↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV069+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:16:21 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.67s 1.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  17 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   69 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   61 (  26   ~;  19   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn  16   !;   0   ?;   4   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] : leq(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',reflexivity_leq) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( leq(X0,pred(X1))
    <=> gt(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',leq_gt_pred) ).

fof(f39,axiom,
    ! [X0] : minus(X0,n1) = pred(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',pred_minus_1) ).

fof(f53,conjecture,
    ( ( leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
      & leq(n0,pv10) )
   => ( leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
      & leq(n0,minus(n5,n1))
      & leq(n0,pv10)
      & leq(n0,n0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_array_0010) ).

fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
        & leq(n0,pv10) )
     => ( leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
        & leq(n0,minus(n5,n1))
        & leq(n0,pv10)
        & leq(n0,n0) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f53]) ).

fof(f66,axiom,
    gt(n5,n0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',gt_5_0) ).

fof(f143,plain,
    ( leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
    & leq(n0,pv10)
    & ( ~ leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
      | ~ leq(n0,minus(n5,n1))
      | ~ leq(n0,pv10)
      | ~ leq(n0,n0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f144,plain,
    ( leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
    & leq(n0,pv10)
    & ( ~ leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
      | ~ leq(n0,minus(n5,n1))
      | ~ leq(n0,pv10)
      | ~ leq(n0,n0) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f143]) ).

fof(f164,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X0,pred(X1))
        | gt(X1,X0) )
      & ( ~ gt(X1,X0)
        | leq(X0,pred(X1)) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f200,plain,
    ! [X0] : leq(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f205,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ gt(X1,X0)
      | leq(X0,pred(X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f164]) ).

fof(f287,plain,
    ! [X0] : minus(X0,n1) = pred(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f307,plain,
    leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f144]) ).

fof(f308,plain,
    leq(n0,pv10),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f144]) ).

fof(f309,plain,
    ( ~ leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
    | ~ leq(n0,minus(n5,n1))
    | ~ leq(n0,pv10)
    | ~ leq(n0,n0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f144]) ).

fof(f321,plain,
    gt(n5,n0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f66]) ).

fof(f349,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ gt(X1,X0)
      | leq(X0,minus(X1,n1)) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f205,f287]) ).

tcf(c_52,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : leq(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f200]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( leq(X1,minus(X0,n1))
      | ~ gt(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f349]) ).

tcf(c_157,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leq(n0,pv10)
    | ~ leq(n0,n0)
    | ~ leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1))
    | ~ leq(n0,minus(n5,n1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f309]) ).

tcf(c_158,negated_conjecture,
    leq(n0,pv10),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f308]) ).

tcf(c_159,negated_conjecture,
    leq(pv10,minus(n135300,n1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f307]) ).

tcf(c_171,plain,
    gt(n5,n0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f321]) ).

tcf(c_199,plain,
    leq(n0,n0),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).

tcf(c_289,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(n0,minus(n5,n1)),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_157,c_158,c_199,c_159,c_157]) ).

tcf(c_5816,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = minus(n5,n1),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_5818,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(n0,iPr_def_10),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_289,c_5816]) ).

tcf(c_8775,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( leq(X0,iPr_def_10)
      | ~ gt(n5,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5816,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_8788,plain,
    ( leq(n0,iPr_def_10)
    | ~ gt(n5,n0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_8775]) ).

tcf(c_8789,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_8788,c_5818,c_171]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWV069+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 18:27:18 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.41  
% 0.09/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.09/0.41  
% 0.09/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.09/0.42  % Proving...
% 3.67/1.27  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.67/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.67/1.27  
% 3.67/1.27  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.67/1.27  
% 3.67/1.27  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.67/1.27  
% 3.67/1.27  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.67/1.27  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.67/1.27  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.67/1.27  
% 3.67/1.27  % ------ Parsing...
% 3.67/1.27  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.67/1.27  
% 3.67/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 15  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.67/1.27  
% 3.67/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.67/1.27  
% 3.67/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.67/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 3.67/1.27  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.67/1.27  
% 3.67/1.27  % 
% 3.67/1.27  % clauses                               152
% 3.67/1.27  % conjectures                           3
% 3.67/1.27  % EPR                                   46
% 3.67/1.27  % Horn                                  102
% 3.67/1.27  % unary                                 58
% 3.67/1.27  % binary                                34
% 3.67/1.27  % lits                                  491
% 3.67/1.27  % lits eq                               115
% 3.67/1.27  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.67/1.27  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.67/1.27  % fd_cond                               6
% 3.67/1.27  % fd_pseudo_cond                        4
% 3.67/1.27  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.67/1.27  
% 3.67/1.27  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.67/1.27  
% 3.67/1.27  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.67/1.27  
% 3.67/1.27  
% 3.67/1.27  % ------ 
% 3.67/1.27  % Current options:
% 3.67/1.27  % ------ 
% 3.67/1.27  
% 3.67/1.27  
% 3.67/1.27  % 
% 3.67/1.27  
% 3.67/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 3.67/1.27  % 
% 3.67/1.27  
% 3.67/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.67/1.27  
% 3.67/1.27  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.67/1.27  
% 3.67/1.27  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------