 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.47 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.56 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.25/0.56 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % sh5l with pid 479139 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.25/0.56 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.25/0.56 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.25/0.56 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.56 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % SubtermCWHack with pid 479140 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.25/0.56 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.25/0.56 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.25/0.56 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.56 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/0.56 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.56 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.25/0.56
% 0.25/0.56 % Proof found!
% 0.25/0.56 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/0.56 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/0.56 % Parsed axioms : 85
% 0.25/0.56 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 25
% 0.25/0.56 % Initial clauses : 67
% 0.25/0.56 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.25/0.56 % Initial clauses in saturation : 66
% 0.25/0.56 % Processed clauses : 2
% 0.25/0.56 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % ...remaining for further processing : 1
% 0.25/0.56 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % NegExts : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.25/0.56 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.56 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.56 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.56 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.56 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.56 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.56 % Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 0.25/0.56 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.25/0.56 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 64
% 0.25/0.56 % ...number of literals in the above : 110
% 0.25/0.56 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/0.56 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3367
% 0.25/0.56 % Search garbage collected termcells : 595
% 0.25/0.56
% 0.25/0.56 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.56 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.25/0.56 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.25/0.56 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.25/0.56 % Maximum resident set size: 3736 pages
% 0.25/0.56
% 0.25/0.56 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.56 % User time : 0.010 s
% 0.25/0.56 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.25/0.56 % Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.25/0.56 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.25/0.56 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------