%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : SWV077+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:44:12 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 111.27s 111.44s
% Output : Refutation 111.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 63 ( 10 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 20 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 86 ( 36 ~; 25 |; 19 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ttrue,axiom,
true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV003+0.ax',ttrue) ).
cnf(c76,plain,
true,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ttrue]) ).
fof(cl5_nebula_array_0018,conjecture,
( ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) )
=> ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& ( n0 != pv40
=> ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) ) )
& ( n0 = pv40
=> true ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cl5_nebula_array_0018) ).
fof(c66,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) )
=> ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& ( n0 != pv40
=> ( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) ) )
& ( n0 = pv40
=> true ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_array_0018]) ).
fof(c67,negated_conjecture,
( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& ( ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ( n0 != pv40
& ( ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)) ) )
| ( n0 = pv40
& ~ true ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c66]) ).
fof(c68,negated_conjecture,
( leq(n0,pv31)
& leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
& ( ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| n0 != pv40
| n0 = pv40 )
& ( ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| n0 != pv40
| ~ true )
& ( ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| n0 = pv40 )
& ( ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ true ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[c67]) ).
cnf(c69,negated_conjecture,
leq(n0,pv31),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c68]) ).
cnf(c70,negated_conjecture,
leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c68]) ).
cnf(c74,negated_conjecture,
( ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ true ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c68]) ).
cnf(c1109,plain,
( ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ leq(pv31,minus(n5,n1))
| ~ true ),
inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c74]) ).
cnf(c104757,plain,
( ~ leq(n0,pv31)
| ~ true ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1109,c70]) ).
cnf(c104764,plain,
~ true,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c104757,c69]) ).
cnf(c104765,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c104764,c76]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWV077+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 9 06:07:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 111.27/111.44 % Version: 1.5
% 111.27/111.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 111.27/111.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 111.27/111.44
% 111.27/111.44 % Initial clauses : 318
% 111.27/111.44 % Processed clauses : 2340
% 111.27/111.44 % Factors computed : 514
% 111.27/111.44 % Resolvents computed: 103791
% 111.27/111.44 % Tautologies deleted: 6
% 111.27/111.44 % Forward subsumed : 2038
% 111.27/111.44 % Backward subsumed : 9
% 111.27/111.44 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 111.27/111.44 % User time : 110.694 s
% 111.27/111.44 % System time : 0.391 s
% 111.27/111.44 % Total time : 111.085 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------