↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV085^7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:39:41 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.31s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  18 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  100 (  14 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   13 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  258 (  39   ~;  28   |;   6   &; 185   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   22 (  22   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   19 (  17 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (  32   ^;  14   !;   0   ?;  46   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    mu: $tType ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    mnot: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    mor: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_31,type,
    mand: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_32,type,
    mimplies: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_51,type,
    mvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_55,type,
    rel_s4: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_56,type,
    mbox_s4: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_62,type,
    leq: mu > mu > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_82,type,
    minus: mu > mu > mu ).

thf(decl_83,type,
    pv68: mu ).

thf(decl_86,type,
    n5: mu ).

thf(decl_87,type,
    n1: mu ).

thf(decl_90,type,
    n0: mu ).

thf(decl_92,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

thf(decl_93,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

thf(decl_94,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

thf(decl_95,type,
    esk4_0: $i ).

thf(mimplies,axiom,
    ( mimplies
    = ( ^ [X4: $i > $o,X5: $i > $o] : ( mor @ ( mnot @ X4 ) @ X5 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bbIDXZFKjk/E---3.1_2849986.p',mimplies) ).

thf(mor,axiom,
    ( mor
    = ( ^ [X4: $i > $o,X5: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
          ( ( X4 @ X3 )
          | ( X5 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bbIDXZFKjk/E---3.1_2849986.p',mor) ).

thf(mnot,axiom,
    ( mnot
    = ( ^ [X4: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
          ~ ( X4 @ X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bbIDXZFKjk/E---3.1_2849986.p',mnot) ).

thf(mand,axiom,
    ( mand
    = ( ^ [X4: $i > $o,X5: $i > $o] : ( mnot @ ( mor @ ( mnot @ X4 ) @ ( mnot @ X5 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bbIDXZFKjk/E---3.1_2849986.p',mand) ).

thf(cl5_nebula_array_0026,conjecture,
    mvalid @ ( mbox_s4 @ ( mimplies @ ( mand @ ( mbox_s4 @ ( leq @ n0 @ pv68 ) ) @ ( mbox_s4 @ ( leq @ pv68 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) ) ) ) @ ( mand @ ( mbox_s4 @ ( leq @ n0 @ pv68 ) ) @ ( mbox_s4 @ ( leq @ pv68 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bbIDXZFKjk/E---3.1_2849986.p',cl5_nebula_array_0026) ).

thf(mvalid,axiom,
    ( mvalid
    = ( ^ [X4: $i > $o] :
        ! [X3: $i] : ( X4 @ X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bbIDXZFKjk/E---3.1_2849986.p',mvalid) ).

thf(mbox_s4,axiom,
    ( mbox_s4
    = ( ^ [X4: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
        ! [X7: $i] :
          ( ~ ( rel_s4 @ X3 @ X7 )
          | ( X4 @ X7 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bbIDXZFKjk/E---3.1_2849986.p',mbox_s4) ).

thf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( mimplies
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
          | ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mimplies]) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( mor
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ Z2 )
          | ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mor]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( mnot
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
          ~ ( Z0 @ Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mnot]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( mand
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ~ ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
            | ~ ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mand]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mvalid @ ( mbox_s4 @ ( mimplies @ ( mand @ ( mbox_s4 @ ( leq @ n0 @ pv68 ) ) @ ( mbox_s4 @ ( leq @ pv68 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) ) ) ) @ ( mand @ ( mbox_s4 @ ( leq @ n0 @ pv68 ) ) @ ( mbox_s4 @ ( leq @ pv68 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cl5_nebula_array_0026]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( mvalid
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
        ! [X3: $i] : ( Z0 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mvalid]) ).

thf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( mbox_s4
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i] :
        ! [X7: $i] :
          ( ~ ( rel_s4 @ Z1 @ X7 )
          | ( Z0 @ X7 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox_s4]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( mimplies
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
          | ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( mand
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ~ ( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 )
            | ~ ( Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_8]),c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X127: $i,X126: $i] :
        ( ~ ( rel_s4 @ X127 @ X126 )
        | ~ ~ ( ~ ! [X122: $i] :
                    ( ~ ( rel_s4 @ X126 @ X122 )
                    | ( leq @ n0 @ pv68 @ X122 ) )
              | ~ ! [X123: $i] :
                    ( ~ ( rel_s4 @ X126 @ X123 )
                    | ( leq @ pv68 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) @ X123 ) ) )
        | ~ ( ~ ! [X124: $i] :
                  ( ~ ( rel_s4 @ X126 @ X124 )
                  | ( leq @ n0 @ pv68 @ X124 ) )
            | ~ ! [X125: $i] :
                  ( ~ ( rel_s4 @ X126 @ X125 )
                  | ( leq @ pv68 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) @ X125 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).

thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X130: $i,X131: $i] :
      ( ( rel_s4 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
      & ( ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ X130 )
        | ( leq @ n0 @ pv68 @ X130 ) )
      & ( ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ X131 )
        | ( leq @ pv68 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) @ X131 ) )
      & ( ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ esk4_0 )
        | ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0 ) )
      & ( ~ ( leq @ pv68 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) @ esk4_0 )
        | ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0 ) )
      & ( ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ esk4_0 )
        | ~ ( leq @ n0 @ pv68 @ esk3_0 ) )
      & ( ~ ( leq @ pv68 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) @ esk4_0 )
        | ~ ( leq @ n0 @ pv68 @ esk3_0 ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ esk4_0 )
    | ~ ( leq @ n0 @ pv68 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i] :
      ( ( leq @ n0 @ pv68 @ X3 )
      | ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ esk4_0 )
    | ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ( leq @ pv68 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) @ esk4_0 )
    | ~ ( leq @ n0 @ pv68 @ esk3_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: $i] :
      ( ( leq @ pv68 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) @ X3 )
      | ~ ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ esk4_0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).

thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0 )
    | ~ ( leq @ pv68 @ ( minus @ n5 @ n1 ) @ esk4_0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( leq @ n0 @ pv68 @ esk3_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).

thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    rel_s4 @ esk2_0 @ esk3_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).

thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_19]),c_0_26])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWV085^7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.18  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 15:59:59 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.18  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.23  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.27  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bbIDXZFKjk/E---3.1_2849986.p
% 0.22/0.31  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.22/0.31  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMMLLNHSN.
% 0.22/0.31  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.31  % Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.22/0.31  % Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 900s (3) cores
% 0.22/0.31  % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.31  % Starting new_ho_16 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.31  % new_ho_16 with pid 2850002 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.31  % Result found by new_ho_16
% 0.22/0.31  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMMLLNHSN.
% 0.22/0.31  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.31  % Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.22/0.31  % Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 900s (3) cores
% 0.22/0.31  % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.31  % Starting new_ho_16 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.31  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = LambdaDef)
% 0.22/0.31  % SinE strategy is LambdaDef
% 0.22/0.31  % Search class: HGHNF-FFSF22-SHSSMFNN
% 0.22/0.31  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.31  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.31  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2850003 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.31  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.22/0.31  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMMLLNHSN.
% 0.22/0.31  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.31  % Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.22/0.31  % Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 900s (3) cores
% 0.22/0.31  % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.31  % Starting new_ho_16 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.31  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = LambdaDef)
% 0.22/0.31  % SinE strategy is LambdaDef
% 0.22/0.31  % Search class: HGHNF-FFSF22-SHSSMFNN
% 0.22/0.31  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.31  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.31  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.31  
% 0.22/0.31  % Proof found!
% 0.22/0.31  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.31  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.31  % Parsed axioms                        : 269
% 0.22/0.31  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 236
% 0.22/0.31  % Initial clauses                      : 7
% 0.22/0.31  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.22/0.31  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
% 0.22/0.31  % Processed clauses                    : 10
% 0.22/0.31  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.22/0.31  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.22/0.31  % ...remaining for further processing  : 10
% 0.22/0.31  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.22/0.31  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.31  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.22/0.31  % Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.22/0.31  % Generated clauses                    : 4
% 0.22/0.31  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.22/0.31  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.31  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.22/0.31  % Paramodulations                      : 4
% 0.22/0.31  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/0.31  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/0.31  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.22/0.31  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.22/0.31  % Total rewrite steps                  : 5
% 0.22/0.31  % ...of those cached                   : 3
% 0.22/0.31  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.31  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.31  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.31  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.31  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.31  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.31  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.31  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.31  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.31  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.31  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.31  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.31  % Current number of processed clauses  : 6
% 0.22/0.31  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.22/0.31  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.31  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.22/0.31  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.22/0.31  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.31  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.22/0.31  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.31  % Current number of archived clauses   : 4
% 0.22/0.31  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.22/0.31  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.22/0.31  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.22/0.31  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.22/0.31  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.31  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.22/0.31  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.22/0.31  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/0.31  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.31  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 7373
% 0.22/0.31  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2871
% 0.22/0.31  
% 0.22/0.31  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.31  % User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.22/0.31  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.31  % Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.22/0.31  % Maximum resident set size: 4376 pages
% 0.22/0.31  
% 0.22/0.31  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.31  % User time                : 0.016 s
% 0.22/0.31  % System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.22/0.31  % Total time               : 0.025 s
% 0.22/0.31  % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.22/0.31  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------