↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SWV069+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:06:45 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.87s 1.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   44 (  20   ~;  13   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0 sgn   4   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(reflexivity_leq,axiom,
    ! [X] : leq(X,X),
    file('theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_leq) ).

fof(leq_gt_pred,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( leq(X,pred(Y))
    <=> gt(Y,X) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',leq_gt_pred) ).

fof(pred_minus_1,axiom,
    ! [X] : minus(X,n1) = pred(X),
    file('theBenchmark.p',pred_minus_1) ).

fof(cl5_nebula_array_0010,conjecture,
    ( ( leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
      & leq(n0,pv10) )
   => ( leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
      & leq(n0,minus(n5,n1))
      & leq(n0,pv10)
      & leq(n0,n0) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_array_0010) ).

fof(cl5_nebula_array_0010_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
        & leq(n0,pv10) )
     => ( leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
        & leq(n0,minus(n5,n1))
        & leq(n0,pv10)
        & leq(n0,n0) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_array_0010]) ).

cnf(c_64,plain,
    leq(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_leq]) ).

cnf(c_69,plain,
    ( ~ gt(B,A)
    | leq(A,pred(B)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[leq_gt_pred]) ).

cnf(c_300,plain,
    minus(A,n1) = pred(A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[pred_minus_1]) ).

fof(gt_5_0,axiom,
    gt(n5,n0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',gt_5_0) ).

cnf(c_333,plain,
    gt(n5,n0),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[gt_5_0]) ).

cnf(c_365,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,pv10),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cl5_nebula_array_0010_neg]) ).

cnf(c_366,negated_conjecture,
    leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cl5_nebula_array_0010_neg]) ).

cnf(c_367,negated_conjecture,
    leq(pv10,pred(n135300)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_300,c_366]) ).

cnf(c_368,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
    | ~ leq(n0,minus(n5,n1))
    | ~ leq(n0,pv10)
    | ~ leq(n0,n0) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cl5_nebula_array_0010_neg]) ).

cnf(c_1287,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
    | ~ leq(n0,pred(n5))
    | ~ leq(n0,pv10)
    | ~ leq(n0,n0) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_300,c_368]) ).

cnf(c_1288,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(pv10,pred(n135300))
    | ~ leq(n0,pred(n5))
    | ~ leq(n0,pv10)
    | ~ leq(n0,n0) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_300,c_1287]) ).

cnf(c_1289,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(pv10,pred(n135300))
    | ~ leq(n0,pred(n5))
    | ~ leq(n0,pv10) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_1288]) ).

cnf(c_1290,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(pv10,pred(n135300))
    | ~ leq(n0,pred(n5)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_365,c_1289]) ).

cnf(c_369,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(n0,pred(n5)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_367,c_1290]) ).

cnf(c_1291,plain,
    leq(n0,pred(n5)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_333,c_69]) ).

cnf(c_1286,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_369,c_1291]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWV069+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 13:10:32 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.36  % Process 3236856 was started by sandbox2 on n014,
% 0.09/0.36  % Sat Sep 26 13:10:32 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.13/0.48  
% 0.13/0.48  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 5.87/1.26  
% 5.87/1.26  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 5.87/1.26  
% 5.87/1.26  % Proof 1 at 0.66 (+ 0.09) seconds.
% 5.87/1.26  % Length of proof is 14.
% 5.87/1.26  % Level of proof is 4.
% 5.87/1.26  % Maximum clause weight is 17.000.
% 5.87/1.26  % Given clauses 263.
% 5.87/1.26  
% 5.87/1.26  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------